Ai Presentation Maker

... Weebit Nano (ASX:WBT) Accelerates AI Memory WithA$150m Cash Down After... moremedium term and focused on AI. Weebit is building out capability... is well suited to next-generation AI accelerators. Threegovernment-backed programs in Korea... in this presentation. Texas Instruments is the world’s number one analog chip maker and number...

...tangible operational efficiencies. This presentation moves beyond regulatory summaries to ... recommendations help fight AI‑driven fraud with trusted AI improving prevention rates ... CAS and SAS Data Maker support privacy‑preserving generation, validated... through transparent, integrated, AI‑enabled governance with lower total ... real-time expectations and rapid AI adoption, SAS Innovate 2026 offers...

... Tool 2021 v2.14 Agena.ai Modeller revision 9464 ag-Grid Enterprise... v0.9.8.0 AI FaceSwap 2.2.0 AI Utility for MasterCAM... X5 v1.34 AI Utility X3 For MasterCAM X3... AI Video FaceSwap 1.1.0 ... Altair AcuSolve 2018.0 Altair AI Studio 2025.0.1 Win....1 + ODTK 7.9 Ansys AI Enviroment v2.0 ANSYS Apache... Aurora 3D Animation Maker 20.01.30 Aurora 3D Presentation 20.01...

... Tool 2021 v2.14 Agena.ai Modeller revision 9464 ag-Grid Enterprise... v0.9.8.0 AI FaceSwap 2.2.0 AI Utility for MasterCAM... X5 v1.34 AI Utility X3 For MasterCAM X3... AI Video FaceSwap 1.1.0 ... Altair AcuSolve 2018.0 Altair AI Studio 2025.0.1 Win....1 + ODTK 7.9 Ansys AI Enviroment v2.0 ANSYS Apache... Aurora 3D Animation Maker 20.01.30 Aurora 3D Presentation 20.01...

... not the current dash for AI and digital platforms, the money... like a tool and die maker or even convince South Korea's... less of a cost disadvantage. AI may be a boon to ... to all of Mr. Singh’s presentation on YouTube and felt it...

... Eric Trump invests in drone maker with gov’t contracts >>24270967, >>24270969... Economy!” >>24270034 2020 Pennsylvania voter-fraud presentation, egregious vote spikes laid bare... ridin shotgun >>24270339 RT - AI overlords of the world hacked...

... the atrocious waxy, grainless, sharpened AI abominations he blessed us with... a better chance of some AI wizz somehow managing to create... was such an amazing movie maker. Such a shame he made... its the best available home presentation. https://slow.pics/c/dcg3tM4h...

..., a powerful and user-friendly resume maker app, is designed to simplify... intelligent features and professional templates. AI Resume Builder for Students – Smarter... presenting their strengths confidently. The AI analyzes your input and recommends ... about content—it’s also about presentation. Bulidats offers modern, clean, and ..., confidence, and competence. With the AI resume builder for students and ...

... positions itself as a “Best AI Presentation Maker” by directly addressing the core..., or video into a ready-to-edit presentation in seconds. It eliminates the... quality, MagicSlides acts like an AI assistant that handles structure, formatting... into a complete, professionally structured presentation in seconds, without struggling with...

... empty handed. According to numerous AI models that extensively search data.... ​4. Identification Summary ​Maker: Citizen ​Model: Imperial Presentation Watch (Custom Order) ​Era... pattern, search for "Imperial Household Presentation Watch" or "Kunaicho Citizen". You...

I’m looking for an AI presentation maker that actually helps me turn startup ideas into professional-looking slides without spending hours fixing every detail. I want something that makes decks look clean and client-ready while letting me focus on pitching and strategy. Most tools I’ve tried so far feel generic or need a lot of manual tweaks. I’m wondering what other founders or early-stage teams are using that actually works. Are there AI tools that help your presentations stand out with investors or partners? Would like to know what’s saved you time, made your slides look good, or just made the process easier. Any tips or tools you swear by would be super helpful. Edit: I’ve tried a few options, and Prezi actually impressed me. It makes slides look clean and professional without a ton of tweaking, which saved me a lot of time. Definitely worth checking out if you want decks that stand out with clients or investors. submitted by /u/WiphaBrtm to r/StartupsHelpStartups [link] [comments]

Hey everyone, I’ve been trying a lot of AI presentation maker tools lately, and most of them feel impressive at first… but not very practical when you actually need to use the slides in a real meeting. Recently came across Dokie AI, and it feels a bit different. The output isn’t the flashiest, but it’s way more grounded and usable: slide flow makes sense content feels closer to real business decks less “template-looking” stuff My workflow now is pretty straightforward: dump rough notes / data generate a full deck tweak key slides export to PPT Compared to other tools, I spend way less time fixing structure or rewriting slides just to make them usable. It’s still not perfect on design, but for me the tradeoff is worth it — I’d rather have something practical and presentation-ready than something that just looks cool. Curious if anyone else has tried newer tools like this — feels like AI PPT makers are finally getting closer to real use cases. submitted by /u/Zestyclose_Bell7668 to r/ArtificialInteligence [link] [comments]

Hey everyone, Not sure if this is the right place, but figured I’d ask people who actually care about design quality. I’m not a designer (clearly 😅), but I make a lot of presentations for work — reports, strategy decks, etc. Lately I’ve been testing some AI presentation tools to save time. So far I’ve tried: Gamma → looks modern, but sometimes feels more like a web doc than a proper deck Dokie AI → less flashy, but the structure is more “presentation-ready” (less rearranging) My issue is… most AI-generated slides either: look too generic or don’t follow good design hierarchy So even if the content is there, the slides still feel “off”. Curious how people here think about this: Are any AI PPT tools actually decent from a design perspective? Or is it still better to just use them for structure and redesign everything manually? Any workflows where AI + design tools actually work well together? Would love to hear how designers approach this — feels like there’s potential here, but not quite there yet. submitted by /u/IX_7akeem to r/GraphicDesigning [link] [comments]

Hey all I'll try to leave out as much identifying info as possible since I don't want this coming back to me. So my job involves making lots of presentations to show to clients and they have to make a good impression on them. Everything's been good before, but when we got more and more clients, my boss, who is a grade A hole,have started to passive aggressively imply I'm slow. Meaning she wants me to make one presentation after another in as little time as possible. I'm now considering using AI to speed things up (she hasn't said that wasn't allowed lol), but I'm unsure if that's a good idea. Also if you have any tools (free I hope) you'd recommend, I'm all ears. Atm I'm planning to use the free version of Canva or Gamma to test the waters so to speak ETA: Went with Prezi in the end since it was able to do a presentation that only needed minimal edits after. Only time will tell if my boss notices I've started using AI tho lol submitted by /u/Luisy-Prv to r/ProductivityApps [link] [comments]

Depends what you mean by "building PowerPoint presentations." If you want AI inside PowerPoint: Microsoft's Copilot is supposed to do this but my experience has been mixed. It's getting better but not magic yet. If you want AI to generate content that exports to PowerPoint: Several tools do this. Gamma exports to PowerPoint format. Beautiful.ai does too. Canva as well. If you want AI to enhance existing PowerPoint: This is trickier. The design-focused tools mostly want you to work in their interface. My workflow for PowerPoint-required deliverables: Generate initial structure in Gamma because it's fast. Export to PowerPoint. Do final edits and polish in PowerPoint itself. Not seamless but works when clients demand .pptx files. The integration between AI tools and PowerPoint is still clunky. Usually involves exporting then cleaning up formatting issues. What's your specific use case? Might be able to suggest a better workflow. submitted by /u/MassiveTopic8598 to r/Entrepreneurs [link] [comments]

Hey everyone, I make presentations pretty often for work (mostly reports and internal updates), so I’ve been trying a few AI presentation makers to speed things up. So far I’ve tested Gamma (which has been around for a while) and Dokie AI. Gamma feels pretty smooth for quick drafts, and Dokie seems a bit more structured for traditional PPT-style slides. Both are decent so far, but I’m still experimenting. Curious what others here are using. Are there any AI presentation makers that actually save you time long term? Or do you still end up rewriting most of the slides anyway? submitted by /u/Total_Hyena5364 to r/contentcreation [link] [comments]

Or as paintings / design and other form of visual mediums for that matter. Should they be classified as AI? Does it feel deceiving? I’m doing an investigation on the matter and would like to know your opinions. submitted by /u/M-Borot to r/AskPhotography [link] [comments]

hey redditors, been testing a bunch of AI presentation tools lately because I create slides pretty often and starting from scratch every time gets old. tried Gamma and Beautiful AI, which are decent, currently using brainbabys presentation makers its cheaper with native web mobile editor , The slides are more structured kind of like gamma and manus combined plus they have docusign mode aswell + u can assign presentations and docs to company entities. anything else you guys recommend? going to buy yearly brainbaby premium if there aren't any alternatives but didnt want to rush in submitted by /u/Comfortable-Fee-2089 to r/ProductivityApps [link] [comments]

UPDATE: circled back on this because i ended up trying a few of the suggestions here. went with prezi actually after a friend mentioned it. took a bit to get used to the zooming style but honestly it's been great for video content. clients actually comment on the presentations now instead of just nodding through them. thanks for the help! been making content for clients and presentations keep popping up more than i expected. slide decks for explainer videos, client pitches, that kind of thing. problem is i'm not a designer and my slides always end up looking basic. been looking into presentation tools lately. tried a couple that claim to generate slides from text but the results were pretty rough. either the layout was weird or the design felt totally disconnected from the content. curious if anyone here has found a presentation maker that actually produces something usable that saves me from starting at a blank slide for an hour. also wondering if these tools work better for certain types of content. i do video mostly so slides need to work on screen, not just in a boardroom. would love to hear what's worth trying and what to avoid. thanks! submitted by /u/SmithsMesonero to r/contentcreation [link] [comments]

I’ve been trying to find a solid AI PPT maker lately because I’m honestly tired of building slides from scratch every week. So far I’ve tested Gamma APP and Dokie AI. Gamma is pretty nice for quick drafts and web-style presentations. The interface is clean and it’s easy to share links. But sometimes I feel like I still need to do a fair amount of editing before it’s ready for a real meeting. Dokie AI surprised me a bit more. It feels more focused on traditional slide structure, and the output was closer to something I could actually present without heavy cleanup. It’s not perfect either, but it saved me more time overall. Still, I’m not fully settled on one tool yet. Are there any other AI slides generators you guys actually use regularly? Not just for testing, but for real work. Would love to hear what’s working for you. submitted by /u/PrestigiousPear8223 to r/Discover_AI_Tools [link] [comments]

Got tired of seeing “THIS AI MAKES PRESENTATIONS IN 30 SECONDS” everywhere, so I spent time testing most major AI presentation tools to see which ones actually hold up in real use. TL;DR at the bottom if you don’t want the rambling. How I tested Same prompt across all tools. Judged on: design quality how much manual editing was needed after whether the output felt usable or just a pile of templates The winners (and why) MagicSlides – Best overall balance of speed, flexibility, and real PPT output MagicSlides.app AN AI PPT Maker stands out for how many input types it supports (text, URL, PDF, YouTube, images). The slides are structured logically, export cleanly to PPTX, and don’t lock you into a proprietary format. Good balance between automation and control — you’re not fighting the AI after generation. Works well if you actually present slides, not just share docs. Downside: design polish still depends on your theme choice, but editing in PPT/Slides is straightforward. Canva – Best template library You probably already use it. Massive design library and decent AI features, but it’s still a design tool first, presentation tool second. Great for visuals, less great for structured decks. The ones you can skip Beautiful AI Templates feel dated and rigid. AI mostly disappears after the first draft. Hard to justify the price. Gemini Canvas Inconsistent results, very little visual control, and requires prompt fiddling to get anything usable. Only makes sense if you’re already paying for Google AI Pro. SlidesAI Cheap and basic. Text → slides works, but expect a lot of cleanup. Prezi The zooming canvas is cool, but AI feels bolted on. No PPTX export and a real learning curve. Niche picks Pitch Strong if you’re in sales and care about engagement analytics and CRM integration. Pitch rooms are genuinely useful. Chronicle Interesting widget-based approach with features like Peek and Deep Hover for live presentations. No PPTX export though, which limits adoption. Plus AI – Best if your team lives inside Google Slides Runs as a Google Slides add-on, so there’s basically no learning curve. Good for teams, comments, and iteration. Less creative freedom compared to standalone tools, but very practical for real workflows. TL;DR – Which tool to pick Need fast, practical PPTs: MagicSlides Google Slides team: Plus AI Need templates for everything: Canva Sales team with CRM needs: Pitch Tight budget: SlidesAI (expect manual work) Already paying for Google AI Pro: Gemini Canvas (barely) Happy to answer questions if anyone’s deciding between specific tools. submitted by /u/Forsaken-Remove-5278 to r/AIToolMadeEasy [link] [comments]

Got tired of seeing "THIS AI MAKES PRESENTATIONS IN 30 SECONDS" ads everywhere, so I tested pretty much every major AI presentation tool to see which ones actually deliver. TL;DR at the bottom if you don't want my rambling. How I tested: Same prompt across all tools, judged on design quality, how much editing I had to do after, and whether the output looked like a template explosion or something I'd actually present. The winners (and why): Alai - Best overall if you care about design and speed without compromising on either. Gives you 4 layout options per slide instead of one take-it-or-leave-it output. The AI actually understands context across slides which makes it easier while making content edits. Editing is easier with both AI and element specific controls, Downside: smaller template library, no Google Slides plugin. Gamma - Great for docs you'll share async (investor updates, internal reports). The scroll format is polarizing - love it for async, hate it for live presenting. Free plan is generous which I appreciate (400 credits). Editing with AI is smooth but the only hassle is it when I use the chat interface to make changes, I often end up changing more than what I wanted. Plus AI - If your team lives in Google Slides, this is the answer. Works as an add-on, zero learning curve. Smooth iterations and great collab features although I felt Gamma and Alai offer more creative control and have more elements to play with. Canva - You probably already have it. Template library is massive. AI features are fine but it's not built for presentations specifically - it's a design tool that happens to do slides. The ones that you can skip: Beautiful AI - Templates look dated. The AI pretty much only exists at the time of creating the first draft post which you are on your own. For their hefty subscription, I don't think the tool is the best on out there. Gemini Canvas - Google's entry. Zero visual control, inconsistent output quality, requires prompt engineering to get anything decent. Only worth it if you're already paying for Google AI Pro and refuse to pay for another tool. SlidesAI - Cheap ($10/mo) but you get what you pay for. Basic text-to-slide conversion. Expect to do significant manual clean-up. Prezi - The zoomable canvas is genuinely cool for storytelling presentations, but AI feels like an afterthought. Can't export to PPTX. Learning curve is real. The niche picks: Pitch - If you're in sales and need engagement analytics + CRM integration, this is purpose-built for you. Pitch rooms are legit useful. Chronicle - Interesting take on slides. Widget-based, has these "Peek" and "Deep Hover" features for controlling audience attention during live presenting. No PPTX export though. TL;DR - Which tool to pick: Need quality + speed: Alai Sharing async (not presenting live): Gamma Team uses Google Slides: Plus AI Need templates for everything: Canva Sales team with CRM: Pitch Tight budget: SlidesAI (but expect manual work) Already paying for Google AI Pro: Gemini Canvas (barely) Happy to answer questions if anyone's deciding between specific tools. submitted by /u/SquareShock5357 to r/powerpoint [link] [comments]

I’m trying to improve my workflow for building presentations and would love recommendations from the community. What tools (AI or not) are you using that are: • Free (or have a solid free tier) • Fast for generating slides • Produce clean, modern, professional designs • AI-assisted (optional, but preferred) I’m especially interested in tools that can take an outline or text and turn it into a full deck with minimal manual work. What do you recommend and why? submitted by /u/Traditional-Fig-2914 to r/ProjectManagementPro [link] [comments]

I’ve been trying to find the best presentation maker for work. I’ve tried a few now, and so far I haven’t been too impressed. Trying to use ChatGPT for this is too clunky, and most of the specialized tools I’ve tried just don’t look very professional. Has anyone had any luck finding something that actually works? I would really love to find a solution, because I hate making PowerPoints, it is the worst part of my job. But it isn’t worth it to me unless I can find an AI that does the job correctly, and doesn’t need a ton of edits. EDIT: Thanks for the recommendations. I've decided to try Beautiful AI. submitted by /u/Downtown-Shoe9410 to r/GraphicDesigning [link] [comments]

I’ve been seeing a ton of new AI tools for making slides and presentations, and honestly it’s getting hard to tell which ones are actually good and which ones are just hype. I’m looking for something that’s fast, gives clean templates, and doesn’t make weird design mistakes. submitted by /u/Icy_Money_2077 to r/ChatGPTPro [link] [comments]

Ahoy Mateys, Last week I introduced you guys to the P A T H, which was up 30% until the Trump Tariff Tape Bomb on Friday. I'm still holding a large January position there (see updates in post). Thesis intact! But now, it be time to set sail on the DIGITAL OCEAN $DOCN as well! I noticed a lot of you discussing “FuNdAmEnTaLs” and “PrIcE tO EaRnInGs RaTiOs.” Maybe some of you need to switch over to r/investing or r/dividends. Since when is this place full of a bunch of value investors? Anyways, here’s an AI play with fundamentals so strong that your mom, dad, grandma and grandpa can buy. Maybe they’ll love you if you can make them some money. I present: DOCN. Below, check out the chart. Notice anything? Almost the exact same set up as P A T H, which took off explosively last week after breaking mult-year accumulation range. Here we have a smaller market cap, and much lower P/E at 31. End of September it JUST completed a Golden Cross. https://preview.redd.it/4spb82g0n9vf1.png?width=1822&format=png&auto=webp&s=51e8f47a51d85453a5a6da8deed7e2eafc04dd53 Trendline going back to August 2023 indicates a breakout here would be huge, and at a meager market cap of 3.6B, this can easily double from here through the end of the year. Once eyes are on this and it finally gets the attention it deserves, it’s going to absolutely fly in this frothy market that is salivating for any AI play it can sink its teeth into. Now lets look at fUnDamENtalS What the fuck does DOCN do? Digital Ocean is a cloud computing company that owns and operates the equipment to run data centers globally. That's right, THEY RUN DATA CENTERS. Oh, just the little old things that are required by every single AI developer and crypto miner to do… fucking everything. THINK MARK, THINK. They’re selling SHOVELS IN A GOLD RUSH Now, as if just being a data center isn’t enough to send a stock flying in this market… *cough cough\… APLD, GLXY, CRWV, NBIS, INOD… \cough cough* DOCN has something that few emerging AI/data/cloud companies bring to the table…EARNINGS. This company actually makes money. They have a 31 p/e and reported an adjusted EPS of $.92 on September 4, 2025. DOCN IS ALSO A DIRECT VENDOR OF AMD CLOUD COMPUTING GPUS. The numbers: Go ahead, take a look. Find me another data/AI company with a $3b market cap boasting numbers like this: https://preview.redd.it/jlywjt63n9vf1.png?width=898&format=png&auto=webp&s=bed35a8ce47fd7ee30ddb33f5c79e97f87ed2a45 These guys are printing money for their size. They BIGLY beat earnings expectations eight times in a row. Last earnings they pumped 30%. For comparison, APLD has a market cap 3x larger with only ~60m in quarterly revenue. (thats like one third of the quarterly revenue DOCN makes.) Jensen Huangs speech last week emphasized the importance of data centers. And that’s not where the NVDA connection stops… New Partnerships: ever heard of NVDA? Ever heard of AMD? Ever heard of openAI? Well… DOCN has deals with ALL THREE. The openAI deal is brand new as of October 2025. AS IF this company isn’t a powerhouse on its own… they stand to be a DIRECT BENEFICIARY to the AMD/openAI deal… You know, the one that caused AMD to pump almost 50% last week??? Why? I’ll repeat it again you dense motherfucker. DOCN IS A DIRECT VENDOR FOR AMD GPUS. NAMELY, THE MI300X CHIP. openAI is driving the implementation of AMD’s chips to supplement the heavy chip demand. As i was preparing this, an additional AMD deal was announced with Oracle for deployment of 50,000 AMD cloud GPUs… data/cloud/ai is the place to be in this market. Now of course this is WSB and who cares about fundamentals when the market runs on crushing those “not long” and exploiting gamma ramps, and this is where things start to get really spicy… IV / TA Let me be clear. This is a 31x p/e company with excellent cash flow. The thesis of this play is NOT a S I play, but a realization of value… That said, bears have painted themselves into a corner. DOCN went public in 2021 and pumped to an ATH of $133 within months… then, stock suffered a large drawdown in the 2021/2022 bear market but stabilized around 30 to 40, where it’s been sideways for three years despite growing their revenue and EPS. Per fintel, the stock has 15.57% S I… That’s not all… check out the insane gamma ramp for the November option expiration. https://preview.redd.it/aa979si9n9vf1.png?width=941&format=png&auto=webp&s=35413ba0b91d84cc4994fb261e6c85214cef0e75 This can gamma ramp in a hurry with a breakout over $40-45, and IV is still very very low, sitting around 80% across most contracts. And because there’s no weekly options, market makers cannot easily hedge upwards momentum, so there’s absolutely nothing to stand in the way of this gamma ramp a month out if things pick up speed. Monthly options carry much greater gamma risk for market makers. You want in on this before it gets stacked with weeklies! Analysts upgrades: turns out, I'm not the only idiot who has found this company… Canaccord raised their price target from 49 to 55 10/10/2025 UBS raised price target to 40 from 32 Market Edge rates it as “Long” (their maximum rating) LSEG rates this stock as “out-perform” Position: Currently holding these calls post dating earnings. 40 x Jan '26 $55c 30x December '25 $55c 55x November $50c https://preview.redd.it/jrbuvp1pc9vf1.png?width=625&format=png&auto=webp&s=c41b4bb0a338a482e04bf764f2a5631775eaaad9 https://preview.redd.it/g7fd1kt1d9vf1.png?width=623&format=png&auto=webp&s=76a14dbebe04ebc73b0a744f9d317c51bdabd874 TLDR; DOCN is SELLING SHOVELS IN A GOLD RUSH, they’re a cloud/data center company that makes a lot of fucking money. They have a 30x p/e, a $3.6b market cap, established partnerships with AMD, NVDA, and a brand new October 2025 deal with OPENAI. They also stand to be a direct beneficiary of the AMD/openAI, and AMD/ORCL deal. Other data centers such as APLD, GLXY, CRWV, NBIS, INOD have pumped to the moon, while DOCN has been sleeping despite the fact that it has incredibly strong numbers. The stock is breaking out of a 3 year consolidation. Previous ATH was 133. PT $69+ (next volume shelf above) submitted by /u/ChemaKyle to r/wallstreetbets [link] [comments]

**Edit: I ended up going with Presentia Ai which works great. Just like it says in the title, what is the best Ai Presentation Maker? I'm looking for something that make high quality slides that I can edit afterwards. Any help would be appreciated. submitted by /u/Dimples_Jovie to r/powerpoint [link] [comments]

Here's a definitive corrected look of the actual console and dock What I think is the actual Switch 2 Console Image before the obfuscations What I think is the actual Switch 2 Dock pImage before the obfuscations TLDR: For the console, the leaked console image is real, and the image was digitally altered by flipping the image, replacing the background with the help of AI generation, and adding the Nintendo logo. For the dock, the obscure tri-wing screw that Nintendo often uses being present here, close to accurate measurements with other information dropped by an industry leading accessory maker Dbrand, and all certifications present and accurately depicted adds up to the conclusion of everything we're seeing so far being correct. Hello people of r/NintendoSwitch2! I'm here to share some of my analysis and information that I've gathered regarding the recent leaks by u/NextHandheld, and why I think it is genuine and that we are seeing the most up to date look of the upcoming Nintendo console: The Nintendo Switch 2. I'm going to categorize the topics by the specific leaks. I'm also going to explicitly tell if something is definitive based on the deep dive analysis, or if something is purely my own speculation. And lastly, I am not a leaker. I only have already posted information and all I'm doing is cross-analyzing everything I can scour on the internet. Chapter 1: The Switch Console What u/NextHandheld originally posted for the console I've been seeing 4 points of errors being pointed out by others here that makes them question the legitimacy of the image. However, I'll argue that these are deliberate obfuscations made by u/NextHandheld, corroborated with some previously trusted leaks. Point 1: The "Plus" sign isn't on the right side That's because the image is flipped horizontally. The \"Plus\" side of the console is right beside the cartridge slot The little cutout or outline that you can kind of see there looks like the flap/cover part of the cartridge slot, which indicates that this side is actually the right side of the console. Whereas if this were to be the left side, this should be the power button which I really don't think goes all the way back there as seen on other CAD leaks, as well as with the switch one. Therefore, the image is flipped horizontally. But flipping the image causes another problem in the leak, which leads me to the next point. Point 2: The Nintendo Logo If we were to flip the image, the Nintendo Logo will no longer be properly oriented. The original leak had the logo oriented correctly but just rotated 180 degrees, but flipping the image inverts the logo which does not look right. I propose that the logo was digitally edited to be inverted or to be added there somehow. Weird color mismatch There's something going on with the sides on the original leaks. The colors are not uniform with an abrupt change in color. This could just be some artifacts from image compression, but I suspect this was due to the leaker editing the logo to be either flipped for the post, or added in entirely. There could very well be no Nintendo logo there in the first place which does feel repetitive having the logo inside the mag-cons slots. Back Print of the Switch Lite Flipped on a leak But let's not forget that the Switch Lite leak went through some logo flip shenanigans as well, so this would not be the first time the logo was altered for a leak. This logo editing explanation also explains why the logo is a bit off-centered. Either it was flipped, or it was just added perhaps to purposefully obfuscate something. Point 3: The Stand https://preview.redd.it/48jz9mrntf9e1.png?width=697&format=png&auto=webp&s=e646ab5a9d0922d8ade75894441b278a6d8e2a7f It looks like there's a protrusion on the far side of the stand in the image. I can think of 2 explanation for this. A, the orange reflection just cuts off there and the lower portion is just a darker reflection that unfortunately blends too well with the background. Or B, the other parts of the stand was incorrectly masked/cut-out (which I'm gonna go back and explain what it's for). Kickstand with either the corrected reflection or masking Personally, I think it's the latter where some parts of the stand was not masked properly from the original image - which leads me to the elephant in the room: Point 4: The Image is AI generated Yes, but that's not the whole picture. Literally. Just a bunch of weirdness going on There's a lot glaring issues in the original image that really does look like it was AI generated. That's because it was. https://preview.redd.it/v2o18gxhvf9e1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=259687be958f3186151c7357c3dad5e5542ec01d I think that he cut-out his hand and the console from the original image and slapped it in some random AI generated workshop to not giveaway the actual background of the leak. This also explains why the reflection of the kickstand on the far side doesn't match with the surrounding, or was masked incorrectly. That's why the console has a harsh outline and edge as opposed to the background, making it pop out of the image. Luckily, NextHandheld himself somewhat made semi-response on the AI generation matters, as he sarcastically remarks about this on the caption of the next image he leaked: The Dock. Chapter 2: The Dock What u/NextHandheld originally posted for the dock \"All NextHandheld (Switch Dock & Console Leak) images in the HIGHEST QUALITY AVAILABLE\" by u/MacksNotCool The drop of the leaked console image was controversial to say the least. But the following leak of the full Switch 2 dock by NextHandheld definitely changed the story. It became clear that the AI background obfuscation was 100% at play and done on purpose. With all that said, I would still like to show 3 key points as to why the leaked dock image is as legitimate as it can be. Point 1: Tri-wing Screws Nintendo loves the Tri-wing screw The first point is the usage of tri-wing screws on the leaked dock. Nintendo has this unique quirk (in the sense of the gaming space) of using the tri-wing screw on their products and already has a handful of existing consoles using the same screw. It already exist on the current Switch console, so it's not out of place and probably expected already to be used on the new console as well. I honestly can't think of any other console manufacturers that uses this esoteric screw type. And the fact that the leak got this specific screw instead of some generic Philips-head screw just adds legitimacy to it being really from Nintendo. I don't want this to be the reason why I'm saying this stuff, but it really is such a Nintendo thing to do. Point 2: Dock Measurements Reference lines using the program fSpy I took the leaked dock image and added some reference lines to line it just so I can flatten and square it up later. Knowing that there's a high likely chance that the new dock uses the same type of screw on the existing Switch dock, I went ahead and measured the width of the screw hole on the current one. Measuring the tri-wing screw on the OLED Dock I then flattened the image using those reference lines on photoshop. It's not 100% accurate, especially on the right side of the dock where the edge is hidden behind a curved portion, so some educated guesstimation was made. We're doing some maths Assuming the screw hole is the same width as the current dock, we can use some math to extrapolate the width of the leaked dock. Some calculation after gives us 198.824 mm. Interestingly, Dbrand's CEO Adam Ijaz gave some comments to The Verge on this interview. "The Switch 2 should measure 270mm wide, 116mm tall, and 14mm thick, with the console portion taking up 200mm worth of that width." And apparently, this isn't some educated guess; claiming that they do have actual measurements based on real 3D scans of the console. With that in mind, the 198.824 mm we got just from this leaked image is within 1.2 mm, and again that also includes the guesstimation for the right side of the dock and some margin of error with the distortion from squaring up the image. Flattened look of the back side of the leaked dock without markings Point 3: Printed Certifications and Labels Bottom of the OLED dock Here's an image I took of an OLED dock. I'm going to use this as our reference for looking at the markings on the leaked dock image. I'm going to use the flattened image we got from the measuring earlier. Since some symbols are much more faded than the others, I'll also play a bit with the light levels to help with visibility. Now let's go try match them. Bingo? 11 out 11. No missing symbols. All of the certifications on the existing dock can be found and matched on the leaked dock. All with accurate depictions of the symbols and no hints of AI hallucination which pretty much eliminates the AI generation angle. According to sources involved in developing electronics and hardware (I just found them on Quora and other things I found when googling), you usually get your product certified during the early stages of Production Validation Testing, that way if you have problems and fail you can go back and fix the issues before going to production. So to see these certifications already imprinted/embedded on the back of the leaked dock means that not only is this is a real device, but also means the hardware NextHandheld has access to is indeed the retail unit as he commented here. https://preview.redd.it/c0m290y0hh9e1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=ff75c5d0a94d794db19da2d5a6f467f3c5355816 In conclusion... for now With all these evidence I present, I hope I am able to explain my case on why the recent leaks by NextHandheld are all legit. For the console, I believe that the leaked image is digitally altered by flipping the image, replacing the background, and adding the Nintendo logo. For the dock, I believe the same AI background obfuscation is still at play. But with evidence of the obscure tri-wing screw that Nintendo often uses being present here, close to accurate measurements with other information dropped by industry leading accessory maker Dbrand, and all certifications present and accurately depicted, everything just adds up to the conclusion of everything we're seeing so far being correct. So to sum it all up, I believe we are looking at a genuine production of the Nintendo Switch 2. This is it. This is the real deal. Writer's Note Thank you for reading along my way too long of a deep dive analysis for the upcoming Switch 2 console. My previous post around this topic got removed for reasons I might get to in the future, but I'm back and I'm able to repost pretty much everything from there plus some more analysis in light of newer leaks from NextHandheld. Thank you to everyone who tried to help figuring out some stuff like u/BirthdayDry1598, to u/MacksNotCool and the moderation team for the much needed clarification, and of course to u/NextHandheld for all the details that he has shared to us. I'd like to ask some things to NextHandheld about some stuff I have in mind, but there's already a lot that he has said that there might be no need to at all. Still, I'm open to talk about some interesting details if he is available. I still have a lot of things to say and to add, so look forward for a part 2 because there definitely will be one. Honestly the only reason I'm cutting this in half is that reddit only allows 20 images in one post, so it's a good stopping point for now. The next one will be focusing on how the older leaks are actively related to the origin of the ongoing leaks, why all the AI obfuscation and why not just use a something like towel for the background, the Chinese joycon leak from a couple of weeks ago is not necessarily fake but not from Nintendo, and how LiDAR might be Nintendo's next gimmick. submitted by /u/RealDoodleDoop to r/NintendoSwitch2 [link] [comments]

Shares of electric vehicle maker Tesla tumbled Friday after the company’s long-awaited robotaxi event — where CEO Elon Musk unveiled the firm’s Cybercab self-driving concept car — failed to impress investors. Tesla stock was down 5.8% as of 6:33 a.m. ET in premarket trading on Friday. Musk revealed Tesla’s Cybercab concept vehicle — a low, silver two-seater, has no steering wheels or pedals — on Thursday night. The plan is for the car to be capable of driving itself autonomously when it launches. The Tesla boss said the company hopes to be producing the Cybercab before 2027, but offered no details on where the cars will be manufactured. He said consumers would be able to buy a Tesla Cybercab for a price tag under $30,000. He also said he expects Tesla to have “unsupervised FSD” up and running in Texas and California next year in the company’s Model 3 and Model Y electric vehicles. FSD, which stands for Full Self-Driving, is Tesla’s premium driver assistance system, available today in a “supervised” version for Tesla electric vehicles. The technology still requires a human driver at the wheel, ready to steer or brake at any time. In reaction to the Thursday event, analysts at Barclays said that the revelations had failed to highlight any near-term opportunities for Tesla, instead prioritizing Musk’s vision for a fully autonomous driving future. “As expected, like prior Tesla product unveils, the event was light on the details, and instead emphasized the vision underpinning Tesla’s growth endeavors in AI/AV [autonomous vehicles],” Barclays’ U.S. autos & mobility team wrote in the note early on Friday. “Yet there were no updates indicating near-term opportunities. Tesla didn’t show its low-cost model planned for 1H′25 production,” they added. “We also didn’t get any near-term updates on FSD progress, or data reflecting improvement in the system.” Piper Sandler analysts said in a separate Friday note that “most trading-oriented firms will be underwhelmed by the robo-taxi unveiling.” “We wouldn’t be surprised if the stock sells off in the coming weeks, as pre-event momentum fizzles,” the investment bank’s analysts said in the note. Morgan Stanley, meanwhile, suggested that Musk failed to make the case that Tesla is an AI company during the event. The bank’s analysts noted that Musk didn’t mention any details on improvements to Tesla’s FSD system, nor did the billionaire go into detail regarding rumored plans of a tie-up between Tesla and xAI, Musk’s AI company. Musk has previously denied such reports. The event “overall disappointed expectations on a number of areas: a lack of data regarding rate-of-change on FSD/tech, ride-share economics and go-to-market strategy,” Morgan Stanley’s analysts wrote in a note Friday. “We were overall disappointed with the substance and detail of the presentation. As such, we anticipate TSLA to be under pressure following the event,” they added. It is expected to take some years still before self-driving cars become a mainstream reality on public roads, with regulators concerned over the safety features embedded into such vehicles. Among the few companies that have successfully launched self-driving cars on public roads is Google’s Waymo, which has offered its robotaxi service to the general public since June. submitted by /u/thelastsubject123 to r/stocks [link] [comments]

I know everyone is biased against AI art but here is a bit more context about the situation Lets say a game designer made a game that is super cool and unique and from all points of view its a solid fun to play game BUT its still in 0 stage of actually making the art for it, so the board is just a plain white board, the characters are just a pencil drawing, the cards are just plain text the items also just text etc etc. The designer makes a kickstarter campaign to ask for funding to hire illustrators for the art because it turns out, art is pretty expensive, needing from a couple thousands to well over 25 thousands.... So in the campaign, the designer puts all the pictures he has from the build game and how it works, even a youtube video describing the gameplay. The game gets no funding at all and feedback from users is that "it looks like shit", not that the game itself is shit but it looks like shit because it has no art. Even though that's the exact reason you are crowdfunding the game! So after the campaign fails because it gets no views because it doesn't have a catchy splash art or flashy colors and designs with cool characters to catch your eye, the designer decides to use AI image generators and photoshop to create his own art. What are your thoughts about this whole situation? EDIT1: So far the scale leans more to NO for various reasons but the main one being that if the designer cannot provide an initial artstyle to show the theme they are going for with their game then you wouldn't back it up. EDIT2: Still heavy on NO even though a lot of people popped up with "i wouldn't mind" type answers. And i feel like i have to state that the designer its not me...this is a hypothetical scenario.... EDIT3: Big NO, there are still people commenting on "i don't mind" kind of answers but still pretty negative responses all around. submitted by /u/Cizity to r/boardgames [link] [comments]

i tried some of them, but seems they cannot actually generate accurate and good content thanks for all the responses, i tested many tools, and summarized the good ones here, the best ai slides maker in 2025 are: Chatslide Pro: Lets you upload multiple files—like PDFs, images, or even links—and turns them into clean, professional slides or videos. You can also upload a style template and separate content files, which is super useful if you’re working with branded materials. There’s a free version too, and honestly, it’s been a game-changer for me. Tome Pro: Used to be a fast, AI-powered tool for creating slides with a nice visual feel. Con: It’s sunset now, so probably not the best option going forward. Canva Pro: Has an AI presentation generator that builds a draft from a short prompt. It’s easy to tweak, and you can use all of Canva’s other design tools to polish it. Great for visual-heavy decks. submitted by /u/Q-U-A-N to r/powerpoint [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/MelkorsGreatestHits to r/DIY [link] [comments]