Fisheye Lens

Freehanded fisheye lens effect is crazy work bro

Got the Laowa 8-15mm f/2.8 II FF Zoom Fisheye in today and it's a ton of fun! I was really worried about shooting a full manual lens, but Nikon makes it super easy with focus peaking. I use peaking to get a ballpark, then punch in 100% to confirm and shoot. Really impressive image results just from 20 minutes of pissing around with it.

Playing with my new Laowa 8-15mm f/2.8 FF Zoom Fisheye lens! I thought full manual would be harder to shoot, but modern cameras have plenty of features to take the pain out of it. Serial Fisheye Experiments Miku by SD Photography, on Flickr Serial Fisheye Experiments Miku by SD Photography, on Flickr

... gồm 6 cặp cảm biến fisheye (trước, sau, trên, dưới, trái... khi mang, cập nhật camera lens bằng khăn chuyên dụng. Bảo...

the blue sky view with adapter fisheye lens shot on #GalaxyA55

... images were taken with a fisheye lens and merged in the ambitious...

... на свою анимированную версию с FishEye Lens в AI-арте. ✨ Обновитесь сейчас...

... Rear View Camera 170° Golden Fisheye Lens Full HD Night Vision Vehicle...

... Sekor C 24mm F/4 Fisheye Review - 35mmdealer Experience report... of the legendary ultra wide-angle lens for the Mamiya 645 system...

...sử dụng. Với hai lens 360 fisheye, camera 360 này chống...khi chạy bộ. Hai lens fisheye đối xứng tạo góc 360... insta360 cũ, kiểm tra lens không xước, khung nhựa composite...V30 (8K ổn định). Lens sapphire chống xước, cửa ...kiểm tra pin không phồng, lens sạch – tuổi thọ cao...48MP quay 8K30fps 360 (single lens 4K120fps slow-mo). HyperSmooth-like stabilization,... IPX8 chịu lặn 10m, lens sapphire chống xước, màn ...

When you're taking images of the band and decide you want to take a selfie.......with your DSLR and a 7.5mm fisheye lens. The stage lighting knew the what to do. ST-38 by Trevor Baldwin, on Flickr

... IS (other than the dual fisheye VR lens), so for the bulk...

That Rokinon 8mm fisheye is an amazing lens; makes great sunstars. I had to be very cognizant on keeping my feet out of this picture.

... can save and chose between; fisheye, long lens, or stock etc, would...

... testing teh new Canon RF7-14mm Fisheye on an upcoming trip. It... (the box) and high end lens was something VERY popular back... $1,899.00 for that lens I'm not sure I'd jump ... I jumped to mirrorless.... The lens in many photographic genres rules ...

...That’s a 50 years old lens (release date 1977?), ...have ever measured this lens. If you call it “...“knowledge” about this particular lens. As others said above, ...results using supported lenses and Lens Sharpness Optimization – no halos, ... are 16/2.8D Fisheye (1993 design) and AF ... gain a lot using Lens Sharpness Optimization, which is common...unsharp” lenses. The second lens had an opinion of one ...

Quote History Originally Posted By Karankawa: Poolside pic looks photoshopped. The columns and parasol pole are warped inward at her waist. View Quote Fisheye lens, maybe?

... any RF lenses. My entire lens protfolio is EF. Many of...) would give me a lighter lens with a little bit of... L is such a sweet lens and one of the few... would still be using this lens today. It's such a sweet... lens, apart from wide open sharpness, ... II L, EF 8-15mm L Fisheye and EF 11-24mm L are ...

Jules Sunley said: I'm still trying to work out if I need to rotate the image for which way up! It is looking up, with a fisheye lens. No help for the location though.

I've got a bonkers circular Fisheye lens. WIth a 220 Degree field of view it's difficult not the get yourself in the shot! 1. LOL

... photography, high contrast, 1.2::fisheye lens effect ::, retro aesthetic   프롬....2::golden hour ::, cityscape background, lens flare, 1.2::breeze ::, casual...

... Z6, the only old Nikon lens in my collection that doesn’t... 16/2.8 fisheye. Check the page for camera and lens support, so...

... at all) distorted by a fisheye lens and a sound track that ...

...? You need a proper telephoto lens on a large sensor. A...? You need a proper macro lens. A phone can't do that... background? You need a proper lens for that. I have yet... mode auto-switches seamlessly—no manual lens swaps. Bokeh/DoF: Simulated shallow... Freewell kits add tele/macro/fisheye for $50-200. Sensors evolved: 1...

... can toggle on/off automatic lens switching, so you always shoot... distortion correction for a stronger fisheye effect Ultrawide, f/1.9...

This is the last lens I got for my Sony A6400, to try a new style of photography. Any tips for a new fisheye user? submitted by /u/Hmagon to r/Cameras [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/FedyaSteam to r/KendrickLamar [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/miragen125 to r/skiing [link] [comments]

I came into possession of this lens by a stroke of luck. I don't want to say too much about it; everything you need to know can be found on MIR.com, see link below. It is not really intended for everyday use, as it is too unwieldy and heavy due to its high light intensity of f = 2.8. Five screw-in filters are built in. I tried it out on my Nikon F3/T and took some pictures with it. But what attracts me to it is its shape and appearance. I can stare at the front lens for a long time and relax 😉 submitted by /u/ATHXYZ to r/AnalogCommunity [link] [comments]

I’m wanting to do some creative portraits using a fisheye lens for my Nikon Z6 while staring below $300. I’m torn between the 7artisans 10mm f/2.8 ii for Z mount, Sigma 15mm f/2.8 D EX Fisheye, or the Nikon AF 16mm. I currently have a Sigma Art 14-24 f2.8 for f mount, but it doesn’t give me the distortion or limb lengthening effect i’m looking for. Im not interested in fully circular fisheye. *I do not own the above images submitted by /u/freshbeats2020 to r/AskPhotography [link] [comments]

Me and my 4 month old kitten might be slightly obsessed with this lens submitted by /u/lasserna to r/cats [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/SuperSeagull01 to r/Birdsfacingforward [link] [comments]

would appreciate any feedback! x submitted by /u/Turbulent_Bag7818 to r/learntodraw [link] [comments]

All shot at 7mm with 20 year old Olympus 7-14mm f4. submitted by /u/mrjoshmateo to r/Cameras [link] [comments]

Before Alex Turner became a proper twat haha submitted by /u/emilyjade94 to r/blunderyears [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/EasyCZ75 to r/flatearth [link] [comments]

I’m broke and got my camcorder for free, and I wanted a fisheye so I found one of those phone lens things for $6. It comes with a macro lens and a .45x lens. Only the macro lens has 37mm threads, the wide lens has a larger diameter female threads so attaching that to the camera without the macro is a no go. I removed the glass from the macro lens because it cancelled the distortion of the .45x lens. I doesn’t have a vignette but for $6 I don’t care. If you’re going to comment “Just buy a $50-$100 lens, it’s not that expensive” please don’t, not everyone can. Any questions welcome submitted by /u/cheeto-Oc to r/camcorders [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/domainofgrain to r/camcorders [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/beomagi to r/M43 [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/Emotionaltraumatose to r/interestingasfuck [link] [comments]

snow pet books squash vanish apparatus butter abundant observation offbeat This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact submitted by /u/Sondersulks to r/fujifilm [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/GrunkleTeats to r/MadeMeSmile [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/marsamallow to r/AnimalCrossing [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/eternalrefuge86 to r/OldSchoolCool [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/johnkphotos to r/space [link] [comments]

I work as a photojournalist at Cape Canaveral, covering rocket launches with up-close cameras at the various launchpads here. For yesterday’s Atlas V rocket launch, I had two cameras at Space Launch Complex 41. These cameras were sound-activated; the sound alone would kill anyone standing at the launchpad during liftoff. Both remote cameras I placed are D7000s, but each was poised to shoot drastically different images. Both cameras and their lenses were wrapped in plastic grocery bags, with a hole cut out for the front element to poke through. At a relatively safe distance from the rocket, — maybe 500 or 600 feet — one D7000 was equipped with a Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8, and was zoomed in to capture a closeup shot of the rocket’s engine and four solid rocket boosters. That setup was completely unharmed. This post will focus on the other setup. The other D7000, which was just over 300 feet away from the rocket, was in the midst of the chaos. This camera was armed with an 8mm Rokinon fisheye lens that I picked up the day before remote camera setup. This camera was just to the left of the flame trench, of which is where most of the rocket’s energy is directed. Here’s my favorite image from the fisheye setup. The afternoon backlighting was great. I’m really pleased with the resulting images. According to my in-camera time, the above image was taken at 15 seconds past the minute. Here’s a photo from :20, five seconds after that image. :26, 11 seconds after the first image. This image is why I think there was a mixture of both water and solid exhaust on my lens. The Aerojet Rocketdyne AJ-60A solid rocket motors used on this rocket are fueled by hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene, which is very acidic. We were warned by our NASA escort to not touch our faces after handling equipment coated in the solid rocket exhaust, and to wash our hands ASAP after arriving back at the KSC Press Site. Here’s a photo of what the lens looked like right after I picked it up from the launchpad. The residue is a sort of dried, cake-y, powdered material stuck to the lens. I’m guessing that the solid exhaust mixes with the water from the pad’s water suppression system, and that resulting substance adheres to the lens. After I got home, I took a wet cloth and wiped off the powdery substance. It came off relatively easily, and I initially thought the lens was fine after I dried it off. That was until I looked at it in better light. The lens was heavily pitted from the solid exhaust particles. That’s not sand or dirt resting on the glass — that’s pitting in the front element itself. Note the dirt and twigs around the glass, too. I’d likely be able to replace just the front element, but I picked up this lens for a hundred bucks, so if I want to do a fisheye shot for a future launch, I’ll probably just buy another one. I’ve retired this lens after just one launch. Same thing happened to an 18-55mm kit lens I placed next to a Delta IV launch in 2016. Looking through the viewfinder of a body with that lens mounted is like looking through glass covered in rain drops. — — — Now, I have some explaining to do, because inevitably, someone is going to write “WHY DIDN’T YOU JUST USE A UV FILTER!?!?!?” in the comments below. I explained this on the last post I did on /r/photography over a year ago, when something similar happened at a different launch. Using a glass filter triples the area that dew can form prior to liftoff. I’ve had shots ruined by dew forming on the front element. Add in a filter, and you’ve got the front element and two additional glass surfaces for dew to ruin your shot. Cheap filters can introduce unwanted image artifacts such as glare. And why use quality filters if the same thing can happen to them rather than the front element? And yes, I only use plastic grocery bags to protect the cameras. Both the camera bodies were fine. It was just the exposed fisheye lens that saw damage. Overall, I’m really happy with my resulting images from both setups, so I’m not bummed at the loss of the fisheye lens. Anyway -- happy to answer questions about the setup. If you're interested in seeing more of my launch photography from the Cape, take a look at my website! submitted by /u/johnkphotos to r/photography [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/Magic142 to r/OldSchoolCool [link] [comments]