Hoka Shoes For Running

... wide). I wear running shoes because normal "walking" shoes don't have enough cushioning... go through several models of running shoes every 6-12 months looking for... been curious about Hoka also. Can anyone suggest max cushion shoes for walking...

... RHEON Marathon Speed Shorts. HOKA – A pair of running shoes with a minimum value... 1 x Women’s Dyna 6 Running Vest Pack. Uyn – 1 x... Men’s OR Women’s Exceleration Running T-Shirt. Stance – 1 x pair.... For the privacy policy of HOKA, please see here. 15. For ...

The Herren Mach X 2 is a training shoe designed for increased speed and performance. *product specifications:* - Durable midsole with PEBA top layer - Enhanced rocker profile for aggressive toe-off - Extended Pebax® plate for added support and propulsion

... grafting and PRP, show promise. Running shoes with thick cushioning and a... and promoting a more natural running technique. For example, Altra pioneered... Kaiha Road, 4 mm), and Hoka (Bondi, ~5 mm) all provide...

Hoka are really good for running. I find it easier for my morning run compared to Nikes. For long walks I prefer my Adidas walking shoes

... looked into Mount to Coast shoes, which are designed speficially with... for many, many hours of running at a time. It's good... more space overall than most running shoes.) The shoes are very light in weight... felt like some of the Hoka models I've tried, though the ...

... don't like it either (HOKA staring at you!) but certain...when we didn't have hybrid shoes or sneakers. Also boots... Brooks Adrenaline GTS (support shoes) - any iteration prior to... don't wear a wide. Hoka Transport GTX - gortex, ...(they sell returns from Pacers running store or just models that...or model. Generally your shoes are going to "die" between... take a pair of shoes that are mildly broken in ...

... op de merken Hoka en Altra. Altra heeft trail running schoenen met... een brede toe box en Hoka heeft... bij verschillende modellen (trail running en lopen..., mijn dagelijkse schoenen van Xeroe shoes. hebben de zelfde voetfoormaat als...

My Hoka shoes are the most comfortable walking/running shoes I’ve ever worn. My Skechers are quite good as well.

... and believes that the Merrell shoes will more likely result in... the firmer shoe than the Hoka, so we bought me the... Hoka waterproof shoe today and I’m ... over the years with his running and sports. I like the ...

I buy a five-pack of the cheapest gym shorts I can find on Amazon every several years and wear old T-shirts. The only thing I spend money on are shoes. I generally like Hoka for running. I have a pair of Adidas lifting shoes with flat, sturdy heels that have been going strong for a full decade.

... terrible for you. For lifting, running shoes are not good.  I wear ... days with my wife. For running you should go to a running store and have a gait ... on soft surfaces, then my shoes would be terrible for you. For lifting, running shoes are not good.  I wear..., because different activities require different shoes. My choice: Hoka One One for running Chuck Taylor’s for lifting UA ...

discountsforcarers.com/off…496 Via link above you can get 20% off pretty much any Hoka shoe as far as I can tell that isn't already discounted. E.g. Hoka Bondi 9 for £128. Discounts for carers is free to sign up for anyone.

tellim said: I am wearing decathlon carbon plate. Shopee also sell cheaper carbon plate from xstep brand Cannot lah. If never wear Nike, Adidas, Asics, Hoka or Cloud running shoes, those sexy yoga pants chio bus at marina bay sands run clubs will see you no up leh.

A nice pair of running/walking shoes! My in-laws are graciously taking ... ago, I wore Nike tennis shoes with insoles and my feet ... debating buying a pair of Hoka Clifton or ASIC Gel Nimbus. ...

Also super annoying that Hoka Speedgoats don't really last after 150 miles. Just looking for alternatives to these because I've only ran in Speedgoats. Longest race I've finished in Speedgoats was 50 miler. submitted by /u/Matteozzz to r/ultrarunning [link] [comments]

I’m finally at a point where my baseline is pretty stable (yay), so I plan to very gradually start running after not doing much exercise in the past few years. As a masters student, my max budget is probably $100-150 usd. I know Hokas are often a recommended brand in general for arthritis, but I figured I would ask the community. If you run, what shoes do you prefer? Any input or advice is appreciated ♡ submitted by /u/West-Citron3999 to r/rheumatoidarthritis [link] [comments]

Hey guys, I wanna try shifting from road running to trail running, so I'm looking for my first trail running shoes. Since I'm a beginner, I don't need something that is very fast/responsive. I prefer to have a shoe that has a good durability and can chug up lots of mileages, and provide comfort for longer runs/hikes. I will use this shoes for leisure hikes as well. I'm currently looking into the following options: Asics Trabuco 14, Salomon Ultra Glide 4, and Hoka Speedgoat 6/7. For anyone that have experience in these shoes? What are your thoughts? If there is any shoes from other brands, just drop the name. Cheers! submitted by /u/mario7lorenzo to r/trailrunning [link] [comments]

Was doing some analysis on Reddit data and looked into road running shoes. Thought I’d share the results here. The charts show how many people (in r/runninglifestyle and across all of reddit in the past year) mentioned each shoe positively, negatively, or in mixed light. How its ranked: Final rankings use a combination of Wilson Score (same algo behind Reddit’s “Best” sort, Amazon’s “Top Reviews”, Steam’s game ratings etc) and net positive volume. So both volume and consistent sentiment are needed to rank. A shoe with only 1 review that happens to be good (100% positive) won’t outrank one with 100 good reviews. Idea is to show what’s most discussed and consistently supported vs critiqued. Less about what is "best", and more about what's most tried and tested. Hopefully it a useful data point esp for folks who dk where to start. Use cases: Different people have different needs, so I’ve segmented the mentions by relevance to use cases to make it more meaningful (swipe images to see) Use case Example comment Long-distance training Not Brooks but I love my asics superblast 2 for long runs. I average in the 10:50-11:40/mile range for slow long runs, and a bit quicker 10:10-10:30/mile for long run workouts, and they perform very well for me. u/19191215lolly (source) Marathon race day Have done my last 3 fulls in EP4s (Boston 24, LA25, and Chicago yesterday where I PRd a 3:44) I love them. I have bunions and these are actually wide enough to accommodate. The only issue I've come across in racing in them was at the water stations yesterday. The street asphalt was more slick than I remember and I felt the need to be extra careful with my footing through the stations. u/19then20 (source) Speed and tempo runs I found the pain from Adidas Supernova Rise unbearable. But found Neo Zen, and Evo SL to be wonderful for tempo or long distance. Adidas Adizero SL 2 also works for mid-range distance. u/CepalMM (source) Versatile daily training I prefer the plus, My running shoe rotation right now is the vomero plus for daily and long run, Then the Pegasus plus for tempo days. u/dblclicks (source) Stability for overpronation As a runner with overpronation and stability needs, if I had to pick one shoe that balances support, lightweight, performance, and durability, I'd choose Asics Superblast 2. It's one of the rare shoes that I've run in that checks all boxes as a daily go to, all well as a performance long run shoe. The wide sole flaring and raised sidewalls provide good stability. ... u/Resilient-Runner365 (source) Maximum cushioning and joint protection My current max-cushion shoe is the Nike Vomero Plus. They are on the heavier side, but the foam provides plenty of cushioning and responsiveness. I’ve run 35 km in them since purchasing them last week and haven’t experienced any pain. Feel free to ask me any questions. u/justrunfar (source) Budget-conscious running I got some Nike Pegasus 41 for £65 in Sports Direct (reduced from £135) recently. Most colour ways were still £135 but the blue/ white was £65 so I grabbed a pair. Now 200km in and they’ve been excellent. u/Cap2017 (source) Wide feet ...NB Rebel V5 for me in 2E works beautifully with enough toe splay... u/happyblyrb (source) Narrow feet I use the Mach 6 for a variety on runs - slow and fast. I'm 6 2 and 91kgs so similar to the OP. I have a narrow foot so they just fit me perfectly. u/Mmofra (source) Road-to-trail hybrid ...I didn’t think it was possible for a shoe to feel so comfortable on pavement and so confident on trails. Feels a lot like what I hoped EVO SL ATR would be, and punishes my lower legs a lot less than Peregrine 15 does on hardpack/gravel. u/JrMSF (source) The full data with all raw comments can be found here. Use the filters for segmenting. Additional notes: Mentions are deduplicated - each person is only counted once, no matter how many repeat raves Non specific mentions get divided between models - e.g. “I love my Endorphin Pro” is split between the Endorphin Pro 1, 2, 3 and 4 (with more weight to the one with more specific mentions) I used LLMs to help analyze the large volume of data - it wouldn't have been possible to do so manually. It’s not 100% accurate though and I had to do some manual reconciliation Thoughts? Anything that seems surprising or off? submitted by /u/heyyyjoo to r/runninglifestyle [link] [comments]

I’m not an expert runner and I have visited a running store to get my feet looked at. The employee told me to use new balance 860s, so that’s what I’ve been using for years, but they’re not quite long enough for my foot when I run and I know the next size up would be too big. I have an 8.5 wide foot, so it’s already hard enough to find a good running shoe. I’m not super fast, and want to work my way up to running a half marathon, but I’m basically starting fresh due to an injury, so won’t be running too extreme of an amount of miles each time until I get to that level. I love stability and dont like when a shoe is insanely cushioned. I don’t want to be running in high heels! Any recs? Hokas are a no for me! submitted by /u/Fantastic_Eye_3896 to r/runninglifestyle [link] [comments]

​ Hello! I have been running properly for about 18 months, and am currently training for my second marathon. i had done my last marathon in a pair of Boston 13's, having done most of my training in those and a pair of gel nimbus 25's, and Adidas EVO SL's (miss them) - however realised after the marathon that the ankle pain I had been getting on long runs was not in fact normal and I over pronated quite a lot. I did gait analysis and bought a pair of Hoka Arahi 7's, which have been great but they are ever so slightly narrow, and just feel very flat, boring and slow, so I'm looking for something a bit racier for the marathon. There don't seem to be a lot of super great stability options out there, does anyone have any recommendations on here? For reference, I'm a man, about 85kg's, with size 9-10 feet (UK size). submitted by /u/SadBoiHour99 to r/AskRunningShoeGeeks [link] [comments]

'm tryna collect money for my alevels so I'm selling some stuff to cover for it everything is in great condition Mercurials 4k Football new 3k Jabulani 2k Foam runners recovery shoes 2k Hoka Bondi 8 runners 9k Catwalk casuals almost new 12k Location Gujranwala h2h or delivery submitted by /u/sirajuddin-haqqani to r/PakistanMarketplace [link] [comments]

Hi all, looking for a road shoe to pair with my current setup and would love some real-world feedback. Me / training Training for Ironman 70.3 this season, and I’d like to run a slower (sub 4h) marathon later this year too (comfort > speed, not an all-out effort). Running 3-4x/week, roughly 30–50 km (18–31 mi) max per week. 1x easy ~10k 1x quality (intervals or threshold) ~10–12k 1x long run 18–24k sometimes a brick run after cycling Paces / effort: Easy: 6:00–6:50 / km (Z1–Z2) Long run: 6:10–6:50 / km (Z2), last 15–20 min maybe Z3 if it feels truly easy Threshold: 4:20–4:45 / km Intervals: ~3:50–4:20 / km About me 35M, ~74 kg, normal width feet Mostly forefoot striker Mostly road/asphalt and small short local trails, I have a road-to-trail shoe for bad weather or when going on trail.. What I already have Adidas Evo SL for tempo/threshold/intervals Adidas Adios Pro 4 for races Hoka Challenger 8 for ugly weather / mixed surfaces What I’m trying to solve I need one road shoe mainly for easy runs + easy long runs + brick runs. Priorities are: soft and comfortable for Z2 mileage (so my legs don’t get trashed on top of cycling/swimming) still “fun” enough that long runs don’t feel like a chore stable enough for tired legs after the bike My history I used to have Asics Novablast 5 and loved them, mostly because they felt very soft and comfortable on easy runs. I also owned Superblast 2 and wasn’t really impressed (I do not get all the hype they got). For me they felt a bit too firm and kind of “brick-like”. Decision I’m currently deciding between: Asics Superblast 3 (tempted because it’s new and supposedly softer/more easy-friendly than SB2) Nike Vomero Plus (seems like the safe comfort pick for easy/long miles) but little bit worried about some speedier long run sessions Asics Megablast (sounds great on reviews, but the price is high and I already own a shoe for faster sessions, so I do not think that I really need this expensive supertrainer) If you’ve run in Superblast 3, how does it feel compared to Superblast 2 in terms of softness and enjoyment at true easy pace? And for Vomero Plus, does it stay enjoyable on 18–24 km long runs, especially when legs are tired? Also open to other suggestions in the same category (big, comfortable road shoe for easy + long). What is your preferred shoe for long runs? Thanks! submitted by /u/StepanSanda to r/AskRunningShoeGeeks [link] [comments]

It’s time for me to start training for a race in May. My feet have issues and I want to try Hokas- but not willing to try buying online. Also not interested in discount stories like dsw or famous brand that sell lesser quality styles of name brand shoes. Who sells high end Hokas in store?? Update- thanks everyone! submitted by /u/SewCarrieous to r/StLouis [link] [comments]

If you want a good healthy run, you should start with proper running shoes that protect and keep your feet comfortable. Here is some of my advice about what you have to notice before buying a pair: First, you need to know your foot shape. Every foot has different ways of movement, which is called pronation. We have 3 types of pronation: neutral, overpronation, and supination. Neutral feet land evenly and the feet do not tilt too much; you just need neutral shoes for these. Overpronation, on the other hand, tends to have flat arches. So if you have these, you need stability shoes with guide rails to keep them aligned. Supination is the kind of feet that lean outward; you'll need cushioned shoes to lower the pressure. Second, choose shoes that match your running style. If you mainly do daily or easy runs, shoes with a thicker, well-cushioned sole are ideal to protect your joints. For speed workouts or tempo runs, you’ll want something lighter, more responsive, and energetic often with a nylon or carbon plate for better propulsion. If you run on trails, look for shoes with aggressive lugs for better traction. The upper should also be durable and supportive to protect your feet from rocks, roots, and uneven terrain. Third, you need to know the right size and fit. If there're stores around, you may want to go in and try on some before buying. If there aren't, you just need to know that running shoes are usually bigger than usual shoes by 0.5 to 1 size. The shoes should have a space about the width of a thumb from the longest toe to the top of the shoes, so that when you are running and your feet expand, they won't get black toenails or hurt your toes. Also, make sure the toe box has enough space so that your feet can move comfortably and the sides are not squeezed. However, your shoes still need to be secure; make sure they won't slide when you move. These are the top 10 running shoes that are highly recommended for comfort and protection The Best Supportive and Comfortable Running Shoes At The Moment Brooks Launch 11 Women’s ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 Nike Pegasus 41 Mizuno Neo Vista 2 ASICS Megablast Hoka Mach X3 Saucony Endorphin Elite 2 Topo Athletic Cyclone 3 Women’s KARHU Ikoni 3.0​ Puma ForeverRun Nitro 2​ I would really appreciate your thoughts in the comments; feel free to discuss them here. submitted by /u/ToughWrongdude141 to r/loseit [link] [comments]

This topic seems to be asked a lot, especially when they start doing longer runs. Comfort matters way more than speed at that point, so I wanted to share a few practical things that actually help when choosing running shoes. This is a quick list of the best options for those who don’t want to learn a long buying guide below: Here Are Some Of The Better Long-run Running Shoes Worth Looking At In 2026: ASICS Megablast Women’s ASICS Gel-Nimbus 27 Mizuno Neo Vista 2 Puma ForeverRun Nitro 2​ Nike Pegasus 41 Hoka Mach X3 Women’s KARHU Ikoni 3.0​ Here are some key features you need to know What counts as a long run? For most recreational runners, a long run typically starts at around 10–12 km and can extend to half-marathon or marathon distances. At these distances, muscle fatigue builds up gradually, and impact protection becomes more important than speed or responsiveness. That’s why shoe comfort, cushioning, and stability matter much more during long runs. Cushioning comes first for long runs For long-distance comfort, cushioning is the most important factor. As fatigue builds up, your form naturally breaks down and your body absorbs more impact with every step. A well-cushioned daily trainer helps reduce stress on your knees, ankles, and lower back. You don’t need the softest foam on the market, but minimal or ultra-light shoes usually feel harsh once you’re deep into a long run For most runners, moderate to max cushioning > lightweight speed shoes. The Three Main Types of Pronation To choose the right pair of running shoes, you need to know your foot pronation. There are three main types of pronation: neutral, overpronate, and supinate. We'll start with neutral. What you're looking for here is more centralized wear down the middle of the ball of the foot. This is actually considered the most biomechanically sound, as everything tracks and rolls through in a straight and forward motion. Now, on to overpronation. You can identify this with slightly more wear down the inside edge of the shoe. It’s quite often caused by the arch of the foot collapsing in, or in some cases, being flat-footed. This leads to a rolling-in motion as you run. If you find you have slightly more wear down the outer edge of the shoe, it's likely that you supinate. This isn’t quite so common, but it’s generally caused by having a high arch. A particularly defined and rigid arch causes you to roll through and off on the outer edge of your shoe. Shoes for Different Pronation Types From there, we can choose the type of shoes that are suitable for your food pronation. Neutral Shoes: Designed for runners with neutral pronation and supination. They provide balanced cushioning and allow the foot to move naturally without added stability or control. Stability Shoes: Suitable for runners with overpronation. These shoes offer extra support around the arch to help control excessive inward foot movement. Motion-Control Shoes: Best for severe overpronation or flat feet. They provide maximum support and structure to prevent the arch from collapsing. Practical Tips for Purchasing Running Shoes Visiting a local running shoe store for foot analysis and professional advice is recommended. Bringing old running shoes and typical running socks helps ensure proper fitting. Shoes should fit comfortably without requiring a break-in period. Running shoes should be approximately half a size larger than regular shoes or allow 1.5 centimeters of space in front of the big toe to prevent issues such as black toenails. Tracking purchase dates and running distance is advised. Most running shoes last between 450 and 600 kilometers or 6 to 9 months before cushioning degrades. At the end of the day, long-run shoes should feel comfortable, protective, and reliable. If your shoes disappear under your feet during a long run, you’ve probably picked the right pair. If you have any questions or want to share what’s been working for you on long runs, feel free to drop a comment below. I’d love to hear your experience submitted by /u/Local_Lavishness_955 to r/BeginnersRunning [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/Forsaken-Eagle551 to r/runninglifestyle [link] [comments]

So between 3 of us in the family, we have 5 pairs recently purchased. 2 pairs of Bondi 8s, 3 pairs of Haka 2s. She uses a pair of Bondi 8s indoors to run on a treadmill. These are less than a year old and the inside of the heel fabric are already wearing out/down (as shown in pics). The Hakas are holding up strong though in daily outdoor use (material is different and more durable). I think she's just disappointed after the perception of quality from the Hoka brand didn't meet reality with her Bondis. She's going back to On and Brooks for her future shoe shopping. I quite like my Hakas. Anyone else have the same problems with their Bondis and shoe buying selection in the household? 😂 submitted by /u/NoFuckinShitRetard to r/Hoka [link] [comments]

So I need to replace my old La sportiva Wildcat shoes. These survived several 5ks, but on the road to trifecta I realized at 10k they are heavy, slow, too narrow and uncomfortable on distance. I am missing a few lugs and this shoe doesn't owe me anything. When reading reviews on this page and trailrunnung subreddit, shoe reviews fall into one of two brand camps: Camp 1 - Hoka, Brooks, Nike, Saucony, Topo, Addidas Camp 2 - Norda, La Sportiva, Altria, Salomon, Inov-8 Going off assumption, Camp 1 is the trend brands based off road running hype. Camp 2 seems to be the more intense brands. There doesnt seem to be any reviews that really cross between these two camps. Eventhough my 21k is in muddy flat land Florida I usually race in US North East with elevation, rocks, trees, etc. With well over 30 models to choose from kind of overwhelming. Any advice on which brand provides a solid all around trail running shoes? Which brand knows ball and which is just jumping on the band wagon to make sales? submitted by /u/Mercinary0505 to r/spartanrace [link] [comments]

What shoes do you guys and gals wear to work? Hoka will always have a special place in my heart lol. Easily the most comfortable and reliable work shoe I’ve ever owned. I had these bad boys for a little under 16 months. Went to my local shoe store and found a sweet pair of waterproof Hokas (with a much trendier style than these ugly bastards lol) on the clearance rack for $120. Most new pairs of Hoka shoes run for at least $140. submitted by /u/tonsofday to r/AmazonDSPDrivers [link] [comments]

Hi all, would like to get some recommendations for trail running shoes for wide and flat feet. I am currently using the Hoka Speedgoat wide but it’s still too narrow for my wide feet :/ I have heard that Altras have a wide toe box, but I’m not sure about zero drop. Would it hurt my feet if I have flat feet? Thank you in advance! submitted by /u/One-Mastodon9244 to r/trailrunning [link] [comments]

Hi all! I’m traveling to Europe next year for the first time from Australia for the London Marathon (got lucky in the lottery). Because I’ll already be bringing my racing shoes (and will have to take them everywhere), I want to buy a single pair of comfortable running shoes that can: Handle all-day city walking (London/UK + Italy + Switzerland), the trip will be around 5 weeks. Do some light hikes/walking (maintained paths, steps, mixed terrain) Still be useful as a daily trainer when I’m back home. I have casual walking shoes (Onitsuka Tigers) but they’re not great for long travel days. My other daily runners are ASICS Novablast 5, which I don’t love for walking, just something off about them. I’ve seen a lot of recommendations for Nike Pegasus, Hoka Bondi, and On. Any thoughts or suggestions? Thank you! Edit: Thanks so much for all the responses, everyone! I’ll check them out and probably wait for a sale before buying a pair, plenty of time to break them in if needed before next year. Also, I might not need the trail aspect as my mom might be joining me on the trip, so some of the hiking might be off the cards. I actually owned the New Balance 1080 v13 before. Great daily (and very durable) runners! submitted by /u/jothrowaway88123 to r/AskRunningShoeGeeks [link] [comments]

I am not The OOP, OOP is u/Fantastic_Truth2164 He’s been pursuing me, then sent me a spreadsheet asking to be reimbursed for our dates?? Am I overreacting? Originally posted to r/AmIOverreacting Original Post July 8, 2025 Hi everyone, I (F23) have been dating this guy (M32) for a little over a month now. He was very persistent in pursuing me, constantly texting, making plans, asking me to go on runs, bike rides, and beach days (we live in Florida), and inviting me to dinner, bars, and even paying for Ubers to and from his place. We were hanging out at least 4 times a week. Everything felt like it was going somewhere. He’d been slowly building things up and even waited weeks to finally kiss me. Then, out of nowhere, he sends me a literal Excel spreadsheet with a breakdown of dates, how much he spent, and a column with my name, asking me to reimburse him. I’m attaching it because I truly can’t believe it. It felt transactional and weirdly formal, especially since he was the one initiating nearly all the plans. What’s even more confusing: after sending this, he still insists on seeing me and continuing to date. Like, you want to invoice me and kiss me? And for context, I’ve picked up the tab quite a few times ,dinner, drinks, etc. , without making a thing of it. I’ve never asked him to pay me back or keep score. I thought we were just getting to know each other and splitting things organically like adults especially since he’s about 10 years older than I am. So am I overreacting or under-reacting, I can’t tell if this is just him being “organized” or if it’s a huge red flag. The text messages TRANSCRIPT OF TEXT MESSAGES Guy sends a breakdown of everything spent (cigs, Google, restaurants etc.) Guy: Hate to ask but can ya Venmo or Zelle me some $ for the last few weeks? I know ya got me some stuff which I'm appreciative of, and definitely happy to cover most things like our date night and drinks and stuff, but ya never paid me for the first round of stuff from a few weeks ago and moneys a little tight for me and a source of stress rn w working two jobs etc. OOP: sure Guy: Ok i think $100 is fair unless you have any objections OOP: are you charging me for in between day Guy: I'm charging you 100$ for the $500 of stuff l"ve covered since we've started hanging Ya never paid me the last time lasked for some OOP: alright maybe we shouldn't go out as much Guy: lol l can't tell ifur butt hurt I'm asking for $100 OOP: Yeah I do like the green Sheees Did you get my Venmo Guy: I did. Thank you very much Coincidentally, [redacted] texted me td saying he was owed $ too. I paid him the $90 you owed him from awhile back. I was hoping you could reimburse me for that eventually OOP: oh sure. Sending now! Guy: I appreciate it very much Delivered How was work and dinner W Liv TOP COMMENT Suitable-Tear-6179 Ok, you sent him the money. You even sent the money to repay what he "gave" to his buddy you owed money to. Do send the mutual a note that says "Hey, X says he gave you the money I owed you. I've already repayed him for it. We're good, right?" Just in case he didn't give the money to the mutual like he said. I mean, someone who's going to send an invoice after the fact, who says he's got money troubles just gives his buddy money you owe, not knowing if you'll pay him back??? That just seems SUS. Ask if you should go through your bank or credit card notes for the times you paid, and write up a bill for him to pay YOU back? Do you think that he would consider that to be reasonable? Because, "At 23, I really can't afford to pay for a 32 year old." I believe he would flip out. You need to bow out of this relationship. Standard custom is the person that asks the other out is the one that pays. If not, it should be Dutch right from the start. It's odd he's so OCD about tracking what he spent with you, and yet he apparently can't budget or stay within his means. The two just don't compute. (How accurate is his list? Because if he's not getting by on 2 jobs, he shouldn't be spending 500+ on socializing, especially when you're good with runs, bike rides, and other low/no cost hangouts. You might want to consider asking, "Hey, We're going Dutch, right?" on the first few dates with the next person you go out with. That way you can budget what you get either way. (I tend to order less expensive stuff on someone else's dime) And you don't get an unanticipated surprise at the end of the meal.... or a month later, though I'd be shocked if anyone else pulled that stunt. Update July 9, 2025 Hi everyone, thanks so much for all the responses on my last post, it blew up and I appreciate all the feedback. I wanted to add some details that didn’t make it into the original post, since a lot of people were asking for clarification: • In the spreadsheet he sent me, I’m the green column (and no, it’s not cigars/cigs for me, lol). • “Green” also referred to a $200 pair of hoka shoes he texted me about buying. • He took me to a nicer spot called In Between Days for a more intimate dinner. • The other man on the spreadsheet asking for payment was actually his twin—who sometimes joins us on double dates, but usually picks up the check himself. • I always offer to pay my share. Money is genuinely stressful for me, and I hate the feeling of owing anyone. He always refused in the moment, then turned around and invoiced me formally later. I would have much rather just paid my own way from the start than have any of this happen. Final update: I sent him the last payment and then blocked him and deleted his contact. I didn’t want him to hold anything over me. It sucks that I paid him, but at least iit’s over. Thanks to everyone who weighed in. THIS IS A REPOST SUB - I AM NOT THE OOP DO NOT CONTACT THE OOP's OR COMMENT ON LINKED POSTS, REMEMBER - RULE 7 submitted by /u/Direct-Caterpillar77 to r/BestofRedditorUpdates [link] [comments]

Context: I hadn't planned to buy the Boston 13, holding out for the Prime X3 Strung as my long-run shoe. However, JD Sports' 70% off deal convinced me to try them (worst case, I'd still get the PX3S). This review focuses specifically on the experience for wide-footed runners. Total distance ran: 30.4 miles (48.92 km) Type of runs: Long Runs: 2 x 15.2 miles (24.46km) Weather ran in: Dry, humid sunshine. My profile: * Height: 5'9" (176cm) * Weight: 160.7 lbs (72.9kg) * Strike Type: Mid-foot striker * Training: Previously on Pfitz 18/55. Now using a custom 20 week plan with 8 weeks of 18/20 mile long runs for Sydney (Leading to the Big Half & Berlin). * Pace in Boston 13: 8:38 min/mile / 5:22 min/km Positives: * Stable ride with energetic give. * Prescriptive ride that guides your stride effortlessly (though this could be a con for runners preferring a neutral feel?). * Lightweight and not stiff like a carbon plate. * Easy to pick up pace and maintain. * Does not bottom out. * Good grip compared to Evo SL. * 6mm drop is great for mid-foot strikers. Negatives: * Performance-focused fit less forgiving than Evo SL's comfort. * Tapered toe box might be an issue for some (see Photo 4). * Short laces for heel lock (see Photo 5). * Not a fun bouncy ride like the Evo SL. * Not recommended for new runners who will be tempted to run too fast. * Slighty heavier than Evo SL. Fit/Upper: * My running shoe size: US10/28cm 2E. * I have 2E high-volume feet with a high instep. I like fun shoes and have experimented with sizing up since 2021, covering over 1242 miles/2000 km per year (Photo 6). Multiple marathons and 20-mile/32km runs completed. * My Fit Reference List (Size Up Strategy): * ASICS Superblast 2: Half size up * Adidas Adios Pro 4, Evo SL, Prime X2 Strung: Half size up * Hoka Cielo Road: Half size up * New Balance Balos: Half size up * Nike Vaporfly 2/3, Alphafly 3: One full-size up * Puma Deviate Nitro 2, Voyage Nitro 3: Half size up * Saucony Endorphin Speed 3: Half size up I went for my usual Adidas sizing of half-size up. The fit is race-focused, unlike the Evo SL. See Photo 4 for the aggressive toe box taper vs Evo SL. If your feet are wider than mine (2E), this will likely be an issue, but it didn't affect me (Photo 4 vs Evo SL). One issue: a loose feel in the heel collar on the first run. Using a heel lock on the second run solved it, but the laces are very short (Photo 5 vs Evo SL). If you buy these, get longer laces! The Midsole: The Evo SL's midsole stability sparks debate. Heel strikers often find it soft and unstable. As a mid-foot striker, I found it firm until the ~25 mile/40km break-in (my pair now has 60 miles/96.5km and feels nicely squishy). The Boston 13's initial feel reminded me of the pre-break-in Evo SL oddly enough. It lacks the Evo SL's bounce, but the rods and soft Lightstrike foam create a prescriptive ride that easily picks up pace without excessive effort achieving turnover. In both runs, there was no bottoming out, unlike my softened Evo SL where I now feel the ground more. I'll stick with the Boston 13 for long runs due to its consistent cushioning. The Outsole: Only tested in dry, sunny conditions so far. Noteworthy: rubbing them on the doormat post-run shows the Boston 13 grips well, whereas the Evo SL slides easily. This grip difference could be a deciding factor for someone. Summary: The Boston 13 is a shoe I shouldn't like on paper but ended up enjoying for long runs, perhaps overcoming my previous bias towards higher-stack shoes. Choose this if: You want a no-nonsense, stable shoe for distance that can pick up the pace without fuss. Boston 13 vs Evo SL at full price? Depends: Prefer fun, energetic rides & you have stable mechanics? Evo SL. Need stability/forgiveness? Boston 13. Important: Neither shoe is suitable for beginners due to their performance nature. Stick to your Brooks Ghost for that. submitted by /u/6to8design to r/RunningShoeGeeks [link] [comments]

I arrived at the meeting spot, of course, 20 minutes early, wearing my Hoka and compression socks, post light warm-up, resting heart rate 42. She showed up 5 minutes late, wearing H&M leggings and some casual walking shoes from a REI. I suggested a classic 12 km training loop at conversational pace (4:40/km), but she said she doesn’t “run that much” and just wanted to do a couple of laps around the park. Alright, I thought, let her have it. We started easy. My watch showed 6:30/km pace, heart rate in Zone 1, basically active recovery. After 500 meters, she said she needed to walk because she’s “not quite in shape yet.” I suggested some high knees and a few strides, and she asked if I “take this all seriously.” She chatted about Netflix shows while I analyzed my Garmin Connect data. After 1.8 km, she said that was her max and asked if we could sit on a bench. We sat. She was sweating like she’d just run a marathon, I was cooling off with an electrolyte drink, heart rate back down to 45. She said it was “great, so nice you didn’t run too fast.” At the end, she asked if she could tag me in a TikTok with #RunningDate. I said I don’t use TikTok—it messes with sleep patterns. I blocked her when I got home. Then ran 15 km at tempo pace to clear my head. Crying, but in Zone 2. submitted by /u/AleNudy to r/RunningCirclejerk [link] [comments]

I arrived at the meeting spot, of course, 20 minutes early, wearing my Hoka and compression socks, post light warm-up, resting heart rate 42. She showed up 5 minutes late, wearing H&M leggings and some casual walking shoes from a REI. I suggested a classic 12 km training loop at conversational pace (4:40/km), but she said she doesn’t “run that much” and just wanted to do a couple of laps around the park. Alright, I thought, let her have it. We started easy. My watch showed 6:30/km pace, heart rate in Zone 1, basically active recovery. After 500 meters, she said she needed to walk because she’s “not quite in shape yet.” I suggested some high knees and a few strides, and she asked if I “take this all seriously.” She chatted about Netflix shows while I analyzed my Garmin Connect data. After 1.8 km, she said that was her max and asked if we could sit on a bench. We sat. She was sweating like she’d just run a marathon, I was cooling off with an electrolyte drink, heart rate back down to 45. She said it was “great, so nice you didn’t run too fast.” At the end, she asked if she could tag me in a TikTok with #RunningDate. I said I don’t use TikTok—it messes with sleep patterns. I blocked her when I got home. Then ran 15 km at tempo pace to clear my head. Crying, but in Zone 2. submitted by /u/AleNudy to r/Garmin [link] [comments]

About me: 33M, 5'8" and 193 lbs, shoe size 8.5. Lift weight 6-7 times a week and run 3-4 times a week. I run for fun and don't usually have an exact time goal in mind, just kinda run by feel and enjoy the good vibes 🤘 Note 1: Some of these shoes are in women's size 10 because I just like their colors better. Note 2: The Asics Superblast 1 and 2 won't be included in this post since I feel like they're not direct competitors with the Hoka Bondi 9. Note 3: These are MY opinions about the shoe. We all have our own preferences so please be respectful and civil towards each other in the comment session 🙂 TLDR: Bondi is back baby!!! I was a big fan of the Bondi 6 and 7 but when the Bondi 8 came out, it was a very disappointing shoe for me. The Bondi 8's midsole was firm and the upper was very narrow in the mid foot area, I didn't really enjoy running in the Bondi 8 at all. The best word I could describe the Bondi 8 is "Clunky". However, I'm happy to report that the Bondi 9 is a much better shoe than the Bondi 8 and it's heading back to the way the Bondi 6 and 7 look and feel with a modern slightly softer mid sole. The first time I put the 9 on I was surprised by how light it feels on food and then I was more surprised when I found out it actually weighs slightly more than the 8. With the 8, I can definitely tell it's a heavy shoe because it's bottom heavy but not with the 9. Hoka did a great job balancing out the upper, midsole and outsole. The upper is now slightly wider in the mid foot area so that's a plus for me. With the 8, it was so narrow in the mid foot area that the medial side of my foot kept pressing against the firm midsole. Even though it didn't cause any blister or anything, it was uncomfortable to run in and it took a couple of miles to get used to that feeling. I'm so glad Hoka fixed that. Breathability is to be determined but it was 50 degrees when I ran this morning and I definitely felt some breeze as I was running. The midsole is a much needed upgrade! It's definitely softer than the previous models but I do have to warn you that if you're expecting it to be something like the New Balance More v5, you're gonna be very disappointed. It's still a very cushioned shoe but slightly on the firmer side. There was one shoe that I kept thinking of as I was running in the 9 and it's the On Cloudeclipse. The run feels very similar between these two shoes: the midsole is very cushioned and you feel very protected but it also firms up a little and give you a little bounce back when you pick up the pace, the midsole definitely feels more alive at a faster pace (which is something I also notice in the Hoka Mach 6). The rocker also helps keep you in the rhythm and provides a much smoother ride. I thoroughly enjoy this improvement, and while I'm planning on using the 9 for easy and normal runs, I can definitely see myself running a few short speed sessions in it as well. The outsole is again to be determined. No signs of wear and tear on my first run and if it's anything like the previous models, it should last you a long time. Now for comparisons, all the shoes (except for the Bondi 8) in the picture are great cruisers so you can't really go wrong with any of them. That said, it really depends on your preference at this point. I will rank these shoes in different categories from "least" to "most" and again, these are just my opinions based on how my foot feels in these shoes so just take them with a grain of salt: Softness: On Cloudeclipse > Hoka Bondi 9 > Saucony Hurricane 24 = Brooks Glycerin Max > New Balance v5. Responsiveness: New Balance v5 > Saucony Hurricane 24 > Brooks Glycerin Max = On Cloudeclipse > Hoka Bondi 9 Versatility: New Balance v5 > Saucony Hurricane 24 = Hoka Bondi 9 > On Cloudeclipse > Brooks Glycerin Max Value: Brooks Glycerin Max > New Balance v5 > On Cloudeclipse > Hoka Bondi 9 = Saucony Hurricane 24 Overall, I really appreciate what Hoka has done with this iteration of the Bondi and if you're a fan of the Bondi line, you should definitely give this a try. Thank you for reading! If you have any questions, feel free to ask! I'll do my best to answer all of them. submitted by /u/thatbajingoisonfiya to r/RunningShoeGeeks [link] [comments]