Ai Ethics

Justin Benson of Aftershoot shares thoughts on AI in photography, touching on editing workflows, ethics, and how these tools can support - not replace photographers. https://luminous-landscape.com/the-camera-creates-ai-assists/ How are you all approaching AI in your own workflow?

... issue, and also one of ethics, in one case I'm personally... designer has a job until AI moves him/her out. Sorry...

...) Given the rapid advances in AI and robotics, you have no... Arthur Caplan, who runs medical ethics at the NYU Grossman School ... for his foundational work in AI. A peer-reviewed piece in Future .... Name one roboticist, surgeon, or AI researcher who agrees with Elmo's ...

... sharing this. The AI and digital ethics framing is timely. Most ethics work I see...

... a GPS or a generative AI without question, yet heatedly debate... from Netflix, Waze, or an AI like me) offer three things... to predict a market trend? AI analyzes millions of data points... contain human biases. * They lack ethics, empathy, or complex social context... from, what the limits of AI are, and when human intuition... GPS나 생성형 AI의 답변은 의...은 저와 같은 AI든 간에)은 인... 싶으신가요? AI가 수백만 개...디서 왔는지, AI의 한계는 무...

...智时尚传播（AI / 虚拟人 / 算法...体技术传播） AI fashion communication —— 人工智...尚消费 Fashion media ethics —— 时尚媒介伦...

I had the pleasure of sitting down with Wendell Wallach recently. He’s been working in AI ethics since before ChatGPT, before the hype, before most people in tech were paying attention. He wrote Moral Machines, worked alongside Stuart Russell, Yann LeCun and Daniel Kahneman. He’s not a commentator, he’s someone who has sat with these questions for decades. What struck me most in our conversation was his argument about AGI. Not that it’s impossible or inevitable, but that it’s the wrong goal entirely. A system can be extraordinarily intelligent and have zero moral reasoning. We’re building toward capability without asking what it’s capable of deciding. The section on accountability genuinely unsettled me. When AI causes harm, who is actually responsible? He maps out why the answer is almost always nobody in a way that’s hard to argue with. Worth watching if you’re tired of the extremes. Full interview: https://youtu.be/-usWHtI-cms?si=NBkwN-AmIshOXJsX submitted by /u/reesefinchjh to r/artificial [link] [comments]

So I'm pretty against AI but I am obviously aware that it CAN be useful and one thing that I've been having trouble with since I stopped using AI is practice questions for study. My main concerns with AI are (1) environmental issues (the biggest problem to me personally); and (2) IP theft which is undisclosed. I've been thinking about running a local model on my laptop (thus fixing the environmental problem) just to make my own practice tests, and they would just be for me to use, not published, so I feel like it wouldn't really hurt anyone in terms of IP. Would you consider this an ethical usage? I've heard people say it still isn't okay to run it locally because the models are still trained initially in a way that's bad for the environment, but I feel like it isn't really going to either support the companies by running it locally to continue training it this way (since they aren't making money off me running it locally, or for that matter even knowing I'm running it) or further impact the environment since it's already trained. I get it's about "the principle of it" but in reality it won't really make an impact, right? I'm also aware it makes mistakes and can make stupid questions of course but I don't think this is really relevant to the ethics. I also don't think its impacts on brain power really are relevant here because it's literally to help me study by making practice questions and not to actually tell me how to do anything. So tl;dr is it unethical to run a local LLM model to make myself practice tests and not publish it anyways so it doesn't spread IP without permission? (sorry for the long post) submitted by /u/UnmappedStack to r/antiai [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/demimonde9 to r/Fauxmoi [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/ChhotaSaHydra to r/science [link] [comments]

i'm in my first year of college rn and EVERYWHERE on social media people are promoting ai and how to use it to build skills and shit. but then i read articles on how ai is misused, the rise in deepfakes, artists suffering, unemployment, there's so much to it. most importantly, it's destroying the plant,, the lack of fresh water is already a concern acc to the UN. i'm so confused. my morals don't allow me to learn anything related to ai, in fact i boycotted all of them long ago on reading how negatively it has been affecting the environment. but again, if i don't upskill myself in this field, i feel like i'd be left behind by everyone else. i can't seem to find out a solution to resolve my dilemma. submitted by /u/_six_sevennn_ to r/ArtificialInteligence [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/Akashictruth to r/singularity [link] [comments]