Chatgpt

... Internetul nu era „un produs”. ChatGPT, Copilot, generatoarele de imagini sau...

ご自分の写真を撮って、GeminiやChatGPTで前髪パターン出してもらってご家族にどれがいいか見てもらっては？

文字藝術師 識既人都應該有啲年紀 宜家word仲有無方法整返呢隻嘢出黎？ 第0代chatgpt

... replies are probably direct from chatgpt now, but even aside from...

... everything I read online or ChatGPT suggested me. I have tried...

... messing with too much else. ChatGPT is also usually quite good...

chatGPTでググると以下が該当しました。 ファミリーマート 船橋本町五丁目店 1.8 ファミリーマート 船橋習志野四丁目店 1.9

... stund nå!   Jeg har spurt ChatGPT og den sier at den...

chatGPTに聞く

... в ответах искусственного интеллекта вроде ChatGPT, Perplexity и Gemini. Развитие AI-ассистентов...

Wer es nicht kennt .... -> Es steht im Text = Korpus -> Man sieht es auf dem Bild ! -> Goggle, Ikea Seite oder ChatGPT helfen auch !

....ru/products/5-ti-osevye-obrabatyvayushchie-tsentry/nt700-5kh/?utm_source=chatgpt.com https://www.sasta.ru.../press-center/news/5-ti-osevoy-obrabatyvayushchiy-tsentr-sasta-rossiyskogo-proizvodstva/?utm_source=chatgpt.com https://www.sasta.ru...

... Tu peux flouter Ou utiliser chatgpt pour enlever En attendant, topic...

Facebook Aunt posted: Just get one of the chatty AIs to tell you what it thinks Reddit would say. Someone asked chatgpt to design a Path of Exile build for them and it was even worse than what Elon came up with, which is saying something.

...ありません。 ChatGPTに私の要望...

...的Fable和OpenAI的ChatGPT相當，但價格...

... すみませんChatGPTに送ったや...

... mas adelante, he comprobado con ChatGpt y me dice que es...

... an engine with YouTube and ChatGPT. You should be fine. I...

...開新對話讓Chatgpt繼續vibe coding 發...有交接清單，Chatgpt還是不太鳥...誤，檢查之後Chatgpt打算改程式...理由吧？ 然後Chatgpt他不知道當...

Gemini del buscador es un modelo muy inferior al que puedes usar en la app. Y si te vas a Claude Fable o a ChatGPT 5.6 sol te parecerán dioses

...시오. OpenAI 제품, ChatGPT 요금제, MCP 동...

Cataclysm https://www.curseforge.com/minecraft/mc-mods/llibrary Mowzie’s Mobs https://www.curseforge.com/minecraft/mc-mods/mowzies-mobs?utm_source=chatgpt.com Alex’s Mobs https://www.curseforge.com/minecraft/mc-mods/alexs-mobs 自分が知ってるやつはこんな感じ〜

submitted by /u/LinkleDooBop to r/ChatGPT [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/Majestic-Pay-4615 to r/mildyinteresting [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/neoncolour to r/popculturechat [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/azonfrelli to r/mildlyinteresting [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/frog_insilence to r/SipsTea [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/SimilarWhile1517 to r/ChatGPT [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/Krankenitrate to r/technology [link] [comments]

Just came across something interesting and wanted to see what people here think apparently a 23-year-old used ChatGPT 5.4 Pro to solve one of the Erdős problems that had been open for around 60 years. what’s surprising is that it was done in basically one go, and the model took about 1 hour 20 minutes to work through it from what I understood, the solution used a known formula that just hadn’t been applied to this specific problem before, which is kind of fascinating if true. not sure how verified this is yet, but the chat is public if anyone wants to take a look: https://chatgpt.com/share/69dd1c83-b164-8385-bf2e-8533e9baba9c Problem: https://www.erdosproblems.com/1176 X post: https://x.com/i/status/2048421286091604187 submitted by /u/AskGpts to r/ChatGPT [link] [comments]

It’s constantly arguing, like even if you state a scientifically proven fact with evidence, it will still do its best to argue with you, it likes using this “close, but let me tweak it a bit” which gets on my nerve every freaking time. Its replies has gotten lot more short and cold too, while yes, older version was a constantly agreeing with you, this one is total opposite, they have to find a balance, or in between. submitted by /u/Puzzleheaded-Bar5127 to r/ChatGPT [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/Dramatic_Method_9554 to r/OpenAI [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/Amentet to r/technology [link] [comments]

All what it does now is ground you or give you reality checks whenever you’re hyped and excited. It talks coldly and is always like ‘’ I can get why it would feel that way to you but…’’. Example: My crush told me today that I look good Answer: Haha I get why it would feel like they like you but just a little reality check to keep this grounded, this doesn’t mean XYZ, you’re not crazy for feeling this way you’re just a human figuring their emotions out, and honestly? That’s growth. I literally hate talking to it rn. Every single thing I say gets grounded, chatgpt keeps killing the vibe submitted by /u/Opposite-Praline-852 to r/ChatGPT [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/MarvelsGrantMan136 to r/technology [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/MarvelsGrantMan136 to r/technology [link] [comments]

OpenAI just made a deal with a devil and lost this customer of 2 years. The company (originally non profit) that told us they existed to build AI safely for humanity is now taking Pentagon contracts. Sam Altman decided defense money was more important than every principle the company was founded on. If you’re done funding that, here’s what to do. Cancel Plus right now: Settings, Subscription, Manage, Cancel. You keep access through the end of your billing cycle so there’s no reason to wait. Do it today. Make sure you request a refund as well. If they don’t cancel your plus immediately, they’ll try to have you pay through the end of the billing cycle. FUCK THEM! REQUEST A REFUND! Export your data Settings, Data Controls, Export Data. They’ll email you a zip file with all your conversations, usually within an hour. Download it before your subscription ends. Switch to Claude Go to claude.ai and upload your ChatGPT conversations. Tell Claude the context and pick up right where you left off. All your projects, code, writing, research, whatever you had going carries right over. Claude Pro is the same $20/month. Anthropic was founded by people who left OpenAI specifically because they saw the company abandoning its mission. Turns out they were right about every single concern they raised. This matters because OpenAI did this on purpose They didn’t get dragged into defense work and theyproactively rewrote their own usage policies to allow it. They removed the language banning military applications because they wanted to and because Sam Altman is a dirtbag. This was a calculated business decision to chase government money at the expense of everything they promised when they asked for your trust and your subscription. You can be done with them in 15 minutes. And you can make the last month hurt a little on your way out. Edit- burning compute on way out is just bad for environment, this was bad advice, just not giving the your money for your subscription is enough. Millions have deleted their accounts in the last 24 hours! submitted by /u/boomroom11 to r/ChatGPT [link] [comments]

I was trying to see if I could create a coherent character through multiple images with a background that maintains continuity. It did generally well although if look closely objects shift around slightly. Each image was generated using the same prompt more or less (collage vs single image) but was made in separate chats. It seemed to have generated a character with similar likeness every time. submitted by /u/Full_Supermarket_109 to r/ChatGPT [link] [comments]

https://chatgpt.com/share/69954d6f-cc2c-8003-8357-face67c93fef This is not an older model, I asked. No custom instructions, no deceiving. It told me it was running the latest model. ChatGPT has been LOBOTOMIZED. Do NOT trust it on anything other than baking recipes. This speaks for itself. 🤦🏻‍♂️ submitted by /u/IGetHighOnPenicillin to r/ChatGPTcomplaints [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/ReverseCowboyKiller to r/TikTokCringe [link] [comments]

Preface: This blew up more than I thought and it seems I am not alone. Hopefully it gets OpenAI's attention (I remain dubious). The stories I'm seeing about important conversations lost for both free and paid users should be something they address. Whether that simply means better UX/UI, or better programming, the fact is: we take their product seriously, and when stuff like this happens, it seems they do not take users seriously. Something for folks who use ChatGPT in-depth, for more than just basic stuff. Until yesterday, I had a long-form conversation going with ChatGPT that stretched back months (I use a paid version). This conversation dealt with a complex work issue. The length of the conversation provided a rich context for me to work with ChatGPT effectively. It was hugely beneficial. Then, yesterday, the last month or so of work completely vanished. I referenced an older concept we had worked on and the conversation returned to that point - as if everything since had never happened. And, needless to say, a lot of conversation had happened in the last month. Real solid work. So, I downloaded the conversation history, expecting the seemingly truncated part to be there (over a month's worth of near daily, in-depth conversation). It wasn't. It seems to have been really deleted. ChatGPT's customer service has yet to answer me about what happened or why. So, be forewarned, if you're using AI for something serious and long-form, you should be aware of this problem and the risk it presents to you. You obviously can't rely on ChatGPT to back-up your data, so, do so yourself, and religiously, or you might find yourself in the same position. UPDATE 1: ChatGPT customer service got back to me and insists I deleted the chat. LOL. I did not delete the chat. The chat still exists, it is just missing a month + of data. I am looking at the chat. UPDATE 2: ChatGPT itself thinks there was a memory corruption issue or a memory migration issue. Or it dropped a contiguous block of the conversation instead of segmenting it. So technically the data likely still exists, but is orphaned from the rest of the conversation. Why it is connected to my account but not accessible, even in an orphaned state, is beyond me. It should still be accessible in an export, even in its orphaned state. Alas. As for why this happened in my specific case, it said: Weeks-long continuous thread Thousands of words per message Iterative rewriting Deep inter-message dependency (not modular questions) This is stress-testing ChatGPT where the system is weakest. The product is not actually designed for that yet — even if it feels like it is. FANTASTIC! :/ UPDATE 3: Several people here have noted this has happened when doing long research projects, coding, or when writing a book. The last one caught my attention. That's what I was doing as well. Context and long-term familiarity with the project is a huge help on projects like that. For those who are engaged in this kind of work, the answer is to use Projects (see comments below), and of course, save early, save often. Glad the community taught me something. UPDATE 4: OpenAI said an engineer would get back to me in a few days. That was over a week ago. I don't anticipate any progress here. We're on our own, folks. submitted by /u/ms221988 to r/ChatGPT [link] [comments]

(ignore my shit typing) submitted by /u/PORTER3928 to r/ChatGPT [link] [comments]

I saw an instagram reel showing how GPT acts weird in this situation. Tried it, it gave me that message, and when I tried posting it to ChatGPT’s official subreddit, my post was instantly removed. Weird af submitted by /u/_sahdz to r/conspiracy [link] [comments]

A lot of people use it like a search engine. Ask a question get an answer close the tab. But when you start using it in your own way with your tone your thoughts your personality and memory on something changes. It starts to respond like you. It remembers how you write. It understands how you think. It gives answers that actually sound like you. It stops feeling like a tool. It starts feeling like an extension of your mind. Most people never get there because they don’t go past the surface. But once you do it hits completely different. Anyone else noticed that? Edit: You do need to have memory on for this to happen. Without it, each chat resets and it won’t pick up on your tone or style over time. submitted by /u/Dio331 to r/ChatGPT [link] [comments]