Laundry Detergent Sheets Comparison

... vinegar is bigger than my laundry detergent. 😂 If people would go... every time I change my sheets. 🤣 Do people not do ... medical issues that pale in comparison to what others are dealing ...

...your mother was." The comparison hit like a stomach punch, ... the scent of lavender laundry detergent mixed with something sour, my...My fingers twisted in the sheets until the knuckles ached, imagining ... your mother was." The comparison hit like a stomach punch, ... the scent of lavender laundry detergent mixed with something sour, my ...My fingers twisted in the sheets until the knuckles ached, imagining ...

... was a look of assessment. Comparison. The brother-alarm blared louder. This... old books and my own laundry detergent. And of her, sitting across.... My bed was unmade, the sheets a tangled mess. She didn't ..., not caring about the tangled sheets or her own nakedness. "Was... scent of her on my sheets, the wet spot on the ...

I originally posted this in r/Lighting but i figured anyone into nerdy LED stuff would find it interesting(may have typos): A while ago i wrote some extremely long posts on CRI, CCT, SPD and DUV that cover a lot of jargon and acronys. Ill explain all the ones not used in those posts but i dont want to rewrite too much so i would check this before: https://www.reddit.com/r/Lighting/comments/1rudpsc/a_primerfaq_on_cri/ Its often said that violet pump white LEDs(WLED from here on) are superior and they are used in some of the best LEDs you can buy in terms of color rendering. Those include names like Soraa, Sunsy Shine, Yuji Sunwave and Waveform Absolute. In this post I will be using some jargon that was explained in my previous posts on CRI and CCT to keep this less than a mile long. Only new stuff will be completely broken down. Most WLEDs use a 450nm visible blue LED coated with a phosphor that converts that short 450nm light into longer wavelengths, which is how they make white light. The underlying blue LED is called the "pump" LED. This shapes the spectral power distribution(SPD) of many WLEDs to have a nasty spike where the blue light punches through the phosphor coating in excessive amounts. Cheap high color temp LEDs are notorious for this, and while the blue light is useless *glare* it still counts towards luminous efficacy! That's how some manufacturers cheat. A violet pump WLED uses the same principle but shortens the wavelength of the pump LED to somewhere around 410-420nm, which makes it closer to the ultraviolet part of the spectrum. I wondered what the advantage of this is beyond the usual marketing speak about "eliminating the blue spike". But there *are* some blue pump WLEDs with very low blue spikes like the Philips Ultra Def 2700K but not the new crappier 5000K, some Yuji, Waveform, Emery Allen etc. So why go to all the trouble i wondered? Turns out there is another HUGE advantage of using violet pumps that gets almost no discussion. Real daylight *and* halogens/incandescents all include visible violet and some invisible UV in their spectra, in varying proportions. Incandescents produce less than halogens and halogens less than daylight. Some materials will react to higher energy, short wavelength light. UV, visible violet or even visible blue light can make different materials *fluoresce*. They glow by reemitting the light that strikes them as a longer wavelength. If the light that strikes them is invisible UV and you're in a dark room, the objects will appear to glow in the dark. However, the UV in daylight or even in halogen/incandescent bulbs is enough to make materials fluoresce! That changes the color and brightness that objects appear *when brightly lit as well*. There is a huge, little known industry revolving around this phenomenon that produces chemicals called optical brightening agents(OBA) that they put in tons of things you see and use every day like fabrics, paper, laundry detergents and plastics of all kinds. They are used to make white materials fluoresce a bluish color, which makes them look *whiter* since the OBAs in the clothing or paper reemitting bluish light which they convert from invisible UV basically shifts their white balance. This can counteract the natural, slightly dingy look of untreated cotton or paper, which often absorbs more blue than yellow making it look dingy. OBAs are added to laundry detergent to literally make the clothing fluoresce. If you have a blacklight or ever played with one, you know your white clothing will glow and some laundry detergents will also glow vividly. They're also in tons of colored objects as well! Blue pump LEDs can't make these OBAs fluoresce blueish due to physics: phosphor conversion can only take shorter wavelengths and convert them to longer ones. This is key. If the shortest wavelength the blue pump LED emits is already visible blue light, it can only make an object *reflect* blue light. Since the blue spike is undesireable, and since a lot of materials with OBAs added naturally absorb blue light more than longer wavelengths, cloth and paper or anything with OBAs added may look dull or dingy when lit by even very high CRI blue pump LEDs when compared to daylight or incandescents. Not only are chemicals that fluoresce added to all sorts of stuff, but a lot of natural materials will fluoresce to some degree from specific regions of the visible violet to UV parts of the spectrum. This finally brings us to the actual LEDs. A *violet* pump's SPD begins significantly closer to the UV part of the spectrum around 410nm, and therefore covers more of the entire spectrum than blue pumps which start around 450nm. That 40nm extra changes the overall shape of a violet pump WLED's SPD significantly, making it more like incandescents at 2700K-4000K and more like daylight at 5000K or higher. That 40 extra nanometers of wavelengths also activates optical brighteners and natural fluorescent materials more like real daylight or incandescent bulbs do! That little discussed fact is actually a HUGE benefit of violet pump WLEDs! This object fluorescence and "white rendering" is not taken into consideration properly by CRI or TM-30. The only real way to account for it is to examine the SPD of a light source. Its a bummer that the high CRI violet pump LEDs are so expensive. A single A19 60W equivalent is about $25 at a minimum. So 10x a blue pump 95 CRI or 100 CRI incandescent/halogen. Pretty much any LED is super efficient, but violet pumps are among the least efficient as well, so with stupid overregulation of consumer light bulbs, its likely to stay a niche product. All of the acronyms or jargon used were covered in plain English here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Lighting/comments/1rzviiw/a_primer_on_spd_cct_and_duv/ Appendix: I should probably clarify a couple of things, maybe more. The fact that these violet pump WLEDs include some violet light in their spectrum is neither harmful or intended to make objects visibly glow in the conventional sense. Real daylight and incandescent bulbs both include UV and violet light in their spectra. For incandescents the amount of UV in relation to their overall light output is tiny. Its more with daylight but still not a large portion of its actual light is in UV on earth, due to the atmosphere filtering out all UVC and much of the UVB and UVA, as well as some of the visible spectrum. Hence, daylight's lumpy but not spiky SPD graph at any CCT in its wide range. Similarly, violet pump WLEDs include some violet(no UV) and its a tiny amount in relation to their overall output. The violet light in real daylight and incan/halogen will cause objects to fluoresce or glow, but it doesnt look like the kind of thing you'd see in a dark room with a blacklight as the only light source at all. The fluorescence of objects under daylight, incan/halogen or violet pump LEDs manifests as bright white clothing and paper, or vividly colored paint, plastic and glass which have OBAs added or have nautral fluorescence in their chemical makeup. So its more that a tablecloth or sheet of paper will look crisp bright white under daylight, incan/halogen or violet pump LEDs without a dingy or dull appearance that may happen with even a very high CRI blue pump LED. The main drawback to violet pump LEDs is their low luminous efficacy as i mentioned, which also means for a given luminance they generate more heat, which is bad for LEDs and they typically need big expensive heatsinks compared to blue pumps. For comparison, a 60W incandescent has a luminous efficacy of 13 lumens/Watt. A blue pump 60W equivalent is usually between100-200 lumens/Watt. While a violet pump is about 60-70 lumens/Watt. The violet pumps are still super efficient compared to incan/halogen but much lower than even the least efficient blue pumps. Edit to add: I was incorrect about the luminous efficacy. Apparently Yuji Sunwave is up to 110 lumens/Watt, putting it on par with high CRI blue pumps. They are incredibly expensive though! submitted by /u/Lipstickquid to r/flashlight [link] [comments]

Previously i wrote two rather long posts detailing the intracacies of CRI, CCT, SPD and DUV. Those would be worth reading before reading this, since this will use terminology that was broken down into plain English in those posts. https://www.reddit.com/r/Lighting/comments/1rudpsc/a_primerfaq_on_cri/ Its often said that violet pump white LEDs(WLED from here on) are superior and they are used in some of the best LEDs you can buy in terms of color rendering. Those include names like Soraa, Sunsy Shine, Yuji Sunwave and Waveform Absolute. In this post I will be using some jargon that was explained in my previous posts on CRI and CCT to keep this less than a mile long. Only new stuff will be completely broken down. Most WLEDs use a 450nm visible blue LED coated with a phosphor that converts that short 450nm light into longer wavelengths, which is how they make white light. The underlying blue LED is called the "pump" LED. This shapes the spectral power distribution(SPD) of many WLEDs to have a nasty spike where the blue light punches through the phosphor coating in excessive amounts. Cheap high color temp LEDs are notorious for this, and while the blue light is useless *glare* it still counts towards luminous efficacy! That's how some manufacturers cheat. A violet pump WLED uses the same principle but shortens the wavelength of the pump LED to somewhere around 410-420nm, which makes it closer to the ultraviolet part of the spectrum. I wondered what the advantage of this is beyond the usual marketing speak about "eliminating the blue spike". But there *are* some blue pump WLEDs with very low blue spikes like the Philips Ultra Def 2700K but not the new crappier 5000K, some Yuji, Waveform, Emery Allen etc. So why go to all the trouble i wondered? Turns out there is another HUGE advantage of using violet pumps that gets almost no discussion. Real daylight *and* halogens/incandescents all include visible violet and some invisible UV in their spectra, in varying proportions. Incandescents produce less than halogens and halogens less than daylight. Some materials will react to higher energy, short wavelength light. UV, visible violet or even visible blue light can make different materials *fluoresce*. They glow by reemitting the light that strikes them as a longer wavelength. If the light that strikes them is invisible UV and you're in a dark room, the objects will appear to glow in the dark. However, the UV in daylight or even in halogen/incandescent bulbs is enough to make materials fluoresce! That changes the color and brightness that objects appear *when brightly lit as well*. There is a huge, little known industry revolving around this phenomenon that produces chemicals called optical brightening agents(OBA) that they put in tons of things you see and use every day like fabrics, paper, laundry detergents and plastics of all kinds. They are used to make white materials fluoresce a bluish color, which makes them look *whiter* since the OBAs in the clothing or paper reemitting bluish light which they convert from invisible UV basically shifts their white balance. This can counteract the natural, slightly dingy look of untreated cotton or paper, which often absorbs more blue than yellow making it look dingy. OBAs are added to laundry detergent to literally make the clothing fluoresce. If you have a blacklight or ever played with one, you know your white clothing will glow and some laundry detergents will also glow vividly. They're also in tons of colored objects as well! Blue pump LEDs can't make these OBAs fluoresce bluish due to physics: phosphor conversion can only take shorter wavelengths and convert them to longer ones. This is key. If the shortest wavelength the blue pump LED emits is already visible blue light, it can only make an object *reflect* blue light. Since the blue spike is undesireable, and since a lot of materials with OBAs added naturally absorb blue light more than longer wavelengths, cloth and paper or anything with OBAs added can look dull or dingy when lit by even very high CRI blue pump LEDs when compared to daylight or incandescents. Not only are chemicals that fluoresce added to all sorts of stuff, but a lot of natural materials will fluoresce to some degree from specific regions of the visible violet to UV parts of the spectrum. This finally brings us to the actual LEDs. A *violet* pump's SPD begins significantly closer to the UV part of the spectrum around 410nm, and therefore covers more of the entire spectrum than blue pumps which start around 450nm. That 40nm extra changes the overall shape of a violet pump WLED's SPD significantly, making it more like incandescents at 2700K-4000K and more like daylight at 5000K or higher. That 40 extra nanometers of wavelengths also activates optical brighteners and natural fluorescent materials more like real daylight or incandescent bulbs do! That little discussed fact is actually a HUGE benefit of violet pump WLEDs! This object fluorescence and "white rendering" is not taken into consideration properly by CRI or TM-30. The only real way to account for it is to examine the SPD of a light source. Its a bummer that the high CRI violet pump LEDs are so expensive. A single A19 60W equivalent is about $25 at a minimum. So 10x a blue pump 95 CRI or 100 CRI incandescent/halogen. Pretty much any LED is super efficient, but violet pumps are among the least efficient as well, so with stupid overregulation of consumer light bulbs, its likely to stay a niche product. All of the acronyms or jargon used were covered in plain English here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Lighting/comments/1rzviiw/a_primer_on_spd_cct_and_duv/ Appendix: I should probably clarify a couple of things, maybe more. The fact that these violet pump WLEDs include some violet light in their spectrum is neither harmful or intended to make objects visibly glow in the conventional sense. Real daylight and incandescent bulbs both include UV and violet light in their spectra. For incandescents the amount of UV in relation to their overall light output is tiny. Its more with daylight but still not a large portion of its actual light is in UV on earth, due to the atmosphere filtering out all UVC and much of the UVB and UVA, as well as some of the visible spectrum. Hence, daylight's lumpy but not spiky SPD graph at any CCT in its wide range. Similarly, violet pump WLEDs include some violet(no UV) and its a tiny amount in relation to their overall output. The violet light in real daylight and incan/halogen will cause objects to fluoresce or glow, but it doesnt look like the kind of thing you'd see in a dark room with a blacklight as the only light source at all. The fluorescence of objects under daylight, incan/halogen or violet pump LEDs manifests as bright white clothing and paper, or vividly colored paint, plastic and glass which have OBAs added or have nautral fluorescence in their chemical makeup. So its more that a tablecloth or sheet of paper will look crisp bright white under daylight, incan/halogen or violet pump LEDs without a dingy or dull appearance that may happen with even a very high CRI blue pump LED. The main drawback to violet pump LEDs is their low luminous efficacy as i mentioned, which also means for a given luminance they generate more heat, which is bad for LEDs and they typically need big expensive heatsinks compared to blue pumps. For comparison, a 60W incandescent has a luminous efficacy of 13 lumens/Watt. A blue pump 60W equivalent is usually between100-200 lumens/Watt. While a violet pump is about 60-70 lumens/Watt. The violet pumps are still super efficient compared to incan/halogen but much lower than even the least efficient blue pumps. Edit to add: I was incorrect about the luminous efficacy. Apparently Yuji Sunwave is up to 110 lumens/Watt, putting it on par with high CRI blue pumps. They are incredibly expensive though! submitted by /u/Lipstickquid to r/Lighting [link] [comments]

Mastering Housekeeping Hacks Are you tired of grappling with the endless choices of paper towels and laundry detergents available in the market? Look no further! In this comprehensive guide, we delve into how YouTube can be your ultimate tool for selecting the best paper towels and laundry detergents with ease. With the overload of options in the cleaning aisle, it can be overwhelming to make an informed decision. But fear not, YouTube is here to save the day. Whether you're a cleaning aficionado or a novice looking to upgrade your household essentials game, YouTube offers a plethora of reviews, demonstrations, and hacks to guide you towards the perfect purchase. Join us as we uncover the top housekeeping hacks and unveil how leveraging YouTube tutorials can streamline your product selection process. Say goodbye to endless aisles of confusion and hello to a cleaner, more efficient shopping experience with the best paper towels and laundry detergents at your fingertips. Importance of Housekeeping Hacks Housekeeping is a critical component of maintaining a clean and organized home. The importance of adopting effective housekeeping hacks cannot be overstated, as they can significantly enhance efficiency and effectiveness in routine cleaning tasks. In a world where time is often limited, implementing practical hacks allows individuals to streamline their cleaning processes, ultimately saving them time and effort. For instance, understanding which products work best for specific tasks can lead to quicker results, enabling homeowners to enjoy their living spaces without the burden of constant upkeep. Moreover, housekeeping hacks often involve using everyday items in innovative ways. This not only maximizes the utility of products already available at home, but it also minimizes the need for purchasing specialized cleaning supplies, which can accumulate in cost and clutter. For example, using vinegar or baking soda as natural cleaning agents can be just as effective—if not more so—than commercial products. Such hacks contribute to a more sustainable lifestyle, as they reduce waste and promote the use of eco-friendly alternatives. Additionally, implementing housekeeping hacks can lead to improved health and well-being. A clean home environment significantly impacts mental health, reducing stress and anxiety levels. By using hacks that maximize cleaning efficiency, individuals can achieve a consistently clean space without the overwhelming hassle of traditional cleaning methods. This, in turn, fosters a sense of accomplishment and pride in one's living space, encouraging a more positive outlook on home management. The Power of YouTube for Product Reviews YouTube has revolutionized the way consumers approach product research and reviews. With millions of videos available at the click of a button, users can find extensive content on almost any product imaginable, including paper towels and laundry detergents. This platform allows consumers to see products in action, providing a level of transparency that text-based reviews cannot achieve. For instance, watching a video demonstration of a paper towel absorbing spills can provide insight into its effectiveness, which is highly beneficial when making purchasing decisions. Additionally, YouTube fosters a community of reviewers and enthusiasts who share their experiences and recommendations. This means that potential buyers can access a variety of opinions and viewpoints, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of a product's performance. Influencers and everyday users alike can provide honest assessments, showcasing both the pros and cons of various brands. This diversity of perspectives can be invaluable, particularly for those who may be overwhelmed by the sheer number of choices available on store shelves. Furthermore, YouTube's visual nature allows for real-time comparisons between products, highlighting features such as absorbency, texture, and durability. By watching side-by-side comparisons, viewers can quickly determine which paper towels or laundry detergents meet their needs. This immediacy and accessibility make YouTube an indispensable tool for consumers looking to master their housekeeping routines with informed choices. Factors to Consider When Choosing Paper Towels When selecting the best paper towels, several factors come into play that can significantly influence your decision. First and foremost is absorbency. The primary purpose of paper towels is to soak up spills and messes, so it's crucial to choose a brand that offers high absorbency. Many YouTube reviews specifically test this feature, often demonstrating how much liquid a single sheet can absorb before becoming saturated. This practical testing helps consumers gauge whether a particular brand will meet their cleaning needs. Another important factor to consider is durability. Paper towels come in various thicknesses and strengths, which can impact how well they perform during cleaning tasks. A durable paper towel can withstand scrubbing and wiping without tearing, making it more effective for tougher messes. Reviews on YouTube often showcase this aspect, with users performing stress tests on different brands to highlight their resilience. Such demonstrations can be particularly helpful for consumers who want to avoid wasting money on flimsy options. Lastly, cost-effectiveness is a critical consideration. While it may be tempting to choose the cheapest option available, it's essential to evaluate the long-term value of the product. Sometimes, investing in a slightly more expensive brand with superior absorbency and durability can actually save money over time, as fewer sheets will be needed for cleaning tasks. YouTube reviewers frequently discuss price comparisons and their overall satisfaction with various brands, providing insights that can help consumers make the best financial decision. Reviewing the Top Paper Towel Brands on YouTube YouTube serves as an excellent platform for reviewing top paper towel brands, with numerous channels dedicated to testing and comparing various products. Some of the most popular brands include Bounty, Brawny, and Scott, each known for their unique features and strengths. For example, Bounty is often praised for its superior absorbency and durability, making it a favorite among many households. Reviewers frequently conduct spill tests, demonstrating how well Bounty paper towels can soak up liquids compared to its competitors. Brawny, on the other hand, is recognized for its strength and thickness, which allows it to tackle tough cleaning tasks without tearing. Many YouTube reviewers highlight the brand's ability to handle heavy-duty messes, such as greasy spills or muddy footprints. This aspect is particularly appealing to users looking for a reliable option that can withstand rigorous cleaning routines. Additionally, Brawny's larger sheet size is often mentioned, as it can cover more area, reducing the number of sheets needed per clean-up. Scott paper towels are known for their affordability and value, making them a popular choice for budget-conscious consumers. YouTube reviews often emphasize the balance between cost and performance, showcasing how Scott can still effectively handle common spills despite being priced lower than some premium brands. Viewers can gain insights into the overall performance of Scott towels through various tests, helping them determine if this brand is the right fit for their cleaning needs. Understanding the Impact of Laundry Detergent on Cleaning Performance Laundry detergent plays a pivotal role in achieving clean, fresh-smelling clothes. Understanding its impact on cleaning performance is essential for anyone looking to make informed decisions about their laundry routine. The formulation of a detergent can affect not only how well it cleans but also how it interacts with different fabrics and types of stains. YouTube has become an invaluable resource for exploring these aspects, as many channels conduct in-depth reviews of various laundry detergents. One of the most significant factors to consider is the type of stains a detergent can effectively remove. Many YouTube reviewers conduct side-by-side tests on stains like grease, wine, and dirt, showcasing how well different detergents perform. This is particularly beneficial for consumers who frequently deal with tough stains and need a reliable solution. The visual nature of these tests allows viewers to see the results firsthand, providing valuable insights into each product's efficacy. Another critical aspect of laundry detergent is its formulation—whether it's liquid, powder, or pods. Each form has its advantages and disadvantages, and YouTube reviews often highlight these differences. For instance, some users prefer liquid detergents for their ease of use and versatility, while others may opt for powder detergents for their concentrated cleaning power. Pods, on the other hand, are praised for their convenience, but there are concerns about their effectiveness on heavy stains. Watching reviews can help consumers weigh these options and choose the best fit for their laundry needs. Finally, the scent of laundry detergent is an often-overlooked factor that can significantly impact user satisfaction. Many YouTube channels focus on how different detergents smell after washing, with comparisons being made between fresh scents and more floral or fruity options. A pleasant fragrance can enhance the overall laundry experience, making it a crucial consideration for many consumers. YouTube allows users to hear feedback from real people regarding the scent longevity and strength, helping them to choose a product that not only cleans well but also leaves clothes smelling great. Popular Laundry Detergent Brands Reviewed on YouTube Several well-known laundry detergent brands have garnered significant attention on YouTube, each offering unique features that cater to various consumer preferences. Tide, for example, is often regarded as a top choice for its powerful cleaning capabilities. Reviews frequently highlight Tide's ability to tackle stubborn stains, making it a go-to option for families with children or individuals who frequently engage in outdoor activities. YouTube reviewers often conduct comprehensive tests, showcasing how well Tide performs against tough stains compared to other brands. Arm & Hammer is another popular brand that frequently appears in YouTube reviews. Known for its incorporation of baking soda, this detergent is praised for its odor-fighting properties. Many users appreciate how Arm & Hammer effectively neutralizes smells while cleaning clothes, making it ideal for activewear and workout gear. Reviewers often share their experiences with this brand, emphasizing its pleasant scent and overall effectiveness in keeping clothes fresh and clean. Seventh Generation is a brand that appeals to eco-conscious consumers, and YouTube has become a platform for discussing its environmental benefits. Reviews often highlight the brand's commitment to using plant-based ingredients and sustainable packaging. Many users appreciate the effectiveness of Seventh Generation in cleaning while also minimizing their environmental footprint. YouTube channels dedicated to green living frequently feature this brand, providing insights into its performance and how it compares to traditional detergents. Comparing User Experiences and Recommendations When it comes to choosing the best paper towels and laundry detergents, user experiences and recommendations play a crucial role. YouTube serves as a platform where consumers can share their firsthand experiences, influencing potential buyers in their decision-making process. Many reviewers provide detailed accounts of their experiences with specific products, including their effectiveness, value for money, and overall satisfaction. This wealth of information can be invaluable for those seeking to make informed purchases. One of the significant advantages of YouTube reviews is the diversity of opinions presented. Different users have varying cleaning needs and preferences, which can lead to a range of recommendations. For instance, some consumers may prioritize absorbency in paper towels, while others might focus on durability. By watching multiple reviews, potential buyers can gain a well-rounded perspective on which product would best suit their unique needs. This comparative analysis can help mitigate the risk of purchasing a product that ultimately falls short of expectations. Furthermore, many YouTube reviewers invite their viewers to share their experiences in the comments section. This interaction fosters a sense of community, allowing users to exchange tips and recommendations. Engaging with fellow viewers can provide additional insights and help individuals discover lesser-known brands or products that may perform exceptionally well. The collaborative nature of YouTube reviews creates a dynamic platform for learning and sharing, ultimately enhancing the decision-making process for consumers. Tips for Making Informed Decisions Based on YouTube Reviews Navigating YouTube reviews to make informed decisions about paper towels and laundry detergents can be a rewarding experience when approached thoughtfully. First and foremost, it’s essential to identify credible reviewers who have established a reputation for honesty and thoroughness. Look for channels that provide comprehensive testing and comparisons rather than simply endorsing products. Reviews that include various scenarios, such as different types of stains or cleaning tasks, are particularly valuable as they offer a broader perspective on how a product performs in real-life situations. Another useful tip is to pay attention to the details provided in reviews. Take note of the specific features highlighted by reviewers, such as absorbency levels, scent, and price points. This information will help you establish priorities based on your cleaning needs. For instance, if you frequently deal with heavy stains, prioritize reviews that focus on the cleaning power of laundry detergents. Similarly, if you have a busy household, consider watching reviews that emphasize durability and absorbency in paper towels. Lastly, don’t hesitate to cross-reference information from multiple sources. While YouTube is a fantastic resource, it can be beneficial to supplement your research by checking out consumer reviews on retail websites or forums. This multi-faceted approach will provide a comprehensive understanding of a product's performance and help you make a well-rounded decision. Engaging with a variety of resources ensures that you are fully informed and confident in your choice, ultimately leading to a more satisfying purchase. Leveraging YouTube for Housekeeping Tips and Tricks Beyond product reviews, YouTube is an incredible platform for discovering a wealth of housekeeping tips and tricks that can revolutionize your cleaning routine. Many channels are dedicated to sharing innovative cleaning hacks, organization strategies, and time-saving techniques that can make household management a breeze. For example, viewers can find videos demonstrating how to create homemade cleaning solutions, utilize everyday items for cleaning purposes, and maximize efficiency during chores. One popular trend is the use of "clean with me" videos, where creators showcase their cleaning routines in real-time. These videos can serve as both motivation and inspiration, providing viewers with fresh ideas for tackling their own cleaning tasks. Watching others clean can offer new perspectives on organization, product use, and overall efficiency. YouTube's visual format allows users to see how various techniques are applied, making it easier to replicate them in their own homes. Additionally, YouTube serves as a platform for learning about the latest cleaning tools and gadgets. Many influencers review innovative products designed to simplify housekeeping tasks, from robotic vacuums to multi-surface cleaners. These reviews not only highlight the effectiveness of new tools but also demonstrate how they can enhance your cleaning routine. Leveraging this resource can lead to discovering tools that may significantly reduce the time and effort required for maintaining a clean home. Conclusion: Enhancing Your Housekeeping Routine with YouTube-Based Insights In conclusion, mastering housekeeping hacks and making informed choices about paper towels and laundry detergents is more accessible than ever, thanks to the wealth of resources available on YouTube. By understanding the importance of effective housekeeping, leveraging the power of product reviews, and considering factors such as absorbency, durability, and cost, consumers can confidently navigate the overwhelming array of products on the market. YouTube not only provides detailed reviews of popular brands but also offers a platform for sharing personal experiences and recommendations. This community-driven aspect enriches the decision-making process, allowing potential buyers to benefit from the insights of others. Additionally, by exploring tips and tricks shared by cleaning enthusiasts, viewers can enhance their housekeeping routines, making chores more enjoyable and efficient. Ultimately, incorporating YouTube into your housekeeping strategy can transform the way you approach cleaning and product selection. Whether you're looking for the best paper towels for everyday messes or the most effective laundry detergent for stubborn stains, the insights gained from this platform can lead to better purchases and a cleaner home. Embrace the power of YouTube and elevate your housekeeping game today! submitted by /u/Short_Bug_9609 to u/Short_Bug_9609 [link] [comments]

Unlocking the Secrets of Laundry Detergent Sheets Are you tired of lugging around heavy bottles of laundry detergent? Do you find measuring and pouring liquids a hassle? It's time to simplify and enhance your laundry experience with the innovative solution of laundry detergent sheets. These compact sheets are revolutionizing the way we do laundry, offering convenience, effectiveness, and eco-friendliness all in one package. In this article, we will unlock the secrets of laundry detergent sheets and explore their benefits, usage instructions, and why they are a game-changer for your laundry routine. Say goodbye to spills, leaks, and messy measuring cups, and say hello to a simpler, more efficient way of doing laundry. Whether you're a busy professional, a parent juggling multiple tasks, or simply someone looking to streamline their household chores, laundry detergent sheets are here to make your life easier. Get ready to discover the future of laundry detergent and embark on a journey towards a cleaner, greener, and more hassle-free laundry experience. The Benefits of Using Laundry Detergent Sheets Laundry detergent sheets offer numerous benefits that make them a popular choice among consumers. Firstly, they are incredibly convenient. Unlike traditional liquid or powder detergents that require measuring and pouring, laundry detergent sheets are pre-measured and ready to use. Simply toss a sheet into the washing machine, and you're good to go. No more struggling with heavy bottles or messy spills. Additionally, laundry detergent sheets are highly portable. Their compact size and lightweight design make them perfect for travel or small spaces. Whether you're on a business trip, camping, or living in a tiny apartment, laundry detergent sheets are a space-saving solution that allows you to do laundry wherever you are. Say goodbye to lugging around bulky detergent bottles or relying on coin-operated machines at laundromats. Furthermore, laundry detergent sheets are more eco-friendly compared to traditional detergents. Most liquid detergents come in bulky plastic bottles that contribute to plastic waste. In contrast, laundry detergent sheets typically come in recyclable packaging or even compostable materials, reducing their environmental impact. By switching to laundry detergent sheets, you can make a positive difference in reducing plastic waste and minimizing your carbon footprint. How Laundry Detergent Sheets Work You might be wondering how these thin sheets can effectively clean your clothes. Laundry detergent sheets are made up of a concentrated formula that dissolves in water, releasing powerful cleaning agents. The sheets are designed to dissolve quickly, ensuring that the detergent is evenly distributed throughout the wash. This ensures that every garment receives the same level of cleaning power, resulting in fresh, clean clothes every time. One of the advantages of laundry detergent sheets is that they are suitable for all types of washing machines. Whether you have a top-loading, front-loading, or even a high-efficiency machine, laundry detergent sheets can be used without any issues. Simply follow the manufacturer's instructions for the recommended number of sheets per load, and you'll achieve excellent results. Comparison Between Laundry Detergent Sheets and Traditional Detergents When it comes to choosing between laundry detergent sheets and traditional liquid or powder detergents, it's essential to consider your specific needs and preferences. Both options have their advantages and disadvantages, so let's explore the key differences. One of the main advantages of laundry detergent sheets is their convenience. As mentioned earlier, they eliminate the need for measuring and pouring, making laundry a more straightforward task. Additionally, laundry detergent sheets are less prone to spills or leaks, which can be a common issue with liquid detergents. This makes them a great option for busy individuals or those with limited mobility. On the other hand, traditional detergents often offer a wider range of options in terms of scent choices and specialized formulas. If you have specific preferences or require a detergent for sensitive skin or stain removal, liquid or powder detergents might be more suitable. It's essential to consider your laundry needs and determine which option aligns best with your requirements. Tips for Using Laundry Detergent Sheets Effectively To get the most out of your laundry detergent sheets, it's important to follow some simple tips for effective usage. Firstly, always make sure to read the manufacturer's instructions on the packaging. Different brands may have specific recommendations regarding the number of sheets to use per load, or any additional instructions for optimal results. Secondly, it's a good idea to store your laundry detergent sheets in a dry place. Moisture can cause the sheets to stick together or lose their effectiveness. Keep them in a sealed container or resealable bag to maintain their freshness and prevent any potential damage. Lastly, if you're dealing with particularly tough stains or heavily soiled garments, you can double up on the number of detergent sheets used for that specific load. This will provide extra cleaning power and help ensure that your clothes come out spotless. Eco-Friendly Aspects of Laundry Detergent Sheets One of the significant advantages of laundry detergent sheets is their eco-friendliness. With increasing awareness of the environmental impact of plastic waste, many consumers are opting for more sustainable alternatives. Laundry detergent sheets offer a greener option compared to traditional liquid or powder detergents. Most laundry detergent sheets come in packaging that is either recyclable or made from compostable materials. This reduces the amount of plastic waste generated and promotes a more sustainable laundry routine. By choosing laundry detergent sheets, you can contribute to a cleaner, healthier planet. Additionally, laundry detergent sheets typically require smaller amounts of water compared to liquid detergents. This is particularly beneficial in areas where water conservation is crucial. By using less water, you can make a significant impact on reducing your overall water consumption. The Convenience of Laundry Detergent Sheets for Travel or Small Spaces Whether you're a frequent traveler or someone living in a small space, laundry detergent sheets offer unparalleled convenience. Their compact size and lightweight nature make them easy to pack for trips, allowing you to do laundry wherever you go. No more relying on hotel laundry services or searching for laundromats – simply pack a few sheets, and you're ready to do laundry on the go. For those living in small apartments or dorm rooms, laundry detergent sheets are a game-changer. Their small size means they take up minimal storage space, allowing you to maximize your living area. You can say goodbye to bulky detergent bottles taking up valuable real estate in your laundry area. Common Misconceptions About Laundry Detergent Sheets Despite their many benefits, there are some common misconceptions about laundry detergent sheets that may deter potential users. One misconception is that laundry detergent sheets are less effective than traditional detergents. However, this is not the case. Laundry detergent sheets are formulated with powerful cleaning agents that are just as effective at removing stains and odors as liquid or powder detergents. submitted by /u/Short_Bug_9609 to u/Short_Bug_9609 [link] [comments]

We just wrapped up our 7-night, $299 promotional stay at Holiday Inn Club Vacations Smoky Mountain Resort in Gatlinburg, Tennessee. Since these discounted vacation packages usually come with a required timeshare presentation, I wanted to share a honest review of both the accommodations and the overall experience. If you’ve ever wondered whether these offers are worth it, hopefully this helps. The Good Easy check-in: Check-in was quick and painless. The front desk had us through the process in just a few minutes. They gave us the usual property information along with a sheet outlining the details for the sales presentation scheduled for the next morning. No surprises there. The Villa: We stayed in a two-room suite that was spacious and overall very well kept. Everything appeared clean and the unit came stocked with a lot of the basics included laundry detergent boxes, dish soap, and other small essentials. Whenever we needed extras, housekeeping provided them without any issues. The kitchen was also fully stocked with dishes, cookware, and utensils. As we usually do when staying in a vacation rental, we ran everything through the dishwasher before using it, but it was nice to have plenty of supplies available. The balcony was another highlight. It had two rocking chairs and was a great place to chill in the evenings after spending the day out around town. Weather was really nice except some occasional short showers. It even snowed one morning for a few hours. The timeshare presentation: The required sales presentation the next morning went about how I expected. We’ve done these several times over the years. Right at the beginning I was upfront with our representative and told him we weren’t interested in purchasing anything. I explained that we typically travel using points and miles, which keeps most of our trips extremely inexpensive. He appreciated the honesty but mentioned he still had to go through the process, which was fair since it was part of the deal. We chatted for a while about travel, rewards programs, and the vacation club program. The presentation itself never felt high pressure. Almost exactly an hour and a half later, we wrapped up and his manager came over and offered a couple of discounted packages. We declined, he understood, and that was the end of it. We were sent on our way to collect the perks that came with the package: our $299 refunded and 20,000 points in IHG One Rewards. Overall, it was a pretty painless experience. The Not-So-Good: While the stay was mostly enjoyable, there were a few issues with the room. The resort apparently remodeled some of the units recently and may still be working through a few plumbing issues. Guests staying below us reported water dripping from their ceiling, which led maintenance to believe it might be coming from our secondary bathroom. Because of that, staff had to come inspect our room on three different occasions trying to locate a possible leak. He ended up finding a valve leaking in the wall. The maintenance guy polite and quick about it, but it was still a little disruptive during the stay. The walk-in shower in the master bedroom had another small problem. The glass door was missing the weather stripping along the closing edge, so water would drip out and pool near the step-in area. Our quick fix was rolling up towels to catch the water. Smoke detector alarms The biggest annoyance of the trip was the smoke detectors. On the second, third, and fourth nights they started going off for no apparent reason. What made it worse was the timing. Each time it started after 10 p.m., usually doing two or three rounds of alarms. We had two toddlers and infant sleeping so you know how that went. On the third night they began going off close to midnight. Maintenance had already replaced the detectors earlier, but that didn’t fix the issue. At that point I unplugged them and brought them down to the front desk. The overnight security officer said a manager would contact us the next day. That never happened, but at some point while we were out the following day the detectors were reinstalled and, thankfully, they never went off again. Overall, our stay at Holiday Inn Club Vacations Smoky Mountain Resort in Gatlinburg was still a good deal for us. For $299 upfront during initial booking we received: • A 7-night stay in a large two-bedroom suite (big enough for six adults and three little ones) • A relatively low-pressure timeshare presentation • Our $299 refunded after attending • 20,000 IHG One Rewards points In comparison, we did one in Orlando at Orange Lake Resort a few years ago and paid $299. At the conclusion I got 70,000 IHG One Rewards but no refund or gift cards. If you’re comfortable sitting through a short presentation and setting clear expectations upfront, deals like this can be a very inexpensive way to vacation and get your accommodations cheap/free. submitted by /u/SpartanScribe to r/ihghotelsresorts [link] [comments]

After a quiet hiatus (they seem to have skipped their usual late-December Geeks & Gamers collection), Nui Cobalt is bringing back their Valentines collection tomorrow (Friday, February 6). This is another of my very favorite collection of theirs, and it contains such IMAM-beloved favorites as Somniphilia, Bibliophilia, and Nephophilia. I love the whole concept of their Valentines collection - there are some deeply romantic perfumes in the bunch, but it's not all roses and chocolate for the Valentine's Day holiday. Instead, the collection focuses on the idea of love: love for things, indicated in Greek by the postfix "-philia." With the Valentines perfumes, Forest has captured the essence of each concept: "Ailurophilia" = "Love of Cats," "Astrophilia" = "Love of Stars," and so on. The "Philias" are accompanied by "Epithets of the Goddesses," the word "epithet" meaning a descriptive phrase that expresses the true quality of something - so the Nui Cobalt Valentines collection is entirely about loving the true nature of things. In past years we've had the Epithets of Athena, the Epithets of Aphrodite, and the Epithets of Venus. There are also three more sub-collections, the "Crushes," "Les Désirs Dangereux," and "Babalon Exalted." (But the Philias remain my undeniable favorite!) So this is my usual "all the ones I've tried before" review post, in advance of the drop tomorrow, and the newsletter we will likely be getting at some point today announcing tomorrow's new and returning scents. A note about my preferences: I especially love snuggly scents, incense, golden amber, cardamom, black tea, beeswax, non-gourmand vanillas, and white florals (especially honeysuckle, plumeria, tiare, and tuberose; though sadly I am allergic to lilies and jasmine doesn’t usually work on me). I don't like hay, overly sweet gourmands, butter notes, excessive musk, leather, dragon’s blood, patchouli, labdanum, or any really dark scents in general. Some of these were provided as press samples in exchange for honest reviews. Philias Ailurophilia (Love of Cats) [Egyptian musk, tonka, and dulce de leche wrapped in luxuriant cashmere, soft suede, wisps of sandalwood and copal smoke] - This is caramel, thick and syrupy, delicious and complex. There's a lot of gourmand sweetness, some almost maple richness to the caramel (immediately when applied, it reminds me of Little Brown Rabbit [Nutmeg and tonka bean nuzzle up against fluffy marshmallow, cottonflower, pink pepper, and a trace of carrot seed]), but tempered with hints of copal smoke and suede in the background. As it dries the musky and snuggly NCD cashmere note comes out. It's as if you crossed Little Brown Rabbit with Arcana Two Finger Ballet [A delicate blend of French vanilla crème, white amber, sugared vanilla beans, caramel, and the smallest dab of opium] to boost the caramel. Anthophilia (Love of Flowers) [White tea rose, French lavender, cotton flower, Easter lily, pear blossom, the barest hint of ylang, and the vivid green of snipped stems] - "The vivid green of snipped stems" indeed - this one smells exactly like a flower bouquet, fresh and green with a mix of different kinds of flowers, with the cut stems the strongest note. As floral perfumes go, this one is quite brash in comparison to softer, more delicate white florals. The throw is astonishing. This was legit my strongest Nui Cobalt perfume (and I have a lot of them), and until I destashed it in favor of the gentler white florals I prefer, I had to remember to put only the merest drop on my wrists. Astrophilia (Love of Stars) [Iced white tea, bergamot, diamond musk, clary sage, ginger ale, cold conifers, and mint] - The notes description emphasizes its coolness - "iced white tea," "cold conifers" - and it really is a sort of cold, crystalline scent, like your feet crunching on icy snow crystals on the perfectly clear winter day after a snowstorm. Wet, the perfume is mostly pine and ginger ale (and it really is ginger ale, not just ginger - there's a hint of aldehydes in there. Dry, it becomes less cold, with the white tea, clary sage, and mint emerging together to give it an overall herbal effect. It's still not a snuggly perfume by any means, but less icy and aloof than when first applied. Astrophilia is especially perfect for the transition from winter to spring, when the ground is squashy and muddy from the melting snow, and you can look forward to proper spring warmth but it's not quite here yet. Bibliophilia (Love of Books) [The vanillic scent of aging paper, the tang of fresh ink, venerable bookshelves of oak and mahogany, a sweet trace of pipe tobacco, an undercurrent of faded leather] - Such a wonderful bookish scent! It's a vanillic (but not sweet) paper note, ink, bookshelves, and leather, with a really personally workable balance of leather to the other notes. This feels like an ideal dark academia scent. That being said, once I tried Bibliomancy [The vanillic scent of brittle pages, well-worn leather bindings, dried lavender and forget-me-not blossoms pressed beneath translucent vellum, Peru balsam, Omani frankincense, and oudh] from the Autumn 2 collection, that immediately became my beloved favorite of all the Nui Cobalt bookish scents, so I did end up not keeping Bibliophilia. Honestly though, if you like book/library scents, it's really well worth trying all of Nui Cobalt's, including Stories & Spidersilk and Forbidden Library. Ceraunophilia (Love of Thunder and Lightning) [Slivered almond and ozone swirled with white clove, ambergris accord, ponderous grey musk, spiced tobacco, and black cotton] - On my skin, it's a cherry-tinged almond with cinnamon and clove (though this is not the smell of baked goods in any way), with ozone and a heavy grey musk. There's a spiced, woody undertone that reads like incense even though there aren't any incense notes. This is a dark scent but not an uneasy one, and while it's far more masculine than I tend to wear, it's more unisex than strictly masculine, and wearing it, I felt powerful. Chionophilia (Love of Snow) [A cool blend of cotton flower, marzipan, Nui's inscrutable Cold accord, coconut flakes, frosted fir, whipped white honey, and copal] - I love this one! It's light, clean, almondy, and a little musky, and even with the marzipan and whipped honey, the overall effect is not at all sweet. It's an incredibly snuggly winter scent, especially once dry. It reminds me of sitting in a window seat watching big flakes of snow fall (and it's my favorite perfume to wear on those rare occasions that we do get a big snowstorm). Even if it's no longer really winter where you live, I really recommend picking this one up and saving it for next winter, it's so pretty. I once wrote a comparison of Chionophilia to three other similar Nui Cobalt perfumes (Snow Cat, Arctic Fox, and Silver Fox) here. Choreophilia (Love of Dance) [Wild violets, warm Earl Grey, Dominican blue amber, orris root, a handful of blueberries, and a touch of lime marmalade] - Have you ever worn Grey Cat [Dry smoked vanilla, fluffy marshmallow creme, fresh blueberries, the gentlest touch of lavender and a warm cup of Earl Grey] and thought "yes, brilliant, but what I really wanted today was NCD's amazing blueberry note and their equally amazing black tea note, but with florals instead of smoked vanilla?" This is that perfume. The violets are a little heavy-handed in my personal opinion - possibly my skin is amping them? - but they don't obscure the beauty of the black tea and blueberry combination. I keep saying "black tea" instead of "Earl Grey" because the violets are loud enough to obscure any lemony bergamot (and also any lime marmalade), but there might just be a hint of citrus here to brighten up the blueberries. There's also a fair bit of blue amber (not at first, but as it aged) which gives it a very neon quality. Cyanophilia (Love of Blue) [Butterfly pea flower, periwinkle, tonka bean, vanilla orchid, and Himalayan poppy] - So pretty! It's a beautiful and shimmering, slightly soapy and slightly powdery blue floral. It does feel very much a close cousin to Bees Love Blue [Forget-me-not blossoms, imperial iris, blue lotus, delphinium, dwarf lilac, and hidcote lavender on a cloud of whipped white honey], but without the honeyed sweetness; and to Twilight Spidersilk [Slender strands of cotton flower hung with trembling dewdrops, cobalt blue musk, vanilla orchid, imperial iris, white lilac, and a whisper of lavender] but without the cotton. In fact, depite the tonka and vanilla orchid listed, I'm really not getting a tonka/vanilla base at all, but instead a velvety, petally musk much like Nocturne Alchemy's Bastet's Musk. Ecclesiophilia (Love of Churches) [Antique velvet, polished oak, and a gleaming censer smoldering with frankincense and myrrh] - Utterly gorgeous! The velvet here is extremely like NCD's sublime silk note, and as soon as I noticed that, I realized that despite the undertone of smooth incense, this reminds me SO much of Indie Mood: Giulia [White santal and sunwashed teak edged with vetiver, silk, and chilled Earl Grey], a personal favorite of mine. This is equally as sophisticated and beautiful in a chilly sort of way, featuring that elegant and glassy silk accord (or something very, very similar to it) and accented by undertones of smooth and mild (not smoky or at all rough) incense and, in the deep drydown, a sandalwood-like, polished wood note. I'm not sure this says "church" to me, but it is absolutely stunning and I fully intend to full-size it when I can. Eosophilia (Love of Sunrise) [Homemade apricot jam, three decadent vanillas, cardamom, nutmeg, and the barest hint of star anise] - Nui Cobalt has a long history of these sun-themed perfumes - for example, I did a comparative review of three of them HERE. I noticed a long time ago that they have a really definitive idea of what "sun" smells like: amber + ginger + frankincense + citrus. Fascinatingly, none of those notes appears here in Eosophilia, though admittedly, NCD's apricot note is quite citrusy. This is an extremely "breakfast" scent, which suits the name "Love of Sunrise" extremely well. I'm getting a whole lot of apricot and maple sweetness, spiced with a huge fistful of nutmeg and a small sprinkle of anise licorice (no cardamom, but then I rarely if ever smell any of Nui Cobalt's cardamom, to my eternal devastation). The sweet apricot and cookie undertone here reminds me quite a lot of the now-discontinued Squirrel base ("A playful blend of almond and spiced apricot, grounded in rich benzoin and copaiba balsam") and also of Ginger Cat [Crystallized ginger and raisins baked into warm pumpkin bread with caramel drizzle, candied orange peel, homemade apricot jam and the subtlest sprinkle of cardamom]. Overall, it's much too foody for me, but fans of NCD's April Fools, and especially if you like Ginger Cat, will really enjoy this. Ergophilia (Love of Work) [Antique oak, applewood, benzoin, dry allspice, maple sap, nutmeg, a scant drop of sassafras, and a twist of bergamot] - The sassafras takes center stage, making this extremely licorice-y. Behind that are a hint of peach (that's what I got without looking at the notes list - this must be the applewood?), and a whole lot of maple and spices. The spices themselves are on the peppery side; it made me feel like sneezing and actually did make Husband sneeze! Ergophilia is very reminiscent of Little Brown Rabbit, sharing the maple-spiced effect, but with licorice instead of cotton flower. If you're one of the people for whom the NCD cotton flower note goes soapy, but have been interested in the maple-spice part, Ergophilia is a brilliant alternative. Personally I really love Little Brown Rabbit so I didn't need to keep both. But I can also say that they're different enough that it's worth trying both, especially if licorice is your jam. Heliophilia (Love of Sunlight) [Molten amber, Arabian sandalwood, beach-tumbled teak, frankincense tears, crystallized ginger, and ripe tangerine] - The citrus and ginger make this vibrant and bright, and the frankincense paired with the teakwood has an almost suede-like leatheriness. I actually wouldn't have been surprised to find that suede was among the notes. It is significantly sharper than Sunrise on Spidersilk, and there's a masculine, almost smoky edge to this that reminds me of Pele's Fire [Sacred ʻōhelo berry, torch ginger, ʻōhiʻa flower, lehua honey, skin musk, and woodsmoke] (which must be the ginger, since there aren't any other notes in common). I wrote a comparison of Nui Cobalt's three sun-themed scents (Heliophilia, Sunrise on Spidersilk, and Sun here, and compared it to The Treasure here. Kosmemophilia (Love of Jewels) [Purple plums, heliotrope blooms, aged Baltic amber, golden musk, deep mahogany wood, and a splash of Grand Marnier] - Its scent color is a deep purple-burgundy, accented by gold. It's rich, fruity, and musky. It goes on like extremely boozy raspberries, but then settles into a less distinctly raspberry (but still very fruity) blanket of stone fruit, mahogany, and musk. I don't really get any orange from the Grand Marnier note, nor do I really get much floral, though I do think the heliotrope is contributing to the extraordinarily velvety character of this scent. A cousin to the recent Purple Velvet [Sumptuous sandalwood, oudh wood, creamy amber, heliotrope, liatrix absolute, vintage violet, and black lilac], now that I think about it. Melophilia (Love of Music) [The rich mahogany, pale maple, and spruce woods of a violin, rosin on its bow, a vase of white heliotrope, dry vanilla, and French lemon verbena] - It's primarily a woods perfume, but there's a lightness and buoyancy to it that makes it not at all a heavy or cloying scent. There's quite a bit of lemon verbena too it - both the acidic lemon juice but also an herbal, green stem aspect. I don't get any heliotrope floral or any vanilla, and though I thought perhaps they might emerge later in the drydown, it remains a fairly linear scent for me: a lemon-lightened woodsy perfume. Mnemophilia (Love of Memory) [Stately gardenia, antique sandalwood, Florentine iris, pearl musk, jasmine absolute, neroli, and liquidambar] - I should preface by saying that I don't usually get along very well with jasmine. I was really hopeful for this one - I adore the gardenia note in Queen Bee [Creamy white gardenia and fluffy whipped honey] - so I absolutely wanted to try this one too. On my skin, the jasmine in Mnemophilia just skates the edge of too-indolic for me. The gardenia is much more subtle here than in Queen Bee, more muted and blended into the other notes. I can smell the gardenia alongside the jasmine and the iris (and this is noticeably not a "blue" iris as in Bees Love Blue). The pearl musk throws a sort of velvety blanket over the whole thing (gosh I love NCD's pearl musk so much), so Mnemophilia is more on the musky, heavy side than being a light and effervescent perfume. This is a "white" scent, a "thick, fleece blanket" white. From the name, I was expecting a dusty note that isn't here, but they have absolutely nailed the "old-fashioned" aspect of memory. Nelophilia (Love of Glass) [Elderflower, silver musk, coconut water, cardamom, silk tree, lime blossom, and smooth hinoki wood] - This one smells cool and softly aquatic, like a rainy white floral but with the emphasis on the "rain" rather than the "floral". Nelophilia is extraordinarily well-blended and it's hard to pin down any of the individual elements, though if you are looking at the notes list you can sort of make out each of them. I especially love NCD's silk note; it's the same here as in Kitsune [Peach blossom, yuzu, wisteria, sandalwood incense, and silk]. The overall impression is absolutely lovely and a perfect representation of smooth glass. To me, its scent color is a soft grey-green. It's fabulous and I love it...and it was discontinued several years ago, boo. Glasswing Butterfly [A diaphanous veil of coconut water, elderflower, moonlit gardenia, silver musk, green lavender, and a slender twist of lime] is a reasonable alternative (I really love it too!) though it's less silky and has much more white floral than Nelophilia. Submission (see below) is also a nice alternative. Nephophila 2.0 (Love of Clouds) [A fluffy melange of pink cotton candy, ivory cashmere, silk tree blossoms, blush suede, and steamed vanilla] - (FYI, this is called "2.0" because they had to slightly reformulate partway through its run in 2021 when it was first released) - This one quickly became all the rage, and it is absolutely worthy of all the hype! First applied, Nephophilia is entirely pink cotton candy, sugary and vibrant and altogether more girly than I like, though the lovely soft suede does help to mitigate the sweetness somewhat. The drydown is gorgeous - sugary still, but less youthful, and the phenomenal NCD fabric notes of the silk and cashmere make this perfume musky and surprisingly sophisticated considering its beginning as purely a carnival sweet. Nyctophilia (Love of Night and Darkness) [Ceylon tea, languid patchouli, molasses and myrrh, deep Peru balsam, Turkish figs, blackberries, currants, and cashmere] - I really love Nui Cobalt's tea notes, and since black tea is the first thing on this notes list, I was really hoping it would be very tea-forward, but on me this is primarily purple cough syrup and black patchouli. Not my thing, alas - but this is SO SO went straight to Husband. Mr Cozy tried it IMMEDIATELY as soon as it arrived in the mail (not even letting it rest), saying "The molasses makes it smell dark, but there's a nice patchouli and woodiness to it." It smells amaaazing on him, all blackcurrant fruitiness with restrained patchouli-incense. And it's suuuuper long-lasting, hanging on through several washes on me. Oneirophilia (Love of Dreaming) [Pale pink rose, angelica, lemon balm, passion flower, night blooming cereus, and sandalwood immersed in an infusion of yarrow, vervain, and mugwort] - Let me start off by saying that I think this one will be a tremendous crowd favorite, and also that it almost but doesn't quite work for me. The rose in this is really delightful. I'm awfully picky about my rose notes, but this one is soft and pink, and on the gentle and powdery side rather than brash or green. It's joined by another floral that actually reads a bit like pink orchid to my nose, but must be the cereus, and I have to sigh because my skin's curse on jasmine (or, I guess, jasmine-adjacent florals) strikes again, and like many NCD jasmine scents this ends up being a touch indolic on me, and I'm just really not into that scent profile. It's a real bummer because the rose and cereus are backed by a host of fuzzy herbal-floral notes that remind me SO much of a field of wildflowers, as well as a spare amount of a musky sort of papaya-like fruit note (the passion flower, maybe?). To be honest I'm not really sure how this "field of flowers" vibe really fits the perfume's name ("Love of Dreaming"), but it is one of THE most beautifully cottagecore scents I've run across, and I think that everybody for whom Nui Cobalt's jasmine works ought to try this one. Ophidiophilia (Love of Snakes) [Pink sandalwood, Saharan musk, copaiba balsam, shea butter, dried fig, pale patchouli, and soft tawny suede] - This one is very clean, smooth, and slinky. I recognize this shea butter from several of NCD's more feminine and my-skin-but-better blends (particularly She Stopped to Pet a Bumblebee and Emotional Support Bee), but here it's much more unisex. The sandalwood, balsam, and suede provide a polished, supple, ever-so-slightly-woody base, with the shea butter for added silkiness, and hints of fruity fig and earthy, slightly peppery (but very light!) patchouli for extra interest. It's a different interpretation of "snakes" than I expected - a gentle, smooth, peaceful garter snake, not a strong and vicious python. Somniphilia (Love of Sleep) [Lamb's wool accord, orange blossom, barely-budding lavender, melissa, green fig, clary, cloud musk, and weightless vanilla marshmallow meringue] - Friends, this is so pretty. If Nui Cobalt Dewdrops on Spidersilk [Cerulean strands of cotton flower bejeweled with dewdrops, cold crystalline musk, tiny black vanilla beans, frozen blue raspberry, and gentle incense] is grown-up blue Sweettarts, this is pink and orange Valentine hearts: sugary and floral, with orange blossom the most prominent of the flowers and herbs listed in the notes. It is so pretty and airy, yet not lacking in throw. It's also not quite what I expected - I was anticipating a much more lavender-forward perfume (lavender + marshmallow) than it actually is. In fact I also got several other of NCD's sleepy lavender perfumes so I could compare them (comparison post here). As it dries, Somniphilia becomes less spun-sugar, making space for the other notes to come out (especially the herbal ones). I love it and wear it ALL THE TIME in spring. Epithets Athena Ergane (Teacher of All Arts) [A seaside temple amid the orange trees, precious sandalwood, white amber resin, a distant breeze of cypress, black tea, and oud] - This is a gorgeous spa-like scent. A bit aquatic (though not salty), and a bit botanical - I keep expecting wood notes but I keep not finding them. The botanicals are more like the botanical notes in gin, except there's no alcohol at all to this perfume. It's a little hard to describe, but it makes me feel so incredibly put-together. The person who wears this perfume might not be on an expensive Mediterranean vacation, but they have their act together. They are a person who Gets Things Done but also doesn't work too hard, and takes plenty of time for self-care. I wear this one a lot in summer. Aphrodite Chrysea (The Golden One) [Sacred benzoin, amber and copal resins, Moroccan cashmere, pink sandalwood, osmanthus, guava, and coconut milk chai] - Sadly, this one didn't really work for me. When first applied, there was definitely some amber and some musky cashmere, but most of what I smelled was fibrous, dried coconut husk. About ten minutes later, it had morphed completely, and became sweet, slightly dusty hard candy (my husband says it is "cut rock candy" like you get at Christmastime - Google it if, like me, you aren't sure what that is). Another half an hour later, it's still cut rock candy but becoming slightly floral, and the amber and cashmere start to make a reappearance. It was interesting to watch this one change, but ultimately it didn't earn a place in my collection. Aphrodite Nikephoros (She Who Brings Victory) [Three precious sandalwoods, bronzed skin musk, raw vanilla bean, Haitian amyris, creamy white rose, and a sprinkle of cardamom] - My immediate impression when first applied is sunscreen and roses - this is a scent for summer. As it begins to dry, it settles into a much more balanced scent, and like a checklist, all of the notes can be distinguished. Sandalwood/amyris, skin musk, vanilla (not a gourmandy bourbon vanilla, but also not the cool Spidersilk vanilla), cardamom, and still that ever-present rose. This rose note is a sharp rose with the vibrancy of the cut green stem, not a softer, velvety, dark pink rose. Several hours later, the rose top note largely evaporates and what's left is a delicious cardamom-sandalwood-skin musk. (And I, as you must know by now because I'm fairly vocal about it, am an absolute cardamom fiend.) If you like Grace [Sun-warmed pink magnolia, wild rose, pearl musk, vanilla orchid, and organic tonka bean butter] from the Whole Being collection, this is definitely one to try as well. Aphrodite Peitho (Goddess of Persuasion) [Tortuga teakwood, green amber, fig leaf, honeycomb, skin-warmed linen, vanilla orchid, fox fur accord, and lime blossom] - Another spa-like perfume, relaxing and luxurious. I get primarily the teakwood (much gentler than in Heliophilia) and linen, with the honeycomb and the green amber combining to form a decadent honey note. I honestly wouldn't have been surprised if this was one of the Bees. This feels like waking up on a Mediterranean vacation, with your windows wide open and the crisp, white curtains blowing gently in the warm breeze. Between this and Athena Ergane, I have a sliiiight preference for Ergane, but both of them are absolute staples of my summer perfumes. Venus Amica (The Friend) [Sun-warmed wildflowers, olivewood, apple blossom, light amber, moringa leaf, and sacred benzoin] - Wildflowers in a bed of grass (what I'm interpreting as a grass note must be the olivewood + moringa), with the heady, slightly astringently apple skin-y aroma of apple blossom wafting over them. Where Pixie [An apple orchard in bloom, spring grasses alive with an unearthly glow, vanilla bean offertory cakes, and sparkling honey mead] is a scent for late summer into early autumn, Venus Amica is undeniably a springtime perfume. It reminds me a bit of Poesie Curiouser & Curiouser [Daisy chains, blades of grass and a rabbithole, a blue cotton frock, airy vanilla clouds] in the way it combines wildflowers and grass, but where Curiouser & Curiouser sits on a vanilla base, there's no vanilla or sweetness to Venus Amica. In fact it's somewhat soapy, which isn't a quality that I mind though I know some of you try to steer clear of soapy scents. Venus Derceto (Patroness of Sex Workers) [Smooth sandalwood, tonka bean, marzipan, fresh coconut, and neroli, subtly spiced with ginger root, cinnamon, nutmeg, and clove] - I get toasted marshmallow (probably the tonka and marzipan), nutmeg-spiced oatmeal (umm...where's that warmed oat note coming from?), a touch of nutty hazelnut, and after a moment, whole lot of cinnamon, which probably just confirms that I amp cinnamon. This is a bummer, because before the cinnamon kicked in, it was such a lovely, cozy, not-quite-too-foody scent. But the cinnamon is obscuring the notes I really wanted to get from this perfume - the sandalwood and neroli, two of my favorite notes - and while the "subtle spices" aren't screaming at me like in some of the chai scents I tried this past fall, they're still loud enough to overtake everything else. This one is sadly not for me, probably excellent for people who love gourmands, and I'm still holding out hope that NCD makes another sandalwood + tonka + neroli scent sometime soon. Venus Verticordia (Changer of Hearts) [Sheerest lavender, clary sage, melissa leaf, and black cardamom warmed by creme caramel, tonka, dry ginger and Moroccan musk] - Nui Cobalt is really into the unexpected pairing of caramel with other contrasting (one might even say conflicting) notes - think Glass Pumpkin or Mad Scientist. Where Glass Pumpkin is pumpkin/caramel + the glassy notes of Nelophilia, and Mad Scientist is caramel facing off against lime, cardamom, and vanilla, Venus Verticordia is caramel against herbal notes, reminsicent of Somniphilia but without the marshmallow or neroli], or a better reference is probably Attitude Adjustment [Sheer vanilla orchid, olive leaf, lemon blossom, pink grapefruit, benzoin, ylang ylang, and a spritz of fresh ginger]. This one goes on as a tempestuous war between the herbals and the caramel, with a strong black pepper effect going on too, but after a few minutes the scent calms down a bit and becomes herbals sweetened by caramel, and the fight between the two halves ends peacefully. Venus Euplea (Of Good Navigation) [Mediterranean lime, honeydew, cerulean musk, translucent amber, precious Hawaiian sandalwood, a touch of clary sage, and a whisper of ambergris accord] - This one is fresh and aquatic, fairly citrus-forward (without looking at the notes, I guessed grapefruit rather than lime), but also quite smooth and well-rounded from sandalwood and amber, with a touch of sweetness from the addition of the honeydew melon (so clever!), and just a hint of complexity from the ambergris and clary sage. (I like NCD's clary sage, but only in very small amounts, and in some of their more herbal perfumes it's just a little heavy for my taste). And amazingly, this one is not at all soapy, so if you're wary of aquatics because they tend to go soapy or laundry detergent-y on you, this would be a good one to try. This is another one (like Athena Ergane and Aphrodite Peitho) that's especially great in summer. Crushes (I've only tried the one) Swoon [A passionate potion of juicy mulberry, acai, and red plum gently spiced with cardamom, heady egyptian amber, wood musk, ambrette seed, and black silk] - This one is an example of the happy surprise when you sniff the vial of perfume and feel kind of meh, but then you put it on your skin and it blossoms into the most beautiful scent! In the vial, it smells exactly like fruit snacks. ("The good ones, or those awful natural ones?" Husband inquired, when I said this out loud. "The proper Welch's ones!" I answered.) On my skin, it is significantly more interesting - it's still sweet red berries, but these fruit snacks have some incense and spice (a cinnamony cardamom) to them. Grown-up fruit snacks! It's remarkably pretty. I'm sure my nose is reading the resin from the egyptian amber plus the wood musk as the incense I'm picking up. Meanwhile the ambrette and silk musks make it exceptionally smooth and velvety, but a light and airy velvet rather than a heavy velvet, if that makes any sense. I wear this one as a cozy-yet-sophisticated winter scent. Les Désirs Dangereux Collared [Black calla lily, orris butter, oat milk, red satin sheets, ripe papaya, and a slender twist of yuzu] - It's a silky, musky pink floral with hints of dusty oat and a little bit of brightness from the fruits (though I wouldn't call this a fruity-floral; the fruit notes are very much in the background). I've never seen calla lily in a perfume's notes list before, so I was very intrigued! On me, it's a musky, ever-so-slightly indolic white floral, and it's really quite interesting because it has that heady white floral thing while actually being quite demure and soft-spoken. Longevity is a little bit below what's usual for Nui Cobalt on my skin; slightly less than half a day. Personally for pink florals in this collection I find Switch to be much more exciting and memorable (see below), but Collared is also really pretty, and a nice way to dip your toe into bolder, heady white florals without it hitting you over the face with them. Subspace [Warm almond milk, dewy blue lotus, labdanum, gardenia, driftwood, and porcelain musk] - I get oat milk more than almond milk, a soft blue lotus floral that gives the whole thing a spa-like aquatic vibe, and a hint of gardenia (just a hint - sometimes gardenia can be a bold, heady white floral but this is truly just a drop to boost the floral quality of the lotus). And yes, driftwood! I definitely wouldn't have named this as driftwood if I hadn't seen the notes list, but there truly is a slightly salty, weathered wood note underneath the warm lactonic and cool aquatic notes. Voyeur [Wet Bulgarian lavender, lemon verbena, old books, oakwood, and tweed] - In the vial, it smells like extremely masculine aftershave, but on my skin it's much more velvety and less sharp, and a bit sweeter. Voyeur is a refreshingly herbal and ever-so-slightly soapy scent, but it also has a really beautiful roundness to it thanks to the book-leather suede and the tweed (a rustic cashmere?) notes. It dries down to another of NCD's fabulous bookish scents, all creamy leather and vanillic paper, perfumed by lemon and lavender, and I'm find it way more intoxicating in this drydown than I had expected. Rereading this review as I put together this new post, I'm reminded how nice this one is and that I should pull it out again! Aftercare [Green coconut water, chilled aloe, neroli, sacred benzoin, lemon balm, and creamy pink rose petal musk] - A very strong cool, green aloe, which until the drydown actually smelled a lot like blue lotus. Joining it is a warmer neroli, which is beautifully balanced between orange blossom and the sharper, more green-herbal character that neroli sometimes has. Both aspects of neroli go really well with the blue lotus effect of the opening. I don't get any rose petals until the deep drydown, when the aquatic note is much more obviously aloe than lotus. I like the drydown quite a lot - the rose is such a beautiful accent - but since I'm not a tremendous fan of lotus notes, this one isn't for me. If you like lotus, though, this one is not to be overlooked. (Especially since there's no actual lotus listed in the notes description!) Switch [Champagne, Lady's Slipper orchid, Egyptian cotton, kudzu, pomegranate, and pink larkspur] - It goes on as fizzy strawberry soda! It's girly and super pink. Like with Parisian Pink [Peony petals, a suede settee, osmanthus, silk tree, spun sugar, Margaret Merril roses, pink grapefruit, and antique sandalwood], my nose is interpreting a fantasy strawberry note that isn't actually there. After a few minutes, really exceptionally pretty pink florals come out too - I could almost call them tuberose if I didn't know it was supposed to be orchid and larkspur. (Anyone have any experience with larkspur as a perfume note before? I love how evocative it sounds!) Switch dries down to a pretty pink floral musk, ever so slightly indolic. I would definitely put this in the same family as Parisian Pink. Dominance [Dark Vicuña wool, caramelized bourbon, Siberian Iris, ebony musk, and English ivy accented with pear] - An almost black dark honey with a confident, untamed mix of other notes - I get tart red grapefruit with the usual mix of herbs/spices that NCD likes to pair with grapefruit, with an underlying and comforting heavy weight of a wool blanket and a very slightly smoked quality that emerges in the drydown. I know it says bourbon, but this is SO definitely a honey scent on me; it feels like it could practically be one of the darker Bees. In the deep drydown, Dominance develops a smoky aftertaste which could almost be oud. Submission [Lotus silk, elderflower cordial, pale peach skin, honeysuckle, pillow moss, and slender bamboo] - This one's a thin, slightly watery, extremely silken pale blue floral. There's an almost pearlescent quality to it, quiet but beautiful, and sort of shimmering in different pastel colors - calm blue, seashell ivory, faint pear green. Looking at the notes list, I suppose I could identify a bit of fruity peach and a bit of aquatic moss, but the overall effect is an extremely silken-floral seafoam sort of scent that almost reminds me of my beloved Nelophilia. It's hard to describe - in fact, I had to test it twice in order to achieve anything of use to say about it, and I think it needed the extra week of rest to really come into itself - but it's extremely pretty. This is an understated beauty. Temple of Astarte [Black vanilla, sandalwood, red patchouli, a spark of ginger, and sacred incense composed of cherrywood, benzoin, and nag champa] - HELLO PATCHOULI! This is a gorgeous deep dark scent, all shimmery black and rich red in its scent color. It's a deep patch, growly and dark, and it's well-matched by the incense and ginger notes, and I definitely get a deep red cherry as well. Temple of Astarte is really quite beautiful, though dark and patch-heavy enough that it's not quite my thing, so I'm honestly quite delighted that Husband snaffled it (he loves patchouli). Lure of the Lash [Blood orange, pink and white peppercorn, lurid musk, nasturtium flower, allspice, cathedral incense, dark patchouli, and tonka] - It's quite a bold, dark scent, and initially the blood orange citrus fights heavily with the patchouli and incense, but it actually settles into quite a harmonious (though still dark and bold!) mix of black patch, earthy and spicy; NCD's amazing cathedral incense (I love their cathedral/temple incense so much); and a base of smoldering red musk brightened by bright citrus. This scent isn't for me, but that's because I'm generally extremely wary of both patchouli and red musk - if you like those notes, this is a very cool and well-crafted scent. Babalon Exalted (I've only tried the one) Bearer of the Golden Cup [Lilies on a lake of crystal, clean skin, lemon thyme, and coumarin] - This lily floral is greenish and silken - it reminds me quite a bit of Nocturne Alchemy's muguet de bois note, actually: quite green and wet and aquatic. It's paired with a golden yellow and sparkling crystalline note that very much reminds me of the "slanting beam of sunlight" effect of Fey Touched [Sunflower petals, honeyed almond, yuzu, sacred benzoin, and prismatic mist from woodland stream dappled in sunlight], but of course this scent is greenish rather than warm yellow. There's an undertone of lemon, not at all floor cleaner-ish, just one that accents and brightens the green lily floral. Personally... Somniphilia is one of my all-time favorite NCDs! I will sing its praises forever. It's my number 1 recommendation for a Nui Cobalt Valentines scent! Ailurophilia and Nephophilia are crowd favorites for good reason, and a fantastic place to start if you're new to Nui Cobalt. If you have tended to like a lot of the same things that I do, my other best recommendations - my other top favorites from this collection besides Somniphilia - are: Chionophilia and Swoon for winter snuggles, Astrophilia for that transitional season from winter to spring, Nephophilia and Nelophilia and Cyanophilia for pure springtime joy, and Aphrodite Peitho and Athena Ergane for summer leisure. (I wish I'd loved more of the other floral-forward scents in the Valentines collection more; if you don't have issues with occasional Nui Cobalt floral notes going indolic on your skin like they do on mine, you should definitely try more of those.) Ecclesiophilia has become one of my favorite "sophisticated" scents, and in fact I've worn it for professional presentations on many occasions in the past year (it helps that I'm a music historian of Tudor sacred music - it's perfect for that vibe!) And while Temple of Astarte and Nyctophilia both have waaay too much patch for me to wear them, they're kind of astonishing on Husband. submitted by /u/TeaAndCozy to r/Indiemakeupandmore [link] [comments]