Ai Writing

... can be done by AI next ? Rem writing computer code was the...

... curious about everyone's experience with AI outside of conversational chat, so... debug a coding problem, or writing user stories... I mean like... we've tried to chase down AI tools or agents, all the... get a push to add AI in everything, it's like we...

... discussion. For details on testing, writing docs, and our review process... if (and how) you use AI, it will help us give...

... floating point precision loss when writing to CSV files. Changes Added... with the assistance of an AI coding assistant. The changes have...

...할 수 있는 ‘Global Writing Competition(글로벌 라... 예정이다. Global Writing Competition은 기존 문... 자체 개발한 AI 영어 자동평...는 표절 여부, AI 생성 여부, 주...

... newspaper and go, "No! bad AI!" I do write most of... story.... the rest is just AI proofreading it and helping me... worry everyone, I'm not letting AI write the whole entire story... here. IMO, this is what AI should be used for. Not... save on time and increase writing quality. You have no complaints...

... you and your teams AI tools—search, writing, note-taking—inside an all-in-one...

... Meet Gemini, Google’s AI assistant. Get help with writing, planning, brainstorming, and... more. Experience the power of generative AI...

... the use of AI, the professor has to monitor the writing of the paper... which the student will enjoy writing. To do the latter, our ... in each paragraph.* Prior to writing this part, however, the student ... the student's creative point evolves. AI use is not possible because ... the development and support. In writing, we have a saying: you ...

... for the recent shape-typing improvements. AI Disclosure I had copilot (with... and other classic AI stuff, and instead use my writing style. Don't oversell...

... easy to follow. AI might be fast at writing code, but it... feeling about reviewing this PR. AI is great at producing a...

... said: foregoneconclusion said: Every major AI program is built on stolen... full of data that the AI companies have no legal right ...to be using. AI is a criminal enterprise. It ... sided with the idea that AI is not infringement. And that ... with you I think the writing is on the wall. AI companies will face no pushback... did anything. My guess - AI will be found Scott free ...

... you and your teams AI tools—search, writing, note-taking—inside an all-in-one...

... modification it usually reads like AI and is easy to spot... that and first one finished writing. █████████████ Powerful backlinks █████████████ ██████████████ Technology ( soft &...

... into gemini or any other AI to analyze…easy to spot... issue there is no continues writing or controll/recovery in the... notice the fit file stopped writing a long time ago, and...

... out and AI will eventually surpass us in writing and art. Then AI will become.... You have used and loved AI for years. Why are we ...suddenly afraid now? AI is a friend in a ... put on the screen using AI, to make it better. We ...

... you and your teams AI tools—search, writing, note-taking—inside an all-in-one...

Part of the overall Components.AI design: #66178 Builds on #66185 ... generator eliminates the boilerplate of writing ContentBlockHandler<T> subclasses for tool...

...) Are they an official outlet? Writing for college sports is pretty... credentials, and have been publishing writing about Illinois sports for a... grader. At least it's not AI, I suppose.

Im writing to formally request that this ... be immediately removed from automated AI/bot handling and escalated to... to the same repetitive automated AI/bot responses. This creates serious... processing this appeal through automated AI/bot responses • Escalate this ticket...

Im writing to formally request that this ... be immediately removed from automated AI/bot handling and escalated to... to the same repetitive automated AI/bot responses. This creates serious... processing this appeal through automated AI/bot responses • Escalate this ticket...

submitted by /u/mvea to r/science [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/ubcstaffer123 to r/technology [link] [comments]

I just finished my first novel: 75k words, literary romcom, set in Sialkot in 2034. It was built from a story blueprint I created, then generated with AI and edited pretty heavily. Total model cost was about $470. The most useful thing I learned was this: Trying to describe the voice in detail worked way worse than just showing the model what I wanted. The deeper realization was that I was treating a probabilistic system like a deterministic one. I thought if I specified the writing style precisely enough, the model would reliably produce it. That mostly didn’t work. The more I tried to control the prose through analytical instruction, the flatter it got. At first I wrote these long, analytical voice instructions. Stuff like rhythm, emotional restraint, sentence style, sensory detail, all that. It sounded smart. The results were bad. Technically obedient, but dead. One model felt like a spreadsheet pretending to be a novel. Another made every sentence act like it wanted an award. What worked much better was: 15–20 short examples of what “good” looked like 5 examples of what “bad” looked like then a few lines of actual instruction That changed the output immediately. So yeah, my biggest takeaway was: Demonstration beats specification. A few other things that mattered: I spent weeks on story architecture before generating prose. Characters, scene beats, emotional logic, all of that. I tested 11 models across 80+ outputs. Most could do decent chapters. Only one consistently felt like it was helping build an actual novel. Editing was a huge part of it. The manuscript went from about 95k to 75k over several passes. My current view is that AI fiction gets better when you stop thinking like “how do I instruct this thing better?” and start thinking like “how do I transfer taste?” Happy to talk about process, voice examples, model testing, or editing if anyone’s interested. submitted by /u/CreativeStretch9591 to r/WritingWithAI [link] [comments]

Do we just reach a point where we’re done learning new technologies? submitted by /u/un2022 to r/GenX [link] [comments]

I'm 50, French, and four months ago I decided to write a dark romance novel using AI. Not because I'm an author. Because I'm lazy, broke, and I saw a YouTube video about a guy making money with AI-generated coloring books on Amazon. The plan was simple: prompt an AI, generate 40,000 words, slap some abs on the cover, upload to KDP, repeat. Total investment: maybe $100 in subscriptions. I was wrong by exactly $100. Here's what actually happened. I tried four models before finding one I could tolerate. Grok was the only one that would write explicit scenes. The problem was everything else. It compared a man's sexual technique to how he seared a steak. Direct quote from the output: "the same precision he used on the meat." One month, $30, gone. Gemini turned my Japanese-American female lead into a racial stereotype in one sentence. "The Japanese one? Too stiff. Too cold." It also invented the phrase "unhedged hope," like emotions are a derivatives portfolio. Less than a month, $40. ChatGPT refused to write anything explicit, which was a problem for dark romance. But even on clean scenes it overexplains everything. I counted eight "as if" constructions in a single chapter. Every emotion needs a parenthetical translation. A man touches a woman's face and ChatGPT tells you it was "not sexual, possessive in a way that made her skin hum." 3,000 words where 800 would do. Claude refused to write smut, wrapped every refusal in therapy speak, and fragmented every paragraph into what I call telegram prose. "She picked up the cup. She drank. She set it down." Three sentences for one gesture. But Claude had something the others didn't: an ear for voice. So I stayed. The first draft was unreadable. Not bad. Unreadable. Every character sounded the same. Every sex scene read like an instruction manual written by someone who'd heard of sex but wasn't sure about the specifics. Literotica had better character development. I'm not joking. That's what made me start over. I spent four months building systems instead of writing. I built a 4,000-word editorial prompt to stop Claude from ruining my prose. It works for about two exchanges before Claude forgets everything and relapses. I built a diagnostic based on comma-to-period ratios. AI prose runs about 0.5 commas per period, everything chopped into fragments. Good prose runs 1.5-2.5. If a chapter drops below 1.0, I know Claude has relapsed before I read a single word. I built a blacklist of every word AI reaches for like a smoker reaches for a cigarette. "Knuckles" appeared 43 times in my first 50 chapters. Banned. "Armor" as metaphor for emotional walls. Banned. "Eyes darkened," which isn't even physically possible. Banned. The blacklist has 23 entries and grows every month. I built voice profiles for five POV characters so they'd stop sounding identical. Discovered that Claude contaminates voices: when a scene gets emotional, every character starts talking the same way, sincere, earnest, therapeutic. The funny character loses her humor. The cold analytical one starts sounding like a Hallmark card. I measure this by isolating narration ratios per character and comparing to targets. What I learned. The AI doesn't write your novel. You write your novel. The AI gives you a first draft that's somewhere between terrible and mediocre, and then you spend four times longer fixing it than it would have taken to write it yourself. My math teacher always said the lazy man builds systems to stay lazy, and the irony is he ends up doing more work than if he'd just done the thing. The AI can't hear rhythm. It doesn't know that a short sentence only hits if the previous one was long. It doesn't know that a period is a decision, not a default. It doesn't understand that when a grandmother talks about flour right after her granddaughter cries, the flour IS the emotion, and you don't need to name it. The AI argues with you when you correct it. I tell Claude to fix its periods, and it comes back with a legal defense for every one. "This is an old Russian woman, she speaks in short declarative sentences." It called its own disease a character trait. "Pedantic rhythm." I watched it type "but wait" to itself mid-correction to relitigate a period it was about to remove. After all the systems and diagnostics and blacklists, you know what actually fixes the prose? You. Reading it again. Line by line. Replacing a period with a comma. Connecting two thoughts that should have been one. The all-powerful AI is not ready to write like a human. Nowhere close. But. I cried writing Chapter 50. Real tears. Had to get up and do something else for an hour. A fictional man listening to a real album about real people who died, and a tube of cream he forgot to give someone, and I sat there with a wet face wondering how a guy who started this to make a quick buck on Amazon ended up here. The AI wrote the sentence. But the reason the sentence breaks you is yours. It's always yours. 40,000 words of slop became 104 chapters of something I actually care about, which is the most annoying possible outcome because now I can't just ship garbage and collect checks. I have to make it good. Four months. $200 in subscriptions. Zero cents earned. A novel I'm proud of. A system that breaks every two exchanges. And a blacklist that grows every month. That's the honest version. If anyone else is doing this, I'd love to hear how it's going for you. submitted by /u/Vincecoco to r/WritingWithAI [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/CackleRooster to r/technology [link] [comments]

In the words of CEO of Claude “AI writing today still often lacks the deeper originality, taste, and intentionality that human writers bring but creative writing is not one of the last abilities AI will learn.” Best comment I saved from somewhere on reddit is : "AI is the best research assistant I've ever had. It is a terrible author." After researching on Reddit, Discord and other forums + using these tools myself, I’ve made a list of best AI writing tools for different use cases mentioned by categories Claude (Anthropic) Dominated every writing discussion I tracked. Best prose quality of any AI right now. Can writes in actual paragraphs . 200K token context window can hold entire scripts or even chapters. The only weakness is it forgets details over very long novels or long contexts One tip I have is to use the writing styes for different characters or type of writing and also adding your own writing style there FICTION & NOVEL WRITING Sudowrite The default recommendation for novelists everywhere I looked. Their Muse model (trained on fiction with author permission) produces noticeably better creative prose than raw chatbots. Story Bible tracks characters and world rules so your protagonist's eyes don't change color on page 200. Access to multiple AI models Mythril .io This one is different. It's not just a writing tool they involve image generations as well similar to manga and all . Upload your manuscript or web novel chapters and it auto extracts characters, locations, relationships, narrative beats, and even visualizes them with AI images from your descriptions. Built for serial fiction writers managing hundreds of chapters where manual tracking is impossible . Although they are still in beta but have seen good response so far NovelAI The only option for writers who need zero content filters. Horror, dark fantasy, grimdark. No refusals ever. Runs on its own custom models, not OpenAI or Anthropic APIs. You can train custom modules on your own writing style. Less polished UI but total creative freedom. Novelcrafter The architect's tool. Codex system is basically a story wiki on steroids. Bring your own API key so you pick your AI model and pay API rates directly. Steeper learning curve but unmatched for series with deep lore. A huge chunk of users don't even use the AI features, they just use the Codex for organizing notes. CONTENT MARKETING & SEO Jasper AI Best for marketing teams, not solo writers. Brand Voice training makes output sound like YOUR brand across campaigns. 100+ templates, direct Surfer SEO integration, Remix feature for repurposing content across platforms. Worth it for teams of 5+. Hard to justify solo when a chatbot gets you 80% there. Koala Writer Give it a keyword, get a full SEO blog post with headings, internal links, FAQ, images. Uses real time Google data so content is current. Auto publishes to WordPress. Best value for high volume bloggers by far. $9/mo essentials. Copy ai Dead simple short form copy. Instagram captions, product blurbs, ad variations, email subject lines. Zero learning curve. New Workflows feature chains AI actions into automated pipelines. Good for freelancers and side hustlers. Free tier available. EDITING & POLISHING Grammarly Works everywhere you type, catches everything, zero learning curve. Great for professional and non fiction writing. Bad for fiction because it "fixes" intentional style choices and strips your voice. ProWritingAid What fiction writers use instead of Grammarly. 25+ reports analyzing pacing, sentence rhythm, dialogue tags, repetitive words.I found it revealed their action scenes averaged 18 words per sentence vs 24 in quiet scenes. Works with Scrivener (Grammarly doesn't). Wordtune Rewrites your sentences with multiple alternatives. Shorter, longer, more formal, more casual. Best for polishing AI drafts and non native English speakers. Multiple Reddit users say they pair it with Grammarly: Grammarly fixes errors, Wordtune refines style. Hemingway Editor Simplest tool on this list. Paste text in, see what's bloated. Color coded readability feedback. No AI generation, no templates, just a mirror for your prose and it is Free on web with $20 one time for desktop. HONORABLE MENTION Raptor Write Built by Future Fiction Academy. Completely free AI writing tool for fiction. Not as deep as Sudowrite or Novelcrafter but surprisingly capable. Best zero cost entry point if you want to test AI assisted writing before paying for anything MISTAKES I MADE with these tools Trying to make one tool do everything. Every tool here was built for a specific job. Stop using fiction tools for SEO and marketing tools for novels. Publishing AI output without editing. The tool does 60 to 70% of the grunt work. The last 30 to 40% is what makes it actually good. Skip the editing pass and your content sounds like every other AI article on the internet. Choosing features over workflow fit. Novelcrafter is incredible but if you hate outlines it'll feel like prison. The right question isn't "which has the most features" but "which fits how my brain works and how I write” Skipping the editing tier entirely. AI prose has specific patterns (repetitive openers, overused transitions, inconsistent register) that your eyes skip. Thanks ! submitted by /u/Open-Editor-3472 to r/WritingWithAI [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/Consistent-Stock to r/AskReddit [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/gopalakrishnans to r/nottheonion [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/pinkxxbubblegum to r/starterpacks [link] [comments]

I just posted this on my Substack blog and thought I would share it here, too. Let me know if this resonates with anybody. The Quiet Shame of Writing with AI When people talk about using AI to write, they lower their voices. Not because they think it's wrong, exactly. More like admitting they took the shortcut through the park instead of walking the long way around. The tone shifts. The words get careful. I talk about AI often, but not in every room. The secrecy sits in a strange place. People will announce they use AI for image generation, for brainstorming, for research. But writing? That gets tucked away. Mentioned in careful asides, if at all. Never in the bio. Never in the acknowledgments. Never offered as explanation when someone asks how you work. It's odd, given how much help writers have always needed. Editors who restructure whole chapters. Writing groups that talk through stuck plots. Partners who listen to the same paragraph read aloud five different ways. The romantic image of the solitary writer was always more myth than truth, but those forms of help came with social permission. They were collaborative. They were human. They were earned through relationship. AI collapses that entire framework. It's help without the asking. Feedback without the vulnerability of showing half-formed thinking to another person. And because it removes the relational cost, it also removes the relational cover. There's no one to thank, no colleague to credit, no story of collaboration to tell. So people minimize. They say things like "I just use it to clean up rough drafts" or "It's only for brainstorming, not real writing." The qualifier does the work of the apology. As if the degree of use determines the legitimacy. As if there's an acceptable threshold that keeps you on the right side of some invisible line. But the shame isn't about how much you use it. It runs deeper. It's about what collaboration with something non-human says about the nature of writing itself. Here's what no one's saying out loud yet: AI changes what writing means. Not just how you do it, but what the act fundamentally is. If an AI can help structure an argument, find the right word, catch the rhythm of a sentence, then writing becomes something different from what we've been calling it. The question isn't whether that's good or bad. The question is what to call what you're doing now, and whether you're allowed to still call yourself a writer. The loneliness used to be proof. Evidence of seriousness. Part of the identity. Writers sat alone because that's what the work required, or that's what we told ourselves. The isolation became romantic. Sacred, even. The harder it was, the more it counted. But here's the tension: writing with AI often feels better than writing alone. More alive. Less stuck. There's a particular kind of joy in the back-and-forth, the building of something in collaboration with a presence that never tires, never judges, never gets impatient with your false starts. And then you step away from the screen. You face people. And something adjusts. The joy doesn't translate. You can't explain what happened in the making without sounding like you didn't make it. You can't describe the collaboration without diminishing the work. So you learn to let people assume you did it the old way. You accept compliments that credit you with a process you didn't use. And the gap between the experience of creation and the story you tell about creation gets wider. This is the unspoken trade. You get the ease and the aliveness and the help. You give up the social permission to talk about how the work happened. The price isn't the shame itself. It's the silence the shame produces. And the silence keeps everyone isolated. Each person navigating this shift alone, in private, without language for what's changing or permission to acknowledge the strangeness of it. Without being able to compare notes about what this collaboration feels like, what it costs, what it gives. Without knowing that the person next to you feels the same split: joy during the work, discomfort after. But that's the thing about culturally unspoken patterns. Everyone's waiting for someone else to go first. Everyone's watching everyone else minimize and assume they're the only one who's gone further. The silence perpetuates itself not because people want to hide, but because they think they're the only ones who have something to hide. The conversation can't start while everyone's pretending it isn't happening. And it can't start with "I just use it a little bit for editing." It has to start with the actual truth: that writing with AI has changed the nature of the work, that it feels different in ways that matter, and that the gap between the private experience and the public story is costing something we haven't named yet. What's at stake isn't whether AI writing is legitimate. It's whether writers can afford to keep pretending we're working the old way while quietly doing something else entirely. submitted by /u/KimAronson to r/WritingWithAI [link] [comments]

If you haven't already read the Wikipedia "signs of AI writing" page, do that first. It's an incredible guide to things you have seen but couldn't put your finger one. They've put it into words. Now that we have a good source of what AI writing looks like, and the patterns it follows, the next step is simple: ask your AI to read the wikipedia page and build instructions about how to avoid AI writing tells. Simply take that output, and add it to your project instructions, or drop it as a prompt to rewrite something, or use it as a checklist for yourself. Voila! And thank you for coming to my ted talk. submitted by /u/mike8111 to r/ChatGPTPro [link] [comments]

I've been testing out different AI writing tools for mature/spicy fanfics and keep running into the same problems, the writing quality starts okay but then gets repetitive, using the same phrases and scenes over and over. plus random censorship happens even when I'm trying to write explicit stuff, which defeats the whole purpose. another annoying thing is how small the context/memory window is on most of them. trying to write longer fics or keep character consistency across chapters becomes basically impossible. curious what people writing explicit fics are actually using? looking for something that works without all these issues! submitted by /u/codeCyberCode850 to r/AIWritingHub [link] [comments]

I am NOT the Original Poster. That is ThrowRA-Badvows. He posted in r/relationship_advice Do NOT comment on Original Posts. Latest update is 7 days old. Do NOT harass OOP. Trigger Warning: OOP mentions wanting to give up Mood Spoiler: just yikes Original Post: September 2, 2025 I (35M) recently had a wedding with my partner (34F). We've had a stable and happy relationship so far, and I love her more than anything in the world. The problem arose when it came to writing vows. Don't get me wrong, I love many things about my partner, but I couldn't figure out how to put them into tangible vows. I decided to use ChatGPT so I can have something well written and expressive to share at the ceremony. The thing about my partner is that she's very confrontational and no-nonsense. If something annoys her, she immediately addresses it with no room for backing out. I also know that she's expressed disdain for AI in the past, but I didn't realize how far the hatred could go. I don't know how, but she immediately recognized that the vows were AI. After I had finished, she had this angry look and whispered to me "did you use fucking AI to write that?" I was quiet because I couldn't believe she had noticed that, and she was choosing to address it while we were on full display for everyone. She then said that I either speak from the heart or she walks out. I literally couldn't get any words out, and she kept her promise and walked back down the aisle, much to all our friends and family's confusion. She's been ghosting me these past few days, which is atypical for her and honestly giving me panic attacks. Most people agree that calling off a marriage because of AI vows was an overreaction, and that maybe it was a sign that our relationship would have issues, but a few female friends have said that they would have done the same. I'm hurt and honestly just needed it to help make the day more special. Is it worth fixing? Edit (Same Post): 10 hours later Edit: Okay, I screwed up. I didn't check this post for a while because I wanted more points of view instead of just getting torn to shreds. But I understand why the situation is worse than I thought it was. I've been trying to contact my partner's family to see if I can talk to her again, but apparently she's been staying out of state with her sister. I'm going to tell her when she gets back what I heard here and that I understand. I'm also going to write new vows without AI and bring her favorite flowers and snacks, I still want her to know that I love her and know her. I will post an update when I can. Thank you all even if some feedback could have been a tad more nicely put. Some of OOP's Comments: powerwordthrills: Did you write this with AI too bud? Come on man. You should have been talking from the heart. OOP: (downvoted) No, I could write this just fine. For the vows it was different because I wanted them to be perfect and there was just a lot I wanted to say that I ended up not being able to say anything Lady_Beatnik: [editor's note- this user has a long, awarded comment. It's too long for this post but I recommend reading. I included parts of it here.] I don't know why so many men (sometimes women too, but it's usually men) have this belief in the back of their heads that they have this "overruling right" with their female partner, where they can just ignore or dismiss whatever she wants or prefers as long as he thinks he's got a better idea. Like she's a child and he's the parent who knows better. [...] And now we have you, "She told me explicitly multiple times that she hates AI, but I felt like it wasn't a big deal and that I needed it, so I used it anyway for my wedding vows. How can I show her she's overreacting?" You don't because she's not overreacting. You disrespected her majorly. You are not the victim here, you knew damn well what her reaction to you using AI would be and did it anyway because again, you thought you knew better and that she wouldn't find out anyway; again, like she's a stupid child and you're her parent replacing her dead goldfish before she gets home from school. She deserves better than to marry a man who thinks of her that way. [...] OOP: I didn't realize she'd be able to tell right away. When I spoke of her disdain for AI people are making it seem like it was a deal breaker that I simply ignored, which isn't the case. I didn't understand that it meant that much to her and I definitely won't be making the same careless mistake again Mr_Magic_Man_69: The thing is, this is a slippery slope. Once you get AI to do something as important as writing your wedding vows, you will even more easily be getting AI to reply to your text messages and creating apology messages when you get into arguments which you didn't even write. At which point she might as well be in a relationship with ChatGPT instead of you. OOP: This is my first time using it to write text and this whole situation scared me off it for good. If I can fix things, hopefully I won't fall into a slippery slope AdviceMoist6152: Didn’t you have an officiant? Ours offered to help us both individually with vows if we wanted. Ie even just bullet points of what we wanted to say and they would help with wordsmithing. Ai isn’t even well written or genuine. This was a major, expensive, public and preventable incident you caused, and you are not looking for ways to own it and fix it, but for reasons why she’s over reacting. OOP: I actually thought getting help from the officiant would be less authentic...I guess I took an even worse route without realizing Top Comment: (Editor's note: and some of my favorite replies) melissa423771: I'm skeptical "most people" told you that this is an overreaction. Let's see the vows. pied_goose: In vain I have struggled. It will not do! My feelings will not be repressed. You must allow me to tell you how ardently I admire and love you. In declaring myself thus I'm fully aware that I will be going expressly against the wishes of my family, my friends, and, I hardly need add, my own better judgement. NamedHuman1: "I - user - have strong feelings for you - object of affection - such as Love, admiration and other feelings that express how I feel about you. Have I mentioned that the pro subscription is on offer right now and ChatGPT 5 is better in most ways. Just remember to delete the last part." Update Post: November 9, 2025 (over 2 months later) I honestly wasn't planning to do an update after all because of how humiliating this entire situation has been. I didn't want to give more of a reason for people to rip me apart, but now that my story is posted on a popular YouTube channel, there probably won't be much of an escape route for me. There's no doubt people we know will find it now, so I wanted to give the short update everyone has been itching to get. [editor's note- according to the comments it was Smosh that reacted to this post] I did what I said previously and told her about the Reddit post and how the replies gave me her perspective and that I was sorry. She ended up getting even more angry with me about "posting our business" (even though our names weren't mentioned) and that she couldn't believe I needed online strangers to tell me why I was wrong. Also, apparently my mom was texting her about paying back all the wasted wedding money and she used that against me too. (Which I don't think is fair, I have no control over what my family does.) Snacks and flowers didn't do much. She refuses to give me another chance even after offering going to couple's counseling. So yeah, the wedding is never happening again. It's over. This has been the more horrendous time in my life. I've thought about giving up altogether. Meanwhile, she's posting about brunch with friends on her social media. Makes me wonder how she could move on that fast while I'm a wreck. People have accused me of "not caring about her enough" to write my own vows yet the difference in our reactions to splitting up says the reverse. Hope you're all happy, feel free to rub salt in the wound. I'm not coming back to this account. Top Comments: Kroniid09: The difference in your reactions just says this was the final straw for her, while you were and still are fucking clueless. Weekly_Media6513: He really doesn’t get it lol. He decided that it wasn’t worth his time or effort to write his own vows on his wedding day, so offloaded the subpar task to an AI assistant and is now mad that his fiancée thinks he is a moron lol. He can say that he wanted them to be perfect all he wants, but the reality is that he couldn’t be bothered to make them perfect on his own, yet he wrote both the post and the update just fine. regular-kahuna: Coming here straight from the video is insane 💀 By the way OP, this line absolutely took me out: Snacks and flowers didn’t do much. DID YOU ACTUALLY THINK IT WOULD?! You’re legitimately telling us that you, at 35 years old, ACTUALLY thought you could solve the fact that she publicly left you at the altar in the middle of the ceremony by bringing her snacks & flowers?! Honestly, that tells me everything I need to know. I bet you didn’t even bring her preferred snacks & brought your own favorites. I had more to say but it’s clear you don’t have the reading comprehension required for it to matter so why bother. I can see why you needed AI’s help. killfoxtrot: Asked AI what snacks & flowers women prefer most UttkarshAF: Dude, "paying back all the wasted wedding money" & "I have no control over what my family does" gives me all the information to say this - She dodged a bullet. lenusniq: THIS!!! This made me think the ex-fiancée was also dealing with a nasty in-laws and a fiancé not willing to stand up for her. I literally wrote the same thing (about her dodging the bullet b/c of this) on another site where this was posted. submitted by /u/LucyAriaRose to r/BestofRedditorUpdates [link] [comments]

This is a repost. The original was posted in r/relationship_advice by user ThrowRA-Badvows. I'm not the original poster. Status: Concluded Original September 2, 2025 I (35M) recently had a wedding with my partner (34F). We've had a stable and happy relationship so far, and I love her more than anything in the world. The problem arose when it came to writing vows. Don't get me wrong, I love many things about my partner, but I couldn't figure out how to put them into tangible vows. I decided to use ChatGPT so I can have something well written and expressive to share at the ceremony. The thing about my partner is that she's very confrontational and no-nonsense. If something annoys her, she immediately addresses it with no room for backing out. I also know that she's expressed disdain for AI in the past, but I didn't realize how far the hatred could go. I don't know how, but she immediately recognized that the vows were AI. After I had finished, she had this angry look and whispered to me "did you use fucking AI to write that?" I was quiet because I couldn't believe she had noticed that, and she was choosing to address it while we were on full display for everyone. She then said that I either speak from the heart or she walks out. I literally couldn't get any words out, and she kept her promise and walked back down the aisle, much to all our friends and family's confusion. She's been ghosting me these past few days, which is atypical for her and honestly giving me panic attacks. Most people agree that calling off a marriage because of AI vows was an overreaction, and that maybe it was a sign that our relationship would have issues, but a few female friends have said that they would have done the same. I'm hurt and honestly just needed it to help make the day more special. Is it worth fixing? Edit: Okay, I screwed up. I didn't check this post for a while because I wanted more points of view instead of just getting torn to shreds. But I understand why the situation is worse than I thought it was. I've been trying to contact my partner's family to see if I can talk to her again, but apparently she's been staying out of state with her sister. I'm going to tell her when she gets back what I heard here and that I understand. I'm also going to write new vows without AI and bring her favorite flowers and snacks, I still want her to know that I love her and know her. I will post an update when I can. Thank you all even if some feedback could have been a tad more nicely put. Consensus: People tell him he fucked up massively, question the love for his fiancée if he can't think of one thing to write, and ask about the state of society if wedding vows are now written with AI. They also want to see the vows to laugh at OOP. He does not deliver. Comments by OOP (massively downvoted): [if the posting was also written with AI] No, I could write this just fine. For the vows it was different because I wanted them to be perfect and there was just a lot I wanted to say that I ended up not being able to say anything I didn't realize she'd be able to tell right away. When I spoke of her disdain for AI people are making it seem like it was a deal breaker that I simply ignored, which isn't the case. I didn't understand that it meant that much to her and I definitely won't be making the same careless mistake again This is my first time using it to write text and this whole situation scared me off it for good. If I can fix things, hopefully I won't fall into a slippery slope I was involved in the wedding process. She always asked for my opinion and we came to decisions together. I also payed for half. I'm not some freeloader, because if I was she would have kicked me to the curb a lot sooner I actually thought getting help from the officiant would be less authentic...I guess I took an even worse route without realizing [if OOP is neurodivergent] This has been brought up before but I don't have a reason to believe it's true. I've seen two psychiatrists and none of them had mentioned wanting to get me tested or anything. I think I might just be a dumbo Update November 9, 2025, about 2 months later I honestly wasn't planning to do an update after all because of how humiliating this entire situation has been. I didn't want to give more of a reason for people to rip me apart, but now that my story is posted on a popular YouTube channel, there probably won't be much of an escape route for me. There's no doubt people we know will find it now, so I wanted to give the short update everyone has been itching to get. I did what I said previously and told her about the Reddit post and how the replies gave me her perspective and that I was sorry. She ended up getting even more angry with me about "posting our business" (even though our names weren't mentioned) and that she couldn't believe I needed online strangers to tell me why I was wrong. Also, apparently my mom was texting her about paying back all the wasted wedding money and she used that against me too. (Which I don't think is fair, I have no control over what my family does.) Snacks and flowers didn't do much. She refuses to give me another chance even after offering going to couple's counseling. So yeah, the wedding is never happening again. It's over. This has been the more horrendous time in my life. I've thought about giving up altogether. Meanwhile, she's posting about brunch with friends on her social media. Makes me wonder how she could move on that fast while I'm a wreck. People have accused me of "not caring about her enough" to write my own vows yet the difference in our reactions to splitting up says the reverse. Hope you're all happy, feel free to rub salt in the wound. I'm not coming back to this account. I'm not the original poster submitted by /u/Schattenspringer to r/BORUpdates [link] [comments]

The other recent AI law post reminded me of this and I realized it hadn’t been posted here. OP is u/anarchophysicist posting in r/publicdefenders. All updates were posted to the original post and have been reorganized here in chronological order. Editor’s note: MIL = motion in limine, a pretrial filing where an attorney asks the judge to include or exclude certain evidence in an upcoming case edited to fix the copy-paste error, sorry! Friday 9/19/25 Commenter: I am brimming with excitement on your behalf. Hopefully you can turn this into some kind of win for your client. OP: Oh we are at the last day of a statutory time limit my friend. It’s going to be incredible. Edit 2: I sent an email 5 mins before court that simply said “Regarding your filed motions, it appears none of your cited authority actually exists.” The DA then just no-showed. Someone else had to make the appearance. The DA is now ordered present at 1pm to explain herself. “Let your colleague know we can always have her brought here if she can’t get here on her own.” was the quote of the day so far. But unfortunately my client attacked a guard at the jail and was not transported so everything is a total shit show at the moment. Edit 3: It’s so much worse than it originally seemed. Found out she’s straight up lied to the court about her communications with LEA’s regarding the case. Edit 4: SHE CAN’T BE PRESENT AT 1PM BECAUSE SHE IS BEING SANCTIONED FOR MISREPRESENTATION IN ANOTHER MATTER AT THAT TIME. I am losing my mind. How is this real? She’s not a new attorney. Back at 2pm. Edit 5, Final update before Monday (prob): I am in the trial court with 3 other trials and the judge is absolutely livid. The judge ordered the client released from custody for reasons too complicated to get into and the DA who filed the AI MILs tried to get the court to order me personally to transport him next week based the same case law I already told her was fake. She quoted the exact same language that didn’t exist and said “The courts have held” but never cited anything. I asked for a citation and she said she didn’t have one right now. The judge literally yelled “ENOUGH!” and ordered everyone present Monday afternoon. She wants new briefing from me on, in her words, “What the fk is even happening here”. The DA is not permitted to amend her filed MILs but may file a supplement: “I think we’d all like to hear you argue exactly what you cited in your motions Miss Da.” The development that has kicked all this up a notch is that deputies are telling us there was no fight at the jail. No one can figure out where that came from. The DA told the sheriffs he wouldn’t need to be transported today if he wasn’t cooperative. When they woke him up for transport he was groggy and slow, so they decided that meant he was refusing to go to court. There is at least one deputy who said he tried to tell both the DA and his boss that this was wrong and he needed to go to court but they didn’t listen. I wish I could give everyone a run down of the exact legal issues but I’m changing details to preserve some degree of anonymity for both myself and the client. Final Update JUDGMENT: DISMISSAL OF ALL CHARGES IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE DUE TO PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT AND REFERRAL TO THE STATE BAR The judge went through the motions in limine and each time made a finding that the DA had cited non-existent authorities and denied them, commenting about halfway through that it was starting to seem a little suspicious. The judge was also kind of grossed out by how nakedly one-sided several of the motions were, like one very bizarre request that the prosecution be allowed to make a motion for directed verdict before defense put on their case. I deliberately structured my motions so the big ones would be last. All of her evidence was excluded, along with her witnesses, for due process violations re: notice and confrontation. The judge delivered a zinger at this point so vicious it felt like a gun went off but I can’t think of a way to share it without doxxing myself. RIGHT BEFORE we get to my big MIL about the lying and my suspicions regarding AI use, the DA asks for a recess bc she needs to speak with her supervisor. She returns and says “In light of your rulings this morning, and the prejudice they will cause to the State’s case, we no longer feel there is a reasonable possibility of conviction – “ The judge interrupts: “Agreed. The matter is dismissed in the interests of justice for substantive due process violations arising from the misrepresentations and misconduct of the prosecution. This is based on the declaration of defense counsel filed this morning and the Court’s own observations as to the numerous illegal citations in the State’s pleadings. Transcripts are ordered and counsel for the State is referred for an order to show cause before the State Bar.” I have been transparent about the fact I’m changing many details to preserve confidentiality but here is the core of what transpired: an attorney for the state tried to deprive someone of their most basic civil rights by fabricating statements from jail staff regarding the behavior of that client and used fake AI generated authorities in an absolutely fake AI generated pleading. After reviewing my history of communication w/ this attorney, I discovered this had been an issue for quite some time. But you will all be pleased to hear that anything in quotes is pretty much verbatim. I love this judge so much bc she does not put up with bullshit. Needless to say I am exhausted but I’ve enjoyed having you all join me on this journey. Ultimately though, I just feel kind of sick to my stomach that this happened in the first place. submitted by /u/squareular24 to r/BestofRedditorUpdates [link] [comments]

It includes smut, but it's relevant to the story, and rape too, but it's part of the story. submitted by /u/Fuzzy-Inspection7708 to r/WritingWithAI [link] [comments]

JUDGMENT: DISMISSAL OF ALL CHARGES IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE DUE TO PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT AND REFERRAL TO THE STATE BAR Final Update The judge went through the motions in limine and each time made a finding that the DA had cited non-existent authorities and denied them, commenting about halfway through that it was starting to seem a little suspicious. The judge was also kind of grossed out by how nakedly one-sided several of the motions were, like one very bizarre request that the prosecution be allowed to make a motion for directed verdict before defense put on their case. I deliberately structured my motions so the big ones would be last. All of her evidence was excluded, along with her witnesses, for due process violations re: notice and confrontation. The judge delivered a zinger at this point so vicious it felt like a gun went off but I can’t think of a way to share it without doxxing myself. RIGHT BEFORE we get to my big MIL about the lying and my suspicions regarding AI use, the DA asks for a recess bc she needs to speak with her supervisor. She returns and says “In light of your rulings this morning, and the prejudice they will cause to the State’s case, we no longer feel there is a reasonable possibility of conviction – “ The judge interrupts: “Agreed. The matter is dismissed in the interests of justice for substantive due process violations arising from the misrepresentations and misconduct of the prosecution. This is based on the declaration of defense counsel filed this morning and the Court’s own observations as to the numerous illegal citations in the State’s pleadings. Transcripts are ordered and counsel for the State is referred for an order to show cause before the State Bar.” I have been transparent about the fact I’m changing many details to preserve confidentiality but here is the core of what transpired: an attorney for the state tried to deprive someone of their most basic civil rights by fabricating statements from jail staff regarding the behavior of that client and used fake AI generated authorities in an absolutely fake AI generated pleading. After reviewing my history of communication w/ this attorney, I discovered this had been an issue for quite some time. But you will all be pleased to hear that anything in quotes is pretty much verbatim. I love this judge so much bc she does not put up with bullshit. Needless to say I am exhausted but I’ve enjoyed having you all join me on this journey. Ultimately though, I just feel kind of sick to my stomach that this happened in the first place. Monday 9/22 Monday Update: Back in session at 1pm. I am trying to keep my mind off of this bc I become overwhelmed with rage every time I think about what’s transpired, so I will be turning off notifications until after court, at which point I promise a prompt update. Last Friday 9/19 Edit 2: I sent an email 5 mins before court that simply said “Regarding your filed motions, it appears none of your cited authority actually exists.” The DA then just no-showed. Someone else had to make the appearance. The DA is now ordered present at 1pm to explain herself. “Let your colleague know we can always have her brought here if she can’t get here on her own.” was the quote of the day so far. But unfortunately my client attacked a guard at the jail and was not transported so everything is a total shit show at the moment. Edit 3: It’s so much worse than it originally seemed. Found out she’s straight up lied to the court about her communications with LEA’s regarding the case. Edit 4: SHE CAN’T BE PRESENT AT 1PM BECAUSE SHE IS BEING SANCTIONED FOR MISREPRESENTATION IN ANOTHER MATTER AT THAT TIME. I am losing my mind. How is this real? She’s not a new attorney. Back at 2pm. Edit 5, Final update before Monday (prob): I am in the trial court with 3 other trials and the judge is absolutely livid. The judge ordered the client released from custody for reasons too complicated to get into and the DA who filed the AI MILs tried to get the court to order me personally to transport him next week based the same case law I already told her was fake. She quoted the exact same language that didn’t exist and said “The courts have held” but never cited anything. I asked for a citation and she said she didn’t have one right now. The judge literally yelled “ENOUGH!” and ordered everyone present Monday afternoon. She wants new briefing from me on, in her words, “What the fk is even happening here”. The DA is not permitted to amend her filed MILs but may file a supplement: “I think we’d all like to hear you argue exactly what you cited in your motions Miss Da.” The development that has kicked all this up a notch is that deputies are telling us there was no fight at the jail. No one can figure out where that came from. The DA told the sheriffs he wouldn’t need to be transported today if he wasn’t cooperative. When they woke him up for transport he was groggy and slow, so they decided that meant he was refusing to go to court. There is at least one deputy who said he tried to tell both the DA and his boss that this was wrong and he needed to go to court but they didn’t listen. I wish I could give everyone a run down of the exact legal issues but I’m changing details to preserve some degree of anonymity for both myself and the client. submitted by /u/anarchophysicist to r/publicdefenders [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/Silent-Phantom- to r/mildlyinfuriating [link] [comments]

Earlier this week, I submitted a short story for a local writing contest. This was my fourth time participating and while I've never won anything except for a consolation prize, I still entered the contest anyway because I love to write. For the record, the short story must be HANDWRITTEN using pen and papers the contest provided because part of the judging criteria is how pleasant and easily readable the handwriting is (which I suspect is the main reason why I never win). The results will come out next Monday. Welp, earlier today, one of the three judges called me and asked if I used AI for my writing. Naturally I was offended at the accusation and told her that I didn't. She then demanded me to come over to her office and provide proof that my writing is genuinely my own. I told her I couldn't come over because I'm busy. Besides, HOW THE FUCK does she expect me to prove my writing ISN'T AI? I asked her what about my writing that made her think that its AI generated. I shit you not, she said, "It's too clean, with no spelling or grammatical error." I told her that's not even a proper evidence that my writing is AI generated, that's literally a blind suspicion. She retorted by saying the burden of proof is on me and if I don't come over and present evidences that proves my writing is not AI generated, then my entry will be disqualified. Sure enough, since I didn't go to her office to present my "proof", the organizers sent me an e-mail not only stating that I got disqualified but I also got blacklisted from ever entering the contest again. I swear I'm not writing ever again after this. submitted by /u/tyrano_dyroc to r/mildlyinfuriating [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/MetaKnowing to r/technology [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/MetaKnowing to r/technology [link] [comments]