Track emerging trends and get alerts when they grow. Create a free account to monitor this trend.
Create Free Account
Home / Led Mirror

Led Mirror

US United States
Sustained growth High volatility Forecasted flat
Led Mirror
What is Led Mirror?

An LED mirror is a mirror that incorporates LED lighting around its edges or behind the glass, providing enhanced illumination for various purposes such as grooming, makeup application, and interior design.

Treendly Index Treendly Forecast Google YouTube
MOM: +47.73%
How much search volume does it get?
Google searches
14.8K/mo
Who is interested in this?
Gender
Female
79%
Male
13%
Unspecified
8%
Age
18-24
37%
25-34
35%
35-44
17%
45-49
4%
50-54
4%
55-64
4%
65+
4%

Is Led Mirror trending?

Yes. Led Mirror growing with a month-over-month change of 2.62% over the past 5 years, with approximately 14,800 monthly searches.


Why is Led Mirror trending?

1
Enhanced Lighting
LED mirrors provide bright, even lighting that mimics natural daylight, making them ideal for tasks like makeup application and grooming.
2
Energy Efficiency
LED lights are energy-efficient and have a longer lifespan compared to traditional bulbs, making LED mirrors a cost-effective choice for consumers.
3
Modern Aesthetic
The sleek and modern design of LED mirrors adds a contemporary touch to bathrooms and dressing areas, appealing to consumers looking for stylish home decor.
4
Smart Features
Many LED mirrors come with smart features such as touch controls, adjustable brightness, and even Bluetooth connectivity, enhancing user experience and convenience.
5
Versatility
LED mirrors are available in various sizes and styles, making them suitable for different spaces, from small apartments to large homes.

Where is this trending?

What are people saying?

47 threads
AI Insights Mixed sentiment
Discussions around 'led mirror' primarily focus on the features and benefits of LED technology in various products, including lighting and displays. Users are sharing their experiences and preferences regarding LED mirrors and related technologies.
LED Technology Benefits
Users appreciate the energy efficiency and brightness of LED lights compared to traditional options.
Integration with Smart Devices
Many discussions highlight the ability to integrate LED mirrors with smartphones and other smart devices through features like Mirror Link and screen mirroring.
Design and Aesthetics
The modern and sleek design of LED mirrors is often praised, making them a popular choice for home decor.
Durability and Lifespan
Concerns about the lifespan of LED lights and their durability compared to other lighting options are frequently mentioned.
Price Considerations
Users express varying opinions on the cost of LED mirrors, with some finding them affordable while others consider them expensive.
Common questions
  • What are the best brands of LED mirrors?
  • How do LED mirrors compare to traditional mirrors?
  • Are LED mirrors worth the investment?
  • What features should I look for in an LED mirror?
  • How long do LED mirrors typically last?
Pain points
  • High initial cost compared to non-LED mirrors.
  • Concerns about the quality and reliability of cheaper models.
  • Limited availability of certain features in some products.
  • Issues with installation or compatibility with existing setups.
  • Potential for glare or reflection problems in certain lighting conditions.
haraj.com.sa
شيفروليه كابتيفا بريمير 2025
... * فتحة سقف بانوراما * أضواء نهارية (LED) * أضواء ضباب أمامية * جنوط ألمنيوم... 18 بوصة * إشارات انعطاف أمامية LED * إشارات مرايا * شبك كروم * قضبان... black alloy rims * Front LED turn signals * Mirror turn signals * Chrome grille...
aumber · Jul 12, 2026
www.ticklingforum.com
RE:Summer Again (F/M, bit of M/F)
... was in the rear view mirror, I was ready to pop... and forth. Which of course led to the flirty, "maybe I'll...
Captain Bad · Jul 12, 2026
jedirp.net
RE:The Dejarik Board
.... It was your desire that led me here, my Lord.” Her.... And I was gone. My mirror self, I mean. It was ...
Kaahnaah Hamu · Jul 12, 2026
www.corvetteforum.com
Fs: 2023 1lt z51 stingray 12k miles kansas city area
... Exterior & Convenience Upgrades • Sequential LED Mirror Cap Turn Signals • Blue-Tinted Wide-Angle...
Paul Fancher · Jul 12, 2026
haraj.com.sa
جيلي توجيلا بانوراما 2025 عرض خاص للكاش ( تظليل مجاني )
... بانورامـــــا - انــــــوار امامية وخلفيـة LED - اضاءة داخلية محيطية -... انعكاس شاشة الجوال على الشاشة (Mirror Link) - مقاعــد جلـد -...
اوتو كار السعودية · Jul 12, 2026
haraj.com.sa
جيلي ازكارا 2022
...). 6. مصباح أمامي LED ساطع ومصباح تشغيل نهاري LED. 7. بها مقاعد... and mp4 videos. 6. Bright LED headlight and daily running light... LED. 7. Has original NAPA leather ... entry sensor. 21. autfold side mirror when door is locked. 22...
jerwin84 · Jul 12, 2026
r/Noses
Enquiring about a nose job changed everything for me
Okay I’m going to yap a bit so apologies :P I will never forget the first time it was pointed out that I had a large nose. My older sister randomly just went “Ugh your nose is so big” on our way to school when I was 13. And I remember looking at the mirror and having no clue what she was on about…until I turned my head and looked at the side profile. I had no clue it looked like that! I had this massive hump that never used to be there before and it seemed to stretch out so far. Anyway, from that point on, something I never even paid attention to (noses) became the only thing I paid attention to. I went into school looking at all the different noses: the widths, the lengths, the shapes, and it made me feel terrible because my nose just seemed WAY bigger. I felt like I had a volcano on my face. I absolutely despised the way I looked. Anyway this hatred basically continued on for the next decade. Which meant, never wanting to take pictures , never wanting to take videos, never wanting to be in front of people, keeping my head down to avoid drawing attention to my face, covering my face when I would laugh. I just accepted that this was the way I would live until I could afford a nose job and “fix” my nose. About a year ago, that day finally came where I had enough to get a nose job. So I started researching HEAVILY into rhinoplasties and that led me to coming to Reddit. I posted an image of current nose and an altered AI image of my “ideal” nose and asked for surgeon recommendations in a nose job subreddit. To my surprise, I woke up the next morning to about 100 notifications from Reddit of people telling me not to get a nose job, which after looking at other posts, I realised was a pretty common theme. BUT, the comments really reinforced some ideas that I never really considered before: 1) Where does my idea of an ideal nose come from? Why do I think a certain nose shape/size is ideal. My nose is not “not ideal”, it’s not “ugly”, it’s just different. Some people will like it, some people won’t and that’s the case for literally everything. 2) My nose is a marker of my Pashtun ethnicity. This was the nose my ancestors had, the nose my grandparents had, the nose my dad has. If I change it, I’m stripping away part of my identity. Maybe to some people this isn’t a big deal, but for me it is. 3) My nose adds character to my overall look. I should own it a lot more. These might seem like obvious things, especially to people active in a sub like this. But for me it wasn’t. To me, it was: 1) Hate the way you look 2) Get a nose job. I never knew there was 3rd option of choosing to love my nose. There are still days where I feel a bit down about my nose, but I usually snap out of it quite quick. And I also have absolutely committed to never getting a nose job and that’s all thanks to posting about surgeon recommendations on Reddit 😂. So thank you nice people of Reddit. submitted by /u/adamk642 to r/Noses [link] [comments]
adamk642 · Jun 21, 2026
r/FierceFlow
I don't regret it even a second. 3,5 years of growing out my hair led to me being happy looking in the mirror!
submitted by /u/EstablishmentEven519 to r/FierceFlow [link] [comments]
EstablishmentEven519 · Jun 6, 2026
r/popculturechat
‘The face doesn’t move’: Hollywood’s obsession with cosmetic surgeries has led to stiffer looks – and performances
A few years ago, New York dermatologist Dr David A Colbert received an unexpected call from a Hollywood director. The director was shooting a film starring a high-profile actor who had plumped his face with so much filler it wouldn’t move. The director proceeded to berate Colbert, whose practice has treated famous faces such as Sienna Miller, Naomi Watts and Robin Wright, for stilting his star’s ability to emote. “He was kind of rude,” Colbert said. “He was like, ‘Hey, can you stop doing what you’re doing [to his face]?’” The director was mistaken: Colbert had never given dermal filler, or Botox, to the actor. “But I felt for him, because he wants his actors to look like people,” said Colbert, who did not disclose the identities of either. That director was fighting a losing battle. These days, the new “it” product among celebrities isn’t a $280 La Prairie concealer or $1000 Decorté moisturizer. It’s an entirely new face, with pillowy lips, stretched-out skin and a stationary forehead. For the rest of us, that means staring at faces on movie screens and streamers that look enhanced – and therefore restricted – by expensive cosmetic procedures. When the trailer for Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey dropped, armchair critics griped that Anne Hathaway, who has denied cosmetic surgery rumors, could not move her forehead enough. They found it unbelievable that Penelope, Odysseus’s wife, would have access to that good a dermatologist in ancient Greece. In the Wicked franchise, Ariana Grande plays Glinda the Good Witch in the Land of Oz, where apparently beauty standards are just as rigid as the real world: Grande’s airbrushed lack of expression led one Dazed writer to ask: “Is Botox ruining cinema?” Ditto for Margot Robbie as Wuthering Heights’s Cathy, whose Barbie-smooth features inspired speculation of cosmetic surgery, which could inhibit the lusty facial contortions one might make during a bodice-ripping scene. Much of this nip-tuck speculation is mean-spirited. It reeks of misogyny, blaming women for unrealistic beauty standards that are widespread in film-making and muffling necessary discussions on ageing in the industry. Millie Bobby Brown, only 22 years old, said that audiences’ responses to her unchangeable expression during the Electric State press tour left her holed up and “depressed for three, four days”. The pitchforks have come for men, too. Barry Keoghan said that online abuse about the way he looks (fans have speculated on whether or not he got filler) has made him “shy away” from acting and public life, and Ryan Gosling’s ageless appearance on a recent episode of Jimmy Fallon had an uncanny valley vibe, or so some fans tweeted. But it is also true that some of the best acting comes from total abandon and a willingness to be ugly – whether that’s Lucille Ball chucking chocolate down her gullet in I Love Lucy, or Charlize Theron’s unflinchingly raw depiction of the poverty-stricken serial killer Aileen Wuornos in Monster. Apparent dermal fillers, Botox, lip augmentation and jawline contouring do not exactly allow for expressive, soul-stirring performances. “It’s almost become standard that the face doesn’t move as much as it used to,” Colbert said. That lack of movement presents an existential threat to the craft of acting. Beauty has always been a job requirement for being a star, but so has facial dexterity. Is all that filler going to make for worse performances? Actors have sculpted their faces for as long as the film industry has existed – and audiences have always voiced their opinions on the topic. Marsha Gordon, a historian and professor of film studies at North Carolina State University, cites a 1929 article in Motion Picture magazine titled The Flesh and Blood Racket. The piece named and shamed mostly men who had gone under the knife, such as the boxer Jack Dempsey, who fixed his battered nose in preparation for a screen career. The bullish actor Louis Wolheim, known for playing thugs, wanted a rhinoplasty to help transition into leading roles; studio executives at United Artists successfully served a restraining order to stop him from changing it. “The close-up was so crucial to moviemaking. I just imagine Marlene Dietrich, Greta Garbo or Clara Bow’s face filling the screen,” Gordon said. “It wasn’t just about conveying emotion. It was an opportunity for audiences to sit in the palace of a movie theater and see a beautiful face.” These women were not immune to face-sculpting rumors back in their day. Legend has it that Dietrich removed her molars to achieve her famously arch cheekbones, and MGM reportedly secretly sent Garbo to see a surgeon. Neither actor is remembered for hamming it up onscreen – both projected a subtle coolness – but they were celebrated for their signature features. Dietrich’s pencil-thin brows, for instance, or Garbo’s sunken, hooded eyelids. “Films have become less intimate in terms of framing a performer’s face,” Gordon continued. “As we shift away from a culture of movie theaters, from big screens to tiny screens, I wonder if that has something to do with this tolerance [for filler].” Dr Anthony Brissett, a Houston-based cosmetic surgeon and president of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, points not to screen size but modern high-definition cameras, which reveal more than the naked eye. “There are things that actors and actresses will share with me that bother them” about their appearances, he said. “I have a hard time seeing it. Then I’ll watch them on television and yeah, sure enough, there it is. They’re under a high level of scrutiny and feeling this desire to look the same continuously.” Age used to be an actor’s enemy. During the Hollywood star system days, when studios controlled every aspect of actors’ lives, a fortysomething woman might quietly fade away, such as Dietrich did, or accept more character roles, which were often undignified (Bette Davis in Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? comes to mind). Now, female actors are no longer expected to disappear from the limelight after turning 30. A woman in her 40s can carry a film – but it helps her career to look as if she never aged. (It would also help her career if she never turned 60 either.) “I just sort of expect female actors somewhere between 30 and 60 are probably doing stuff, and they’re not going to move their foreheads,” Colbert said. Male actors do it too, but “it’s very competitive, especially for women.” Hollywood’s filler-mania mirrors national interest: an estimated 1.6 million Americans received facial procedures last year, with neurotoxins and fillers being the most popular. Then there is the sudden rise in GLP-1 drugs, such as Ozempic and Wegovy, which have slimmed down famous bodies and faces to the extent that fillers are required to correct for the gauntness. At the same time, forgoing these kinds of doctor’s appointments has become a show of dedication to one’s craft – an indication that the industry’s new beauty standards are not aligned with the work, or representative of how the regular people being portrayed in films look. Kate Hudson said that she quit Botox while filming her Oscar-nominated role in Song Sung Blue, since the film was set in the 1980s, before the procedure hit the market. Jennifer Lawrence told the New Yorker she gets Botox but draws the line at forehead filler, which shows more on camera. In casting, there are two types: bankable stars and actors who lack name recognition. Stars don’t audition for parts, actors do, and the stakes are higher for actors debating whether to get in on the cosmetic enhancement trend. “Visible plastic surgery is an immediate audition killer for almost every project I’ve worked on,” said Marie, a Los Angeles-based casting director who has worked on network TV shows and major film releases. (Marie is a pseudonym.) “Networks really hate plastic surgery unless it’s on someone who’s already famous, then they magically don’t notice it. The more famous you are, the more you can fuck with your face before it starts to hinder your chances of getting on in a movie.” Marie said that some younger, up-and-coming actors clearly have filler, which looks good in a selfie but prohibits them from embodying a role. “It’s really sad, a lot of younger actresses feel the need to be beautiful on Instagram, but then it makes them less realistic and accessible,” she said. “Being a model and an actress are two different things. I wouldn’t send someone [to a director] with visible plastic surgery, because they would look at us like we’re crazy and have bad taste.” Still, Marie said that cosmetic surgery or filler is never directly addressed in casting processes she has been involved with. “It’s completely unspoken,” she said. Zak Barnett, 50, is an acting coach in Hollywood. He does not have conversations about cosmetic enhancements while training actors on their artistic processes, but said his students talk to their agents about it, debating whether it will help them land jobs. Barnett believes that AI’s recent infiltration of Hollywood might help to reverse this trend. “The desire to be perfect will be taken over by AI projects and AI actors,” he said. “I think what audiences are going to want to see more and more is the truth, which is imperfections. If we get back to character-driven stories, then we won’t want anything to obstruct that authenticity.” It’s a nice thought. But Jessica M Goldstein, a journalist who has covered Hollywood aesthetics and culture, is not as hopeful. “Beauty standards under capitalism require there to always be something new to purchase,” she said. “There might be a superficial change – humanmade things become a badge of prestige or class, like how brands will talk about something being made in America. But that doesn’t mean that people are going to stop paying to have work done. It just means the nature of the work will change.” Goldstein predicts a shift toward more subtle enhancements. Fifteen or 20 years ago, actors started to get veneers en masse. Famous smiles all looked identical. These days, veneers are less standardized – though they’re still nice-looking, and very expensive. To some extent, this shift is already happening with faces. Brissett, the cosmetic surgeon, says patients are reporting “filler fatigue”, either opting to dissolve their filler or not re-up when it wears off (most fillers last up to a year). “It’s something they’ve outgrown,” he said. More people are turning to facelifts, Brissett said, which is the second most popular cosmetic surgery procedure in the US. The “deep-plane facelift” can cost up to $40,000 in major metropolitan areas such as New York or Los Angeles. It’s a newer, more natural-looking procedure intended to make someone look refreshed but not necessarily radically different. Crucially, it allows for facial movement. “Celebrities, public figures, and high-profile individuals are having it done quietly,” one surgeon told New York magazine last year. Jennifer Lawrence might shy away from filler, afraid of how it would impact her acting. But when asked if she had had a deep-plane, she eagerly responded: “Believe me, I’m gonna!” submitted by /u/ThrowawayGreenWitch to r/popculturechat [link] [comments]
ThrowawayGreenWitch · Jun 2, 2026
r/Games
007 First Light Review Thread
Game Information Game Title: 007 First Light Platforms: PlayStation 5 (May 27, 2026) Xbox Series X/S (May 27, 2026) PC (May 27, 2026) Nintendo Switch 2 Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfRZRwu4aEc Developer: IO Interactive Review Aggregator: OpenCritic - 88 average - 98% recommended - 51 reviews Critic Reviews Atarita - Atakan Gümrükçüoğlu - Turkish - 93 / 100 Centering on James Bond's origin story, 007 First Light blends action and stealth elements with flawless pacing, delivering that long-awaited, glorious return to the franchise. With its impactful melee combat mechanics, cleverly designed spy gadgets, and stellar acting performances, it places the player directly in the lead role of a breathtaking blockbuster movie. But Why Tho? - Matt Sowinski - 9 / 10 IO Interactive feels like they've found a new home in the James Bond franchise. 007 First Light is a blast, with a tense and enthralling narrative that punches way higher and harder than anyone could have expected. CGMagazine - Marcus Kenneth - 8 / 10 The best moments in 007 First Light are the ones where everything aligns for a few minutes, and you stop thinking about mechanics entirely. Cinelinx - Caleb Gayle - 5 / 5 007 First Light features a slew of unforgettable moments, cinematic jaw-dropping scenes, amazingly smooth combat, and one heck of a story. With all this stacked up, 007 First Light it is a brilliant action adventure title, and my top pick for game of the year! Cloud Dosage - Jon Scarr - 4.5 / 5 007 First Light turns a young Bond campaign into a spy adventure built around bluffing, gadgets, and recovering when missions fall apart. MI6, Q-Branch tools, and close-range fights keep the campaign moving, but the shooting, driving, and limited replay value hold it back. It’s a good fit if you want a story-led Bond game focused more on spy work than giant stealth sandboxes. ComingSoon.net - Tyler Treese - 9.5 / 10 As stylish as the films themselves, 007 First Light is a brilliant depiction of Bond. Daily Mirror - Aaron Potter - 4 / 5 James Bond's video game return is a delight from start to finish, with Hitman develop IO Interactive expertly lending its spy expertise to a new breed of interactive spy thriller. DayOne - Jon Clarke - 9 / 10 With a great cast of characters, tons of imagination, and just the right amount of player agency and replayability, there is a delightful playground full of gadgetry and spycraft that players will want to return to again and again. A confident return for the Double-O program, and - sorry Goldeneye - this is, without a doubt, the best James Bond game ever made. Digitec Magazine - Philipp Rüegg - German - 5 / 5 After 30 years, ‘GoldenEye’ is finally retiring. With ‘007 First Light’, IO Interactive – the masterminds behind ‘Hitman’ – delivers the ultimate Bond experience that fans have been waiting for since the N64 classic. DualShockers - Christian Bognar - 9 / 10 With superb writing, top-notch acting, beautiful cinematography, and expressive gameplay, 007 First Light is as sleek as it is engaging. Eurogamer - Rick Lane - 4 / 5 007 First Light is less cerebral and replayable than IO's World of Assassination trilogy, but makes up for it with excellent fistfights and oodles of charm. Everyeye.it - Joseph Arace - Italian - 8.2 / 10 007 First Light is just like its protagonist: charismatic, energetic, funny, charming; as well as impetuous, exaggerated, and immature. GAMES.CH - Olaf Bleich - German - 86% "007 First Light" isn't a perfect action game, but it's excellent nonetheless. GAMINGbible - Olly Smith - 9 / 10 007 First Light is an exquisite taste of slick spy action and blockbuster storytelling, and is fully what a Bond game should be, but rarely is. GamePro - Annika Bavendiek - German - Unscored IO Interactive delivers a magnificent gaming comeback for James Bond with 007 First Light, which proves worthy of the source material. GameRant - Dalton Cooper - 8 / 10 It's not perfect, but 007 First Light is a mostly great start to IO Interactive's all-new take on the James Bond universe. GameSpot - Mark Delaney - 8 / 10 007 First Light wisely repurposes what works in both universes but isn’t afraid to reimagine or ditch those parts that don’t. Gameblog - Geralt de Reeves - French - 9 / 10 While it won't revolutionize the industry like GoldenEye did in its time, it undoubtedly delivers one of the best video game experiences of all time, putting you in the shoes of the iconic spy. Gamersky - 心灵奇兵 - Chinese - 8.6 / 10 007: The First Steps not only reimagines the classic, but more importantly, it truly lives up to the legendary "007" designation. Generación Xbox - Gabriel Fuentes - Spanish - 85 / 100 007 First Flight is a testament to originality in its script and marks the beginning of a new trilogy for the character in the world of video games. Gfinity - Alister Kennedy - 10 / 10 007 First Light is, for me, an absolute masterpiece that shattered all pre-release anxieties and is, in fact, the greatest Bond video game of all time. IO Interactive masterfully balances explosive action with "Hitman"-inspired stealth, all brought to life by Patrick Gibson’s breathtaking, definitive performance as a young James Bond. Equal parts thrilling and cinematic, this incredible experience is a gorgeous love letter to the franchise and a sure-fire Game of the Year contender. Hobby Consolas - David Rodriguez - Spanish - 85 / 100 First Light is the best Bond experience ever seen in a video game —a complete package, true to the essence of the character, updated, and incredibly fun to play. IGN India - Rayan Sayyed - 9 / 10 007 First Light understands what makes James Bond interesting beyond the suits and gadgets. This younger Bond is reckless, emotional, and still figuring out his fundamentals, making his story feel more personal. Pair that with flexible stealth, solid hand-to-hand combat, strong production values, and Hitman-style mission design, and you get a Bond game that feels cinematic that gives players plenty of freedom. Plus, the variety in mission design and the satisfying spy fantasy make 007 First Light gives James Bond the best debut in this generation. IGN Italy - Silvio Mazzitelli - Italian - 9 / 10 The James Bond saga could hardly have ended up in better hands. IO Interactive has crafted an adventure that perfectly captures the spirit of the 007 movies with an engaging story, stunning settings, and gameplay that's polished in every detail. IGN Portugal - Pedro Pestana - Portuguese - 9 / 10 While cinema is still searching for a new Bond, the studio IO Interactive has already found its virtual version. Rebellious and arrogant, Patrick Gibson does a fantastic job in the shoes of Her Majesty's secret agent without needing to wear a tuxedo, in a well-crafted adventure that marks the beginning of a new era for 007 in video games. With gameplay that cleverly distances itself from what we already know from Hitman to embrace a stronger narrative and the cinematic moments immortalized on the big screen, 007: First Light didn't need a license to dazzle. IGN Spain - Mario Seijas - Spanish - 8 / 10 007 First Light features a sophisticated and comprehensive infiltration system, as well as solid hand-to-hand combat mechanics. The lackluster cover system does not detract from what could mark a new era for 007 in the world of video games. INFINITY AREA - Florian Prache - French - 9.5 / 10 James Bond 007 First Light is a huge surprise from IO Interactive. Far from being just a Hitman clone in disguise, the game establishes its own identity with rich gameplay, smart stealth mechanics, and explosive action. Despite disappointing driving sequences and the lack of English voice acting, the game manages to keep players engaged from start to finish thanks to its atmosphere, visuals, and great freedom of approach. An essential adventure for James Bond fans. INVEN - Kyuman Kim - Korean - 9.1 / 10 After a long stretch in the dark, a truly worthy 007 game has finally arrived. With a young Bond at its center, it delivers nearly everything fans could want from a Bond film—thrilling storytelling, clever twists, and charismatic characters alike. It feels poised to become a new “first light” in the history of 007 games. Loot Level Chill - Mick Fraser - 9 / 10 007 First Light is a superb adventure game that does so much more than simply coast on the popularity of its franchise. Manual dos Games - Luiz Henrique Silva - Portuguese - 10 / 10 007 First Light delivers on the promise of being the ultimate James Bond game by introducing a new version of the character that oozes charisma in every second on screen, alongside an excellent storyline supported by memorable side characters who help drive the narrative forward. The game also features an extremely creative level design that fully embraces its stealth and combat systems, making players truly feel like an MI6 spy. MeuPlayStation - Thiago do Nascimento Barros - Portuguese - 100 / 100 007 First Light is all about aura. It honors James Bond's legacy by bringing everything we love about him since the 1960's movies in the ultimate 007 videogame experience. Chases, shootings, explosions, plot twists, politics, charm, Bond Girls, guns, cars, boats, Q Technologies, Moneypenny, M, iconic characters, beautiful locations... All of that with great level design, combat and exploration. The name is Bond, James Bond. Multiplayer First - James Lara - 8.5 / 10 If there is one thing I’m even more certain of than when we first learned that IO Interactive was making a 007 game, it’s that they are still the perfect studio to be making a Bond game. As many have called it, it’s a match made in heaven, and, as the first entry in what is hopefully a long-running series, I think the franchise is in safe hands. It’s one thing to make an experience on an established IP; another to actually understand what makes that experience so great. IO has captured the soul of a Bond experience in 007 First Light. With a strong foundation to build upon, a new era for MI6’s finest is upon us, and I cannot wait to see where IO Interactive takes the franchise next. PCGamesN - Paul Kelly - 8 / 10 While it doesn't pull up any roots, 007: First Light is a beautiful, cinematic action game that makes clever use of the IO formula. From the performance of Patrick Gibson to the iconic score, this is a game that tells a new story and basks in nostalgia in equal measure, giving James Bond a fresh angle in the process. PCMag Middle East - Ali El Sayed - 5 / 5 First Light feels like a true Bond game, a strong IO Interactive game, and the best blueprint 007 has had in video games for decades. It balances story, action, stealth, gadgets, and style better than any Bond game before it. PPE.pl - Wojciech Gruszczyk - Polish - 9.5 / 10 007 First Light is the best James Bond game ever – brilliantly written, superbly acted and brimming with that unique atmosphere we’ve come to expect from stories about Agent 007. IO Interactive has combined its own experience from Hitman with a cinematic adventure in the style of Uncharted, throwing in gadgets, spectacular missions, interesting characters and a very well-crafted story of the young Bond. Not everything works perfectly, as the game sometimes holds your hand (a bit too tightly!), but ultimately it’s a brilliant start to a new era of 007 in gaming. PSX Brasil - Ivan Nikolai Barkow Castilho - Portuguese - 90 / 100 007 First Light is an excellent James Bond game: varied gameplay with intelligent approach options, a story worthy of the character's films, beautiful graphics, and great technical performance. The TacSim mode is a great way to increase the title's longevity. Although the campaign features many slow-paced moments with secondary characters and combat animations that repeat frequently, it's an adventure that deserves to be checked out by any 007 fan or action game enthusiast in general. Pizza Fria - Álvaro Saluan da Cunha - Portuguese - 9.3 / 10 007 First Light is a game that presents us with a different kind of James Bond, treated with the weight, charm, and complexity that Ian Fleming's character deserves. Push Square - Stephen Tailby - Unscored I'm not quite finished with 007 First Light just yet, but overall I'd say it's exactly what I was hoping for. The characterisation of this young Bond and his associates is really strong, and the globetrotting story lets you explore some great locations. It really shines in its sandbox missions, but shootouts have their moments too, and the whole thing weaves together really quite nicely. I'm really interested to see how the final few missions shake out, but beyond some technical quibbles and uncertainty on the driving, I'm pretty happy with IOI's new vision for James Bond. Region Free - Joonatan Itkonen - 4 / 5 I don't think we've seen a better example of Bond as a genuine character in gaming. This isn't just a replica of what we have on the screen, either. In First Light, Bond is his own character, as important a part of the canon as Brosnan, Connery, or Craig. This is one of the most thrilling Bond adventures to date. República DG - Ruancarlo Silva - Portuguese - 9.6 / 10 007: First Light is not only the best 007 game ever made, but it also easily rivals the best games in the genre. IO Interactive delivers a special experience that honors the legacy of the greatest spy in entertainment history. Restart.run - Imran Khan - 3.5 / 5 It is likely the best James Bond game ever, but there's some qualifiers that drag 007 First Light down from being a complete knock-out. SECTOR.sk - Peter Dragula - Slovak - 9.5 / 10 007 First Light is a strong new beginning for James Bond in games, combining a deep origin story, varied missions, stealth, action, excellent hand-to-hand combat, precise shooting, impressive visuals and classic Bond atmosphere. A few slower sections and the lack of a body-hiding mechanic are minor issues in an otherwise excellent spy adventure. Screen Rant - Kyle Gratton - 9 / 10 007 First Light brings James Bond back to gaming in an innovative story that celebrates the character's legacy, alongside franchise-best gameplay. Shacknews - Donovan Erskine - 9 / 10 007 First Light is a crowning achievement for IO Interactive and the culmination of the studio’s growth over the years. The Nerd Stash - Julio La Pine - 9.5 / 10 007 First Light is not only the best James Bond video game to date, but also one of the greatest action-adventure titles of this generation, full of jaw-dropping action sequences, a compelling narrative, and superb acting. The Outerhaven Productions - George Yang - 4 / 5 007 First Light delivers a strong Bond origin story with solid stealth, gadget use, and plenty of spy-thriller energy. Tom's Guide - Rory Mellon - 5 / 5 007 First Light is the finest James Bond video game in nearly 30 years. Its cinematic single-player campaign is remarkable, offering a gripping, quintessentially Bond story, packaged together with some of the best action-adventure set pieces I've ever experienced. Whether you're a longtime Bond fan or a newcomer, 007 First Light is unmissable. Check Amazon Check Best Buy Tourens - Mert Tuna - Turkish - 8.5 / 10 Despite its slow pace at the start and a few minor AI glitches, this is an experience that keeps players locked to their screens with its rich level designs, freedom oriented stealth mechanics, and satisfying cinematic action. A game that’s definitely worth a try. VGC - Jordan Middler - 5 / 5 007 First Light might just be the best James Bond game ever. The way IOI has translated the Bond fantasy into a 14-hour globetrotting epic is masterful. It's a game full of spectacle, humour, action, and romance. Everything James Bond should be. New Bond owners Amazon must ensure this franchise continues. Worth Playing - Cody Medellin - 8.5 / 10 007 First Light shows that the Hitman developers have a good handle on how to make a James Bond game work within their wheelhouse. The emphasis on less flashy espionage alongside multiple avenues to accomplish your given goal works to this game's favor in helping to differentiate it from past 007 games. There's still enough action to prevent the game from feeling like a complete tonal shift from common expectations. The quality of the stealth helps compensate for the combat, which is good but can feel lacking in areas. The adventure remains fun but familiar, while the presentation is top-notch. The game is another good example of how to do a licensed game well, and the hope is that we'll see IO Interactive do more in this universe, whether that's DLC or a full-on sequel. Xbox Achievements - Dan Webb - 92% For well over two decades, IO Interactive have become synonymous with their Hitman series. Since 2000, the Danish studio has released twelve games, w... submitted by /u/Turbostrider27 to r/Games [link] [comments]
Turbostrider27 · May 26, 2026
r/IndianCivicFails
[Not OC] Mysuru installs mirrors on walls to stop public urination, adds LED lights for night; leaves internet impressed
Source - https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/etimes/trending/nobel-genius-mysuru-installs-mirrors-on-walls-to-stop-public-urination-adds-led-lights-for-night-leaves-internet-impressed/amp\_articleshow/130852103.cms Video source - insta @ news_vibes_india2 submitted by /u/bifrost_traveler to r/IndianCivicFails [link] [comments]
bifrost_traveler · May 6, 2026
r/BestofRedditorUpdates
Me [25 F] with my boyfriend [25 M] duration 7 months. My boyfriend is very jealous and keeps making "rules" for me to follow. (LONG)
I am not The OOP, OOP is u/rulesrulesrules7 Me [25 F] with my boyfriend [25 M] duration 7 months. My boyfriend is very jealous and keeps making "rules" for me to follow TRIGGER WARNING: Abusive behavior, controlling behavior, gaslighting, manipulation, verbal abuse, infidelity MOOD SPOILER: An amazing ending for OOP Original Post Apr 4, 2015 Hello, everyone. I have a bit of a weird predicament to share with you. I have been dating my boyfriend ("Peter") for about 7 months now. When we get along, we get along spectacularly. Our chemistry is off the charts, we're playful, we're both driven, we have similar interests (same career path, both read for leisure, both interested in exercise). I've been told by many friends that they can just sense how much we care about each other and that we have the same disposition: calm, relaxed, sweet. If not for the following stuff, I would be head over heels for him. Hell, I already am when he's not acting this way. So this stuff started happening about a month in. Peter is an extremely jealous person. He's admitted this to me. He can also be a bit judgmental and conservative. The following is a list of things he's asked me to do for him throughout the course of our relationship. I haven't asked for anything like this in return and I've even asked him if he feels like I've done the same and he's said no: No cursing. No low-cut shirts. No weed (not a big deal, I've smoked < 10 times and was okay with giving this up for him). He prefers me to not get "drunk." Not a big deal, I don't drink a lot, but it kind of sucks that I can never let loose and get tipsy with my friends without a comment from him. No perverted jokes: with him, or anyone else. He says the jokes would be funny if a guy said them but they're not funny when I do it. No using a joking "little kid" voice with friends - even girls. No talking about other guys around him because he thinks I'm trying to make him jealous. No talking about past relationships, even though he does this. No emoticons in texts with other guys. No exclamation points or sounding "too flirty or happy" when talking to guys. Audibly say "goodbye" when we part ways. Verbally greet him, even if I'm late to class. No speaking to male friends on the telephone or texting after 10 pm at night. Text him when I leave my apartment and I'm on the way to school. This isn't a specific rule, but if I don't text him for 3-4 hours during the day, he'll say "Oh, hi there, silent one. What have you been up to?" He likes me to stop by his study space when I get to school, before class, after class, and before I leave at the end of the day. He's stopped by my space less than 10 times in our 7 months together. He asks me if I'm "behaving" when we're not together physically. We've had a bit of a power struggle when I've wanted to go out with my group of friends. There is a structured timetable of how much I'm allowed to talk to my ex. We broke up two years ago and a half and had a year of silence. Recently, we've been speaking on facebook. (He doesn't have my phone number). It's random stuff about our undergraduate. Just friendly stuff, lighthearted. I'm only allowed to talk to him once every three weeks for 10-15 minutes. If he facebooks me and it's been outside those three weeks, I'm not supposed to respond. He still gets mad even when the ex facebooks me. I'm not supposed to "flirt" with members of the opposite sex. I don't. However, he's seen interactions between guys and me and it appears he thinks that anything along the lines of smiling, laughing, or sarcasm are grounds for flirting. He "doesn't like" easily 80% of the guys I interact with on a regular basis. There have been a few incidents that have bothered me in the time we've been together. In the interest of time, the most recent problem he and I have been having is my friend named James. James graduated last year from the program that Peter and I are in together. He's a big brother type to me. He was an assigned TA for the class I was in and I went to a study group he led. We became friends. We've been friends for three years and nothing has ever happened and neither James nor I have ever shown any interest in it. We just have similar political views and give each other dating advice on occasion. James came to visit the school and he and I got together for lunch while he was here. He was here for 3 days and I saw him once for only an hour. Before he visited, we texted back and forth maybe once every ten days. Since he visited, it's been 2-3 times a week, about 10 texts at a time. Nothing outrageous. I imagine it'll start lessening when it's been longer since his visit and exams approach. He's in a new city without a lot of friends and I enjoy talking to him. Because he's working, he usually texts me on Saturday and Sunday more than the work week. James texted me last Saturday morning. I didn't answer so he followed up with a text on Sunday. We chatted briefly about a TV show. Then he texted me again this Saturday to tell me about his date the night before. This has been driving Peter up the wall. He's demanded to see the texts back and forth. Even though I strongly object to this, as I think it's an invasion of privacy only 7 months in, I let him see all the texts. There was nothing inappropriate there (this is where the "no emoticon" rule came from though). However, Peter says that James is a "shark" and is only friends with me because he wants to date me. This is ridiculous because James and I have no feelings towards each other, act more like siblings, and are going to be living in different states for the rest of our lives. Peter causes a fight EVERY time he notices James texting me or gets pouty and silent until I ask him what's wrong, then we fight. About two hours ago, Peter gave me another rule. He wants me to arrange it so James only texts me once a week. No word yet on how many texts I would be "allowed" to exchange with him. He also says he doesn't want us talking about "intimate things." When I asked him what that entailed, he brought up that he was mad that I told James that I was going to take a nap in the last conversation we had. I only told James that as a conversation-ender so he wouldn't wonder why I wasn't responding. Peter just seems unreasonable. I guess, here's the big problem. I feel like Peter gets mad about something, fights with me until I'm worn down, then comes up with a "compromise" which is really just him imposing another rule on me. There was a guy who liked me at the beginning of the year that I eventually just had to block on my phone because Peter got so mad about it. He's asked me twice to show him that the guy is really blocked. He really is. Same thing happened with the ex and I know his end game is me never speaking to the ex again. Peter had a jealousy issue with my friend Rob and wore me down to the point that I basically just avoid Rob now (Rob even approached to ask if I was mad at him and apologize for whatever he did). I just feel like this is going to keep happening over and over. I never get the benefit of the doubt, James is constantly afraid I'm going to be "stolen" and I feel like I teeter-totter between wanting to give him what he asks so he'll feel comfortable and feeling like it will never be enough. I feel like a caged animal. I'm afraid every time James texts me or any guy speaks to me in front of Peter. I like him so much but this jealousy is driving me crazy. I'm also afraid if we're together, I'm going to get to the point where I'm not allowed to be friendly with 50% of the population. I'm in danger of losing a total of 3 good, respectful guy friends, all of which I've known for longer than Peter. (I knew Rob for two years, James for 3, and the ex for nearly 6). I'm not a bad person or a bad girlfriend and I'm tired of being treated this way. We fight at least weekly, sometimes twice a week, over an issue like this. I just want it to stop and to be with the person I fell so hard for. But I also don't want to end up in a controlling relationship with someone who can't manage their jealousy. Any advice? Ever been on his side or mine? He's already going to a counselor but our school only provides one every two weeks and he missed his last appointment. He's open to couple's counseling but I don't know if there's a point 7 months in. Because he missed the last appointment, he hasn't brought up the jealousy thing with his counselor yet. He's willing to read books on this topic but I feel like the problem is that he won't start to get better until he really trusts me and wants to change. He says that he does but then he keeps doing this stuff. tl;dr: Very jealous boyfriend continually gives me "rules." Sample list above (not all of them). Any ideas on how to make him more comfortable? Is this fixable? Have you been on either side of something like this? RELEVANT COMMENTS MeltMyCheeseKThxBai You just presented us with a literal bullet point list of why you need to break the fuck up with him, ASAP. PETER is the shark here. And actually, you're right- this WILL keep happening over and over. Not only will it keep happening, but it will keep escalating. Here is a list for you, and I will call it "Soon." Soon, you will be afraid to walk around while looking anywhere but the ground because you don't want to be accused of purposely making eye contact with someone. Soon, you will compliantly give him access to all of your stuff to placate him and he will peruse your personal stuff regularly; many confrontations will result about your "infractions" and he will spring them on you at inconvenient times. Soon, you will not be allowed to interact or be friendly with anyone who isn't on his approved list; this will eventually include your family. Soon, while you're constantly on eggshells afraid to be accused of cheating, you will find out that he actually cheated on you. Maybe with one of those exes he likes to talk about. Because, you see, these types are so paranoid about cheating because they are cheaters and think everyone else will cheat too. Soon, if you have a job, he will be asking about your coworkers and maybe even show up there for a "surprise inspection". Don't be surprised if soon, additionally, he starts the practice of keeping you up all night fighting and not letting you sleep when he knows you have to work. Soon, you will stop butting heads about you going out with friends. This is because he will make your every attempt so miserable that you will give up to make things "easier". Soon, you will be but a shell of your former self and will wonder who the fuck that is staring at you in the mirror. Soon, he may become violent. He likely won't until he has effectively removed your support systems (friends and family) but eventually he damn near certainly will. I hope that SOON you heed the warnings and get the fuck away from this lunatic before he ruins you. Seriously, you have to get this. This is very, very bad. He will not change no matter how much counseling he gets. You modifying your behavior will NEVER change his. He is fucking dangerous and you need to end it with him NOW before he gets the chance to employ more advanced tactics on you. You are in dire need of these two books; "The Gift of Fear" and "Why Does He Do That?" I beg you, read them. Please seriously get the fuck away from this person. Edit: More stuff coming Soon to a relationship near you (will add as I think of them): Soon, he will call you "slut" and/or "whore" for the first time because "he told you not to wear that shirt". You will get upset. You also will never wear that shirt again. OOP I don't live near my family but there was a time last weekend where I was texting my family about a basketball game. We were cuddling on the couch and he took the phone away and said "Babe, can we just have 'us' time? We've been fighting all day and I just want to be with you." So that might be eminent. We fought today after James texted me about his date last night. I've been sick with a 101+ fever the past two days and cuddling with my childhood stuffed animal. He picked her up and acted like he was going to rip her arm off because he "wanted to scare me" and "see what I would do." I had to stop myself from kicking him. I've had the animal since I was 5 and she's from my dead grandmother. I don't know what I would do if she was broken. When I got her back, I tried to kick Peter out and he wouldn't leave. I ended up throwing his shoes and keys into the hallway and pushing him out the door. He took me out to lunch and then went back to the library. Now he's mad that we're going to bed angry. This was one of the texts I got this afternoon: "I know you don't want to hurt his (meaning James) feelings by telling him to take it easy on texts but you need to consider your boyfriend's feelings about this guy texting you so often every week. What he is doing is crossing my boundary. I know you don't want to hurt his feelings so I get you might not want to tell him flat out to stop texting. There are other ways. The main point is that this is too much and it is crossing a line of mine. I think once a week might be ideal and if we could reach that, it would ease my feelings. I ask that you consider my feelings. In return, I will make sure my jealousy does not lead me to imposing boundaries. You can tell him the truth: that he is crossing my boundaries and I ask that he respects me. I am being reasonable. All of our fights the last few weeks have been about this. If this goes away, then we both win and we can stay together happier." When I asked him what he's ever done in exchange for what I've given up, he said that he went through a phase of criticizing me and he's gotten better. That that was real change. Then he told me that I mean the world to him and he wouldn't go out of his way to try and fix our issues if he didn't care about me and being together for the future. I told him I wanted a break. Update May 1, 2015 (1 month later) Hi, all. Sorry that I dropped off and stopped responding all the sudden. I want to take a moment to sincerely thank you all for the outpouring of support and kindness that you showed me after my original post. I've read every single comment and PM probably 4 times and watched every lecture that was sent my way. I also went and picked up a book two days ago about controlling relationships which was recommended to me by a few redditors. I've read 160 pages so far. Honestly, I'm so turned around in this relationship that I don't know what's happening anymore. I do think that this relationship has some disturbingly manipulative and controlling elements coming from Peter. We've had several incidents in the last four weeks which have been very disheartening. Here are a sample: I went out to happy hour with friends - a guy and girl that are engaged to each other - at 5 pm while Peter studied. I guess he assumed we were eating dinner together because we eat most of our meals together. He didn't confirm that though. He knew where I was going and who I was with. I put my phone away because my friends both had their phone away and it was just us three. My phone was on silent because I had been in the library. I checked my phone every half hour or so. The last time I checked it, he had sent me a text asking about dinner and then a snarky follow up 15 minutes later. I had order an appetizer with my friends and wasn't hungry. I told him to go ahead and eat without me and we'd meet up later. I decided to go back to my friends' house to play with their dog and have another beer. Peter had told me that he was going to study until 10 pm and then wanted to spend the night together. All the sudden, Peter was mad at me for not telling him I was eating, not telling him we switched locations (even though I did, within 10 minutes of switching places) and telling me that he had right as my boyfriend to know where I was. He said I was inconsiderate and selfish. He was texting me every 10-15 minutes, angry at me, and completely ruined the night. I couldn't hide from my friends that I was upset and it was borderline humiliating. I went home by 10 pm but didn't want to see him because I was angry. He didn't apologize until the next day after we talked about it extensively and even then tried to justify it. I feel weird around my friends now that they've seen this. There was another incident when we ran into one of my good friends and I stopped to chat with her. Peter and I had spend the night together, had lunch together, and gone on a walk. I caught up with my friend for 3 minutes and then planned on walking to Peter's study space to chat for a few minutes before going back to my friend to study with her. (Peter likes to say "goodbye" even though we study like 20 ft apart, separated by a wall.) Peter got impatient, felt ignored, and walked off. Then he sent me several texts about how rude and inconsiderate I was by pretending that he wasn't there. That wasn't true at all; I was telling my friend I liked her sweater, asking her how she was, then I was going to exit with Peter to fill my water bottle and say goodbye. This blew up into a 3 hour argument via text. I had my best friend from home visiting last weekend. She stayed with me and drove 18 hours round trip in 4 days just to see me. Peter constantly texted, made passive aggressive comments if I didn't respond quickly enough, and generally was negative about me not giving him enough attention. I pointed all this out, he agreed and told me he would calm down. We all went to a dinner on her last night in town and I thought it went nicely. When Peter got out of the car, my friend made a comment that she was glad to see Peter and I getting along better. 5 minutes later, I got a text from Peter criticizing me, accusing me of not acting like a "couple" with him, acting distant, and not holding his hand. I was shocked. I thought I did a great job with the conversation, he talked for his fair share amount of time, and he got along well with my friend. She's been my best friend for 10 years. He said he hates how I "always do this." I have literally no idea what he's talking about. This wasn't a date. This was the first time he met one of the people who was most important to me and the last thing I wanted to do was make her feel like a third wheel. I told him I wasn't going to argue while she was in town but obviously was upset for the rest of the night. He apologized the next day but only after a long conversation. Obviously he didn't make a great impression once my friend saw the aftermath of dinner. Peter and I had a good day on Tuesday. We had fun, were getting along, etc. I came over to his place, took a nap, he went to soccer, and then I ordered us dinner. We ate together and bonded. I checked my phone (I keep it in my backpack now, at his request) and he saw I had a text. He wanted to know who it was from and what it said. I told him it was from James, asking where I was studying this summer (my home state or school state). Peter started lecturing me about getting texts after 10 pm (it was 10:30 where we were, 9:30 where James was). He talked about how it was inappropriate, he wouldn't talk to a girl so late, and asked why James wanted to know where I was. He asked if James was planning on visiting me. James and I have no plans like that whatsoever. Later, I got chapstick out of my backpack and Peter started accusing me of sneaking around to text James back. I wasn't. He asked me three times if that's what I did. I almost left but Peter convinced me to stay. All of the sudden, I felt suspicious. I asked to see his facebook chat log so I could see when he had lasted facebooked his ex that he swears he hasn't spoken to. He refused. I ended up leaving, then coming back and saying if he wouldn't show me the same transparency he's demanded from me, it was over. He still tried to say no. In retrospect, I'm horrified by how angry I felt. I wanted to push him or hit him. I've never, ever felt like that towards another person. It's like I didn't recognize myself. He ended up showing me the log. He had a long conversation with his ex from Christmas Eve, which was laden with inside jokes, flirting, and sexual references. I asked to see his phone. Whole months were missing from his call log but he had two voicemails from her which insinuated they had some contact with each other. He swears that's all there is but almost half his call log is gone. This is something I could forgive in a normal relationship -with remorse and change - but it hurts a lot considering that he's breaking rules he's given me, lied, and been hypocritical. I feel so watched and suffocated over actual guy friends, subjected myself to structured timetables imposed by him, had an open phone policy, and he's off talking about suggestive stuff with his ex. She's blocked him now but that's not the point. He's got me to the point where I feel guilty every time a male friend talks to me and I've actually started believing that I'm doing something wrong if I laugh at a guy friend's joke. I feel sick when my phone goes off if I'm around him. I've been reading literature on controlling/abusive relationships and shared my concerns with him that he's meandering into this territory. He's been dismissive of it almost every time I've brought it up. I've had three friends tell me they're concerned based on the rules and his jealousy. He just says he has high standards and boundaries and that I would be jealous too if the roles were reversed. I don't think I would be but he insists I would. I just feel like he doesn't listen to me or take me seriously. I thought things were getting better, he said I could text James whenever I wanted and he would be less harsh/critical in general. Yesterday though, he asked if I had responded to James and why "that guy" wanted to know where I was and said it was weird James was being so nosy. I think James was just making conversation. Then, last night, I was studying with friends and Peter walked by. Peter and I had just fought (we had been at dinner 10 minutes before) and I was mid-word in conversation with a friend and just made eye contact with him and looked away. I got a text asking why I didn't smile and wave. I apologized and said it was my fault and didn't mean to hurt his feelings. I then got more texts saying I was "cold" and demanding an explanation. That got me upset and I tried to tell him that the constant criticism and control was too much. That I felt like he was trying to control my emotions and make me pretend to be happy when I wasn't. He told me I was overreacting and he was tired of arguing and just wanted "to be good and nice." I feel like he starts a fight, expresses his feelings, then wants it to be over, even though the criticism and control is really wearing me down and making me agitated. I just feel like if I stay with him, I'm going to end up giving in and letting him criticize me, letting go of my guy friends, and apologizing when I mess up. That I'll just end up a shell of myself and cater to his needs instead of compromising. But I also don't think he's doing this on purpose. I think he gets insecure and doesn't know how to fix it, so he wants me to do it instead of asking himself if he's overreacting. I think that's how we get all these rules. He's fixing symptoms and not the root cause. I don't think any of this is malicious. I tried to break up with him again two days ago. He begged me to wait until after finals (8 days). Eventually I agreed but said that there would be no sleep overs or physical affection. He agreed but now he's trying to kiss me even when I tell him I don't want to kiss. Then he gets mad I'm not kissing back. He says he knows now that he's being controlling and manipulative and he'll change. But I'm not seeing any change. I just feel so confused as to whether I'm overreacting or not. I can't tell if he's actually being a little abusive and he makes me doubt myself because he doesn't call me names or hurt me physically. He wants to read the book when I'm done with it and says he'll learn from it and wants to stay with me. In 8 day finals are over. In 17 days, I graduate from law school. I just feel so bad about myself and confused. I've always been an empathetic person and emotionally intelligent person (that's usually what I'm "known for" by friends... know how to say the right thing at the right time and see things from other people's perspectives) but I feel so steamrolled. I'm also so embarrassed. I'm supposed to be this strong, capable woman and I can't even tell if my relationship is healthy. Right now, I'm planning on dumping Peter the second his final is over and blocking him on everything. I feel relief when I think about that. But I also feel scared that I'll miss him and that I'm being crazy and unwilling to compromise. That I'm throwing away something good by being dramatic. I keep trying to convince myself, apart from the question of whether he's controlling, that if I'm not happy, I can't stay with Peter. That long distance is too hard. He wants to interview at law firms in my city and plan on how to get back together in a year. I can't do that if I have any doubts and I don't want to spend another day miserable. I HAVE to dump him. I just need to make sure I do. I've already tried multiple times. I can't get talked back into this. This isn't healthy. Sidenote: He knows that I've posted on here but not what my username is and he hasn't seen the original post. It's a possibility he could stumble upon this and he would obviously recognize it because of this level of detail. TL;DR: I feel like a crazy person. I'm doubting my emotions. I know I need to break up with him but I'm so worried I'm being overdramatic and ruining something because I'm unreasonable. I know I need to get out but why am I so reluctant to? Final Update from the "Rules" girl - I did it. May 25, 2015 (24 days after 1st update) I finally did it. Today I took the last step and blocked him on all my accounts (10 minutes ago). We're going no contact. You all were right that he used the time before and immediately after finals to draw me back in. I don't really regret waiting though. I didn't want to be the reason that he ended up messing up all his finals and potentially not getting a job he wanted because of grades. That isn't the person that I want to be and I'm okay with sacrificing a few weeks of my happiness for retaining that part of myself. The following weeks were full of his apologies, assurances that he's changing, etc. But nothing changed. I realized that I didn't even want to wait around to see if he could get better because I don't want to be with him. He's not respectful of me and you can't teach respect. He seems completely incapable of empathizing with me and taking me into consideration when making plans. He wouldn't listen to me, he was dismissive of my concerns, and I just didn't feel valued, supported, or happy when we spoke. When I broke up with him, he said that's what he wanted too because my interactions with men (including James) are "inappropriate" and "not in line with his beliefs." Two months ago that would have really bothered me and I would have gotten reeled back in defending myself but I just said "You know that's not true but I'm not going to fight with you about it. I wish you the best. Goodbye." and then blocked him. I feel a little sad and lonely. It'll be weird to go from nearly constant contact and cutesy text messages to complete and utter silence but I'm hoping the payoff of not having horrible fights multiple times a week will balance that out. The good news: I graduated last week, made honor roll, got the highest award in a competitive class, I'm back in my home state, living with my parents (I adore them and get along well with them), and my bar review class starts tomorrow morning. I'm back to running and lifting multiple times a week and I'm in the process of booking up my social calendar. It'll be hard to stop checking my phone compulsively and sad going to sleep without saying goodnight to him, but I think that I'm in the best circumstances (aka not living one building away) to make this fade as gently as possible. I've reached out to a friend already and she supports my decision. I'll reach out to a few others this afternoon. The hardest part of this is letting go of the fantasy that he would get better and I could have this intense, passionate, beautiful relationship with him that was also healthy. I let his possessiveness slide because I felt so intensely cared about. But now I know what to watch out for in the future. I'm going to remain single for the rest of 2015 in an effort to build myself back up and prevent another toxic relationship. I will protect myself in the future the way I would protect a friend. I'm 25 now and I need to start taking who I date more seriously because I don't want to end up married to someone like Peter. I'm scared of the future, of being with someone like him, and of never feeling this level of passion again. I'm especially afraid that I really am all the things he accused me of being. But I know I'm doing the right thing. This is usually when he would come running to my door, knocking, waiting, and begging me to unblock him. This is the first time I won't. Thank you, so much, for your support and patience. This sub gets a lot of grief for a myriad of reasons but you all do so much good. So much more than you even know. I am eternally grateful to each and every one of you that commented and especially those that direct messaged me. You all were a lifeline to me when I wasn't ready to turn to my friends. Thank you, from the bottom of my heart. tl;dr: I dumped him. Got accused of sort-of cheating (again) during the break up. Feeling weird but relieved. Blocked him on everything. Just wanted to share the good news. Two years out of an abusive relationship and I'm so happy, I could burst. July 29, 2017 (over 2 years later) Two years ago, I posted some rather desperate r/relationships questions asking for help. (If you're curious the initial cry for help, starting to gather strength to leave, the jubilant break up post. I knew deep down that something was desperately wrong with my relationship but I was hellbent on fixing it. The posts were the beginning of finding my way out of what felt like a mindfog. I tried to post on relationships to let people know how it was going, in the hopes that if there were people considering leaving similar situations, they know that something better is out there. Unfortunately, relationships doesn't allow multiple posts. However, I felt an intense desire to share the "after" part of leaving an abusive relationship to let women know that there IS life after an abuser, even if they feel like their world will cease without the relationship. I hope this sub is an okay place for this. It only took about two months after my break up to know that I would 100% be okay. That moment came while I was on a family vacation and was curling my hair in the mirror. I made eye contact with my reflection. I remember being startled because I saw someone looking back that looked calm. She wasn't worried about whether she'd get called slutty, whether smiling too much at dinner would get her accused of cheating, or whether the swimsuit she chose for the pool would get her accused of "showing off" and yelled at. For the first time in a year, I felt happy, safe, and confident. I became nearly giddy realizing I hadn't been criticized in months and I felt FREE. It took so much for me to get out of the relationship. I think I was borderline addicted to the highs and lows. Every time I started to escape, I got "love bombed" (learned this term in my research post-break up) and pulled back in. I was worried nothing would ever feel as good as that relationship. However, I followed all the “standard break up advice” and worked out, reconnected with friends, started up new hobbies and (very importantly!) went to counseling. It was a long road, but a much easier one than I originally expected. And at the end of it, I was happy. Here's a list of things that have happened to me in the last two years that have been better than that relationship: Passing my state's bar to become a lawyer; Starting a new job where I feel challenged and respected; Getting a gorgeous new apartment downtown; Getting into the best shape of my life; Making friends with a strong group of intelligent, kickass women that my ex would have never let me befriend; Drinking/smoking/sleeping without being guilted for not following my ex's expectations for what I should be doing with my time; Getting a cat and not needing to worry about her safety around my ex or him getting jealous; Leaving my house without having to give text updates about where I am; Smiling at strangers without being questioned over it; Being approached to run for office in 2018 and saying yes because I want to do it; and Literally everything. Here's what I want to say to anyone who is interested: Anyone can get sucked into an abusive relationship. It doesn't matter how smart you are, how confident you are, or how independent you want to be. Just because you’re in one doesn’t make you dumb or worthless. It doesn’t make you easy prey or unable to be in a healthy relationship next time. The only antidote is listening to your gut and respecting boundaries that you put into place for your own life. There were so many times that I felt a pit in my stomach and knew something was wrong but ignored it because I felt like a compromise could be found. Some people out there are scary, they are manipulative, and they do not want the best for you. They only care about themselves and you cannot make them respect you, value you, or treat you well. When you meet that person, don't try to change them. Cut your losses and leave. Don't let their voice get in your head and to start believing their narrative of who you are. It took me nearly a year to undo the damage that an 8 month relationship did to me. (Can you believe things got this bad in 8 months?!) I would internally feel myself panic for months after the break up when I laughed too much with my friends, thinking that I would be getting lectured about being fake/flirty/inappropriate. It took me so long to start making sarcastic jokes again (my ex didn't "get them" or think they were funny). I basically had to regrow all myself self confidence and redefine myself worth. I could barely even express an opinion on where I wanted to eat since it hadn't mattered in so long. Once I got past that, I remember marveling at the tranquility of my life being mine, my self esteem returning to normal, and people treating me gently/kindly. My parents told me I was happier than they’d seen me in a year and my best friend told me that she was glad “to have me back.” (Side note: Counseling is IMPORTANT. People that are in an abusive relationship are more likely to get into another one than someone who has never been abused. When you are being abused, up looks like down and down looks like up. Going to counseling helped me re-orient, figure out what was normal, and taught me to listen to my gut. It helped me rebuild and make sure this wouldn’t happen again. I didn’t even need many sessions but I actually liked it by the end! I’m forever a gigantic advocate of finding a counselor that fits your needs well.) I don’t want this to be the point of my post, so I’m putting it last. I took a dating hiatus for 6 months after the break up and tried to rebuild on my own. I think this was extremely important to help me re-center. After the six month hiatus, I wrote out parameters for dating and a list of things I needed in a partner (kindness, gentleness, warmth, an even temper). I was picky, I stopped seeing people that I felt weren’t listening to me or weren’t treating me well. After six months of dating, I found someone that fit the list. I’ve been dating him for a bit over a year, and I can’t stress how different this relationship is. It’s night and day. I’m listened to, respected, treated like a real partner, and my boundaries matter. I can be friends with whoever I want (I’m still good friends with James!) and my alone time is given with no questions asked. Tl;dr: I was in an abusive relationship, asked reddit for help, and they came through. Life is so much better post-break up. I want to emphasize this can happen to anyone, just because it’s happening doesn’t mean you deserve it. Get out! Life gets better than you can imagine. THIS IS A REPOST SUB - I AM NOT THE OOP DO NOT CONTACT THE OOP's OR COMMENT ON LINKED POSTS, REMEMBER - RULE 7 submitted by /u/Direct-Caterpillar77 to r/BestofRedditorUpdates [link] [comments]
Direct-Caterpillar77 · Apr 28, 2026
All threads (47)
Thread Source Author Date
شيفروليه كابتيفا بريمير 2025
... * فتحة سقف بانوراما * أضواء نهارية (LED) * أضواء ضباب أمامية * جنوط ألمنيوم... 18 بوصة * إشارات انعطاف أمامية LED * إشارات مرايا * شبك كروم * قضبان... black alloy rims * Front LED turn signals * Mirror turn signals * Chrome grille...
haraj.com.sa aumber Jul 12, 2026
RE:Summer Again (F/M, bit of M/F)
... was in the rear view mirror, I was ready to pop... and forth. Which of course led to the flirty, &quot;maybe I&#039;ll...
www.ticklingforum.com Captain Bad Jul 12, 2026
RE:The Dejarik Board
.... It was your desire that led me here, my Lord.” Her.... And I was gone. My mirror self, I mean. It was ...
jedirp.net Kaahnaah Hamu Jul 12, 2026
Fs: 2023 1lt z51 stingray 12k miles kansas city area
... Exterior &amp; Convenience Upgrades • Sequential LED Mirror Cap Turn Signals • Blue-Tinted Wide-Angle...
www.corvetteforum.com Paul Fancher Jul 12, 2026
جيلي توجيلا بانوراما 2025 عرض خاص للكاش ( تظليل مجاني )
... بانورامـــــا - انــــــوار امامية وخلفيـة LED - اضاءة داخلية محيطية -... انعكاس شاشة الجوال على الشاشة (Mirror Link) - مقاعــد جلـد -...
haraj.com.sa اوتو كار السعودية Jul 12, 2026
جيلي ازكارا 2022
...). 6. مصباح أمامي LED ساطع ومصباح تشغيل نهاري LED. 7. بها مقاعد... and mp4 videos. 6. Bright LED headlight and daily running light... LED. 7. Has original NAPA leather ... entry sensor. 21. autfold side mirror when door is locked. 22...
haraj.com.sa jerwin84 Jul 12, 2026
للبيع هايلاندر 2025 GLE عداد 13 ألف
... واضاءة نهارية وكشافات ضباب جميعها (LED) نظام الدخول الذكي للسائق و... km/L 18-inch alloy wheels LED headlights, taillights, daytime running lights... wheel Power windows Automatic rearview mirror Second-row window shades 8-inch touchscreen...
haraj.com.sa jth2005 Jul 12, 2026
هيونداي توسان 2018 أسود
... بالمرايا الجانبية * أضواء نهارية أمامية LED * منفذ طاقة * مكيف خلفي، نظام... condition. Steering wheel controls * Side mirror turn signals * Fog lights * USB... inputs * Chrome rims * Side mirror controls * Front LED daytime running lights * Power...
haraj.com.sa عضو 31 38401 Jul 12, 2026
RE:MuskThread: Cybercask of the Elontillado
... satellite that’ll use a giant mirror to reflect sunlight to Earth...? Like, taking a 60x60 feet mirror and pretending it can reflect... I got a loving mirror and an 1W led. how about I...
forums.somethingawful.com RabbitWizard Jul 12, 2026
MG 5 موديل 2025 - ستاندر
... * Chrome Front Grille * Side Mirror Turn Signals * LED Rear Lights * Rear Fog...
haraj.com.sa i.nx2888 Jul 12, 2026
غرفة نوم ملكية توصيل وتركيب مجاني جدة 180x200 bedroom set
... اضاءة LED ✅ 2 كومدينو Nightstand ✅ تسريحة + مراية Dresser with Mirror...
haraj.com.sa elegantfurniture Jul 12, 2026
RE:VoIP stack for Home assistant and ESPHome
...ESP endpoint options The ESP mirror Options view exposes supported ...; Ring on conference. ESP mirror keypad and endpoint options346×533... The card remains a mirror and controller: the selected ESP...live availability HA softphone, ESP mirror and phonebook modes respond to...row is omitted completely. ESP mirror cards also follow the bound...could previously leave the display, LED or audio policy in the...
community.home-assistant.io meconiotech Jul 12, 2026
RE:VoIP stack for Home assistant and ESPHome
...ESP endpoint options The ESP mirror Options view exposes supported ...; Ring on conference. ESP mirror keypad and endpoint options346×533... The card remains a mirror and controller: the selected ESP...live availability HA softphone, ESP mirror and phonebook modes respond to...row is omitted completely. ESP mirror cards also follow the bound...could previously leave the display, LED or audio policy in the...
community.home-assistant.io meconiotech Jul 12, 2026
RE:45 Years, And A Parade To Boot?�………...North Cascade Wanderings
... where, and then Pastor Kyle led us in prayer. ![IMG_8451.jpg... dim reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face ...
steemit.com elizabethbit Jul 12, 2026
RE:UFC 329 McGregor/Holloway 2: None Of This Matters
... skill basis it&#039;s practically a mirror match. Both men eschew defense... reputation as a sex criminal led to the audiences completely rejecting...
forums.somethingawful.com CarlCX Jul 11, 2026
Crowhaven (Shiver Series)
... gate, past the road that led toward the old chapel woods, ... kind of coward needs a mirror to shoot a bird?” The ... black. Deep. Reflective. A living mirror. Riley saw herself in them. ... would lead people to the mirror road.” Julian whispered, “Zebra Road.” ...
forums.delphiforums.com Royals1 Jul 11, 2026
تويوتا هايلندرGLE اصفار وارد عبدالطيف جميل
... واضاءة نهارية وكشافات ضباب جميعها (LED) نظام الدخول الذكي للسائق و... km/L 18-inch alloy wheels LED headlights, taillights, daytime running lights... wheel Power windows Automatic rearview mirror Second-row window shades 8-inch touchscreen...
haraj.com.sa الجبيل84 Jul 11, 2026
RE:Diskutera Socialdemokraterna
... posturing. A landmark peer-reviewed study led by Ekin Ok at the... of empathy. They can effortlessly mirror the emotional outrage of a...
www.familjeliv.se Padirac Jul 11, 2026
The Democrat Party Must Be Destroyed
... so, votes cast held a  mirror up to officials’ core beliefs, ... Rights legislation was opposed and led by Democrat Senator Robert Byrd, ... but oppose the model that led to the U.S. becoming the ...
forums.delphiforums.com ElDotardo Jul 11, 2026
RE:My Journey From Deprived Good Girl to Owned Submissive
... live strip for daddy which led to me on my knees... looked at myself in the mirror right after and chuckled. I ...
forum.literotica.com FreedomInFantasy Jul 11, 2026
RE:What was the first Prog rock album you listened to
Mirror Image said: ↑ From the Prog ... band&#039;s overall musical identity. This led to fame for particular artists ... Tear. Click to expand... &#039;Kinell, Mirror, wouldn&#039;t it have been easier ...
forums.stevehoffman.tv grimtraveller Jul 11, 2026
جيلي توجيلا 2025 لا يفوتك عروض التقسيط والكاش
... بانورامـــــا - انــــــوار امامية وخلفيـة LED - اضاءة داخلية محيطية -... انعكاس شاشة الجوال على الشاشة (Mirror Link) - مقاعــد جلـد -...
haraj.com.sa شركة قطاف للسيارات شانجان Jul 11, 2026
RE:What would a 7th gen Sega system have looked like?
... was this the mistake that led to their demise? fatnickindustries.com... revenue &gt;The swift saturn exit led to the erasure of Almost ..., this was almost a complete mirror of the situation that the ... entrance into the market, this led to microsoft using off the ...
www.neogaf.com snapdragon Jul 11, 2026
RE:Snap! -- Space Mirror Approved, AC Revolution, Workers and AI
... Now, let’s jump right in… Mirror AC AI mashup2560×1440 280 ... FCC Approves Reflect Orbital’s Space Mirror Satellite That Astronomers Hate Despite... satellite that’ll use a giant mirror to reflect sunlight to Earth... out gradually. . . . This impasse has led some scientists and companies back ... FCC Approves Reflect Orbital’s Space Mirror Satellite Is an air-conditioning revolution...
community.spiceworks.com Suzanne-Spiceworks Jul 10, 2026
RE:Snap! -- Space Mirror Approved, AC Revolution, Workers and AI
... Now, let’s jump right in… Mirror AC AI mashup2560×1440 280 ... FCC Approves Reflect Orbital’s Space Mirror Satellite That Astronomers Hate Despite... satellite that’ll use a giant mirror to reflect sunlight to Earth... out gradually. . . . This impasse has led some scientists and companies back ... FCC Approves Reflect Orbital’s Space Mirror Satellite Is an air-conditioning revolution...
community.spiceworks.com Suzanne-Spiceworks Jul 10, 2026
Enquiring about a nose job changed everything for me
Okay I’m going to yap a bit so apologies :P I will never forget the first time it was pointed out that I had a large nose. My older sister randomly just went “Ugh your nose is so big” on our way to school when I was 13. And I remember looking at the mirror and having no clue what she was on about…until I turned my head and looked at the side profile. I had no clue it looked like that! I had this massive hump that never used to be there before and it seemed to stretch out so far. Anyway, from that point on, something I never even paid attention to (noses) became the only thing I paid attention to. I went into school looking at all the different noses: the widths, the lengths, the shapes, and it made me feel terrible because my nose just seemed WAY bigger. I felt like I had a volcano on my face. I absolutely despised the way I looked. Anyway this hatred basically continued on for the next decade. Which meant, never wanting to take pictures , never wanting to take videos, never wanting to be in front of people, keeping my head down to avoid drawing attention to my face, covering my face when I would laugh. I just accepted that this was the way I would live until I could afford a nose job and “fix” my nose. About a year ago, that day finally came where I had enough to get a nose job. So I started researching HEAVILY into rhinoplasties and that led me to coming to Reddit. I posted an image of current nose and an altered AI image of my “ideal” nose and asked for surgeon recommendations in a nose job subreddit. To my surprise, I woke up the next morning to about 100 notifications from Reddit of people telling me not to get a nose job, which after looking at other posts, I realised was a pretty common theme. BUT, the comments really reinforced some ideas that I never really considered before: 1) Where does my idea of an ideal nose come from? Why do I think a certain nose shape/size is ideal. My nose is not “not ideal”, it’s not “ugly”, it’s just different. Some people will like it, some people won’t and that’s the case for literally everything. 2) My nose is a marker of my Pashtun ethnicity. This was the nose my ancestors had, the nose my grandparents had, the nose my dad has. If I change it, I’m stripping away part of my identity. Maybe to some people this isn’t a big deal, but for me it is. 3) My nose adds character to my overall look. I should own it a lot more. These might seem like obvious things, especially to people active in a sub like this. But for me it wasn’t. To me, it was: 1) Hate the way you look 2) Get a nose job. I never knew there was 3rd option of choosing to love my nose. There are still days where I feel a bit down about my nose, but I usually snap out of it quite quick. And I also have absolutely committed to never getting a nose job and that’s all thanks to posting about surgeon recommendations on Reddit 😂. So thank you nice people of Reddit. submitted by /u/adamk642 to r/Noses [link] [comments]
r/Noses adamk642 Jun 21, 2026
I don't regret it even a second. 3,5 years of growing out my hair led to me being happy looking in the mirror!
submitted by /u/EstablishmentEven519 to r/FierceFlow [link] [comments]
r/FierceFlow EstablishmentEven519 Jun 6, 2026
‘The face doesn’t move’: Hollywood’s obsession with cosmetic surgeries has led to stiffer looks – and performances
A few years ago, New York dermatologist Dr David A Colbert received an unexpected call from a Hollywood director. The director was shooting a film starring a high-profile actor who had plumped his face with so much filler it wouldn’t move. The director proceeded to berate Colbert, whose practice has treated famous faces such as Sienna Miller, Naomi Watts and Robin Wright, for stilting his star’s ability to emote. “He was kind of rude,” Colbert said. “He was like, ‘Hey, can you stop doing what you’re doing [to his face]?’” The director was mistaken: Colbert had never given dermal filler, or Botox, to the actor. “But I felt for him, because he wants his actors to look like people,” said Colbert, who did not disclose the identities of either. That director was fighting a losing battle. These days, the new “it” product among celebrities isn’t a $280 La Prairie concealer or $1000 Decorté moisturizer. It’s an entirely new face, with pillowy lips, stretched-out skin and a stationary forehead. For the rest of us, that means staring at faces on movie screens and streamers that look enhanced – and therefore restricted – by expensive cosmetic procedures. When the trailer for Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey dropped, armchair critics griped that Anne Hathaway, who has denied cosmetic surgery rumors, could not move her forehead enough. They found it unbelievable that Penelope, Odysseus’s wife, would have access to that good a dermatologist in ancient Greece. In the Wicked franchise, Ariana Grande plays Glinda the Good Witch in the Land of Oz, where apparently beauty standards are just as rigid as the real world: Grande’s airbrushed lack of expression led one Dazed writer to ask: “Is Botox ruining cinema?” Ditto for Margot Robbie as Wuthering Heights’s Cathy, whose Barbie-smooth features inspired speculation of cosmetic surgery, which could inhibit the lusty facial contortions one might make during a bodice-ripping scene. Much of this nip-tuck speculation is mean-spirited. It reeks of misogyny, blaming women for unrealistic beauty standards that are widespread in film-making and muffling necessary discussions on ageing in the industry. Millie Bobby Brown, only 22 years old, said that audiences’ responses to her unchangeable expression during the Electric State press tour left her holed up and “depressed for three, four days”. The pitchforks have come for men, too. Barry Keoghan said that online abuse about the way he looks (fans have speculated on whether or not he got filler) has made him “shy away” from acting and public life, and Ryan Gosling’s ageless appearance on a recent episode of Jimmy Fallon had an uncanny valley vibe, or so some fans tweeted. But it is also true that some of the best acting comes from total abandon and a willingness to be ugly – whether that’s Lucille Ball chucking chocolate down her gullet in I Love Lucy, or Charlize Theron’s unflinchingly raw depiction of the poverty-stricken serial killer Aileen Wuornos in Monster. Apparent dermal fillers, Botox, lip augmentation and jawline contouring do not exactly allow for expressive, soul-stirring performances. “It’s almost become standard that the face doesn’t move as much as it used to,” Colbert said. That lack of movement presents an existential threat to the craft of acting. Beauty has always been a job requirement for being a star, but so has facial dexterity. Is all that filler going to make for worse performances? Actors have sculpted their faces for as long as the film industry has existed – and audiences have always voiced their opinions on the topic. Marsha Gordon, a historian and professor of film studies at North Carolina State University, cites a 1929 article in Motion Picture magazine titled The Flesh and Blood Racket. The piece named and shamed mostly men who had gone under the knife, such as the boxer Jack Dempsey, who fixed his battered nose in preparation for a screen career. The bullish actor Louis Wolheim, known for playing thugs, wanted a rhinoplasty to help transition into leading roles; studio executives at United Artists successfully served a restraining order to stop him from changing it. “The close-up was so crucial to moviemaking. I just imagine Marlene Dietrich, Greta Garbo or Clara Bow’s face filling the screen,” Gordon said. “It wasn’t just about conveying emotion. It was an opportunity for audiences to sit in the palace of a movie theater and see a beautiful face.” These women were not immune to face-sculpting rumors back in their day. Legend has it that Dietrich removed her molars to achieve her famously arch cheekbones, and MGM reportedly secretly sent Garbo to see a surgeon. Neither actor is remembered for hamming it up onscreen – both projected a subtle coolness – but they were celebrated for their signature features. Dietrich’s pencil-thin brows, for instance, or Garbo’s sunken, hooded eyelids. “Films have become less intimate in terms of framing a performer’s face,” Gordon continued. “As we shift away from a culture of movie theaters, from big screens to tiny screens, I wonder if that has something to do with this tolerance [for filler].” Dr Anthony Brissett, a Houston-based cosmetic surgeon and president of the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, points not to screen size but modern high-definition cameras, which reveal more than the naked eye. “There are things that actors and actresses will share with me that bother them” about their appearances, he said. “I have a hard time seeing it. Then I’ll watch them on television and yeah, sure enough, there it is. They’re under a high level of scrutiny and feeling this desire to look the same continuously.” Age used to be an actor’s enemy. During the Hollywood star system days, when studios controlled every aspect of actors’ lives, a fortysomething woman might quietly fade away, such as Dietrich did, or accept more character roles, which were often undignified (Bette Davis in Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? comes to mind). Now, female actors are no longer expected to disappear from the limelight after turning 30. A woman in her 40s can carry a film – but it helps her career to look as if she never aged. (It would also help her career if she never turned 60 either.) “I just sort of expect female actors somewhere between 30 and 60 are probably doing stuff, and they’re not going to move their foreheads,” Colbert said. Male actors do it too, but “it’s very competitive, especially for women.” Hollywood’s filler-mania mirrors national interest: an estimated 1.6 million Americans received facial procedures last year, with neurotoxins and fillers being the most popular. Then there is the sudden rise in GLP-1 drugs, such as Ozempic and Wegovy, which have slimmed down famous bodies and faces to the extent that fillers are required to correct for the gauntness. At the same time, forgoing these kinds of doctor’s appointments has become a show of dedication to one’s craft – an indication that the industry’s new beauty standards are not aligned with the work, or representative of how the regular people being portrayed in films look. Kate Hudson said that she quit Botox while filming her Oscar-nominated role in Song Sung Blue, since the film was set in the 1980s, before the procedure hit the market. Jennifer Lawrence told the New Yorker she gets Botox but draws the line at forehead filler, which shows more on camera. In casting, there are two types: bankable stars and actors who lack name recognition. Stars don’t audition for parts, actors do, and the stakes are higher for actors debating whether to get in on the cosmetic enhancement trend. “Visible plastic surgery is an immediate audition killer for almost every project I’ve worked on,” said Marie, a Los Angeles-based casting director who has worked on network TV shows and major film releases. (Marie is a pseudonym.) “Networks really hate plastic surgery unless it’s on someone who’s already famous, then they magically don’t notice it. The more famous you are, the more you can fuck with your face before it starts to hinder your chances of getting on in a movie.” Marie said that some younger, up-and-coming actors clearly have filler, which looks good in a selfie but prohibits them from embodying a role. “It’s really sad, a lot of younger actresses feel the need to be beautiful on Instagram, but then it makes them less realistic and accessible,” she said. “Being a model and an actress are two different things. I wouldn’t send someone [to a director] with visible plastic surgery, because they would look at us like we’re crazy and have bad taste.” Still, Marie said that cosmetic surgery or filler is never directly addressed in casting processes she has been involved with. “It’s completely unspoken,” she said. Zak Barnett, 50, is an acting coach in Hollywood. He does not have conversations about cosmetic enhancements while training actors on their artistic processes, but said his students talk to their agents about it, debating whether it will help them land jobs. Barnett believes that AI’s recent infiltration of Hollywood might help to reverse this trend. “The desire to be perfect will be taken over by AI projects and AI actors,” he said. “I think what audiences are going to want to see more and more is the truth, which is imperfections. If we get back to character-driven stories, then we won’t want anything to obstruct that authenticity.” It’s a nice thought. But Jessica M Goldstein, a journalist who has covered Hollywood aesthetics and culture, is not as hopeful. “Beauty standards under capitalism require there to always be something new to purchase,” she said. “There might be a superficial change – humanmade things become a badge of prestige or class, like how brands will talk about something being made in America. But that doesn’t mean that people are going to stop paying to have work done. It just means the nature of the work will change.” Goldstein predicts a shift toward more subtle enhancements. Fifteen or 20 years ago, actors started to get veneers en masse. Famous smiles all looked identical. These days, veneers are less standardized – though they’re still nice-looking, and very expensive. To some extent, this shift is already happening with faces. Brissett, the cosmetic surgeon, says patients are reporting “filler fatigue”, either opting to dissolve their filler or not re-up when it wears off (most fillers last up to a year). “It’s something they’ve outgrown,” he said. More people are turning to facelifts, Brissett said, which is the second most popular cosmetic surgery procedure in the US. The “deep-plane facelift” can cost up to $40,000 in major metropolitan areas such as New York or Los Angeles. It’s a newer, more natural-looking procedure intended to make someone look refreshed but not necessarily radically different. Crucially, it allows for facial movement. “Celebrities, public figures, and high-profile individuals are having it done quietly,” one surgeon told New York magazine last year. Jennifer Lawrence might shy away from filler, afraid of how it would impact her acting. But when asked if she had had a deep-plane, she eagerly responded: “Believe me, I’m gonna!” submitted by /u/ThrowawayGreenWitch to r/popculturechat [link] [comments]
r/popculturechat ThrowawayGreenWitch Jun 2, 2026
007 First Light Review Thread
Game Information Game Title: 007 First Light Platforms: PlayStation 5 (May 27, 2026) Xbox Series X/S (May 27, 2026) PC (May 27, 2026) Nintendo Switch 2 Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfRZRwu4aEc Developer: IO Interactive Review Aggregator: OpenCritic - 88 average - 98% recommended - 51 reviews Critic Reviews Atarita - Atakan Gümrükçüoğlu - Turkish - 93 / 100 Centering on James Bond's origin story, 007 First Light blends action and stealth elements with flawless pacing, delivering that long-awaited, glorious return to the franchise. With its impactful melee combat mechanics, cleverly designed spy gadgets, and stellar acting performances, it places the player directly in the lead role of a breathtaking blockbuster movie. But Why Tho? - Matt Sowinski - 9 / 10 IO Interactive feels like they've found a new home in the James Bond franchise. 007 First Light is a blast, with a tense and enthralling narrative that punches way higher and harder than anyone could have expected. CGMagazine - Marcus Kenneth - 8 / 10 The best moments in 007 First Light are the ones where everything aligns for a few minutes, and you stop thinking about mechanics entirely. Cinelinx - Caleb Gayle - 5 / 5 007 First Light features a slew of unforgettable moments, cinematic jaw-dropping scenes, amazingly smooth combat, and one heck of a story. With all this stacked up, 007 First Light it is a brilliant action adventure title, and my top pick for game of the year! Cloud Dosage - Jon Scarr - 4.5 / 5 007 First Light turns a young Bond campaign into a spy adventure built around bluffing, gadgets, and recovering when missions fall apart. MI6, Q-Branch tools, and close-range fights keep the campaign moving, but the shooting, driving, and limited replay value hold it back. It’s a good fit if you want a story-led Bond game focused more on spy work than giant stealth sandboxes. ComingSoon.net - Tyler Treese - 9.5 / 10 As stylish as the films themselves, 007 First Light is a brilliant depiction of Bond. Daily Mirror - Aaron Potter - 4 / 5 James Bond's video game return is a delight from start to finish, with Hitman develop IO Interactive expertly lending its spy expertise to a new breed of interactive spy thriller. DayOne - Jon Clarke - 9 / 10 With a great cast of characters, tons of imagination, and just the right amount of player agency and replayability, there is a delightful playground full of gadgetry and spycraft that players will want to return to again and again. A confident return for the Double-O program, and - sorry Goldeneye - this is, without a doubt, the best James Bond game ever made. Digitec Magazine - Philipp Rüegg - German - 5 / 5 After 30 years, ‘GoldenEye’ is finally retiring. With ‘007 First Light’, IO Interactive – the masterminds behind ‘Hitman’ – delivers the ultimate Bond experience that fans have been waiting for since the N64 classic. DualShockers - Christian Bognar - 9 / 10 With superb writing, top-notch acting, beautiful cinematography, and expressive gameplay, 007 First Light is as sleek as it is engaging. Eurogamer - Rick Lane - 4 / 5 007 First Light is less cerebral and replayable than IO's World of Assassination trilogy, but makes up for it with excellent fistfights and oodles of charm. Everyeye.it - Joseph Arace - Italian - 8.2 / 10 007 First Light is just like its protagonist: charismatic, energetic, funny, charming; as well as impetuous, exaggerated, and immature. GAMES.CH - Olaf Bleich - German - 86% "007 First Light" isn't a perfect action game, but it's excellent nonetheless. GAMINGbible - Olly Smith - 9 / 10 007 First Light is an exquisite taste of slick spy action and blockbuster storytelling, and is fully what a Bond game should be, but rarely is. GamePro - Annika Bavendiek - German - Unscored IO Interactive delivers a magnificent gaming comeback for James Bond with 007 First Light, which proves worthy of the source material. GameRant - Dalton Cooper - 8 / 10 It's not perfect, but 007 First Light is a mostly great start to IO Interactive's all-new take on the James Bond universe. GameSpot - Mark Delaney - 8 / 10 007 First Light wisely repurposes what works in both universes but isn’t afraid to reimagine or ditch those parts that don’t. Gameblog - Geralt de Reeves - French - 9 / 10 While it won't revolutionize the industry like GoldenEye did in its time, it undoubtedly delivers one of the best video game experiences of all time, putting you in the shoes of the iconic spy. Gamersky - 心灵奇兵 - Chinese - 8.6 / 10 007: The First Steps not only reimagines the classic, but more importantly, it truly lives up to the legendary "007" designation. Generación Xbox - Gabriel Fuentes - Spanish - 85 / 100 007 First Flight is a testament to originality in its script and marks the beginning of a new trilogy for the character in the world of video games. Gfinity - Alister Kennedy - 10 / 10 007 First Light is, for me, an absolute masterpiece that shattered all pre-release anxieties and is, in fact, the greatest Bond video game of all time. IO Interactive masterfully balances explosive action with "Hitman"-inspired stealth, all brought to life by Patrick Gibson’s breathtaking, definitive performance as a young James Bond. Equal parts thrilling and cinematic, this incredible experience is a gorgeous love letter to the franchise and a sure-fire Game of the Year contender. Hobby Consolas - David Rodriguez - Spanish - 85 / 100 First Light is the best Bond experience ever seen in a video game —a complete package, true to the essence of the character, updated, and incredibly fun to play. IGN India - Rayan Sayyed - 9 / 10 007 First Light understands what makes James Bond interesting beyond the suits and gadgets. This younger Bond is reckless, emotional, and still figuring out his fundamentals, making his story feel more personal. Pair that with flexible stealth, solid hand-to-hand combat, strong production values, and Hitman-style mission design, and you get a Bond game that feels cinematic that gives players plenty of freedom. Plus, the variety in mission design and the satisfying spy fantasy make 007 First Light gives James Bond the best debut in this generation. IGN Italy - Silvio Mazzitelli - Italian - 9 / 10 The James Bond saga could hardly have ended up in better hands. IO Interactive has crafted an adventure that perfectly captures the spirit of the 007 movies with an engaging story, stunning settings, and gameplay that's polished in every detail. IGN Portugal - Pedro Pestana - Portuguese - 9 / 10 While cinema is still searching for a new Bond, the studio IO Interactive has already found its virtual version. Rebellious and arrogant, Patrick Gibson does a fantastic job in the shoes of Her Majesty's secret agent without needing to wear a tuxedo, in a well-crafted adventure that marks the beginning of a new era for 007 in video games. With gameplay that cleverly distances itself from what we already know from Hitman to embrace a stronger narrative and the cinematic moments immortalized on the big screen, 007: First Light didn't need a license to dazzle. IGN Spain - Mario Seijas - Spanish - 8 / 10 007 First Light features a sophisticated and comprehensive infiltration system, as well as solid hand-to-hand combat mechanics. The lackluster cover system does not detract from what could mark a new era for 007 in the world of video games. INFINITY AREA - Florian Prache - French - 9.5 / 10 James Bond 007 First Light is a huge surprise from IO Interactive. Far from being just a Hitman clone in disguise, the game establishes its own identity with rich gameplay, smart stealth mechanics, and explosive action. Despite disappointing driving sequences and the lack of English voice acting, the game manages to keep players engaged from start to finish thanks to its atmosphere, visuals, and great freedom of approach. An essential adventure for James Bond fans. INVEN - Kyuman Kim - Korean - 9.1 / 10 After a long stretch in the dark, a truly worthy 007 game has finally arrived. With a young Bond at its center, it delivers nearly everything fans could want from a Bond film—thrilling storytelling, clever twists, and charismatic characters alike. It feels poised to become a new “first light” in the history of 007 games. Loot Level Chill - Mick Fraser - 9 / 10 007 First Light is a superb adventure game that does so much more than simply coast on the popularity of its franchise. Manual dos Games - Luiz Henrique Silva - Portuguese - 10 / 10 007 First Light delivers on the promise of being the ultimate James Bond game by introducing a new version of the character that oozes charisma in every second on screen, alongside an excellent storyline supported by memorable side characters who help drive the narrative forward. The game also features an extremely creative level design that fully embraces its stealth and combat systems, making players truly feel like an MI6 spy. MeuPlayStation - Thiago do Nascimento Barros - Portuguese - 100 / 100 007 First Light is all about aura. It honors James Bond's legacy by bringing everything we love about him since the 1960's movies in the ultimate 007 videogame experience. Chases, shootings, explosions, plot twists, politics, charm, Bond Girls, guns, cars, boats, Q Technologies, Moneypenny, M, iconic characters, beautiful locations... All of that with great level design, combat and exploration. The name is Bond, James Bond. Multiplayer First - James Lara - 8.5 / 10 If there is one thing I’m even more certain of than when we first learned that IO Interactive was making a 007 game, it’s that they are still the perfect studio to be making a Bond game. As many have called it, it’s a match made in heaven, and, as the first entry in what is hopefully a long-running series, I think the franchise is in safe hands. It’s one thing to make an experience on an established IP; another to actually understand what makes that experience so great. IO has captured the soul of a Bond experience in 007 First Light. With a strong foundation to build upon, a new era for MI6’s finest is upon us, and I cannot wait to see where IO Interactive takes the franchise next. PCGamesN - Paul Kelly - 8 / 10 While it doesn't pull up any roots, 007: First Light is a beautiful, cinematic action game that makes clever use of the IO formula. From the performance of Patrick Gibson to the iconic score, this is a game that tells a new story and basks in nostalgia in equal measure, giving James Bond a fresh angle in the process. PCMag Middle East - Ali El Sayed - 5 / 5 First Light feels like a true Bond game, a strong IO Interactive game, and the best blueprint 007 has had in video games for decades. It balances story, action, stealth, gadgets, and style better than any Bond game before it. PPE.pl - Wojciech Gruszczyk - Polish - 9.5 / 10 007 First Light is the best James Bond game ever – brilliantly written, superbly acted and brimming with that unique atmosphere we’ve come to expect from stories about Agent 007. IO Interactive has combined its own experience from Hitman with a cinematic adventure in the style of Uncharted, throwing in gadgets, spectacular missions, interesting characters and a very well-crafted story of the young Bond. Not everything works perfectly, as the game sometimes holds your hand (a bit too tightly!), but ultimately it’s a brilliant start to a new era of 007 in gaming. PSX Brasil - Ivan Nikolai Barkow Castilho - Portuguese - 90 / 100 007 First Light is an excellent James Bond game: varied gameplay with intelligent approach options, a story worthy of the character's films, beautiful graphics, and great technical performance. The TacSim mode is a great way to increase the title's longevity. Although the campaign features many slow-paced moments with secondary characters and combat animations that repeat frequently, it's an adventure that deserves to be checked out by any 007 fan or action game enthusiast in general. Pizza Fria - Álvaro Saluan da Cunha - Portuguese - 9.3 / 10 007 First Light is a game that presents us with a different kind of James Bond, treated with the weight, charm, and complexity that Ian Fleming's character deserves. Push Square - Stephen Tailby - Unscored I'm not quite finished with 007 First Light just yet, but overall I'd say it's exactly what I was hoping for. The characterisation of this young Bond and his associates is really strong, and the globetrotting story lets you explore some great locations. It really shines in its sandbox missions, but shootouts have their moments too, and the whole thing weaves together really quite nicely. I'm really interested to see how the final few missions shake out, but beyond some technical quibbles and uncertainty on the driving, I'm pretty happy with IOI's new vision for James Bond. Region Free - Joonatan Itkonen - 4 / 5 I don't think we've seen a better example of Bond as a genuine character in gaming. This isn't just a replica of what we have on the screen, either. In First Light, Bond is his own character, as important a part of the canon as Brosnan, Connery, or Craig. This is one of the most thrilling Bond adventures to date. República DG - Ruancarlo Silva - Portuguese - 9.6 / 10 007: First Light is not only the best 007 game ever made, but it also easily rivals the best games in the genre. IO Interactive delivers a special experience that honors the legacy of the greatest spy in entertainment history. Restart.run - Imran Khan - 3.5 / 5 It is likely the best James Bond game ever, but there's some qualifiers that drag 007 First Light down from being a complete knock-out. SECTOR.sk - Peter Dragula - Slovak - 9.5 / 10 007 First Light is a strong new beginning for James Bond in games, combining a deep origin story, varied missions, stealth, action, excellent hand-to-hand combat, precise shooting, impressive visuals and classic Bond atmosphere. A few slower sections and the lack of a body-hiding mechanic are minor issues in an otherwise excellent spy adventure. Screen Rant - Kyle Gratton - 9 / 10 007 First Light brings James Bond back to gaming in an innovative story that celebrates the character's legacy, alongside franchise-best gameplay. Shacknews - Donovan Erskine - 9 / 10 007 First Light is a crowning achievement for IO Interactive and the culmination of the studio’s growth over the years. The Nerd Stash - Julio La Pine - 9.5 / 10 007 First Light is not only the best James Bond video game to date, but also one of the greatest action-adventure titles of this generation, full of jaw-dropping action sequences, a compelling narrative, and superb acting. The Outerhaven Productions - George Yang - 4 / 5 007 First Light delivers a strong Bond origin story with solid stealth, gadget use, and plenty of spy-thriller energy. Tom's Guide - Rory Mellon - 5 / 5 007 First Light is the finest James Bond video game in nearly 30 years. Its cinematic single-player campaign is remarkable, offering a gripping, quintessentially Bond story, packaged together with some of the best action-adventure set pieces I've ever experienced. Whether you're a longtime Bond fan or a newcomer, 007 First Light is unmissable. Check Amazon Check Best Buy Tourens - Mert Tuna - Turkish - 8.5 / 10 Despite its slow pace at the start and a few minor AI glitches, this is an experience that keeps players locked to their screens with its rich level designs, freedom oriented stealth mechanics, and satisfying cinematic action. A game that’s definitely worth a try. VGC - Jordan Middler - 5 / 5 007 First Light might just be the best James Bond game ever. The way IOI has translated the Bond fantasy into a 14-hour globetrotting epic is masterful. It's a game full of spectacle, humour, action, and romance. Everything James Bond should be. New Bond owners Amazon must ensure this franchise continues. Worth Playing - Cody Medellin - 8.5 / 10 007 First Light shows that the Hitman developers have a good handle on how to make a James Bond game work within their wheelhouse. The emphasis on less flashy espionage alongside multiple avenues to accomplish your given goal works to this game's favor in helping to differentiate it from past 007 games. There's still enough action to prevent the game from feeling like a complete tonal shift from common expectations. The quality of the stealth helps compensate for the combat, which is good but can feel lacking in areas. The adventure remains fun but familiar, while the presentation is top-notch. The game is another good example of how to do a licensed game well, and the hope is that we'll see IO Interactive do more in this universe, whether that's DLC or a full-on sequel. Xbox Achievements - Dan Webb - 92% For well over two decades, IO Interactive have become synonymous with their Hitman series. Since 2000, the Danish studio has released twelve games, w... submitted by /u/Turbostrider27 to r/Games [link] [comments]
r/Games Turbostrider27 May 26, 2026
[Not OC] Mysuru installs mirrors on walls to stop public urination, adds LED lights for night; leaves internet impressed
Source - https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/etimes/trending/nobel-genius-mysuru-installs-mirrors-on-walls-to-stop-public-urination-adds-led-lights-for-night-leaves-internet-impressed/amp\_articleshow/130852103.cms Video source - insta @ news_vibes_india2 submitted by /u/bifrost_traveler to r/IndianCivicFails [link] [comments]
r/IndianCivicFails bifrost_traveler May 6, 2026
Me [25 F] with my boyfriend [25 M] duration 7 months. My boyfriend is very jealous and keeps making "rules" for me to follow. (LONG)
I am not The OOP, OOP is u/rulesrulesrules7 Me [25 F] with my boyfriend [25 M] duration 7 months. My boyfriend is very jealous and keeps making "rules" for me to follow TRIGGER WARNING: Abusive behavior, controlling behavior, gaslighting, manipulation, verbal abuse, infidelity MOOD SPOILER: An amazing ending for OOP Original Post Apr 4, 2015 Hello, everyone. I have a bit of a weird predicament to share with you. I have been dating my boyfriend ("Peter") for about 7 months now. When we get along, we get along spectacularly. Our chemistry is off the charts, we're playful, we're both driven, we have similar interests (same career path, both read for leisure, both interested in exercise). I've been told by many friends that they can just sense how much we care about each other and that we have the same disposition: calm, relaxed, sweet. If not for the following stuff, I would be head over heels for him. Hell, I already am when he's not acting this way. So this stuff started happening about a month in. Peter is an extremely jealous person. He's admitted this to me. He can also be a bit judgmental and conservative. The following is a list of things he's asked me to do for him throughout the course of our relationship. I haven't asked for anything like this in return and I've even asked him if he feels like I've done the same and he's said no: No cursing. No low-cut shirts. No weed (not a big deal, I've smoked < 10 times and was okay with giving this up for him). He prefers me to not get "drunk." Not a big deal, I don't drink a lot, but it kind of sucks that I can never let loose and get tipsy with my friends without a comment from him. No perverted jokes: with him, or anyone else. He says the jokes would be funny if a guy said them but they're not funny when I do it. No using a joking "little kid" voice with friends - even girls. No talking about other guys around him because he thinks I'm trying to make him jealous. No talking about past relationships, even though he does this. No emoticons in texts with other guys. No exclamation points or sounding "too flirty or happy" when talking to guys. Audibly say "goodbye" when we part ways. Verbally greet him, even if I'm late to class. No speaking to male friends on the telephone or texting after 10 pm at night. Text him when I leave my apartment and I'm on the way to school. This isn't a specific rule, but if I don't text him for 3-4 hours during the day, he'll say "Oh, hi there, silent one. What have you been up to?" He likes me to stop by his study space when I get to school, before class, after class, and before I leave at the end of the day. He's stopped by my space less than 10 times in our 7 months together. He asks me if I'm "behaving" when we're not together physically. We've had a bit of a power struggle when I've wanted to go out with my group of friends. There is a structured timetable of how much I'm allowed to talk to my ex. We broke up two years ago and a half and had a year of silence. Recently, we've been speaking on facebook. (He doesn't have my phone number). It's random stuff about our undergraduate. Just friendly stuff, lighthearted. I'm only allowed to talk to him once every three weeks for 10-15 minutes. If he facebooks me and it's been outside those three weeks, I'm not supposed to respond. He still gets mad even when the ex facebooks me. I'm not supposed to "flirt" with members of the opposite sex. I don't. However, he's seen interactions between guys and me and it appears he thinks that anything along the lines of smiling, laughing, or sarcasm are grounds for flirting. He "doesn't like" easily 80% of the guys I interact with on a regular basis. There have been a few incidents that have bothered me in the time we've been together. In the interest of time, the most recent problem he and I have been having is my friend named James. James graduated last year from the program that Peter and I are in together. He's a big brother type to me. He was an assigned TA for the class I was in and I went to a study group he led. We became friends. We've been friends for three years and nothing has ever happened and neither James nor I have ever shown any interest in it. We just have similar political views and give each other dating advice on occasion. James came to visit the school and he and I got together for lunch while he was here. He was here for 3 days and I saw him once for only an hour. Before he visited, we texted back and forth maybe once every ten days. Since he visited, it's been 2-3 times a week, about 10 texts at a time. Nothing outrageous. I imagine it'll start lessening when it's been longer since his visit and exams approach. He's in a new city without a lot of friends and I enjoy talking to him. Because he's working, he usually texts me on Saturday and Sunday more than the work week. James texted me last Saturday morning. I didn't answer so he followed up with a text on Sunday. We chatted briefly about a TV show. Then he texted me again this Saturday to tell me about his date the night before. This has been driving Peter up the wall. He's demanded to see the texts back and forth. Even though I strongly object to this, as I think it's an invasion of privacy only 7 months in, I let him see all the texts. There was nothing inappropriate there (this is where the "no emoticon" rule came from though). However, Peter says that James is a "shark" and is only friends with me because he wants to date me. This is ridiculous because James and I have no feelings towards each other, act more like siblings, and are going to be living in different states for the rest of our lives. Peter causes a fight EVERY time he notices James texting me or gets pouty and silent until I ask him what's wrong, then we fight. About two hours ago, Peter gave me another rule. He wants me to arrange it so James only texts me once a week. No word yet on how many texts I would be "allowed" to exchange with him. He also says he doesn't want us talking about "intimate things." When I asked him what that entailed, he brought up that he was mad that I told James that I was going to take a nap in the last conversation we had. I only told James that as a conversation-ender so he wouldn't wonder why I wasn't responding. Peter just seems unreasonable. I guess, here's the big problem. I feel like Peter gets mad about something, fights with me until I'm worn down, then comes up with a "compromise" which is really just him imposing another rule on me. There was a guy who liked me at the beginning of the year that I eventually just had to block on my phone because Peter got so mad about it. He's asked me twice to show him that the guy is really blocked. He really is. Same thing happened with the ex and I know his end game is me never speaking to the ex again. Peter had a jealousy issue with my friend Rob and wore me down to the point that I basically just avoid Rob now (Rob even approached to ask if I was mad at him and apologize for whatever he did). I just feel like this is going to keep happening over and over. I never get the benefit of the doubt, James is constantly afraid I'm going to be "stolen" and I feel like I teeter-totter between wanting to give him what he asks so he'll feel comfortable and feeling like it will never be enough. I feel like a caged animal. I'm afraid every time James texts me or any guy speaks to me in front of Peter. I like him so much but this jealousy is driving me crazy. I'm also afraid if we're together, I'm going to get to the point where I'm not allowed to be friendly with 50% of the population. I'm in danger of losing a total of 3 good, respectful guy friends, all of which I've known for longer than Peter. (I knew Rob for two years, James for 3, and the ex for nearly 6). I'm not a bad person or a bad girlfriend and I'm tired of being treated this way. We fight at least weekly, sometimes twice a week, over an issue like this. I just want it to stop and to be with the person I fell so hard for. But I also don't want to end up in a controlling relationship with someone who can't manage their jealousy. Any advice? Ever been on his side or mine? He's already going to a counselor but our school only provides one every two weeks and he missed his last appointment. He's open to couple's counseling but I don't know if there's a point 7 months in. Because he missed the last appointment, he hasn't brought up the jealousy thing with his counselor yet. He's willing to read books on this topic but I feel like the problem is that he won't start to get better until he really trusts me and wants to change. He says that he does but then he keeps doing this stuff. tl;dr: Very jealous boyfriend continually gives me "rules." Sample list above (not all of them). Any ideas on how to make him more comfortable? Is this fixable? Have you been on either side of something like this? RELEVANT COMMENTS MeltMyCheeseKThxBai You just presented us with a literal bullet point list of why you need to break the fuck up with him, ASAP. PETER is the shark here. And actually, you're right- this WILL keep happening over and over. Not only will it keep happening, but it will keep escalating. Here is a list for you, and I will call it "Soon." Soon, you will be afraid to walk around while looking anywhere but the ground because you don't want to be accused of purposely making eye contact with someone. Soon, you will compliantly give him access to all of your stuff to placate him and he will peruse your personal stuff regularly; many confrontations will result about your "infractions" and he will spring them on you at inconvenient times. Soon, you will not be allowed to interact or be friendly with anyone who isn't on his approved list; this will eventually include your family. Soon, while you're constantly on eggshells afraid to be accused of cheating, you will find out that he actually cheated on you. Maybe with one of those exes he likes to talk about. Because, you see, these types are so paranoid about cheating because they are cheaters and think everyone else will cheat too. Soon, if you have a job, he will be asking about your coworkers and maybe even show up there for a "surprise inspection". Don't be surprised if soon, additionally, he starts the practice of keeping you up all night fighting and not letting you sleep when he knows you have to work. Soon, you will stop butting heads about you going out with friends. This is because he will make your every attempt so miserable that you will give up to make things "easier". Soon, you will be but a shell of your former self and will wonder who the fuck that is staring at you in the mirror. Soon, he may become violent. He likely won't until he has effectively removed your support systems (friends and family) but eventually he damn near certainly will. I hope that SOON you heed the warnings and get the fuck away from this lunatic before he ruins you. Seriously, you have to get this. This is very, very bad. He will not change no matter how much counseling he gets. You modifying your behavior will NEVER change his. He is fucking dangerous and you need to end it with him NOW before he gets the chance to employ more advanced tactics on you. You are in dire need of these two books; "The Gift of Fear" and "Why Does He Do That?" I beg you, read them. Please seriously get the fuck away from this person. Edit: More stuff coming Soon to a relationship near you (will add as I think of them): Soon, he will call you "slut" and/or "whore" for the first time because "he told you not to wear that shirt". You will get upset. You also will never wear that shirt again. OOP I don't live near my family but there was a time last weekend where I was texting my family about a basketball game. We were cuddling on the couch and he took the phone away and said "Babe, can we just have 'us' time? We've been fighting all day and I just want to be with you." So that might be eminent. We fought today after James texted me about his date last night. I've been sick with a 101+ fever the past two days and cuddling with my childhood stuffed animal. He picked her up and acted like he was going to rip her arm off because he "wanted to scare me" and "see what I would do." I had to stop myself from kicking him. I've had the animal since I was 5 and she's from my dead grandmother. I don't know what I would do if she was broken. When I got her back, I tried to kick Peter out and he wouldn't leave. I ended up throwing his shoes and keys into the hallway and pushing him out the door. He took me out to lunch and then went back to the library. Now he's mad that we're going to bed angry. This was one of the texts I got this afternoon: "I know you don't want to hurt his (meaning James) feelings by telling him to take it easy on texts but you need to consider your boyfriend's feelings about this guy texting you so often every week. What he is doing is crossing my boundary. I know you don't want to hurt his feelings so I get you might not want to tell him flat out to stop texting. There are other ways. The main point is that this is too much and it is crossing a line of mine. I think once a week might be ideal and if we could reach that, it would ease my feelings. I ask that you consider my feelings. In return, I will make sure my jealousy does not lead me to imposing boundaries. You can tell him the truth: that he is crossing my boundaries and I ask that he respects me. I am being reasonable. All of our fights the last few weeks have been about this. If this goes away, then we both win and we can stay together happier." When I asked him what he's ever done in exchange for what I've given up, he said that he went through a phase of criticizing me and he's gotten better. That that was real change. Then he told me that I mean the world to him and he wouldn't go out of his way to try and fix our issues if he didn't care about me and being together for the future. I told him I wanted a break. Update May 1, 2015 (1 month later) Hi, all. Sorry that I dropped off and stopped responding all the sudden. I want to take a moment to sincerely thank you all for the outpouring of support and kindness that you showed me after my original post. I've read every single comment and PM probably 4 times and watched every lecture that was sent my way. I also went and picked up a book two days ago about controlling relationships which was recommended to me by a few redditors. I've read 160 pages so far. Honestly, I'm so turned around in this relationship that I don't know what's happening anymore. I do think that this relationship has some disturbingly manipulative and controlling elements coming from Peter. We've had several incidents in the last four weeks which have been very disheartening. Here are a sample: I went out to happy hour with friends - a guy and girl that are engaged to each other - at 5 pm while Peter studied. I guess he assumed we were eating dinner together because we eat most of our meals together. He didn't confirm that though. He knew where I was going and who I was with. I put my phone away because my friends both had their phone away and it was just us three. My phone was on silent because I had been in the library. I checked my phone every half hour or so. The last time I checked it, he had sent me a text asking about dinner and then a snarky follow up 15 minutes later. I had order an appetizer with my friends and wasn't hungry. I told him to go ahead and eat without me and we'd meet up later. I decided to go back to my friends' house to play with their dog and have another beer. Peter had told me that he was going to study until 10 pm and then wanted to spend the night together. All the sudden, Peter was mad at me for not telling him I was eating, not telling him we switched locations (even though I did, within 10 minutes of switching places) and telling me that he had right as my boyfriend to know where I was. He said I was inconsiderate and selfish. He was texting me every 10-15 minutes, angry at me, and completely ruined the night. I couldn't hide from my friends that I was upset and it was borderline humiliating. I went home by 10 pm but didn't want to see him because I was angry. He didn't apologize until the next day after we talked about it extensively and even then tried to justify it. I feel weird around my friends now that they've seen this. There was another incident when we ran into one of my good friends and I stopped to chat with her. Peter and I had spend the night together, had lunch together, and gone on a walk. I caught up with my friend for 3 minutes and then planned on walking to Peter's study space to chat for a few minutes before going back to my friend to study with her. (Peter likes to say "goodbye" even though we study like 20 ft apart, separated by a wall.) Peter got impatient, felt ignored, and walked off. Then he sent me several texts about how rude and inconsiderate I was by pretending that he wasn't there. That wasn't true at all; I was telling my friend I liked her sweater, asking her how she was, then I was going to exit with Peter to fill my water bottle and say goodbye. This blew up into a 3 hour argument via text. I had my best friend from home visiting last weekend. She stayed with me and drove 18 hours round trip in 4 days just to see me. Peter constantly texted, made passive aggressive comments if I didn't respond quickly enough, and generally was negative about me not giving him enough attention. I pointed all this out, he agreed and told me he would calm down. We all went to a dinner on her last night in town and I thought it went nicely. When Peter got out of the car, my friend made a comment that she was glad to see Peter and I getting along better. 5 minutes later, I got a text from Peter criticizing me, accusing me of not acting like a "couple" with him, acting distant, and not holding his hand. I was shocked. I thought I did a great job with the conversation, he talked for his fair share amount of time, and he got along well with my friend. She's been my best friend for 10 years. He said he hates how I "always do this." I have literally no idea what he's talking about. This wasn't a date. This was the first time he met one of the people who was most important to me and the last thing I wanted to do was make her feel like a third wheel. I told him I wasn't going to argue while she was in town but obviously was upset for the rest of the night. He apologized the next day but only after a long conversation. Obviously he didn't make a great impression once my friend saw the aftermath of dinner. Peter and I had a good day on Tuesday. We had fun, were getting along, etc. I came over to his place, took a nap, he went to soccer, and then I ordered us dinner. We ate together and bonded. I checked my phone (I keep it in my backpack now, at his request) and he saw I had a text. He wanted to know who it was from and what it said. I told him it was from James, asking where I was studying this summer (my home state or school state). Peter started lecturing me about getting texts after 10 pm (it was 10:30 where we were, 9:30 where James was). He talked about how it was inappropriate, he wouldn't talk to a girl so late, and asked why James wanted to know where I was. He asked if James was planning on visiting me. James and I have no plans like that whatsoever. Later, I got chapstick out of my backpack and Peter started accusing me of sneaking around to text James back. I wasn't. He asked me three times if that's what I did. I almost left but Peter convinced me to stay. All of the sudden, I felt suspicious. I asked to see his facebook chat log so I could see when he had lasted facebooked his ex that he swears he hasn't spoken to. He refused. I ended up leaving, then coming back and saying if he wouldn't show me the same transparency he's demanded from me, it was over. He still tried to say no. In retrospect, I'm horrified by how angry I felt. I wanted to push him or hit him. I've never, ever felt like that towards another person. It's like I didn't recognize myself. He ended up showing me the log. He had a long conversation with his ex from Christmas Eve, which was laden with inside jokes, flirting, and sexual references. I asked to see his phone. Whole months were missing from his call log but he had two voicemails from her which insinuated they had some contact with each other. He swears that's all there is but almost half his call log is gone. This is something I could forgive in a normal relationship -with remorse and change - but it hurts a lot considering that he's breaking rules he's given me, lied, and been hypocritical. I feel so watched and suffocated over actual guy friends, subjected myself to structured timetables imposed by him, had an open phone policy, and he's off talking about suggestive stuff with his ex. She's blocked him now but that's not the point. He's got me to the point where I feel guilty every time a male friend talks to me and I've actually started believing that I'm doing something wrong if I laugh at a guy friend's joke. I feel sick when my phone goes off if I'm around him. I've been reading literature on controlling/abusive relationships and shared my concerns with him that he's meandering into this territory. He's been dismissive of it almost every time I've brought it up. I've had three friends tell me they're concerned based on the rules and his jealousy. He just says he has high standards and boundaries and that I would be jealous too if the roles were reversed. I don't think I would be but he insists I would. I just feel like he doesn't listen to me or take me seriously. I thought things were getting better, he said I could text James whenever I wanted and he would be less harsh/critical in general. Yesterday though, he asked if I had responded to James and why "that guy" wanted to know where I was and said it was weird James was being so nosy. I think James was just making conversation. Then, last night, I was studying with friends and Peter walked by. Peter and I had just fought (we had been at dinner 10 minutes before) and I was mid-word in conversation with a friend and just made eye contact with him and looked away. I got a text asking why I didn't smile and wave. I apologized and said it was my fault and didn't mean to hurt his feelings. I then got more texts saying I was "cold" and demanding an explanation. That got me upset and I tried to tell him that the constant criticism and control was too much. That I felt like he was trying to control my emotions and make me pretend to be happy when I wasn't. He told me I was overreacting and he was tired of arguing and just wanted "to be good and nice." I feel like he starts a fight, expresses his feelings, then wants it to be over, even though the criticism and control is really wearing me down and making me agitated. I just feel like if I stay with him, I'm going to end up giving in and letting him criticize me, letting go of my guy friends, and apologizing when I mess up. That I'll just end up a shell of myself and cater to his needs instead of compromising. But I also don't think he's doing this on purpose. I think he gets insecure and doesn't know how to fix it, so he wants me to do it instead of asking himself if he's overreacting. I think that's how we get all these rules. He's fixing symptoms and not the root cause. I don't think any of this is malicious. I tried to break up with him again two days ago. He begged me to wait until after finals (8 days). Eventually I agreed but said that there would be no sleep overs or physical affection. He agreed but now he's trying to kiss me even when I tell him I don't want to kiss. Then he gets mad I'm not kissing back. He says he knows now that he's being controlling and manipulative and he'll change. But I'm not seeing any change. I just feel so confused as to whether I'm overreacting or not. I can't tell if he's actually being a little abusive and he makes me doubt myself because he doesn't call me names or hurt me physically. He wants to read the book when I'm done with it and says he'll learn from it and wants to stay with me. In 8 day finals are over. In 17 days, I graduate from law school. I just feel so bad about myself and confused. I've always been an empathetic person and emotionally intelligent person (that's usually what I'm "known for" by friends... know how to say the right thing at the right time and see things from other people's perspectives) but I feel so steamrolled. I'm also so embarrassed. I'm supposed to be this strong, capable woman and I can't even tell if my relationship is healthy. Right now, I'm planning on dumping Peter the second his final is over and blocking him on everything. I feel relief when I think about that. But I also feel scared that I'll miss him and that I'm being crazy and unwilling to compromise. That I'm throwing away something good by being dramatic. I keep trying to convince myself, apart from the question of whether he's controlling, that if I'm not happy, I can't stay with Peter. That long distance is too hard. He wants to interview at law firms in my city and plan on how to get back together in a year. I can't do that if I have any doubts and I don't want to spend another day miserable. I HAVE to dump him. I just need to make sure I do. I've already tried multiple times. I can't get talked back into this. This isn't healthy. Sidenote: He knows that I've posted on here but not what my username is and he hasn't seen the original post. It's a possibility he could stumble upon this and he would obviously recognize it because of this level of detail. TL;DR: I feel like a crazy person. I'm doubting my emotions. I know I need to break up with him but I'm so worried I'm being overdramatic and ruining something because I'm unreasonable. I know I need to get out but why am I so reluctant to? Final Update from the "Rules" girl - I did it. May 25, 2015 (24 days after 1st update) I finally did it. Today I took the last step and blocked him on all my accounts (10 minutes ago). We're going no contact. You all were right that he used the time before and immediately after finals to draw me back in. I don't really regret waiting though. I didn't want to be the reason that he ended up messing up all his finals and potentially not getting a job he wanted because of grades. That isn't the person that I want to be and I'm okay with sacrificing a few weeks of my happiness for retaining that part of myself. The following weeks were full of his apologies, assurances that he's changing, etc. But nothing changed. I realized that I didn't even want to wait around to see if he could get better because I don't want to be with him. He's not respectful of me and you can't teach respect. He seems completely incapable of empathizing with me and taking me into consideration when making plans. He wouldn't listen to me, he was dismissive of my concerns, and I just didn't feel valued, supported, or happy when we spoke. When I broke up with him, he said that's what he wanted too because my interactions with men (including James) are "inappropriate" and "not in line with his beliefs." Two months ago that would have really bothered me and I would have gotten reeled back in defending myself but I just said "You know that's not true but I'm not going to fight with you about it. I wish you the best. Goodbye." and then blocked him. I feel a little sad and lonely. It'll be weird to go from nearly constant contact and cutesy text messages to complete and utter silence but I'm hoping the payoff of not having horrible fights multiple times a week will balance that out. The good news: I graduated last week, made honor roll, got the highest award in a competitive class, I'm back in my home state, living with my parents (I adore them and get along well with them), and my bar review class starts tomorrow morning. I'm back to running and lifting multiple times a week and I'm in the process of booking up my social calendar. It'll be hard to stop checking my phone compulsively and sad going to sleep without saying goodnight to him, but I think that I'm in the best circumstances (aka not living one building away) to make this fade as gently as possible. I've reached out to a friend already and she supports my decision. I'll reach out to a few others this afternoon. The hardest part of this is letting go of the fantasy that he would get better and I could have this intense, passionate, beautiful relationship with him that was also healthy. I let his possessiveness slide because I felt so intensely cared about. But now I know what to watch out for in the future. I'm going to remain single for the rest of 2015 in an effort to build myself back up and prevent another toxic relationship. I will protect myself in the future the way I would protect a friend. I'm 25 now and I need to start taking who I date more seriously because I don't want to end up married to someone like Peter. I'm scared of the future, of being with someone like him, and of never feeling this level of passion again. I'm especially afraid that I really am all the things he accused me of being. But I know I'm doing the right thing. This is usually when he would come running to my door, knocking, waiting, and begging me to unblock him. This is the first time I won't. Thank you, so much, for your support and patience. This sub gets a lot of grief for a myriad of reasons but you all do so much good. So much more than you even know. I am eternally grateful to each and every one of you that commented and especially those that direct messaged me. You all were a lifeline to me when I wasn't ready to turn to my friends. Thank you, from the bottom of my heart. tl;dr: I dumped him. Got accused of sort-of cheating (again) during the break up. Feeling weird but relieved. Blocked him on everything. Just wanted to share the good news. Two years out of an abusive relationship and I'm so happy, I could burst. July 29, 2017 (over 2 years later) Two years ago, I posted some rather desperate r/relationships questions asking for help. (If you're curious the initial cry for help, starting to gather strength to leave, the jubilant break up post. I knew deep down that something was desperately wrong with my relationship but I was hellbent on fixing it. The posts were the beginning of finding my way out of what felt like a mindfog. I tried to post on relationships to let people know how it was going, in the hopes that if there were people considering leaving similar situations, they know that something better is out there. Unfortunately, relationships doesn't allow multiple posts. However, I felt an intense desire to share the "after" part of leaving an abusive relationship to let women know that there IS life after an abuser, even if they feel like their world will cease without the relationship. I hope this sub is an okay place for this. It only took about two months after my break up to know that I would 100% be okay. That moment came while I was on a family vacation and was curling my hair in the mirror. I made eye contact with my reflection. I remember being startled because I saw someone looking back that looked calm. She wasn't worried about whether she'd get called slutty, whether smiling too much at dinner would get her accused of cheating, or whether the swimsuit she chose for the pool would get her accused of "showing off" and yelled at. For the first time in a year, I felt happy, safe, and confident. I became nearly giddy realizing I hadn't been criticized in months and I felt FREE. It took so much for me to get out of the relationship. I think I was borderline addicted to the highs and lows. Every time I started to escape, I got "love bombed" (learned this term in my research post-break up) and pulled back in. I was worried nothing would ever feel as good as that relationship. However, I followed all the “standard break up advice” and worked out, reconnected with friends, started up new hobbies and (very importantly!) went to counseling. It was a long road, but a much easier one than I originally expected. And at the end of it, I was happy. Here's a list of things that have happened to me in the last two years that have been better than that relationship: Passing my state's bar to become a lawyer; Starting a new job where I feel challenged and respected; Getting a gorgeous new apartment downtown; Getting into the best shape of my life; Making friends with a strong group of intelligent, kickass women that my ex would have never let me befriend; Drinking/smoking/sleeping without being guilted for not following my ex's expectations for what I should be doing with my time; Getting a cat and not needing to worry about her safety around my ex or him getting jealous; Leaving my house without having to give text updates about where I am; Smiling at strangers without being questioned over it; Being approached to run for office in 2018 and saying yes because I want to do it; and Literally everything. Here's what I want to say to anyone who is interested: Anyone can get sucked into an abusive relationship. It doesn't matter how smart you are, how confident you are, or how independent you want to be. Just because you’re in one doesn’t make you dumb or worthless. It doesn’t make you easy prey or unable to be in a healthy relationship next time. The only antidote is listening to your gut and respecting boundaries that you put into place for your own life. There were so many times that I felt a pit in my stomach and knew something was wrong but ignored it because I felt like a compromise could be found. Some people out there are scary, they are manipulative, and they do not want the best for you. They only care about themselves and you cannot make them respect you, value you, or treat you well. When you meet that person, don't try to change them. Cut your losses and leave. Don't let their voice get in your head and to start believing their narrative of who you are. It took me nearly a year to undo the damage that an 8 month relationship did to me. (Can you believe things got this bad in 8 months?!) I would internally feel myself panic for months after the break up when I laughed too much with my friends, thinking that I would be getting lectured about being fake/flirty/inappropriate. It took me so long to start making sarcastic jokes again (my ex didn't "get them" or think they were funny). I basically had to regrow all myself self confidence and redefine myself worth. I could barely even express an opinion on where I wanted to eat since it hadn't mattered in so long. Once I got past that, I remember marveling at the tranquility of my life being mine, my self esteem returning to normal, and people treating me gently/kindly. My parents told me I was happier than they’d seen me in a year and my best friend told me that she was glad “to have me back.” (Side note: Counseling is IMPORTANT. People that are in an abusive relationship are more likely to get into another one than someone who has never been abused. When you are being abused, up looks like down and down looks like up. Going to counseling helped me re-orient, figure out what was normal, and taught me to listen to my gut. It helped me rebuild and make sure this wouldn’t happen again. I didn’t even need many sessions but I actually liked it by the end! I’m forever a gigantic advocate of finding a counselor that fits your needs well.) I don’t want this to be the point of my post, so I’m putting it last. I took a dating hiatus for 6 months after the break up and tried to rebuild on my own. I think this was extremely important to help me re-center. After the six month hiatus, I wrote out parameters for dating and a list of things I needed in a partner (kindness, gentleness, warmth, an even temper). I was picky, I stopped seeing people that I felt weren’t listening to me or weren’t treating me well. After six months of dating, I found someone that fit the list. I’ve been dating him for a bit over a year, and I can’t stress how different this relationship is. It’s night and day. I’m listened to, respected, treated like a real partner, and my boundaries matter. I can be friends with whoever I want (I’m still good friends with James!) and my alone time is given with no questions asked. Tl;dr: I was in an abusive relationship, asked reddit for help, and they came through. Life is so much better post-break up. I want to emphasize this can happen to anyone, just because it’s happening doesn’t mean you deserve it. Get out! Life gets better than you can imagine. THIS IS A REPOST SUB - I AM NOT THE OOP DO NOT CONTACT THE OOP's OR COMMENT ON LINKED POSTS, REMEMBER - RULE 7 submitted by /u/Direct-Caterpillar77 to r/BestofRedditorUpdates [link] [comments]
r/BestofRedditorUpdates Direct-Caterpillar77 Apr 28, 2026
(Production trope) "**** it, just roll with it"
Not sure how best to describe this, but when an error or unavoidable situation on set leads to a memorable character. Star Wars: The Last Jedi - Porgs When filming on Skellig Michael, there was a prevalence of puffins on the island. This problem was solved by CGI-ing over them and creating these little bastards. Twin Peaks - Bob The accidental reflection of Frank Silva, a set dresser for the show, in the mirror of a shot led David Lynch to cast him as the central antagonist of the show submitted by /u/gaymer91 to r/TopCharacterTropes [link] [comments]
r/TopCharacterTropes gaymer91 Apr 13, 2026
I traced $2 billion in nonprofit grants and 45 states of lobbying records to figure out who's behind the age verification bills. The answer involves a company that profits from your data writing laws that collect more of it.
EDIT/UPDATE: New post and research at https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1rtd51g/update_i_pulled_irs_filings_for_the_org_that/ Website: https://tboteproject.com Support Findings: https://tboteproject.com/donate/ Repository: https://tboteproject.com/git/hekate/attestation-findings I've been pulling public records on the wave of "age verification" bills moving through US state legislatures. IRS 990 filings, Senate lobbying disclosures, state ethics databases, campaign finance records, corporate registries, WHOIS lookups, Wayback Machine archives. What started as curiosity about who was pushing these bills turned into documenting a coordinated influence operation that, from a privacy standpoint, is building surveillance infrastructure at the operating system level while the company behind it faces zero new requirements for its own platforms. I want to be clear about what this is and isn't. I am not the author of the earlier r/linux post by aaronsb and I'm not affiliated with them. I titled this to draw attention on this subreddit because the privacy implications go well beyond Linux. Every source cited here is a public record. What the bills actually require you to hand over Most reporting on these bills says something vague like "age checks at device setup." The statutory language is more specific and more invasive than that. California AB-1043, signed October 2025 and effective January 1, 2027, defines "Operating system provider" under Section 1798.500(g) as "a person or entity that develops, licenses, or controls the operating system software on a computer, mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device." Every OS provider must then: provide an interface at account setup collecting a birth date or age, and expose a real-time API that broadcasts the user's age bracket (under 13, 13 to 15, 16 to 17, 18+) to any application running on the system. Read that again. Every app on your device gets to query a system-level API that returns your age bracket in real time. This isn't age verification at the point of accessing restricted content. This is a persistent age-broadcasting service baked into the operating system itself, queryable by every installed application. Colorado SB26-051 (passed the Senate 28-7, now in the House) copies the same definitions in the same order, same penalty structure ($2,500 per child for negligent violations, $7,500 for intentional ones), same exemptions. The template is the ICMEC "Digital Age Assurance Act," and it's been introduced or is pending in Illinois (three separate bills), New York, Kansas, South Carolina, Ohio, Georgia, Florida, and at the federal level. New York's S8102A goes further. It requires device manufacturers to perform "commercially reasonable and technically feasible age assurance" at device activation and explicitly bans self-reporting. The AG picks the approved methods. That means biometric age estimation or government ID verification before you can use a device you purchased. Exemptions in all of these bills cover broadband ISPs, telecom services, and physical products. None contain any exemption for open-source software, non-commercial projects, or privacy-preserving verification methods. The status right now: State Bill Status CA AB-1043 Enacted, effective Jan 1, 2027 CO SB26-051 Passed Senate, in House committee LA HB-570 Enacted, effective July 1, 2026 UT SB-142 Enacted, first in nation TX SB-2420 Enjoined by federal judge NY S8102A Pending IL HB-3304, HB-4140, SB-2037 Pending Federal KOSA, ASAA Pending The privacy architecture these bills create What's concerning about these bills is they don't just verify age once. They create persistent identity layer inside the operating system that applications can query at will. The commercial age verification vendors who would provide this infrastructure (Yoti, Veriff, Jumio) charge $0.10 to $2.00 per check, require proprietary SDKs, demand API keys tied to commercial accounts, and operate cloud-only with no self-hosted option. Your age verification data goes to a third-party cloud service. Every time. Compare this to what the EU built. The EU Digital Identity Wallet under eIDAS 2.0 has a reference implementation published under Apache 2.0/EUPL and uses selective disclosure credentials. A user can prove they fall within an age bracket without handing over their date of birth. The EU's Digital Services Act puts age verification obligations on Very Large Online Platforms (45M+ monthly users), not on operating systems. FOSS projects that don't act as intermediary services are explicitly outside scope. Micro and small enterprises get additional exemptions. The EU approach is not without its own problems. The reference code is open, but the operational system is not self-hostable. You cannot run your own trusted identity provider. The wallet apps require Google Play Services or the iOS equivalent, which locks out users of privacy-focused Android distributions like GrapheneOS, CalyxOS, and LineageOS. Device attestation requirements effectively ban rooted or jailbroken devices. The zero-knowledge proof privacy guarantees only hold if you trust that credential issuers and verifiers are not colluding to correlate your activity. ZKP is a cryptographic mechanism, not a trust architecture, and it cannot solve the problem of collusion between parties in the chain. Even with those caveats, the architectural gap between the two approaches is wide. The EU model does not create a persistent age-broadcasting API at the OS level. It does not mandate commercial vendors. It does not force biometric data into a third-party cloud on every check. The US bills assume every operating system is built by a corporation with the infrastructure and revenue to absorb these costs. The EU started from the opposite assumption and built accordingly. EU approach US bills Who's regulated Platforms with 45M+ users FOSS exemption Yes, five separate mechanisms Verification method Open-source wallet, zero-knowledge proofs Cost to non-commercial projects $0 Privacy architecture Selective disclosure, privacy by design Works offline Yes Who wrote the legislation This is where it gets interesting. Rep. Kim Carver (R-Bossier City), the sponsor of Louisiana's HB-570, publicly confirmed that a Meta lobbyist brought the legislative language directly to her. The bill as drafted required only app stores (Apple, Google) to verify user ages. It did not require social media platforms to do anything. Meta deployed 12 lobbyists across 9 confirmed firms for this single bill, paying at least $324,992 (described as a "very conservative estimate"). The confirmed firms include Pelican State Partners (who also lobby for Roblox, letting Meta frame this as "broad industry support" rather than one company's project), Adams and Reese LLP (the #1 ranked Louisiana government affairs firm), and State Capitol Solutions. Nicole Lopez, Meta's Director of Global Litigation Strategy for Youth, testified at the House Commerce Committee in support. She also testified in South Dakota for a similar bill. She's Meta's national point person for these laws. HB-570 passed unanimously at every stage: House 99-0, Senate 39-0. So why did Meta need 12 lobbyists? Because the votes were never the concern. The lobbyists were there to control the text and block amendments. The key amendment battle came from Senator Jay Morris, who expanded the bill to include app developers alongside app stores after Google's senior director of government affairs publicly questioned why "Mark Zuckerberg is so keen on passing these bills." When Morris introduced his amendment, Meta went silent. The conference committee compromise maintained dual responsibility but kept the primary burden on app stores, which is what Meta wanted from the start. At that same Senate hearing, Morris directly questioned DCA Executive Director Casey Stefanski about who funds her organization. She reportedly deflected, said she "wasn't comfortable answering," then under continued pressure admitted tech companies provide funding but refused to name them. The advocacy group that doesn't legally exist The Digital Childhood Alliance presents itself as a coalition of 50+ conservative child safety organizations (later inflated to 140+, though only six have ever been publicly named). It has been testifying in favor of these bills across states. Here is what public records show about its legal status: I searched all four regional extracts of the IRS Exempt Organizations Business Master File (eo1 through eo4.csv), which cover every tax-exempt organization registered in the United States. DCA is not there. No EIN exists for this organization. I also searched for incorporation records in Colorado, DC, Delaware, and Virginia, plus OpenCorporates (200M+ companies), ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer, GuideStar, and Charity Navigator. No incorporation record exists in any of them. DCA's domain was registered December 18, 2024 through GoDaddy with privacy protection and a four-year registration. The website was live and fully formed one day later: professional design, statistics, testimonials from Heritage Foundation and NCOSE staff, ASAA talking points already loaded. This is not a grassroots launch. This is a staging deployment of a pre-built site. 77 days later, Utah SB-142 became the first ASAA law signed in the country. DCA processes donations through For Good (formerly Network for Good, EIN 68-0480736), which is a Donor Advised Fund. For Good explicitly states in its documentation that it serves "501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations." DCA claims 501(c)(4) status. DCA is classified as a "Project" (ID 258136) in the For Good system, not as a standalone nonprofit. I searched all 59,736 For Good grant recipients across five years, roughly $1.73 billion in disbursements. Zero grants to DCA, DCI, NCOSE, or any related entity. The donation page appears to be cosmetic. Bloomberg reporters exposed Meta as a DCA funder in July 2025. The Deseret News detailed the arrangement in December 2025. No version of the website, across 100+ Wayback Machine snapshots, has ever disclosed funding sources. Every blog post and testimony targets Apple and Google. Meta is never mentioned or criticized. DCA's leadership traces directly to NCOSE (National Center on Sexual Exploitation): Casey Stefanski, Executive Director, spent 10 years at NCOSE as Senior Director of Global Partnerships. Unusually, she never appears on any NCOSE 990 filing as an officer, key employee, or among the five highest-compensated staff. A senior director title at a $5.4M organization for a decade with no 990 appearance suggests either below-threshold compensation, an inflated title, or something else about the arrangement. Dawn Hawkins, DCA's Chair, simultaneously serves as CEO of NCOSE. John Read, DCA's Senior Policy Advisor, spent 30 years at the DOJ Antitrust Division investigating app stores and Big Tech. NCOSE's own 501(c)(4) structure turns out to be complicated. Tracing Schedule R filings across four years reveals that NCOSE created "NCOSE Action" (EIN 86-2458921) as a c4 in 2021, reclassified it from c4 to c3 in 2022, then created an entirely new c4 called "Institute for Public Policy" (EIN 88-1180705) in 2023 with the same address and the same principal officer (Marcel van der Watt). By 2024 the original entity had disappeared from Schedule R entirely. Despite NCOSE's website describing NCOSEAction as "created by NCOSE," and Schedule R listing the Institute as a "controlled organization," all 19 transaction indicators between NCOSE and the Institute are marked "No." No grants, no shared employees, no shared facilities, no reimbursements. Zero reported transactions between a parent and its own controlled c4 while staff move freely between them. Concurrently, NCOSE's lobbying spending tripled from $78,000 to $204,000, coinciding with DCA's launch and the ASAA legislative push. $70M+ in super PACs, deliberately fragmented Meta poured over $70 million into state-level super PACs and structured every one to avoid the FEC's centralized, searchable database: Entity Meta's contribution Type Notable detail ATEP $45M Bipartisan 527 PAC Co-led by Hilltop Public Solutions META California $20M State PAC Chaired by Brian Rice, Meta VP of Public Policy California Leads $5M State PAC Union-partnered Forge the Future Downstream from ATEP State PAC (TX) Policy priorities mirror ASAA language Making Our Tomorrow Downstream from ATEP State PAC (IL) Also chaired by Brian Rice By registering every PAC at the state level rather than federally, Meta scatters filings across dozens of state ethics commission databases with different formats, different disclosure timelines, and no centralized search. Each filing is technically public. Aggregating them into a coherent picture requires manually querying each state. This is structural opacity by fragmentation. Forge the Future's stated policy priorities include: "Empowering parents with oversight of children's online activities across devices and digital environments." That is functionally identical to the ASAA framing. Of 20 Meta-backed candidates across Texas and North Carolina primaries, 19 won (Washington Post, March 12, 2026). The firm that bridges both tracks This is the finding that connects two things I'd been tracking separately. Hilltop Public Solutions, a Democratic consulting firm, shows up in three distinct contexts: Co-leads ATEP, Meta's $45M bipartisan super PAC Involved in DCA's messaging coordination, per investigative reporting Connected to Forge the Future, the downstream Texas PAC with ASAA-aligned policy priorities This makes Hilltop the first confirmed entity bridging Meta's political spending operation and the DCA advocacy campaign. The firm helping Meta elect "tech-friendly" state legislators also coordinates messaging for the nominally independent grassroots organization pushing those legislators to pass ASAA. The dark money network Meta's Colorado lobbying runs through Headwaters Strategies, paid $338,500 since 2019, with monthly payments jumping from roughly $5K/month to $14K-$30K/month starting July 2023 as state-level age verification bills accelerated. Headwaters co-founder Adam Eichberg simultaneously serves as a registered Meta lobbyist in Colorado, as Chair of the Board of the New Venture Fund (the flagship entity of the Arabella Advisors network, $669M revenue), and as founding board member of the Windward Fund (another Arabella entity, $311M revenue). The Arabella network operates four entities from the same building at 1828 L Street NW, Washington DC, with combined annual revenue exceeding $1.3 billion. NVF transfers $121.3M per year to the Sixteen Thirty Fund, a 501(c)(4) with no donor disclosure requirements. I parsed the IRS Form 990 Schedule I filings across all five Arabella entities. That's 4,433 grants totaling approximately $2.0 billion. I searched for every child safety, age verification, and tech policy organization I could identify. Zero matches. The Schedule I grant pathway is definitively ruled out. If Meta money flows through this network, it would have to travel via fiscal sponsorship, consulting fees, or non-grant payments, which are inherently less transparent. The Eichberg connection matters not because it proves a pipeline, but because the person receiving Meta's lobbying payments chairs the governance structure of the largest anonymous-donor-funded advocacy network in US politics. That structural overlap is documented regardless of whether money moves through it. The company that benefits Meta's own Horizon OS (powering Quest VR headsets) already has Meta Account age verification, a Get Age Category API, Family Center parental controls, Quest Store age ratings, and default minor account protections. I scored Horizon OS at 83% compliance readiness with these mandates. Meta is not opposing these bills. In Colorado, I pulled lobbying records from the Secretary of State's SODA API and found Meta's four registered lobbyists on SB26-051 listed in a "Monitoring" position. Not amending, not opposing. Watching. On every social media regulation bill in Colorado, Meta takes an "Amending" position, actively fighting changes. Across 117 lobbying records on 22 bills: Bills regulating social media: Meta position is "Amending" (fighting) The one bill putting the burden on OS providers: Meta position is "Monitoring" (watching) Meta fights bills that regulate Meta. Meta watches bills that regulate everyone else. In California, Meta spent over $1 million on state lobbying in the first three quarters of 2025 and publicly supported AB-1043, breaking ranks with its own trade associations (TechNet and Chamber of Progress both opposed it). Meta supported a bill that creates surveillance infrastructure at the OS level while leaving social media platforms untouched. Meta's LD-2 filings with the Senate explicitly list H.R. 3149/S. 1586, the App Store Accountability Act, as a lobbied bill. The filing narrative includes "protecting children, bullying prevention and online safety; youth safety and federal parental approval; youth restrictions on social media." In the same filing, Meta also lobbies on KOSA and COPPA 2.0, which would regulate Meta directly. Meta supports the bill that burdens its competitors and lobbies to weaken the bills that burden itself. Both positions appear in the same quarterly disclosure. The privacy questions I've tried to present findings here, not conclusions. But from a privacy standpoint: Why does the company that profits from collecting user data draft legislation requiring every operating system to collect age data and broadcast it to every installed application via a system-level API? Why do these bills mandate commercial age verification vendors (Yoti, Veriff, Jumio) whose business model is collecting biometric data, while the EU's equivalent uses open-source zero-knowledge proofs that reveal nothing beyond "over 18"? Why is there no data minimization requirement in any of these bills for the age verification data itself? AB-1043 creates a persistent age signal API. Who governs what happens to the data flowing through it? Why does Meta fund an advocacy group with no legal existence in the IRS system to push legislation that creates new data collection infrastructure at a layer below Meta's own products, while Meta faces zero new requirements? Why does the company whose lobbyist drafted one of these bills write it to specifically exclude social media platforms from the age verification mandate? If the goal is child safety, why regulate the operating system, which has no direct contact with children, instead of the social media platforms where the documented harm occurs? What you can do If you're in CO, IL, or NY, these bills are still in committee. Comment on the record. System76's CEO met with the Colorado bill's sponsor on March 9 and the sponsor suggested excluding open-source software. The conversation is happening now. Contact the EFF, FSF, and Software Freedom Conservancy with the specific statutory language and compliance gap numbers. They need to know these definitions cover volunteer-maintained software with no exemption. Read the actual bill text. CA AB-1043 is searchable on leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. CO SB26-051 is on leg.colorado.gov. The definitions are what matter, not the news summaries. If you maintain software that could be classified as an "operating system provider" under these definitions, start thinking about your response now. CA AB-1043 takes effect January 1, 2027. Louisiana HB-570 takes effect July 1, 2026. Sources (all public records) Bill text: CA AB-1043 (Chapter 675, leginfo.legislature.ca.gov), CO SB26-051 (leg.colorado.gov), LA HB-570 Act 481 of 2025 (legis.la.gov), NY S8102A (nysenate.gov), TX SB-2420, UT SB-142 (le.utah.gov) Federal lobbying: OpenSecrets Meta profile (opensecrets.org, client ID D000033563), Senate LDA filing UUID b73445ed-15e5-42e7-a1e8-aeb224755267 Colorado lobbying: CO Secretary of State SODA API (data.colorado.gov, datasets vp65-spyn, dxfk-9ifj, df5p-p6jt) Louisiana lobbying: LA Board of Ethics, F Minus database (fminus.org/clients/pelican-state-partners-llc/, fminus.org/clients/meta-platforms-inc/) California lobbying: CalAccess (cal-access.sos.ca.gov), Bloomberg Government Super PACs: Forge the Future (texasforgefuturepac.com), Texas Ethics Commission, Illinois State Board of Elections, Politico (Feb 2, 2026), Washington Post (Mar 12, 2026) DCA records: WHOIS/RDAP (rdap.org), Wayback Machine CDX API (100+ snapshots), IRS EO BMF (eo1-eo4.csv), OpenCorporates, ProPublica, GuideStar NCOSE: IRS Form 990 FY2020-FY2024 including Schedule R; NCOSEAction/Institute for Public Policy (EIN 88-1180705); original NCOSE Action (EIN 86-2458921) via Schedule R history For Good/Network for Good: forgood.org, DCA donation page source (targetable_type=Project, targetable_id=258136), For Good 990s via ProPublica (EIN 68-0480736, 59,736 recipients searched) IRS 990 filings: ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer: NVF (EIN 20-5806345), STF 2024 (sixteenthirtyfund.org), DCI (EIN 39-3684798), Windward, Hopewell, North Fund, NCOSE (EIN 13-2608326), ConnectSafely (EIN 47-3168168) Campaign finance: CO TRACER bulk data (tracer.sos.colorado.gov), FollowTheMoney.org, FEC API (Meta PAC C00502906) Reporting: Bloomberg (July 2025), Deseret News (Dec 2025), The Center Square, ACT | The App Association, Dome Politics, Pluribus News, Nola.com, Privacy Daily EU framework: EUR-Lex (Digital Services Act, eIDAS 2.0 Regulation), EUDIW GitHub repository, T-Scy consortium Technical: freedesktop.org, GNOME/KDE documentation, Meta developer docs (developer.meta.com/horizon) Full dataset, OSINT tasklist, and all processed findings are published with sources embedded in each file: github.com/upper-up/meta-lobbying-and-other-findings This is an ongoing investigation. Pending: Texas Ethics Commission records for Forge the Future expenditure recipients, NCOSEAction's first 990 filing, IRS Form 8872 for ATEP, and FOIA responses from Colorado and Louisiana. If you have access to lobbying data from states I haven't covered (IL, NY, UT, GA), I'd appreciate a heads up. I am not claiming Meta wrote every one of these bills. Louisiana is confirmed by the sponsor; the others use a shared ICMEC template. I am not claiming there is a direct Arabella-to-DCA funding pipeline; I checked $2 billion in grants and found no evidence. I am not claiming child safety isn't a legitimate concern. What I am documenting is: the company whose lobbyist drafted HB-570 wrote it to exclude its own platforms; the advocacy group pushing these bills nationally has no legal existence and is confirmed funded by Meta; the same consulting firm bridges Meta's super PAC and DCA's messaging; none of these bills exempt open-source or non-commercial software while the EU equivalent does; and the mandatory age-signal API creates persistent surveillance infrastructure at the OS level with no data minimization requirements. The records are above. Draw your own conclusions. This section documents what happened when this investigation was posted to Reddit, and provides context on Meta's documented history of using astroturfing, coordinated reporting, and platform manipulation to suppress unfavorable content. What happened The original version of this investigation was posted to r/linux, where it was mass reported and pulled down pending moderator review (150 upvotes, roughly 15k views before being pulled down some 40 minutes after being posted) The content that was suppressed names Meta lobbying firms, traces documented payments, cites Senate LD-2 filings, and links to IRS records. It identifies Hilltop Public Solutions as the first confirmed entity bridging Meta's $45M super PAC and the DCA astroturf campaign. This is the kind of content that a well-resourced actor would have reason to suppress. I cannot prove the mass reports were coordinated rather than organic. That is the point of the tactic: Reddit's infrastructure makes it impossible to distinguish genuine community objections from manufactured ones, and it rewards the behavior either way by automatically removing the content. Meta has done this before In March 2022, the Washington Post reported that Meta hired Targeted Victory, one of the largest Republican consulting firms in the country, to run a nationwide astroturfing campaign against TikTok. Internal emails obtained by the Post showed the campaign: Placed op-eds and letters to the editor in regional news outlets across the country, none of which disclosed the connection to Meta or Targeted Victory Promoted stories about dangerous TikTok "trends" that had actually originated on Facebook Pushed local politicians and political reporters to frame TikTok as a threat to children In an internal email, a campaign director wrote that the "dream would be to get stories with headlines like 'From dances to danger: how TikTok has become the most harmful social media space for kids'" Meta's spokesman defended the campaign by saying "all platforms should face a level of scrutiny consistent with their growing success." Meta did not deny hiring the firm or directing the campaign. The story was confirmed by the Washington Post, Fortune, Variety, CBS News, Engadget, Tortoise Media, the Boston Globe, and Techdirt, among others. This is not speculation about what Meta might do. This is what Meta has been publicly documented doing: hiring firms to plant stories, manufacture public concern about competitors using child safety as the framing, and conceal the corporate origin of the messaging. The Targeted Victory campaign and the DCA campaign use the same playbook: fund an outside entity to push messaging that serves Meta's commercial interests while hiding Meta's involvement. Reddit's bot and astroturfing problem is structural Research published in Nature (Scientific Reports) documented coordinated political astroturfing patterns across platforms including Reddit. A separate study found that at least 15% of content in surveyed subreddits was posted by corporate trolls or bot accounts designed to manipulate public opinion. Since June 2025, bot networks have been systematically exploiting Reddit and Meta's own moderation systems through mass reporting. Thousands of legitimate Facebook groups were deleted after coordinated bot reports triggered automated enforcement. The same mass-reporting tactic works on Reddit: a small number of accounts can file reports, trigger automated removal, and flag the poster's account for site-wide spam filtering, all without engaging with the content. Venture-backed firms like Doublespeed now offer astroturfing-as-a-service across Reddit, TikTok, and Instagram, operating physical phone farms to bypass platform detection. The infrastructure for suppressing content through coordinated inauthentic behavior is commercially available. What this means for this investigation Meta spent $26.3 million on federal lobbying in 2025 and deployed 86+ lobbyists across 45 states. It funded a nationally active advocacy group (DCA) with no legal existence in the IRS system. It hired Hilltop Public Solutions to simultaneously run its $45M super PAC and coordinate DCA's messaging. It previously hired Targeted Victory to run a covert astroturfing campaign against TikTok using child safety as the narrative frame. This investigation documents all of that with primary sources. A post containing those findings was mass reported on Reddit within hours and suppressed site-wide by automated systems. Whether the reports were organic or coordinated, the outcome is the same: the content was removed from the platform where Meta has both the motive and the documented capability to suppress it. The research is published in a git repository with every source embedded. It does not depend on Reddit's infrastructure to survive. Sources Washington Post, "Facebook paid Republican strategy firm to malign TikTok" (March 30, 2022): https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/facebook-tiktok-targeted-victory/ Fortune, "Meta paid a Republican consulting firm to turn the public against TikTok" (March 31, 2022): https://fortune.com/2022/03/31/facebook-meta-paid-republican-consulting-firm-targeted-victory-turn-public-opinion-against-tiktok/ Variety, "Facebook Parent Company Defends Its PR Campaign to Portray TikTok as Threat to American Children" (March 31, 2022): https://variety.com/2022/digital/news/meta-facebook-tiktok-pr-campaign-1235218866/ Techdirt, "Facebook-Hired PR Firm Coordinated Anti-TikTok Campaign To Spread Bogus Moral Panics" (March 31, 2022): https://www.techdirt.com/2022/03/31/facebook-hired-pr-firm-coordinated-anti-tiktok-campaign-to-spread-bogus-moral-panics/ Tortoise Media, "Meta 'astroturfed' TikTok" (April 5, 2022): https://www.tortoisemedia.com/2022/04/05/meta-astroturfed-tiktok CBS News, "Report: Facebook Hired PR Firm To Smear TikTok": https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/report-facebook-hired-pr-firm-to-smear-tiktok/ Engadget, "Meta reportedly paid political consultants to smear TikTok": https://www.engadget.com/meta-targeted-victory-tiktok-smear-campaign-133139892.html Boston Globe, "Facebook paid GOP firm to malign TikTok, internal e-mails reveal" (March 30, 2022): https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/03/30/business/facebook-paid-gop-firm-malign-tiktok-internal-e-mails-reveal/ Georgetown Free Speech Project, "Facebook hires GOP consulting firm to smear rival TikTok": https://freespeechproject.georgetown.edu/tracker-entries/facebook-hires-gop-consulting-firm-in-dc-area-to-smear-rival-tiktok/ Nature Scientific Reports, "Coordination patterns reveal online political astroturfing across the world" (2022): https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-08404-9 Medium/HR News, "Study: At Least 15% of All Reddit Content is Corporate Trolls": https://medium.com/@hrnews1/study-at-least-15-of-all-reddit-content-is-corporate-trolls-trying-to-manipulate-public-opinion-49cb302c26a5 TechCrunch, "Facebook Group admins complain of mass bans" (June 24, 2025): https://techcrunch.com/2025/06/24/facebook-group-admins-complain-of-mass-bans-meta-says-its-fixing-the-problem/ YNet News, "Public opinion for sale: The new startup causing a storm" (Doublespeed): https://www.ynetnews.com/tech-and-digital/article/hyraenbmzx Meta Transparency Center, "Inauthentic Behavior" policy: https://transparency.meta.com/policies/community-standards/inauthentic-behavior/ The Hacker News, "Meta Disrupts Influence Ops Targeting Romania, Azerbaijan, and Taiwan" (May 2025): https://thehackernews.com/2025/05/meta-disrupts-influence-ops-targeting.html submitted by /u/Ok_Lingonberry3296 to r/linux [link] [comments]
r/linux Ok_Lingonberry3296 Mar 13, 2026
LED MIRRORS
Renovating two very small bathrooms in a very small home. What are your ideas on LED mirrors? Are they worth the cost or not? If yes, what advice do you have about buying, choosing one for myself? submitted by /u/SuggestionFrosty6108 to r/bathrooms [link] [comments]
r/bathrooms SuggestionFrosty6108 Dec 11, 2025
For anyone with an LED bathroom mirror—what feature turned out to be the most useful?
Hey everyone, I’m shopping for a new bathroom mirror and noticed a lot of the LED models come with features like dimming, anti-fog, touch sensors, color temperature control, Bluetooth, and smart functions. For those of you who already have one: Which feature ended up being the most useful in everyday life? Was there a feature you thought you’d love but never actually use? Anything you wish you knew before installing one? Trying to avoid paying extra for things that sound cool but don’t really matter once installed. Would love to hear real experiences or see photos of your setup if you’re open to sharing. Thanks in advance! submitted by /u/Complete_Dust5488 to r/bathrooms [link] [comments]
r/bathrooms Complete_Dust5488 Nov 25, 2025
DIY All Mirrored Half-Bathroom, Floor to Ceiling
Finally finished this and wanted to share with others who might appreciate. We have a tiny half-bathroom that needed fixed and reno’d. Inspired by Flight of the Navigator’s silvery spaceship, and Yayoi Kusama’s infinity mirrors, I wanted to make it feel as big as possible in there, with a vibe that suggested a big, starry future, perhaps with a multiverse. Not an artist, just a handyman w/ random skills. Thought this was gonna be easy. It wasn’t. But except for painting the door, it’s finally done! Key features: - all mirrors were hand-cut. Cutting mirrors is hard. I broke a lot learning. - floor tiles are not rated for walking. To make that work I cast the floor as solid epoxy ~1/4” thick. This ensured the floor was perfectly level and flat, to reduce risk of tiles having point loads that could crack them. - countertop is mirrored stainless, set over a thick coat of wood-filled epoxy with black to bond and level. It was previously cut glass pieces, but moisture quickly got to the wood butcherblock under and the swelling and warping caused all pieces to shatter. - LED lights are eclectic arrangement, because when I tried installing them in a more tidy professional manner the lighting didn’t look balanced. A motion activated sensor turns them and toilet seat on. - Toilet seat is cast epoxy with lights and wiring. People seem to either love it or hate it! submitted by /u/TheSolarJetMan to r/DIY [link] [comments]
r/DIY TheSolarJetMan Nov 5, 2025
[SERIOUS] 1949-1957 studies affirm something or someone could have been watching us from outer space.
According to a new study, something was observing nuclear tests from space before the satellite era. An international team of scientists led by astrophysicist Beatriz Villaruel of the Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics published a discovery in Scientific Reports. After analyzing more than 100,000 astronomical photographs taken between 1949 and 1957, researchers identified a series of anomalous flashes of light known as transients. These points of light appeared to suddenly appear, rotate and disappear. The study revealed that the frequency of these phenomena increased by 45% during the days surrounding the first atmospheric nuclear detonations. The flashes displayed a highly reflective, mirror-like glow, and some displayed apparent rotation. Most notably, all the images analyzed predate 1957, the year humans placed their first satellite into orbit. The team ruled out natural causes and optical failures, noting that if the recordings are authentic, the objects would have to be non-human artificial structures. submitted by /u/_TheVengeful_ to r/aliens [link] [comments]
r/aliens _TheVengeful_ Oct 29, 2025
I Babysat for $500 Cash. I’ll Never Do It Again.
I almost didn’t take the job. Something about the ad felt…off. “Looking for responsible sitter. One night only. Good pay. Cash. Must follow instructions.” That was it. No details about the kid, no address, nothing about the hours. Just a burner Gmail account to reply to. I was broke enough to overlook all that. My rent was due in three days, and my fridge was down to half a jar of pickles and an expired yogurt. So I sent a message, figuring I wouldn’t get a reply. I got one back in less than an hour. “Thank you for reaching out. The job is simple. Watch our son, Matthew, from 7PM–midnight. $500 cash. Please do not let him look into mirrors. Please do not answer the door if someone knocks and claims to be us. Address attached.” I stared at the screen, rereading the message. No mirrors. Don’t open the door. Those weren’t “instructions.” Those were warnings. But again…$500. Five hundred dollars for five hours of sitting on a couch while a kid sleeps? I could ignore the creepiness for that. The house was out in the suburbs, tucked away at the end of a cul-de-sac with no streetlights. Every house on the street was dark except theirs, a faint yellow glow behind heavy curtains. The parents greeted me at the door. They looked…normal. Almost aggressively normal, like the kind of people you’d see in stock photos: mom in a cardigan, dad in khakis, both smiling too wide. “We’re so glad you could make it,” the mom said, ushering me inside. “Matthew’s upstairs, already in his room.” I nodded, clutching my backpack strap. “Any, uh, allergies? Bedtime routine?” The dad cut me off. “The instructions in the email are the most important. Don’t let him near mirrors. Don’t answer the door.” “Right,” I said, trying to sound casual. “Can I ask…why?” The mom’s smile faltered for half a second, but she recovered fast. “Just follow them. We’ll be back at midnight. Five hundred cash, like we promised.” Before I could press further, they slipped out the door. The lock clicked. The house felt wrong once they left. Too quiet. Not the cozy, suburban quiet where you can hear the hum of a fridge or a distant dog bark. This was…sterile. Like the silence in an empty hospital wing. I wandered through the downstairs. Every reflective surface was either missing or covered: the bathroom mirror gone, the TV screen draped with a sheet, even the glass in the picture frames replaced with paper. The air prickled against my skin. I checked on the kid. Matthew was sitting cross-legged on his bed, staring at me when I opened the door. He looked about eight. Blond hair, pale skin, dark circles under his eyes like he hadn’t slept in days. “Hi,” I said, forcing a smile. “I’m your babysitter.” He didn’t answer. Just blinked at me slowly, then asked: “Do you know which ones are real?” My stomach dropped. “What do you mean?” “The people,” he said. His voice was flat, like he was reciting something. “Sometimes they’re not them. Sometimes they’re copies.” I laughed nervously. “That’s…uh…that’s creepy. Where’d you hear that?” He tilted his head, birdlike. “From the other Matthew.” I swallowed. “The…other Matthew?” He pointed toward the darkened window. “He comes when the glass is open.” I pulled the curtains shut tighter. The first knock came around 8:30. Three slow raps on the front door. I froze on the couch, my phone in hand. The instructions screamed in my head: Don’t answer the door. Another knock. Louder this time. “Hey,” a man’s voice called, muffled through the wood. “It’s us. We forgot something inside.” The parents. My pulse thudded in my ears. It sounded like the dad but flatter, like someone replaying a recording through a bad speaker. I crept closer, careful not to touch the knob. “We just need to come in for a second,” the voice said. Behind me, I heard movement on the stairs. Matthew was standing halfway down, clutching the railing, staring at the door with wide eyes. “That’s not them,” he whispered. The knocking stopped. The hours dragged. Every time I thought the house was quiet again, something else happened. 9:15: I heard footsteps pacing the upstairs hallway. Heavy, deliberate. Except Matthew was sitting on the floor next to me, coloring with broken crayons. 9:47: The TV, even with the sheet over it, flickered to life with static. I yanked the plug from the wall. It kept flickering for a full ten seconds before finally going black. 10:22: Another knock. This time the mom’s voice. “Please. He’s dangerous. Let us in before it’s too late.” Matthew started crying, covering his ears. I didn’t open the door. At 11:00, I heard whispering. Not from the door this time. From upstairs. I crept up, leaving Matthew on the couch with my phone flashlight. The whispers grew louder as I reached his bedroom. The door was cracked open. Inside, the moonlight from the window illuminated a figure sitting on the bed. Matthew. Except I’d left him downstairs. This Matthew looked identical but wrong, the way a wax figure almost looks real until you see the eyes. His lips moved, whispering to himself, words I couldn’t quite make out. Then he snapped his head toward me. I slammed the door shut and bolted down the stairs. The real Matthew was exactly where I’d left him. He looked up at me with tears streaking his face. “You saw him,” he said. I didn’t answer. 11:40. The knocking came again. Both voices this time, the mom and dad in perfect unison: “LET US IN.” The door rattled like they were trying to break it down. Matthew was shaking, curled against me on the couch. “Don’t,” he begged. “If you let them in, they’ll take you instead.” The pounding grew violent, wood splintering. I dragged Matthew with me into the kitchen, searching for a back exit. That’s when I noticed the one uncovered reflective surface left in the house: the oven door. And in it, I saw myself. Except my reflection wasn’t moving the same way I was. I staggered back, nearly dropping Matthew. The other me smiled, wide and wrong, teeth too many for a human mouth. The reflection pressed its palm against the glass from the inside. A hairline crack snaked across the oven door. Midnight couldn’t come fast enough. I huddled in the kitchen with Matthew, the pounding from the front door shaking the walls, the whispering upstairs turning into full-on giggles, and my reflection grinning from the oven, cracks spiderwebbing wider with every second. I thought I was going to break. Then the noise stopped. All at once. The clock on the microwave blinked 12:00 AM. The front door swung open. The parents walked in, smiling, normal again. “You did well,” the mom said. She handed me an envelope of cash. My hands shook as I took it. “What the hell is wrong with this house? With him?” I pointed at Matthew, who clung to my leg. The dad crouched down, prying the boy off me. “He’s not our son,” he said simply. My mouth went dry. “What?” “We lost Matthew years ago,” the mom said. “But things still come through. Things that look like him. Things that look like us. We can’t get rid of them, only contain them.” They each took one of Matthew’s hands. He didn’t fight. Just looked back at me with hollow eyes. “You did your job,” the dad said. “You kept him from escaping. That’s all we needed.” And before I could say a word, they led him upstairs. The door slammed shut behind them. I stumbled outside, clutching the envelope, the night air biting my lungs. When I got home, I dumped the cash onto my kitchen table. Every bill was crisp, perfect. Except when I flipped them over, the faces weren’t of presidents. They were of me. Smiling. Too wide. With too many teeth. submitted by /u/salty_Astronaut77 to r/stories [link] [comments]
r/stories salty_Astronaut77 Oct 4, 2025
Bathroom LED mirror lights gone dimmer
The lights of this LED mirror in the bathroom have gone dimmer. First picture is when it was first installed and second is recently. How do I even start solving this? Should I look into the LED lights or something else? submitted by /u/AdhesivenessPrize530 to r/AskElectricians [link] [comments]
r/AskElectricians AdhesivenessPrize530 Feb 1, 2025
LED mirror in bathroom worth it?
I’m renovating a small primary en suite bathroom (paying a contractor, not doing it myself). These LED mirrors (also with anti fog) look cool. But I’m not sure if they’re worth the extra cost and effort. I would also have regular vanity lights above. But I like the light from all sides and light colour-changing ability of the mirror. Do you have any experience with them or advice? submitted by /u/User-4574 to r/homerenovations [link] [comments]
r/homerenovations User-4574 Sep 25, 2023
220731 Giant LED screen hits back up dancer for boy group Mirror during Hong Kong concert
submitted by /u/LouderLouder to r/CpopIdols [link] [comments]
r/CpopIdols LouderLouder Aug 15, 2022
Ruthless warlord who led 'gay purges' in Chechnya killed fighting for Russia in Ukraine - World News - Mirror Online
submitted by /u/StupidizeMe to r/lgbt [link] [comments]
r/lgbt StupidizeMe Mar 1, 2022
LED rear view mirror advertisement on Tik Tok
submitted by /u/artery1800s to r/CrappyDesign [link] [comments]
r/CrappyDesign artery1800s Jan 14, 2022
This 600 LED infinity mirror coffee table
submitted by /u/ProfStorm to r/GTAGE [link] [comments]
r/GTAGE ProfStorm Apr 8, 2020
This 600 LED infinity mirror coffee table I built and programmed
submitted by /u/Procupine to r/gifs [link] [comments]
r/gifs Procupine Apr 8, 2020
This 600 LED infinity mirror coffee table I built
submitted by /u/Procupine to r/Damnthatsinteresting [link] [comments]
r/Damnthatsinteresting Procupine Apr 8, 2020
I made a 600 LED programmable infinity mirror coffee table!
submitted by /u/Procupine to r/woodworking [link] [comments]
r/woodworking Procupine Apr 6, 2020