Moisturizer

... and nape. Uses witch hazel moisturizer and does alot of cutting...

@FLGranny I tried it. I found the polish to be very harsh. I would rather use it on my body than my face. The moisturizer had a very unpleasant scent to me, but I have a very keen sense of smell. I wound up throwing most of it out. I LOVE the Tatcha Rice polish and have enough other moisturizers that I love.

... Anti-aging, Peptide และ Moisturizer มีส่วนผ...

..., no fragrance, no actives, and moisturizer more often than you think. ...

... the last 3 years. No moisturizer and no cleanser. Instead, I...

That steroid dependency cycle is so frustrating and your concern about TSW is completely warranted. Things that helped us with nighttime were filing nails as short as possible, keeping the bedroom cool, cotton pajamas and adding magic molecule into our routine before moisturizer. It is a hypochlorous acid spray which helps calm the inflammation that makes eczema so much worse at night.

Lifemaxxing (Gen Z for living your best life) is a term that has been thrown around a lot lately by kids who spend their time getting perms, moisturizing their faces, and “mogging”. But if you ask them what it actually means, no one seems to be able to give a definition that works for everyone. By the end of this, you'll know what living your best life actually means, how to do it according to Aristotle, and why so much of what people call lifemaxxing today is completely wrong. The Gen Z influencer, Clavicular, famously said, “If you’re not looksmaxxing, you’re not lifemaxxing.” But after watching a fully grown, allegedly straight dude who smokes meth curl his eyelashes and hit himself in the face with a hammer, be like “this is peak life”, I was like huh… that seems off. The problem is that he basically coined the term. So he’s become the authority on what it is. And if you check Urban Dictionary, the top definition reflects that: Lifemaxxing When you work towards making your life better John: what's Joseph doing with all those weights and moisturizer? James: he's lifemaxxing dumbass It half jokingly says lifemaxxing is making your life better by moisturizing and lifting weights. I don’t moisturize and I find lifting weights annoying and my life is still pretty good, so this makes no sense to me. So I did what any sane person in today’s day and age would do. I posted a story asking my friends what they think. The answers I got varied a lot. (I'd post screenshots, but can't in this sub) None said that it was getting perms or smoking meth. Some answers were pretty well thought out. But they still had a lot of holes in them and none were universal. So I kept digging and discovered someone already thought about this so deeply that they came up with a definition that has held up pretty well for over 2,000 years. In Aristotle’s book Nicomachean Ethics, he basically lays out what he believes is the formula for the best life. I dug into the original text of this dense and truly brilliant work and attempted to translate it into terms that even Gen Z broccoli heads with TikTok brain can understand (lets be real, this would land better in a series of short-form videos). I apologize in advance for how long this is. I’m actually trying to keep this short and may even break this out into a series because of how much interesting depth there is on the topic. But anyways, lets get started. What do we actually want? Before we get into how to live your best life, we need to agree on what we're actually shooting for. Most people you ask will say that it’s money, freedom or something about how everyone’s definition is different. But the reality, according to Aristotle, is that we’re all after the same thing even if how we get there is different. To prove this, all you have to do is act like a 5 year old for a minute and keep asking why you want anything over and over until you can’t think of any other reason. It usually goes something like this: I want that job. Why? So I can make money. Why So I can buy that car. Why? So I can get that person. Why? So people will think I’m cool. Why? So I can have more friends. Why? So I can be happy. Try it with anything. The car, the body, the girl, the followers, the freedom. Every chain ends in the same place. So I can be happy. Aristotle calls this the “highest good” because it’s the only thing you do for its own sake and not for the sake of something else. But "happiness" is just a temporary feeling. When most people say they want to be "happy," they think of a feeling. A mood. Something you're experiencing at any given moment in time. Though this feeling can be the result of living your best life, it’s not accurate to say this is the end goal for 2 reasons: It’s basically impossible to spend every waking moment in complete blissful euphoria. That’s not actually what would make you truly happy. Think about it. Why would someone who has everything willingly take on hard challenges like climbing mountains and changing the world instead of sitting on the beach drinking martinis and watching funny TikTok videos? Because it’s not fulfilling. Chasing happiness ironically often leads to misery and depression. Some people who have everything like money and fame have gone down the path of trying to make themselves feel good all the time and they usually end up in rehab, overdosing or suicidal. So chasing constant pleasure clearly doesn’t lead to living your best life. What you actually want isn't a temporary feeling you chase. It's a state of being you exist in. Aristotle’s word for this was Eudaimonia. It has been translated as happiness, living well, or flourishing. But happiness is considered a less precise definition than “flourishing” or “living well”. That’s because happiness is what you feel. Flourishing is how you live. Happiness and flourishing are not the same thing. Category Happiness Flourishing / Fulfillment Source External Internal Effort Minimal Requires work Duration Fleeting Lasting Driver Pleasure Purpose Result Fades fast Compounds over time Essence Feeling State of being Happiness is just a series of dopamine hits. You want something, you get it, you feel good, you feel empty, you want the next thing. Pleasure spike, crash, repeat. It's the doom scrolling and slot machine loop. Flourishing runs on different chemicals Serotonin from pride and self-respect Oxytocin from real connection Endorphins from overcoming hard things. These don't just spike and crash, but build over time. Flourishing is something you actively do. This is a really important point because often times people think if I just had xyz, I’d be happy. But as we discussed, happiness isn’t the true end state. And likewise, flourishing isn’t a state of being you reach one time and then are done. It’s something to be built and maintained. It’s not like you win a game and then the game is over. Flourishing is an ongoing activity. You're either doing it, or you're not. Aristotle says sleeping man with all the virtues in the world is not flourishing while he sleeps. In other words, the successful entrepreneur who hasn't done anything in ten years maybe was flourishing in the past but can’t just coast on that success forever. He's arguably not even an entrepreneur anymore. If you stop doing it, you stop being it. How does one “do” flourishing? Flourishing, as Aristotle puts it, is doing the right activity, excellently. But what are the right activities? And how do we do them excellently? Aristotle groups the right activities into three categories of human goods: Bodily goods, like health and vitality External goods, like food, shelter, and resources Goods of the soul, like knowledge, relationships, and meaningful contribution Doing them excellently means something specific too. Aristotle calls it virtue. In practice, it looks like balance. According to Aristotle, lifemaxxing life doesn’t mean maxing anything out at all really. If you’re doing something to the extreme, it’s not considered virtuous. An example he uses is courage. You have the two negative examples on the outer ends. Being a coward who doesn’t take action and then being so bold that you do stupid things without considering the consequences. Virtue, or the ability to do something excellently, is in the middle of the two extremes. So a virtuous and courageous person would take action when needed in a way that is strategic and not reckless. Aristotle also gave us criteria we can think about for thinking about if we’re doing things excellently Doing the right thing To the right person (if applicable) In the right amount At the right time In the right way For the right reason Miss any one and the action stops being excellent. So if you’re donating money, this sounds like an excellent activity that is a meaningful contribution, right? But if it is... To a bad cause (wrong thing to do) To someone corrupt (wrong person) A penny donated by a millionaire (wrong amount) When it’s too late (wrong time) By humiliating the person you’re giving money to (wrong way) So that he can tell people how great he is (wrong reason) ...then it is not excellent. So at the end of the day, to live your best life, you spend your time doing things that are good for your health, generating resources, or your soul in a way that checks all the boxes for excellence. To lifemaxx, you max out the % of your time you spend doing these activities. Having the best day isn’t having the best life. You can have a great Tuesday and a wasted decade. You can have a brutal year and still live your best life. To lifemaxx, you have to think long-term and make decisions for a lifetime. This is also why the past doesn't save you. The athlete who hasn't trained in five years isn't really an athlete anymore. The writer who hasn't written in a decade isn't really a writer anymore. The executive who hasn't done meaningful work in a decade isn't really an executive anymore. The version of you that exists today is the version that counts. What you've done before is part of who you are, but doesn't make you who you are today. What you do consistently, day after day, over a lifetime, does. As Aristotle put it, "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." The flip side, if flourishing is built on what you do consistently from now on, then your past doesn't lock you in. The cigarette smoker who quit yesterday isn't a smoker anymore. The person who has been wasting their life until now can start flourishing tomorrow. The past is closed. The future is open. The only question is what you do with today. There are certain baseline things you need to flourish. To live your best life, you have to have certain baseline conditions. You can't flourish if you're starving, in chronic pain, surrounded by toxic relationships, or financially stressed out. Your body and surrounding circumstances have to be at least okay enough for you to be in a position to even think about flourishing. Aristotle lays them out as the following: Bodily goods Health Strength / vitality Beauty (think of this like taking care of your body and hygiene) Long life External goods Food, drink, clothing, shelter (he doesn't list these explicitly but they're implied) Wealth (but specifically, enough wealth, not max wealth. He's clear that excessive wealth doesn't add to flourishing) Good birth (born into a situation where you can improve your life) Good children Friends (and good friends, not just any friends) Political / social conditions A functioning society Some degree of leisure (you can't flourish if every waking hour is survival labor) Freedom from slavery and oppression FINALLY: Is looksmaxxing lifemaxxing? Ah yes, I’ve been waiting for this. Addressing the idea that you have to maximize how good you look to live your best life. First, I’ll concede that if you take a natural approach to looking good, then this would often check the boxes of bodily goods that improve health and vitality. As an extremely handsome and good looking man myself 💅, I do care about looking and feeling good. I lift weights, do challenging hikes and activities, push myself physically, and am conscious of what I put in my body. As a result, I am happy with how I look and feel. My physical shape and vitality levels are prizes that I have earned through years of consistent hard work and healthy choices. Unfortunately, that’s not what the "looksmaxxing is lifemaxxing" crowd is pushing for. Now before I go full unc, I’ll say that if I’m wrong about anything here, then I’ll laugh at myself for being a hater and take it back. But my understanding is that the belief of the "looksmaxxing is lifemaxxing" crowd is that you should go to any lengths to maximize how good you look. Some extreme examples I’ve heard are how Clavicular smokes meth to suppress his appetite or how Dillon Latham literally injected sperm into his face to make his eyes more puffy or something because it was “an absolute mog” or whatever. These may be the exceptions and not the norm, but the underlying idea is that it is acceptable to do things to improve your perceived physical appearance, even at the expense of your actual health and vitality. They aren’t moisturizing their faces for their health. They’re doing it out of vanity. Sitting in front of the mirror applying lotion, makeup, curling their eyelashes, and doing their hair doesn’t make them healthier. It doesn’t produce resources. It doesn’t make them smarter or improve their relationships. It doesn’t do any good for themselves or for the world. In fact, the epitome of looksmaxxing is reaching “mog” status. This is where someone who may or may not have any brainpower, skills, or value to the planet feels an unearned sense of superiority for positioning themselves next to people that they perceive to be inferior-looking so that they can feel they look better by comparison. This actually kills relationships and instead of contributing and actively seeks to harm the other person by belittling them. Looksmaxxing is actually just an immature, insecure, and vain lifeminnimzing activity that, in Aristotle’s terms, rots the soul. But the crazy part is that for someone like Clav, looksmaxxing could be his version of lifemaxxing. I know I know I sound crazy and contradictory, but hear me out. Looksmaxxing might genuinely be his best life. It probably gives him purpose. He may genuinely think he's helping other guys build confidence. Maybe it's his way of coping with something deeper. It certainly generates money for him. If he truly believes that he’s doing the right activities excellently by Aristotles definitions, then creating a looksmaxxing movement truly could be HIS version of lifemaxxing. But that's super unique to him and his life. Just because it's HIS version doesn't make it THE version. Being the leader of a movement that you believe is helping people and the follower of one for vain and selfish reasons are two totally different things. Flourishing is doing the right things, excellently, over a complete life, once the basics are in place. You have to find your own “right” things to do with your life. That's it. Now the questions becomes practical. What are the basics you need in place? What does "the right things" actually mean for you? How do you build the habits to do them consistently? What does doing these things with excellence look like for you? PS, there’s so much to cover, I wanted to give a few honorable mentions Aristotle wrote like 10 books on this. I just covered like a fraction of the notes I have from book 1 alone. Wanted to give a quick rundown of some interesting related concepts I jotted down in my notes, but didn’t cover. I feel like these could literally be their own posts: Why things that seem good temporarily aren't actually good To Aristotle, “desirable” and “good” are basically synonymous We all share basic desires (eat, drink, sleep) but also desire things we don’t need (looksmaxxing, views, dopamine hits, dating a supermodel) The dopamine hits seem good in the moment but may seem terrible later when you didn’t get any sleep and feel your brain rotting because you don’t have an attention span What he calls acquired desires (wants): based on individual experience, vary over time, only appear good Natural desires (needs): born with them, shared by all humans regardless of background Why taking action matters more than talent Aristotle says a happy man lives well and does well. Characteristics in happiness are all found in being. Someone virtue, wisdom, pleasure, external prosperity. In order to win (like in the Olympics) you have to compete. So those who compete win the noble and good things in life. This is a point that I like to make. You can’t win at life if you don’t play the game of life. If everything is certain, you know what will happen next, you can’t have good things happen to you. It’s not the most talented that win necessarily. It’s those who compete. So you could be the most talented content creator in the world, but if you never make content, you’ll never win and receive the benefits of being the most talented. To live your best life you must exercise virtue, not just have it. This touches on one reason why watching a powerful performance can make us emotional. Because you see someone living out their best lives and it reminds us that we’re not everything we are capable of and we know it. Good visual is a video game character who has stats sitting on the stand watching someone with lower stats win. Why living impulsively isn't your best life Aristotle talks about following passions, but not how we think of it today. Passions = impulse or desires. The person who “follows passions” pursues each successive object as passion directs. This is a key phrase where he’s describing someone whose life has no consistent direction. they chase whatever desire shows up next. Wake up, want pizza, get pizza. Feel bored, scroll. There’s no overarching principle organizing the choices; each one is just a reaction to the latest impulse. If you’re impulsive, you’re not living life, life is happening to you. Living your best life involves organizing your desires as opposed to just following impulses. submitted by /u/moonlite-money to r/selfimprovement [link] [comments]

I’m currently using Re’equil Oil-Free Moisturizer, but it doesn’t feel hydrating enough for me and tends to make me sweat. My skin type is normal 😁 submitted by /u/Nothingness_Person to r/IndianSkincareAddicts [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/Additional_Berry_977 to r/interestingasfuck [link] [comments]

I've been repurchasing the same moisturizer for 8 months now (the one on the right is my 7th tube and it is newly purchased). I have tried IWhite Korea Aqua Moisturizer Acne plus and Dr. Althea 345 cream but no one tops this. It gets pretty hot here during the summer. This moisturizer is lightweight and non-greasy. submitted by /u/EstySleepsALot to r/beautytalkph [link] [comments]

I just discovered my 4yo has covered my cat (8m) in human moisturizer. I’m about to wash him off now in the bath. Do I need to worry about skin absorption of toxins? (Pictures of cat and moisturizer ingredients) Update: thanks all! The cat has been washed with cat-safe soap. Luckily it was a water based moisturizer and it came off really easily. (She'd washed him before she moisturized him, so he isn't saturated with moisturize to the extent the picture suggests.) Child and I had a good conversation about why you don't moisturize the cat, or paint the cat or put anything on the cat. submitted by /u/ladymaggot to r/CATHELP [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/Right-Assignment3759 to r/interestingasfuck [link] [comments]