Track emerging trends and get alerts when they grow. Create a free account to monitor this trend.
Create Free Account
Home / Tradovate Stop Loss And Take Profit

Tradovate Stop Loss And Take Profit

US United States
Flat Low volatility Forecasted flat
Tradovate Stop Loss And Take Profit
What is Tradovate Stop Loss And Take Profit?

Tradovate Stop Loss and Take Profit are risk management tools used in trading to automatically close positions at predetermined price levels. A Stop Loss order limits potential losses by closing a position when the market price reaches a specified level, while a Take Profit order locks in profits by closing a position when the market price reaches a desired profit level.

Treendly Index Treendly Forecast Google YouTube
How much search volume does it get?

Is Tradovate Stop Loss And Take Profit trending?

Yes. Tradovate Stop Loss And Take Profit growing with a month-over-month change of 1.49% over the past 5 years.


Why is Tradovate Stop Loss And Take Profit trending?

1
Automated Risk Management
Tradovate's Stop Loss and Take Profit features allow traders to automate their risk management strategies, reducing the need for constant monitoring of the market and helping to protect their capital.
2
Enhanced Trading Discipline
By setting Stop Loss and Take Profit levels, traders can adhere to their trading plans and avoid emotional decision-making, which can lead to impulsive trades and increased losses.
3
Increased Popularity of Algorithmic Trading
As algorithmic trading becomes more prevalent, tools like Stop Loss and Take Profit are gaining popularity among traders who seek to implement systematic trading strategies without manual intervention.
4
User-Friendly Interface
Tradovate offers a user-friendly platform that simplifies the process of setting Stop Loss and Take Profit orders, making it accessible for both novice and experienced traders.
5
Market Volatility Management
In a volatile market, Stop Loss and Take Profit orders help traders manage their exposure to sudden price movements, providing a safety net that can mitigate potential losses.

What are people saying?

24 threads
AI Insights Mixed sentiment
Discussions around Tradovate's stop loss and take profit features highlight user frustrations with functionality, particularly regarding value display and integration with TradingView. Users are seeking solutions to technical issues and alternatives for better trading experiences.
Technical Issues
Users report freezing issues when adjusting stop loss and take profit settings, affecting their trading efficiency.
Integration Challenges
There are concerns about the inability to set stop loss and take profit on TradingView while using Tradovate, leading to requests for alternative solutions.
User Experience
Traders express dissatisfaction with the user interface and functionality of Tradovate, particularly on mobile platforms.
Seeking Alternatives
Some users are exploring other brokers that provide better integration and functionality for stop loss and take profit settings.
Community Support
Users are seeking advice and tips from the community to overcome their issues with Tradovate's features.
Common questions
  • How can I display the value of my stop loss and take profit in Tradovate?
  • Why do my stop loss and take profit adjustments freeze?
  • Is there a way to set stop loss and take profit in TradingView with Tradovate?
  • What are the best brokers for integrating stop loss and take profit features?
  • Are there any tips for improving Tradovate's performance?
Pain points
  • Freezing adjustments when changing stop loss or take profit settings.
  • Inability to set stop loss and take profit on TradingView.
  • Frustration with mobile app functionality.
  • Lack of clear guidance or solutions from the community.
  • Concerns about losing money due to technical issues.
r/Daytrading
Do you use automated Stop Loss and Take Profit?
Just started my trading journey and currently doing paper in Tradovate. I have it set up so when I enter, I have a take profit for 2x and a stop loss for 1x. I posted my strat somewhere and a fellow redditor said he doesn't, and I shouldn't, use automated exits. As it shows up in the DOM and industrial l traders will see that and blow through a stop loss and then reverse course. They said they enter, stay for about 10 minutes or so, and manually exit. Anyone else have conviction about using, or not using, automated exits? submitted by /u/LaughingIntoTheAbyss to r/Daytrading [link] [comments]
LaughingIntoTheAbyss · May 16, 2026
r/tradingmillionaires
I created a BEAST of an ORB strategy on TradingView
https://preview.redd.it/4yg2yj0r4wsg1.jpg?width=5648&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=67901415a6113048cce9a4030f8d8c60f767eac9 https://preview.redd.it/jfcvak0r4wsg1.jpg?width=5704&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=70dc87a7d24042e4faaf2a0079a2cfcc3f011784 https://preview.redd.it/mnm67k0r4wsg1.jpg?width=4032&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=44b66cc3cc64fdc173837d4493609099d24783c0 https://preview.redd.it/b9hs7l0r4wsg1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=b4b9c47be5faabc2f83d5e8eb1b88f655b0f838e I built a fully automated Opening Range Breakout strategy for futures trading — here's how it works Hey everyone, I wanted to share a strategy I've been developing and refining for a while now that I use for futures trading on TradingView. It's called the Xiznit Universal ORB and it's built around the Opening Range Breakout concept with a lot of added flexibility and automation built in. I'll break down how it works so anyone can understand it regardless of experience level. What is an Opening Range Breakout? The basic idea behind an ORB strategy is simple. At the start of a trading session, price tends to consolidate within a range as the market figures out direction. Once price breaks out of that range — either above the high or below the low — it often continues in that direction with momentum. The strategy watches for that breakout and enters a trade in the direction of the move. What makes this strategy different from a basic ORB is the level of customization and the built-in trade management that handles everything automatically once you're in a trade. You Define Your Own ORB Range and Trigger Bar This is one of the features I'm most proud of. Most ORB strategies lock you into a fixed timeframe for the opening range — usually the first 15 or 30 minutes of a session. This strategy lets you define exactly how long the opening range should be using any timeframe you want. You set the ORB Range Timeframe and the strategy will track the high and low of price during that window, then lock them in as your range once the time is up. So if you want a 10-minute opening range, set it to 10. If you prefer a 30-minute range, set it to 30. Completely up to you. On top of that, you also define your own Trigger Bar Timeframe. The trigger bar is the candle that actually confirms the breakout. For example you might use a 10-minute ORB range to establish the zone but want a 3-minute candle to confirm the breakout before entering. This separation between the range timeframe and the trigger timeframe gives you a huge amount of control over how sensitive or conservative the entry is. Faster trigger bars mean earlier entries, slower trigger bars mean more confirmation before getting in. Three Sessions, Full Control The strategy supports three separate trading sessions — Asian, London, and New York — and you can enable or disable any of them independently. Each session gets its own ORB range calculated fresh when that session opens. You also set the session times yourself in HHMM format so you can adjust them to your timezone and your preferred trading hours. There's even a built-in timezone selector so the session detection works correctly no matter where you are in the world. Three Entry Modes Once the ORB range is locked and a breakout is detected on your trigger bar, the strategy has three different ways it can enter a trade: Classic Breakout — The most straightforward mode. When the trigger bar closes above the ORB high, go long. When it closes below the ORB low, go short. You can optionally require the breakout candle body to be a minimum percentage of the ORB range to filter out weak moves. Pullback After Breakout — Instead of entering right at the breakout, this mode waits for price to break out and then pull back to a zone before entering. You choose the pullback target — ORB midpoint, a Fibonacci level, a fixed number of ticks from the broken level, VWAP, a Fair Value Gap, or an Order Block. This is great for avoiding chasing entries and getting a better risk/reward on the trade. MA + VWAP Confirmation — This mode adds a trend filter on top of the breakout. The entry only triggers if price is also above the fast moving average and VWAP for longs, or below them for shorts. You can combine this with a slope filter to make sure the moving average is actually trending in your direction before entering. Automatic Trade Management — Set It and Forget It This is where the strategy really shines for people who want to automate their trading. Once you're in a trade, everything is handled automatically. You set three take profit levels — TP1, TP2, and TP3 — each with its own R:R ratio and its own number of contracts to exit. So for example you might take 2 contracts off at TP1, 2 more at TP2, and let 1 run as a runner to TP3. You decide the split however you want. The stop loss management is equally flexible. You can use the opposite side of the ORB as your stop, the ORB midpoint, or a custom number of ticks. After TP1 is hit the strategy can automatically move the stop to breakeven plus a buffer so the trade becomes risk-free. After TP2 is hit it can move the stop up to the TP1 level to protect the runner. There's also an option to move the stop to breakeven once price has traveled a certain percentage of the way toward TP1, and an ATR-based trailing stop that kicks in after TP2 for those who prefer a dynamic exit on the runner. If price hits TP2 and then retraces back down to TP1, the runner automatically closes at TP1 to lock in profits rather than letting the trade turn into a loser. Built-In Risk Controls The strategy has several layers of protection built in for prop firm traders and anyone managing drawdown carefully: Daily dollar loss limit — Once your account is down a set dollar amount for the day, the strategy stops taking new trades for the rest of that session EOD Flatten — At a time you define, all open positions are automatically closed so you're never holding overnight unless you want to Weekend Gap Protection — Automatically flattens the position on Friday afternoon to avoid getting caught in weekend gaps One Trade Per Session — Forces the strategy to take only one trade per session window, blocking re-entries and opposite direction trades if you prefer a strict one-and-done approach Allow One Opposite Reversal — If the first trade gets stopped out, the strategy can optionally take one trade in the opposite direction if price breaks the other side of the ORB Entry Filters On top of the entry modes there are several optional filters you can stack to improve trade quality: Volatility Filter — Only enters if ATR is within a normal range, avoiding choppy low-volatility conditions and extreme spike conditions Volume Confirmation — Requires a volume spike above average to confirm the breakout has real participation behind it RSI Filter — Only allows longs above a threshold and shorts below a threshold VWAP Slope Filter — Only allows longs when VWAP is sloping upward and shorts when it's sloping downward Inside Bar Filter — Skips breakout entries on inside bars since those tend to produce false breakouts Higher Timeframe Alignment — Only takes trades in the direction of the higher timeframe trend using a 50 EMA on a timeframe you define Ghost Webhook Automation The strategy is built to work with Ghost by QuantCrawler for full automation. When an alert fires it sends a complete JSON payload including entry price, quantity, stop loss, and all three TP levels with their quantities. When the stop loss moves the strategy fires a separate SL update alert so Ghost can modify the live order at the broker. This means once your alerts are configured the entire trade lifecycle — entry, partial exits, stop moves, and final close — executes automatically without you touching anything. Who Is This For? This strategy works well for futures traders on instruments like MNQ, MGC, SIL, NQ, ES, and similar markets. It's designed with prop firm compliance in mind so the daily loss limit and EOD flatten features are there to keep you within drawdown rules. Whether you want to sit at your desk and trade it manually or set it up to run fully automated through Ghost, the strategy handles both use cases. If you have questions about setup or want to know more about any of the features drop them in the comments. submitted by /u/Xiznit to r/tradingmillionaires [link] [comments]
Xiznit · Apr 3, 2026
r/algorithmictrading
I coded a FVG Opening Range Breakout strategy on MES futures and the backtest looks insane. Tell me why I'm wrong before I do something stupid.
So I've been working on a Fair Value Gap scalp strategy on MES futures running on a 1-minute chart at the 9:30 AM opening range. The logic is pretty simple — wait for a Fair Value Gap breakout, retest, engulfing candle confirmation, then entry. Stop loss around 9.25 points, take profit around 18 points. Fully automated through TradingView → TradersPost → Tradovate. Here are the verified 1-year stats (Mar 2025 to Mar 2026, 12 contracts): 171 trades, 52.63% win rate, Profit factor 1.704, Max drawdown $2,985 (14.65%), Net P&L ~$28,140 in 12 months, ~$2,345/month average, ~14 trades per month (not every day — only fires when setup is valid), 3-year backtest: 488 trades, 52.25% WR, Profit Factor 1.534, Sharpe ratio 2.14. The equity curve goes up and to the right pretty cleanly. Max drawdown is small relative to returns. Here's where I might be losing my mind: If this holds up on funded accounts, running 5 LucidDirect 150K accounts at 12 contracts each (fully automated, same strategy), the math says I could pull roughly $92,000 net over the lifetime of those accounts before they transition to live. Total cost to set up: $2,940. Someone also told me I should take out a $10K personal loan, put $2,940 into the 5 funded accounts and run the live account with the rest. On paper that's $120,000+ potential on a $10K loan. I know this sounds insane. That's why I'm posting. Here's what's worrying me: Is a 3-year backtest on 1-minute MES data actually meaningful or am I just curve fitting to one bull market? The strategy only has MES data going back to March 2023. Is that enough? Funded accounts are simulated .Lucid could theoretically change rules, deny payouts, or shut down. They're a relatively new firm (2025). Automation risk .One bad day with a broken stop loss and a funded account is gone permanently (Direct accounts have no reset). Past performance obviously doesn't guarantee future results. Has anyone run anything similar on prop firm accounts? Am I missing something obvious? What would you do to stress test this further before putting real money in? Not financial advice obviously. Just trying to get a gut check from people who know what they're looking at before I do something I can't undo.Not selling anything just looking for advice among peers. submitted by /u/Global_Box_156 to r/algorithmictrading [link] [comments]
Global_Box_156 · Mar 27, 2026
r/FuturesCopyTrading
Stop Loss & Take Profit on TradingView + Tradovate (Reality + Better Way)
A lot of people keep asking how to add Stop Loss and Take Profit directly on TradingView when using Tradovate. Short answer: you’re not missing anything. The limitation is real. Right now, the workflow is broken: • market orders don’t consistently allow TP/SL attachment • modifying after entry takes time • dragging levels is slow and error-prone • multi-account trading makes it worse This becomes a serious issue if you’re trading fast instruments like MNQ or NQ. You end up doing this: • enter trade • scramble to add stop • hope price doesn’t move too fast That’s not a strategy. That’s exposure. What actually works better is flipping the workflow: Before entering, define: • stop size (example: 10 points) • target size (example: 20 points) • number of accounts Then execution becomes: • click once • position opens • stop and target are already attached • applied across all accounts instantly No delay. No fixing after. This is especially important if you: • scalp • trade multiple prop accounts • use market orders • trade NQ / MNQ I ran into this exact problem and ended up building my own trading desk (Proteryx) around it. Main difference: • bracket orders are attached at execution • copy trading across accounts is native • risk is consistent everywhere • no dependency on TradingView limitations Also worth mentioning: After trying to automate NQ for a while, I’ve found it one of the hardest instruments to get consistent results with. Too fast. Too reactive. Too many stop cascades. So I’m curious: • what are you guys trading mostly? MNQ, NQ, MES, ES? • are you entering with market or limit? • and are you attaching stops BEFORE or AFTER entry? Because that one detail alone is the difference between controlled risk and chaos. submitted by /u/New-Shine-6836 to r/FuturesCopyTrading [link] [comments]
New-Shine-6836 · Mar 17, 2026
r/Tradovate
Using Tradovate - How Can I Get My Stops and Limits to Show a Value?
https://preview.redd.it/r6ed24qgonmg1.png?width=896&format=png&auto=webp&s=f630565bd7197a8948b47a34bcf44b80ec472c36 I saw this post and there were no real answers to this, asking if there is any way to show the value of your stop loss or take profit submitted by /u/Fun-Razzmatazz6457 to r/Tradovate [link] [comments]
Fun-Razzmatazz6457 · Mar 2, 2026
r/science
People who stop taking weight-loss injections like Ozempic regain weight in under 2 years, study reveals. Analysis finds those who stopped using medication saw weight return 4 times faster compared with other weight loss plans.
submitted by /u/mvea to r/science [link] [comments]
mvea · Jan 8, 2026
All threads (24)
Thread Source Author Date
RE:Tradeify Review 2026: Is It Worth It for Funded Traders?
... bounces back into profit. This forces traders to utilize tight, calculated stop losses rather than..., high-frequency scalpers should take note. My Verdict: For this case study, I ultimately leaned toward Tradovate. The ability to... respect the drawdown and loss limits, Tradeify offers a bit more freedom in how you achieve the profit target. 2. Drawdown Mechanics...
www.forexfactory.com UniversalPro May 4, 2026
RE:Best Prop Firm Passing Service | Get Funded Fast
...scalpers. If you don't take profits quickly on Apex, you .... Payouts and the Profit Split Comparison Why do we ... two firms. Prop Firm Profit Split Comparison 2024 FTMO Profit Split: FTMO starts traders ...consistency rule limiting your profit days on the funded level)....primarily uses Rithmic or Tradovate data feeds, connecting to platforms ...perfectly aligns with your stop loss and the FTMO risk management ...
www.forexfactory.com UniversalPro Apr 30, 2026
Do you use automated Stop Loss and Take Profit?
Just started my trading journey and currently doing paper in Tradovate. I have it set up so when I enter, I have a take profit for 2x and a stop loss for 1x. I posted my strat somewhere and a fellow redditor said he doesn't, and I shouldn't, use automated exits. As it shows up in the DOM and industrial l traders will see that and blow through a stop loss and then reverse course. They said they enter, stay for about 10 minutes or so, and manually exit. Anyone else have conviction about using, or not using, automated exits? submitted by /u/LaughingIntoTheAbyss to r/Daytrading [link] [comments]
reddit.com LaughingIntoTheAbyss May 16, 2026
I created a BEAST of an ORB strategy on TradingView
https://preview.redd.it/4yg2yj0r4wsg1.jpg?width=5648&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=67901415a6113048cce9a4030f8d8c60f767eac9 https://preview.redd.it/jfcvak0r4wsg1.jpg?width=5704&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=70dc87a7d24042e4faaf2a0079a2cfcc3f011784 https://preview.redd.it/mnm67k0r4wsg1.jpg?width=4032&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=44b66cc3cc64fdc173837d4493609099d24783c0 https://preview.redd.it/b9hs7l0r4wsg1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=b4b9c47be5faabc2f83d5e8eb1b88f655b0f838e I built a fully automated Opening Range Breakout strategy for futures trading — here's how it works Hey everyone, I wanted to share a strategy I've been developing and refining for a while now that I use for futures trading on TradingView. It's called the Xiznit Universal ORB and it's built around the Opening Range Breakout concept with a lot of added flexibility and automation built in. I'll break down how it works so anyone can understand it regardless of experience level. What is an Opening Range Breakout? The basic idea behind an ORB strategy is simple. At the start of a trading session, price tends to consolidate within a range as the market figures out direction. Once price breaks out of that range — either above the high or below the low — it often continues in that direction with momentum. The strategy watches for that breakout and enters a trade in the direction of the move. What makes this strategy different from a basic ORB is the level of customization and the built-in trade management that handles everything automatically once you're in a trade. You Define Your Own ORB Range and Trigger Bar This is one of the features I'm most proud of. Most ORB strategies lock you into a fixed timeframe for the opening range — usually the first 15 or 30 minutes of a session. This strategy lets you define exactly how long the opening range should be using any timeframe you want. You set the ORB Range Timeframe and the strategy will track the high and low of price during that window, then lock them in as your range once the time is up. So if you want a 10-minute opening range, set it to 10. If you prefer a 30-minute range, set it to 30. Completely up to you. On top of that, you also define your own Trigger Bar Timeframe. The trigger bar is the candle that actually confirms the breakout. For example you might use a 10-minute ORB range to establish the zone but want a 3-minute candle to confirm the breakout before entering. This separation between the range timeframe and the trigger timeframe gives you a huge amount of control over how sensitive or conservative the entry is. Faster trigger bars mean earlier entries, slower trigger bars mean more confirmation before getting in. Three Sessions, Full Control The strategy supports three separate trading sessions — Asian, London, and New York — and you can enable or disable any of them independently. Each session gets its own ORB range calculated fresh when that session opens. You also set the session times yourself in HHMM format so you can adjust them to your timezone and your preferred trading hours. There's even a built-in timezone selector so the session detection works correctly no matter where you are in the world. Three Entry Modes Once the ORB range is locked and a breakout is detected on your trigger bar, the strategy has three different ways it can enter a trade: Classic Breakout — The most straightforward mode. When the trigger bar closes above the ORB high, go long. When it closes below the ORB low, go short. You can optionally require the breakout candle body to be a minimum percentage of the ORB range to filter out weak moves. Pullback After Breakout — Instead of entering right at the breakout, this mode waits for price to break out and then pull back to a zone before entering. You choose the pullback target — ORB midpoint, a Fibonacci level, a fixed number of ticks from the broken level, VWAP, a Fair Value Gap, or an Order Block. This is great for avoiding chasing entries and getting a better risk/reward on the trade. MA + VWAP Confirmation — This mode adds a trend filter on top of the breakout. The entry only triggers if price is also above the fast moving average and VWAP for longs, or below them for shorts. You can combine this with a slope filter to make sure the moving average is actually trending in your direction before entering. Automatic Trade Management — Set It and Forget It This is where the strategy really shines for people who want to automate their trading. Once you're in a trade, everything is handled automatically. You set three take profit levels — TP1, TP2, and TP3 — each with its own R:R ratio and its own number of contracts to exit. So for example you might take 2 contracts off at TP1, 2 more at TP2, and let 1 run as a runner to TP3. You decide the split however you want. The stop loss management is equally flexible. You can use the opposite side of the ORB as your stop, the ORB midpoint, or a custom number of ticks. After TP1 is hit the strategy can automatically move the stop to breakeven plus a buffer so the trade becomes risk-free. After TP2 is hit it can move the stop up to the TP1 level to protect the runner. There's also an option to move the stop to breakeven once price has traveled a certain percentage of the way toward TP1, and an ATR-based trailing stop that kicks in after TP2 for those who prefer a dynamic exit on the runner. If price hits TP2 and then retraces back down to TP1, the runner automatically closes at TP1 to lock in profits rather than letting the trade turn into a loser. Built-In Risk Controls The strategy has several layers of protection built in for prop firm traders and anyone managing drawdown carefully: Daily dollar loss limit — Once your account is down a set dollar amount for the day, the strategy stops taking new trades for the rest of that session EOD Flatten — At a time you define, all open positions are automatically closed so you're never holding overnight unless you want to Weekend Gap Protection — Automatically flattens the position on Friday afternoon to avoid getting caught in weekend gaps One Trade Per Session — Forces the strategy to take only one trade per session window, blocking re-entries and opposite direction trades if you prefer a strict one-and-done approach Allow One Opposite Reversal — If the first trade gets stopped out, the strategy can optionally take one trade in the opposite direction if price breaks the other side of the ORB Entry Filters On top of the entry modes there are several optional filters you can stack to improve trade quality: Volatility Filter — Only enters if ATR is within a normal range, avoiding choppy low-volatility conditions and extreme spike conditions Volume Confirmation — Requires a volume spike above average to confirm the breakout has real participation behind it RSI Filter — Only allows longs above a threshold and shorts below a threshold VWAP Slope Filter — Only allows longs when VWAP is sloping upward and shorts when it's sloping downward Inside Bar Filter — Skips breakout entries on inside bars since those tend to produce false breakouts Higher Timeframe Alignment — Only takes trades in the direction of the higher timeframe trend using a 50 EMA on a timeframe you define Ghost Webhook Automation The strategy is built to work with Ghost by QuantCrawler for full automation. When an alert fires it sends a complete JSON payload including entry price, quantity, stop loss, and all three TP levels with their quantities. When the stop loss moves the strategy fires a separate SL update alert so Ghost can modify the live order at the broker. This means once your alerts are configured the entire trade lifecycle — entry, partial exits, stop moves, and final close — executes automatically without you touching anything. Who Is This For? This strategy works well for futures traders on instruments like MNQ, MGC, SIL, NQ, ES, and similar markets. It's designed with prop firm compliance in mind so the daily loss limit and EOD flatten features are there to keep you within drawdown rules. Whether you want to sit at your desk and trade it manually or set it up to run fully automated through Ghost, the strategy handles both use cases. If you have questions about setup or want to know more about any of the features drop them in the comments. submitted by /u/Xiznit to r/tradingmillionaires [link] [comments]
reddit.com Xiznit Apr 3, 2026
I coded a FVG Opening Range Breakout strategy on MES futures and the backtest looks insane. Tell me why I'm wrong before I do something stupid.
So I've been working on a Fair Value Gap scalp strategy on MES futures running on a 1-minute chart at the 9:30 AM opening range. The logic is pretty simple — wait for a Fair Value Gap breakout, retest, engulfing candle confirmation, then entry. Stop loss around 9.25 points, take profit around 18 points. Fully automated through TradingView → TradersPost → Tradovate. Here are the verified 1-year stats (Mar 2025 to Mar 2026, 12 contracts): 171 trades, 52.63% win rate, Profit factor 1.704, Max drawdown $2,985 (14.65%), Net P&L ~$28,140 in 12 months, ~$2,345/month average, ~14 trades per month (not every day — only fires when setup is valid), 3-year backtest: 488 trades, 52.25% WR, Profit Factor 1.534, Sharpe ratio 2.14. The equity curve goes up and to the right pretty cleanly. Max drawdown is small relative to returns. Here's where I might be losing my mind: If this holds up on funded accounts, running 5 LucidDirect 150K accounts at 12 contracts each (fully automated, same strategy), the math says I could pull roughly $92,000 net over the lifetime of those accounts before they transition to live. Total cost to set up: $2,940. Someone also told me I should take out a $10K personal loan, put $2,940 into the 5 funded accounts and run the live account with the rest. On paper that's $120,000+ potential on a $10K loan. I know this sounds insane. That's why I'm posting. Here's what's worrying me: Is a 3-year backtest on 1-minute MES data actually meaningful or am I just curve fitting to one bull market? The strategy only has MES data going back to March 2023. Is that enough? Funded accounts are simulated .Lucid could theoretically change rules, deny payouts, or shut down. They're a relatively new firm (2025). Automation risk .One bad day with a broken stop loss and a funded account is gone permanently (Direct accounts have no reset). Past performance obviously doesn't guarantee future results. Has anyone run anything similar on prop firm accounts? Am I missing something obvious? What would you do to stress test this further before putting real money in? Not financial advice obviously. Just trying to get a gut check from people who know what they're looking at before I do something I can't undo.Not selling anything just looking for advice among peers. submitted by /u/Global_Box_156 to r/algorithmictrading [link] [comments]
reddit.com Global_Box_156 Mar 27, 2026
Stop Loss & Take Profit on TradingView + Tradovate (Reality + Better Way)
A lot of people keep asking how to add Stop Loss and Take Profit directly on TradingView when using Tradovate. Short answer: you’re not missing anything. The limitation is real. Right now, the workflow is broken: • market orders don’t consistently allow TP/SL attachment • modifying after entry takes time • dragging levels is slow and error-prone • multi-account trading makes it worse This becomes a serious issue if you’re trading fast instruments like MNQ or NQ. You end up doing this: • enter trade • scramble to add stop • hope price doesn’t move too fast That’s not a strategy. That’s exposure. What actually works better is flipping the workflow: Before entering, define: • stop size (example: 10 points) • target size (example: 20 points) • number of accounts Then execution becomes: • click once • position opens • stop and target are already attached • applied across all accounts instantly No delay. No fixing after. This is especially important if you: • scalp • trade multiple prop accounts • use market orders • trade NQ / MNQ I ran into this exact problem and ended up building my own trading desk (Proteryx) around it. Main difference: • bracket orders are attached at execution • copy trading across accounts is native • risk is consistent everywhere • no dependency on TradingView limitations Also worth mentioning: After trying to automate NQ for a while, I’ve found it one of the hardest instruments to get consistent results with. Too fast. Too reactive. Too many stop cascades. So I’m curious: • what are you guys trading mostly? MNQ, NQ, MES, ES? • are you entering with market or limit? • and are you attaching stops BEFORE or AFTER entry? Because that one detail alone is the difference between controlled risk and chaos. submitted by /u/New-Shine-6836 to r/FuturesCopyTrading [link] [comments]
reddit.com New-Shine-6836 Mar 17, 2026
Using Tradovate - How Can I Get My Stops and Limits to Show a Value?
https://preview.redd.it/r6ed24qgonmg1.png?width=896&format=png&auto=webp&s=f630565bd7197a8948b47a34bcf44b80ec472c36 I saw this post and there were no real answers to this, asking if there is any way to show the value of your stop loss or take profit submitted by /u/Fun-Razzmatazz6457 to r/Tradovate [link] [comments]
reddit.com Fun-Razzmatazz6457 Mar 2, 2026
People who stop taking weight-loss injections like Ozempic regain weight in under 2 years, study reveals. Analysis finds those who stopped using medication saw weight return 4 times faster compared with other weight loss plans.
submitted by /u/mvea to r/science [link] [comments]
reddit.com mvea Jan 8, 2026
How I built a system that finally worked and helped me quit my 7-5
I traded my weekends for backtesting. While everyone else was out, I was on TradingView running replays, marking levels, and testing one model again and again until I could see it in my sleep. That discipline turned my trading from random decisions into a system I could trust. Every weekend, I collected more data, refined my rules, and learned what actually worked on my Tradovate accounts, not what looked good in hindsight. Backtesting results: https://preview.redd.it/2i3ba26b5swf1.png?width=1747&format=png&auto=webp&s=7e41a6c62aab78726e9a63aa0e7287b5a08a950e Backtesting matters because it gives you conviction and clarity. Conviction to hold through noise because you’ve seen the setup play out hundreds of times. Clarity to know what to avoid because the data already proved it doesn’t pay. When both align, trading stops being emotional. You wait. You execute. You review. An edge isn’t a hunch or a video idea. You measure it in R. Expectancy equals (win% × average win R) minus ((1 − win%) × average loss R). If expectancy stays positive and consistent across different conditions, you’ve found something real. But you can’t know that from ten trades. You need two to five hundred samples before trusting it. Logging results in R keeps your sizing scalable and your risk clear. What you track defines what you learn. I log the date and session, the instrument, time of day, setup tag, and market context, whether we’re trending, ranging, or near key Asia, London, or New York highs and lows. I record entry, stop, target, risk in points and dollars, and the result in R. Then I note MFE and MAE, management actions like breakeven or partials, a screenshot link, an emotion score from calm to tilted, and one quick lesson. After a few weeks of this, your patterns start to reveal themselves without guesswork. The key is to define one play and commit. For my fifteen-minute ORB, I mark the initial range, identify where liquidity was taken, then wait for displacement confirmed by a clean one-minute break. My stop goes at the first candle that created the gap afterr the breakout. If it’s under thirty points on NQ, I target 2R. If it’s thirty or more, I target 1R. Once price takes the internal high or low and closes, I move to breakeven. Two trades a day maximum, and if the first one wins, the day is over. Simplicity is the only way consistency scales. Backtesting doesn’t need to be complicated. Start with bar-by-bar replay, hide the future, call your trades in advance, and treat it like it’s live. Then try level-first testing by marking high timeframe zones and revealing how price reacted. Build separate data blocks for different market regimes, high versus low volatility, trending versus ranging, news versus calm sessions. Only test within your planned trade window, such as 9:30 to 10:30 EST, so your data actually matches your execution time. Finally, compare fixed-target management to trailing or breakeven-after-liquidity rules and see which one truly improves expectancy. Refinement comes from focus, not over-optimization. Filter by time of day, one or two key windows, nothing else. Find your stops sweet spot. My rule is simple: under thirty points, aim for 2R; thirty or more, aim for 1R. Always require a liquidity draw to be taken before entry. Stick with one entry trigger and one breakeven rule for at least one hundred trades before you judge anything. Constantly changing parameters kills edges faster than bad trades. Avoid curve fitting by changing only one variable per test cycle. Keep a few months of data untouched for out of sample validation. If your system only works on the data you trained on, it’s fake. Expect performance to dip slightly in live trading but remain positive. If tiny rule changes completely flip your results, your system is too fragile. Simplify until it’s stable. Once your backtest shows positive expectancy, move into forward testing. Trade twenty simulated sessions exactly by your rules, two trades max per day, no improvising. Track if you followed the plan. If your yes rate is under eighty percent, your issue isn’t the edge, it’s execution. Fix that first. Then move to small live size for another twenty sessions. Only scale when both expectancy and discipline hold up. Your review process builds long-term growth. Daily notes should answer what you saw, what you did, and what you learned. Weekly reviews should identify what repeated, time of day, stop size, rule breaks, or recurring behavior. Monthly recaps decide which improvements deserve a permanent spot in the rulebook, supported by before and after data. Promote one change per month, not ten. Beyond win rate, measure the things that really drive your curve: your payoff ratio, average win R versus average loss R, streak risk, your worst realistic drawdown in R, time to profit, how long winners take versus losers, and giveback rate, how much of your open profit you lose before exit. Often, improving management adds more profit than finding new entries. A thirty-day backtesting sprint is the fastest way to get proof. In week one, write your playbook and collect fifty replay samples. Week two, expand to one hundred fifty and tag volatility and stop size. Week three, test different management rules and choose the one with the better expectancy. Week four, forward test ten sessions with full journaling, screenshots, and a weekly recap for accountability. Most traders fail in backtesting because they mix models, judge results after ten trades, or keep adding filters until nothing triggers. Others replay with the right edge visible, which completely invalidates the test. Backtesting only works when done with discipline and blindness to the future. After a full year of data, I’ve learned that win rate alone means nothing. My setups hover around fifty percent, yet the account grows steadily because my payoff and management make up the difference. Seeing how results shift by stop size and time window showed me exactly when my edge appears and when it doesn’t. That awareness changed everything. Backtesting isn’t glamorous. It’s long hours, replays, screenshots, and rewriting the same rules until they become muscle memory. But it turns chaos into craft. I chart with TradingView, trade on Tradovate, and use Tradezella for journaling and backtesting. That combination built the conviction I needed to finally trade with confidence and consistency. submitted by /u/Kasraborhan to r/Trading [link] [comments]
reddit.com Kasraborhan Oct 23, 2025
Anyone else have issues with stop-loss/take profit adjustments freezing? (Especially when using stop bracket orders)
Lately, when I try to adjust my buy/sell stops (whether the trade has been initiated, or just adjusting it to market movement), the change freezes. Sometimes if I wait (an unreasonably long time) it comes back, but often I have to refresh the page. Using Tradovate as a broker, and it happens on the app and website. I have a current gen 12 core cpu, 24gb 3090, and 1 gig internet. Of course I'm hardwired directly to my Verizon router and when I test the internet speed, I almost always get in the high 8xx to mid 900 mbs. No background apps other than Youtube, listening to traders, maybe spotify but not often. As a high frequency scalper, this has costed me a lot of money and frustration. Any tips/help would be greatly appreciated. submitted by /u/mrshock3r to r/TradingView [link] [comments]
reddit.com mrshock3r Sep 17, 2025
What props allow you to set stop loss and take
Profit on the app? Mobile app for Apple. Apex does not. You can use tradovate and then open the tradingview to see it but I wanna take trades and set stops in tradingview mobile. Any props allow this? submitted by /u/sunny242477 to r/TradingView [link] [comments]
reddit.com sunny242477 Aug 11, 2025
I have tested 5 futures prop firms and 2 crypto props here are my recommendations and ones to avoid.
The ones to avoid ALPHA FUTURES: they are more expensive than most. their platform technical foundation shows concerning weaknesses: Trading Engine Issues, Execution delays during high volatility, Order filling discrepancies, System downtime during critical market moments, Incomplete market data feeds, Delayed stop-loss executions, Inconsistent margin calculations, Unreliable position tracking, Problems with multi-leg orders and their dashboard always has issues. They have a very vague rule about “tick scalping” my first payout was denied for “tick scalping”. I sent videos of my trading sessions to show them I was not tick scalping and it was just me closing trades early due to Market changes or trades hitting my stop in profits. They did not care. They told me wait until the next payout window and how to correct my “tick scalping”. I did exactly what they said and the 2nd payout was denied for the same reason. Don’t waste your time with ALPHA FUTURES. APEX TRADER FUNDING: At face value APEX looks like a pretty good way to go because it’s so cheap and you can stack accounts but the good things stop there. Payouts with APEX are hit or miss. I got a few and then they just started denying my payouts for whatever reason they could think of even though the way I traded never changed. Their random rule changes, requesting video of me trading and their company leadership getting caught saying compromising things is enough for me to avoid them at all costs. The good TOPSTEP: I rank them 3rd place because they have a scaling plan which is super annoying, TopstepX has had some significant issues and they no longer have a Tradovate option. The good things about TOPSTEP is they are reputable, I personally have never had a payout denied by them, if you are a beginner it’s very easy to achieve the 5 days of $200 goal and get a payout and moving to live was an easy process and it was nice to have phone calls with the team. They are actually very nice and honest people. MY FUNDED FUTURES: Ranking them 2nd place because they have no activation fee, offer more plans so there is something that will fit everyone’s needs (I mainly use the expert plans)and the ability to pass Evals in one day. I have never had a payout denied by them and when I had a technical issue it was fixed in 10 minutes. They are very solid and trust worthy. TAKE PROFIT TRADER: I rank them 1st place because even tho you have to trade 5 days on Eval they have daily payouts once you are above your buffer which is easy to achieve, no activation fee, good rewards program. It’s really great to make money and send it to your bank the same day. CRYPTO PROPS: I mainly use a personal account on BYBIT for crypto futures but I have given some crypto prop firms a try. BREAKOUT: Avoid them. Their user interface is absolutely trash and it didn’t matter what web browser I would use the platform would crash constantly to the point I could not even use it. CRYPTO FUND TRADER: really good platform with a good user interface, always pays out, decent rules. Even though I mainly trade on accounts I fund myself because I never intended to trade with props forever. I will continue to review prop firms and continue to give recommendations. submitted by /u/bigblackguy6912 to r/PropFirmTester [link] [comments]
reddit.com bigblackguy6912 Jul 5, 2025
I have tested 5 futures prop firms and 2 crypto prop firms and here are my recommendations and my avoid at all costs.
The ones to avoid ALPHA FUTURES: they are more expensive than most. their platform technical foundation shows concerning weaknesses: Trading Engine Issues, Execution delays during high volatility, Order filling discrepancies, System downtime during critical market moments, Incomplete market data feeds, Delayed stop-loss executions, Inconsistent margin calculations, Unreliable position tracking, Problems with multi-leg orders and their dashboard always has issues. They have a very vague rule about “tick scalping” my first payout was denied for “tick scalping”. I sent videos of my trading sessions to show them I was not tick scalping and it was just me closing trades early due to Market changes or trades hitting my stop in profits. They did not care. They told me wait until the next payout window and how to correct my “tick scalping”. I did exactly what they said and the 2nd payout was denied for the same reason. Don’t waste your time with ALPHA FUTURES. APEX TRADER FUNDING: At face value APEX looks like a pretty good way to go because it’s so cheap and you can stack accounts but the good things stop there. Payouts with APEX are hit or miss. I got a few and then they just started denying my payouts for whatever reason they could think of even though the way I traded never changed. Their random rule changes, requesting video of me trading and their company leadership getting caught saying compromising things is enough for me to avoid them at all costs. The Good TOPSTEP: I rank them 3rd place because they have a scaling plan which is super annoying, TopstepX has had some significant issues and they no longer have a Tradovate option. The good things about TOPSTEP is they are reputable, I personally have never had a payout denied by them, if you are a beginner it’s very easy to achieve the 5 days of $200 goal and get a payout and moving to live was an easy process and it was nice to have phone calls with the team. They are actually very nice and honest people. MY FUNDED FUTURES: Ranking them 2nd place because they have no activation fee, offer more plans so there is something that will fit everyone’s needs (I mainly use the expert plans)and the ability to pass Evals in one day. I have never had a payout denied by them and when I had a technical issue it was fixed in 10 minutes. They are very solid and trust worthy. TAKE PROFIT TRADER: I rank them 1st place because even tho you have to trade 5 days on Eval they have daily payouts once you are above your buffer which is easy to achieve, no activation fee, good rewards program. It’s really great to make money and send it to your bank the same day. CRYPTO PROPS: I mainly use a personal account on BYBIT for crypto futures but I have given some crypto prop firms a try. BREAKOUT: Avoid them. Their user interface is absolutely trash and it didn’t matter what web browser I would use the platform would crash constantly to the point I couldn’t even use it. CRYPTO FUND TRADER: really good platform with a good user interface, always pays out, decent rules. Even though I mainly trade on accounts I fund myself because I never intended to trade with props forever. I will continue to review prop firms and continue to give recommendations. submitted by /u/bigblackguy6912 to r/Daytrading [link] [comments]
reddit.com bigblackguy6912 Jul 5, 2025
margin call ... and maximum profit and loss settings
I've been practicing with a demo account the last week.. and I plan on continuing but have probably a stupid question. I'm totally new to futures. Have watched a few youtube futures for beginners videos so I have a basic understanding. I've got a couple scenarios... In the settings I can put in a daily max profit and daily max loss. So for an example if I was to buy a micro/long and walked away would I need to worry about adding a stop on either side? Would my max profit/loss take care of that when one or the other were triggered? The other scenario is if I put in a buy without the max daily gain/loss and I forgot to put in a stop would Tradovate automatically pull me out if I went over my balance/maintenance margin? Just wondering how bad it could get. I plan on starting with around $500.. and trading micros.. and wouldn't want to go beyond my $500 if something crazy happened in the market. thanks for any info. submitted by /u/tri0xinn245 to r/Tradovate [link] [comments]
reddit.com tri0xinn245 May 17, 2025
Next Thursday I will have 30 days of profit in my live account. Can’t wait to close my account with Topstep. (Long post and last post here)
I’m CONVINCED these “live” accounts aren’t actually live. If I had an account open with 100k of capital in it with Tradovate, like I do at Topstep. Then my allotted drawdown is calculated off of margin requirements the brokerage sets, and if I breach those margin requirements, my position is liquidated. Brokerages literally allow us to trade on 1000% margin OR MORE!!! So my 100k of cash could theoretically trade $100 million worth of NQ futures contracts (with 1000% margin) OR 277 NQ contracts…..FUCKING INSANE. And theoretically would have to loose 75% of my capital in any given trade to get a margin call. I know this as I got a margin call the first night I traded my own personal account. As you can only deposit $5000 at a time, my account was at 5k I went up $2500 and then lost $3400 (account was liquidated with $3600 in it as I had 4 contracts on.) I did not have enough capital with margin requirements to hold the position. My fault, and I understood more capital= more margin= less margin calls. As long as I never over leverage myself. In other words with a 100k account for me to loose a trade I would have to be a complete fucking idiot. As I can go down 10-15-20k and HOLD MY POSITION if I so choose. I don’t get smacked out and locked out when I loose 3k. Which is only 0.833333333% of the value of 1 NQ CONTRACT. Yet we can trade up to 15 contracts with a “150k account”…..PROP FIRMS ARE FUCKING US!!!!! So for everyone who shit talked me a few weeks ago for asking the risk team for another $1000 in drawdown in my live account can get fucked 🫡 As well as TOPSTEP, y’all can get fucked too. They are casino operators and they get to write the rules we must trade by in order to win any money. It’s a loosing game for 95% of traders. 95% of traders will give more to the casino than they take out. This is facts, and I don’t think there can be an argument to be made otherwise. If it were the other way around, the casino (topstep) wouldn’t have a viable business now would they?? Just think logically about that one for a second. Don’t come at me saying some dogshit excuse saying they are trying to fund great traders and make money from their great trading. HAH! Cause if that were true, based off of their criteria- I am a great trader. I am one of THEIR top 10-15 traders. ( No I’m not tooting my own fucking horn about this stat, I’m using it for CONTEXT. So don’t come at me saying I’m a cocky egotistical fuckwad as some of you tried to insinuate previously.) I AM HOWEVER SAYING THAT IF THE COMPANY I TRADE FOR HAS ME RANKED AS ONE OF THEIR BEST, WHY WOULDN’T THEY GIVE ME FREEDOM TO TRADE??? WOULDN’T THEY WANT TO HELP MOLD ME INTO A BETTER AND BETTER TRADER TO MAKE THEM MORE AND MORE MONEY??? WHY WOULDN’T A RISK MANAGER REACH OUT TO ME AFTER AN 8 DAY LOOSING STREAK OF -$25,000 BUT IMMEDIATELY EMAIL ME WHEN I MAKE $20,000 IN A DAY SAYING THEY’LL LOCK ME OUT IF I LOOSE HALF OF THAT $20,000. MAKE THAT MAKE SENSE 🤦🏻‍♂️ I wouldn’t be told no when asked for A LITTLE more drawdown. Some of y’all acted like I asked them to give me a 20k DLL. I don’t give a fuck about my winning day percentages, because they are skewed due to the fact I was stopped out on most of my trades because of a DAILY LOSS LIMIT topstep enforced me to trade with. In just two weeks time I took an $85k live funded account to $180k and DID IT ONLY WINNING 3/10 days. Now can you imagine if I was allotted a little more drawdown? I would have had 6/10 or 7/10 winning days and that 80k account would be upwards of a half a million if not more. And to those non risky folks who think 3k is too much to go down on in a single trade-or in a day for that matter trading the NQ. Those just looking to make $200 and they’re done for the day. Do you understand the notational value of the contract you hold? Like do you actually understand that making $200 dollars on a contract that is worth 400k is a 0.0555555556% ROI? It’s minuscule, almost nonsensical. But I digress. Now in my own personal account, If I do happen to get a margin call and my position is liquidated, I DONT BLOW MY ACCOUNT. I’M NOT LOCKED OUT OF MY ACCOUNT. I DONT HAVE TO DEAL WITH PAIN OF FAILING A CHALLENGE OVER AND OVER AGAIN. And most importantly I DONT HAVE TO RESET ANYTHING. I can still trade even after being liquidated, as they liquidate you with money in your account. You just can’t trade with as many contracts, THATS IT. I don’t have to deal with the mental anguish of failing a stupid fucking challenge or an XFA with “profits” in it which have insane rules to keep YOUR profits locked away from you in hopes you blow it before you do get to a payout. They aren’t trying to mold “great traders” Micheal Patek is not looking for the Michael Jordon of trading. They are solely focused on leaching money from bad traders. CAUSE THERE ARE WAY MORE LOSERS THAN WINNERS IN THIS SPACE. I also believe this is why CME has stepped in because they aren’t making the money off the data these prop firms provide to us and our CHARGING US FOR. Our “commissions” are going to the prop firm cause they are fake!! Just another way for them to take more and more money back from profitable traders so they always have the upper hand. CME also can’t be happy when they understand folks can reset 100 times a month if they want to, and they realize people just don’t understand that $15,000 can go into your own personal account, and that is a huge starting point to start trading the futures market. Where instead someone just wasted $15,000 on resets and challenges and doesn’t even fathom it because it was stolen from them $150 at a time. Hence why all these prop firms all of the sudden have a maximum amount of resets allowed per month. At the same time it teaches extreme gambling tendencies. Which is all negative, prop firms add ALMOST no value to us as traders, they don’t add value to the brokers who are ACTUALLY active in the market, and they don’t add value to the actual markets. I say almost no value because prop firms actually did hold value for me. So I know they must hold value for others. I was broke when I became profitable, my business was failing and I was on the verge of selling my home. First month I was profitable I made $70k in prop firm payouts with -$20 in my bank account. Ever since my equity curve has gone up every month. I have made over $500,000 in payouts since August. And I’m doing better financially than I ever have. But ever since becoming profitable I realized I was spending way to much on resets/ sim funded accounts etc. etc. After crunching the numbers, I spent $75,000 on resets ( this isn’t just with topstep) to make $500,000. Great ROI if I’m running a business, spend $75,000 and 7 months of my time to profit $425,00….not bad. But it’s all come at a cost, it’s been extremely mentally taxing and exhausting. And to be honest had me feeling like a gambler rather than a trader. Cause I didn’t care about blowing accounts-it’s only $150, so bad trade after bad trade would ensue. Which is a naive way of thinking and will only lead to my failure IMO. I have the tools and the resources to do this myself. And that’s what I’m going to do from here on out 🫡 As a point of wrapping this all up- I SAY THIS TO TELL ALL OF YOU, DO YOUR OWN THING. IF YOU ARE A HALF DECENT TRADER STOP WASTING MONEY WITH PROP FIRMS- INSTEAD DEPOSIT IT INTO YOUR OWN BROKERAGE AND TRADE YOUR STRATEGY AND DEVELOP YOUR CORE RULES AND PRINCIPLES IN WHICH YOU TRADE BY. NOT BY WHICH A PROP FIRM DESIGNATES YOU TO TRADE. THIS GAME IS HARD ENOUGH, PROP FIRMS PUT EXTRA RULES IN PLACE IN ORDER FOR US TO FAIL AND FOR THEM TO LINE THEIR POCKETS. SO I SAY TO YOU ALL- TAKE THE LEAP OF FAITH FUCK A PROP FIRM - GO MAKE THAT BREAD!!!! 🫡✌🏻 submitted by /u/AdministrativeTie945 to r/TopStepX [link] [comments]
reddit.com AdministrativeTie945 Apr 5, 2025
How to show Take Profit and Stop Loss Dollar Amounts on Bracket Order Labels in Chart for Tradovate
submitted by /u/ExitedFor69 to r/Tradovate [link] [comments]
reddit.com ExitedFor69 Mar 26, 2025
How to show Take Profit and Stop Loss Dollar Amounts on Bracket Order Labels in Chart for Tradovate
When trading through Tradovate as your broker, you only see "Sell Limit" and "Sell Stop" text labels on your take profit/stop loss bracket orders in the chart, whereas when using TradingView's paper trading, the labels show the actual dollar amount for those respective orders (and this gets re-calculated if you add/remove contracts or move your take profit/stop loss levels). Can the paper trading behavior be added for the Tradovate broker? Thanks! submitted by /u/ExitedFor69 to r/TradingView [link] [comments]
reddit.com ExitedFor69 Mar 25, 2025
Take profit and stop loss on Tradovate's Tradingview integration
I am unable to set TP and SL on Tradingview with Tradovate. Is there a way around this? What would be an alternative Broker? submitted by /u/No-Ball-6284 to r/Tradovate [link] [comments]
reddit.com No-Ball-6284 Feb 22, 2025
No, 95% DON'T fail but if you are new you need to read this because it could change your LIFE like it did mine.
Hi all, It appears I will be taking a payout in the next few weeks after starting from zero seven months ago. For those of you just starting I wanted to share with you a few things that I have worked through. I trade futures on a 2 minute chart. I started with ES and moved to NQ. I use prop firms for leverage (TopStep) I lost constantly until just a month ago then held a funded account and it is at a 70% daily win rate. I am not particularly special. I have no education and basically screwed my life up. You can read more at the very end, but if a high school dropout like me can do this, I feel you can to. Away we go. Why you see that "95% of everyone fails" and this isn't likely true. One of the primary goals of this post is to refute the claim that 95% of everybody that trades loses. The idea that this is gambling and a fast way to lose everything. So here is a little about where I am at after just seven months, and why I will take my first actual payout in a week or two. My Journey so far to profitable in 7-8 months. There have been 155 weekdays (trading days) between April 21, 2024 to today. I traded ALL of them except for ONE holiday. I realized the NQ always seems to have enough volatility to get a move and ES not so much on holidays. Point is that I traded every single one of them and when I would fail a combine I would get another one until I was passing them. I also studied around 2-3 hours every day outside of trading. So even at 2.5 hours that is another 545 hours of studying one person who has a proven system, back testing, purchasing Tradovate market replay and running that, watching videos, making notes during the videos on my iPad with my apple pencil, and learning a system. It isn't about technical analysis or special secret methods a youtube guru teaches you Trading is to me 90% emotional and mental and 10% technical. You can teach a child how to look for things on a chart and click a button when those things happen. Children do not have a lifetime of fear of loss and holding what they gained. They do not worry about the same things adults do. The mental game in trading is a HUGE obstacle to overcome. We learn in "Trading in the Zone" and "Best Loser Wins" how much of a mind game it is. When a trader learns more about the market they fool themselves into thinking that they will finally start winning, but the market is not predictable so there becomes a false sense of certainty (from Trading in the Zone) We get out of winning trades to hold our profit and stay in losing trades because we hate losing and convince ourselves the trade will turn around (Best Loser Wins). We come to the market because someone told us that they have a "90% success rate with this ONE SPECIAL SYSTEM" (every youtube guru ever). Until we get over OURSELVES and realize our relationship with money, loss, and gain, we will repeat the same bad judgement over and over again. We will incur losses and wonder why. We will win and then lose it all because of things like negative self image or the inability to stay out after a win, or the urge to revenge trade and lose even more. In short, trading is the ultimate humbling experience that you will either learn and grow from, or quit and cry about. This is the ONE THING that will either straighten your twisted mind out, or will eat you alive. So traders, if you are new, you need to invest in a discovery program on yourself and need to start learning about these things, or be left in the dust. So then, even if you have this all straight, why do so many lose? People fail because they fail to properly have a system. If you have a proper system that is realistic, and have a proper trading plan daily where you are sticking to losing only a certain dollar amount then leaving the market, and hitting a profit target and leaving the market, you are already on a level above 99% of everyone who is starting their journey. People don't do this and they flounder. They think they can come in against people doing this for decades and a billion dollar hedge funds computer that can execute moves in a 10th of a second and win right off the bat. They can't So what is a realistic success/fail rate? I asked GPT about this. I consult ChatGPT all the time. There are trading AI's there if you pay a paltry $20 a month for the service. In Taiwan a study showed that 19% if traders were profitable. In the USA 10.3% profited year over year In India 30% profited. Interestingly, the nations that seem to value education more than we do here in the USA, where there is more to lose and more to gain? They seem to succeed more. Point is, it is not a 95% fail rate. Funny stat about traders. I read once that a major brokerage put out stats about how long an account on their platform stays active before the user no longer logs in. They found that: A new account typically stops being used by the 30 day period with 80% of people quitting. Most everyone close to 85% are done by the 45-60 day mark. The firm which released their financials being a public company spent 80% of their budget on marketing for new clients because they have only 30-60 days to profit from all new clients. So that tells you a lot about the industry in general, but still doesn't explain why the 95% failure rate is brandied about. Why the 95% failure rate myth exists People have a funny tendency to complain. The internet has facilitated the largest public square ever known to man, and I feel it is simple. The people that are winning are taking this very seriously. They study every day, they obsess over making themselves the best version they can be, and will never let up. The successful people don't speak up. The unsuccessful people do. The people that fail invariably come to reddit, facebook, tiktok and other platforms. They complain and get sympathy from others that also failed. They failed not because trading is "impossible" or "gambling" but because they went into the markets without education and training, went up against a giant machine, and quickly lost their money due to many factors they were not aware existed. At the end of the day, those that succeed don't talk much. Those that fail yell very loudly. And that is why I think that with proper training, enough study, and an obsessive mindset that people can and will find success in the markets. It is not that people are not smart, not that people are being "scammed," but because people are not willing to put in the work to understand what has to be done. They are not willing, or maybe not even aware that they need to straighten out their mental game in order to succeed, and that trading is the most rewarding thing they can do, if only they are committed to it. If you made it this far, you should know that I am not particularly educated. I am a high school dropout that failed everything in his life because I had a TON of trauma as a kid that caused me to think I was not worthy of anything. I spent my 43 years consistently self sabotaging and blowing up every opportunity ever presented to me. So if I can find success at this, the chances are that YOU can find success at this, but it won't work, unless you work. Thanks, and have a great day. submitted by /u/Not_Leaving_LV to r/Daytrading [link] [comments]
reddit.com Not_Leaving_LV Nov 24, 2024
Stop loss and take profit bar
How come when I’m paper trading in TradingView, there is a stop loss and take profit bar on the charts where I can move up and down in real time…..but when I connect to tradovate broker and trade on TradingView, the stop loss and tp bars are no longer there? Are there any brokers that can connect to TradingView and still have the stop loss and tp bars, so I can do trailing stop losses? submitted by /u/annabelle1223 to r/TradingView [link] [comments]
reddit.com annabelle1223 Oct 7, 2024
Trailing stop loss and tp bar
Is there no way to have a stop loss and take profit bar on the charts when trading on tradovate? Ones where I can move it real time to do a trailing stop loss? submitted by /u/annabelle1223 to r/Tradovate [link] [comments]
reddit.com annabelle1223 Oct 7, 2024
Is there a way to set a proper take profit and stop loss when copytrading?
I have 20 Apex PA Accs and want to copy trade them all w/ tradovate. Do I have to rely on pressing the gray "Exit Mkt & Cancel" button each time whenever I hit my tp or sl or is there a way to automatically set limit tps/sls? submitted by /u/Fast_Bill_1565 to r/Tradovate [link] [comments]
reddit.com Fast_Bill_1565 Aug 23, 2024
How to see take profit and stop loss dollar amount in tradingview
When using tradingview paper trading software, it shows the actual $ Amount of TP and SL. When I actually trade and hook up my tradovate, it only shows the line and I have to manually calculate it. Can someone tell me how to get the dollar amount shown? submitted by /u/NoShape9268 to r/TradingView [link] [comments]
reddit.com NoShape9268 Jan 22, 2024
Show Take Profit and Stop Loss Dollar Amounts on Bracket Order Labels in Chart for Tradovate
When trading through Tradovate as your broker, you only see "Sell Limit" and "Sell Stop" text labels on your take profit/stop loss bracket orders in the chart, whereas when using TradingView's paper trading, the labels show the actual dollar amount for those respective orders (and this gets re-calculated if you add/remove contracts or move your take profit/stop loss levels). ​ Can the paper trading behavior be added for the Tradovate broker? ​ Thanks! submitted by /u/s1dest3p to r/TradingView [link] [comments]
reddit.com s1dest3p Jan 18, 2023