Track emerging trends and get alerts when they grow. Create a free account to monitor this trend.
Create Free Account
Home / Software / Zero Trust

Zero Trust

US United States
Rapid growth High volatility Seasonal (Feb) Forecasted growth Software Concept
Zero Trust
What is Zero Trust?

Zero Trust is a security model that assumes that all users, devices, and applications are untrusted and must be verified before being granted access to resources. It is designed to prevent data breaches and protect sensitive information by limiting access to only those who need it.

Treendly Index Treendly Forecast Google YouTube
MOM: +50.69%
How much search volume does it get?
Google searches
4.4K/mo

Is Zero Trust trending?

Yes. Zero Trust growing with a month-over-month change of 3.37% over the past 5 years, with approximately 4,400 monthly searches.

This is a seasonal trend that peaks every February. The seasonal demand is forecasted to decline over the next year.


Why is Zero Trust trending?

1
Rising Cybersecurity Threats
With the increasing number of cyber attacks and data breaches, organizations are looking for more secure ways to protect their sensitive information. Zero Trust provides a comprehensive security approach that can help prevent these attacks.
2
Remote Workforce
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many organizations to adopt remote work policies, which has increased the need for secure access to resources from outside the corporate network. Zero Trust provides a secure way to access resources from anywhere, without compromising security.
3
Complex IT Environments
As organizations adopt cloud-based applications and services, their IT environments become more complex and difficult to secure. Zero Trust provides a unified security approach that can be applied across all environments, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.
4
Compliance Requirements
Many industries have strict compliance requirements that mandate the protection of sensitive information. Zero Trust provides a security model that can help organizations meet these requirements and avoid costly fines and legal issues.
5
Increased Awareness
As more organizations adopt Zero Trust, there is increased awareness and understanding of the importance of a comprehensive security approach. This has led to more investment in cybersecurity and a greater focus on protecting sensitive information.

What are people saying?

41 threads
AI Insights Mixed sentiment
Discussions around 'zero trust' focus on its implementation challenges, vendor marketing tactics, and the effectiveness of various tools. Participants express skepticism about the term being overused and question its practical application in real-world scenarios.
Implementation Challenges
Many users share their struggles with implementing zero trust principles effectively, highlighting cultural shifts and technical complexities.
Vendor Marketing vs. Reality
There is a concern that vendors overstate the capabilities of zero trust solutions, leading to disillusionment among users who find the reality more complicated.
Software Limitations
Some discussions suggest that relying solely on software for zero trust is insufficient, advocating for hardware-based solutions to reduce human error.
Real-World Tool Evaluation
Users seek genuine feedback on zero trust network access tools, emphasizing the need for practical experiences over marketing promises.
Balancing Usability and Security
Participants discuss the challenge of maintaining user-friendly access while enforcing stricter security measures, especially in hybrid work environments.
Common questions
  • How true is end-to-end zero trust implementation?
  • What zero trust network access tools have proven reliable?
  • Is zero trust just a buzzword or does it have real value?
  • What are the best practices for microsegmentation?
  • How do you balance usability with tighter access controls?
Pain points
  • Cultural change is harder than technical implementation.
  • Vendors often exaggerate the effectiveness of their solutions.
  • Software-based zero trust has limitations and requires constant patching.
  • Onboarding and integration processes can be cumbersome.
  • Managing access policies becomes complicated with increasing layers.
voz.vn
RE:Hướng dẫn selfhost Bitwarden miễn phí bằng Fly.io
Zero Trust said: Bitwarden trên Cloudflare chạy ngon hem các bác Thấy k ổn nên thôi chuyển về selfhost, dùng tạm thôi. 1password vẫn ngon nhất.
jerryno6 · Jun 19, 2026
voz.vn
RE:Xin tư vấn trồng cây ớt
Zero Trust said: Nhà em có cây ớt mà ko biết kiểu gì nó ko đậu trái, nó cứ lớn cao lên. 1 tháng trước em tìm hiểu xong cũng cắt bớt lá để dinh dưỡng nó tập trung đậu quả hay gì gì đó xong rồi nó cứ cao lớn rồi xum xuê như vậy View attachment 3672358 ớt đực cmnr ớt tôi tồng 20cm là trái sum xuê
rickly_2006 · Jun 19, 2026
forums.hardwarezone.com.sg
RE:Last night who watched Joanne Peh livestream , she was sobbing quite badly as she talking
... the day of due to "zero respect from merchant", she wrote... where people’s time, effort and trust are not respected, and where ...
yperic · Jun 19, 2026
www.blackhatworld.com
RE:Testing Cold Email for Local Lead Gen – $0 Ad Spend, All Hustle
... process works from scratch with zero ad spend. Will post again... as possible. 1. Performance + Visual Trust Cold B2B traffic judges you...
ServerlessArch · Jun 19, 2026
forums.somethingawful.com
RE:The Amazing Digital Circus (& The Last Act): Spoiler Tag Til Release (6/19)
... things, betrayed the main cast's trust several times, and lashed out... express his regret, even with zero expectations of being forgiven, not...
Bad Seafood · Jun 19, 2026
www.flashback.org
RE:Hur grundar man en stiftelse som förvaltar ens tillgångar i evinnerlig tid?
... Internationellt använder man oftast begreppet "Trust" eller "Foundation" (stiftelse) i...historiska regeln om att en trust måste upplösas efter 80–... pengar. 3. Caymanöarna (STAR Trust)Caymanöarna har en unik juridisk...som heter STAR Trust.Fördelar: I en vanlig trust kan släktingarna (... pengar. I en STAR Trust har förmånstagarna inga juridiska rättigheter...slängde in hälften i Avanza Zero utan att jag ens ...
Paddan1000 · Jun 19, 2026
r/indiadiscussion
Only happens in India - Trust in judiciary is ZERO now.
Source: https://www.shoneekapoor.com/legal-news/domestic-fight-death-not-murder-hc/ submitted by /u/Western-Ask1377 to r/indiadiscussion [link] [comments]
Western-Ask1377 · Jun 16, 2026
r/BestofRedditorUpdates
My (26f) friend (26f) has accused me of stealing her boyfriend. Boyfriend (25m) had no idea they were dating
I am not The OOP, OOP is u/ThrowRAbfthief26 My (26f) friend (26f) has accused me of stealing her boyfriend. Boyfriend (25m) had no idea they were dating Originally posted to r/relationship_advice Original Post March 23, 2024 Names changed to respect privacy and throwaway account. Honestly no idea where to start with this and sorry if it's long. I (26f) have been friends with "Carly" (also 26f) since middle school. We lost touch after I moved out of state for law school but our parents are still friends. I moved back to our home state last year when I graduated and met "Matt" (25m). We bonded instantly as we're both studying to be lawyers. Matt should graduate this year if all goes well. Because of studying and work, we've taken things really slowly and only just recently became official. As we'd gone official, I decided to invite him to my sister's 21st birthday party. It was a huge party at my parent's house back in my home town. Both Matt and I work and live (separately) about an hour away. Wed been at the party for about an hour when Carly arrived with her parents. I was excited to see her as I'd been meaning to get back in touch since I'd moved back. The timing had never been right. Well, Carly spotted us and hurried on over. I was surprised when she gave Matt a huge hug and asked him what he was doing at the party. Turns out they work in the same building and Matt is friends with a few of Carly's friends. They've been out on group nights together a few times. I did the whole "Oh, Carly this is my boyfriend Matt" thing and her face instantly fell. She looked furious with me and ignored me for the rest of the party. I sent her a message the next morning asking if I had done anything wrong. Carly blew up at me and accused me of stealing her boyfriend and I soon got several rude messages from mutual friends sat Ng something similar. I met up with Matt and asked him what the hell was going on. I had assumed that once we'd made it official, we were exclusive. Matt had no idea what I was talking about. I relayed Carly's message and he was even more confused. He said that he got on with Carly when they saw each other but it had never been anything more than a friendship. He didn't think anything of them spending time together outside of work with friends so that's why I didn't know he and Carly worked in the same building. It's been a week since the party and I'm still getting messages from people 's how I could do that to Carly. I've tried saying over again that Matt and Carly weren't dating but it's falling on deaf ears. Even my parents have heard about from Carly's parents. I have zero idea the hell to do. Where do I go from here? I trust Matt completely but what do I do about Carly? Edit: People have asked about the friends who have sent me messages. These are all mutual friends of myself and Carly who we've known since high school. None of them, as far as I know, have ever met Matt. None of his work friends who also know Carly have sent me messages. Also I have spoken to Carly and we are meeting up tomorrow to talk. RELEVANT COMMENTS Not-nuts It seems you unintentionally busted up Carly's fantasy. Not your fault, not your problem. She's immature and full of drama. OOP She's never acted like this before and that's why it really rattled me. Sure, I haven't seen her much over the past few years but she was never like this in high school as far as I can remember. ApexCurve Why can’t you sit down with her and find out what the hell is going on? You’re studying law and 26, not 15. You of all people should know that but Matt said means absolutely squat. The truth is going to lay somewhere in the middle. Granted, you’re not in the wrong either way, as that girl needs to realize that there is no such thing as stole. He clearly wasn’t into her. And for crying out loud, she’s 26 and running to her mummy and daddy. Like so many, God have her parents failed her big time. OOP I'm meeting her tomorrow. It would have been sooner but I'm studying, working or with Matt so I don't have a lot of free time. Billowing_Flags If she can't produce "evidence" of her actually DATING Matt IRL (not just in her head), then I'd blow off her claims of GF status. There should easily be all kinds of social media pix, stories, check-ins, whatever evidencing a BF/GF relationship (not just a whole GROUP of people hanging out). Your generation is HUGE on social media presence. See what she can actually present! ETA: If she can't produce a sizeable number of pictures/posts of just the 2 of them dating, then I'd drop this friendship like a rock and BLOCK her because Carly would be a bunny-boiler! ~ DivinitySousVide Well this is a shit show created by Carly. I think you should just ignore her. So you know what your parents heard? Did they hear you broke up Carly and her BF? OOP "So you know what your parents heard? Did they hear you broke up Carly and her BF?" My mom called me the day after the party and told me that Carly's mom had been on the phone complaining about me. Carly had told her that I had stolen her boyfriend and then she called my mom. I told mom that wasn't the case but apparently Carly and her mom are still telling that story. OOP Updated the post March 24, 2024 (Same Post/Next Day) UPDATE: Well, I met up with Carly. They're not dating and never were so Matt isn't a cheater. I met up with Carly this morning at a coffee shop in our home town. She wasn't happy to be there but I'm over her feelings after the past week I've had. I sat her down and asked her to give me her side of the story. I told her exactly what Matt had said to me and asked for her to explain everything. Carly met Matt last year, not long before I moved back to the state. A mutual friend in the building they both work in invited Matt to after work drinks and that's when they met. Carly thought he was cute and started flirting with him. Side bar: Matt is awful at picking up flirting cues. It took weeks of me flirting with him until he realised and asked me out. This is something I always find amusing because Matt himself is really outgoing with a lot of charisma. No, they never spent any time alone together apart from the odd run to a coffee shop near their building to grab lunch. I went through Carly's phone and there are no messages from Matt apart from ones in their group chat. They haven't kissed or slept together. Carly has never been to Matt's apartment and Matt has never been to Carly's apartment. I asked her why she thought he was her boyfriend. This is a direct quote: "Ok so we're not officially boyfriend and girlfriend yet but I was sure he was going to ask me really soon. He's always smiling at me and making jokes. I know he was going to ask me out, just the two of us." I basically said "Carly, that's not him flirting with you. That's just Matt. He's a friendly guy! I'm sorry but he and I have been seeing each other for a while now so it's not going to happen." I explained how we'd been taking it slow because of us both being so busy with studying and work so we've only just made it official. As I said all this I could see Carly's elaborate fantasy crumble. I asked her to please set the record straight with her parents (for my parents sake) and with our mutual friends. Carly looked flustered but mumbled something that sounded like "Yeah, fine." I said I was sorry for this misunderstanding and hopefully we could all put this behind us. On my drive to Matt's apartment I called him to relay everything. He was baffled by the whole thing but said he would message Carly. Once I got there he showed me the text: "Hey Carly. Look, I'm sorry if I mislead you in any way with my actions, please know they have only ever been from a friendly place. I see us as friends but that's all. I hope we can be friends in the future once this has all blown over but if you're not comfortable with that then I respect it. All the best, Matt" Carly hasn't responded yet and I don't know if she will. Hopefully she will set the record straight with everyone, I'm washing my hands of this mess and focusing on my relationship with Matt and my studies! THIS IS A REPOST SUB - I AM NOT THE OOP DO NOT CONTACT THE OOP's OR COMMENT ON LINKED POSTS, REMEMBER - RULE 7 submitted by /u/Direct-Caterpillar77 to r/BestofRedditorUpdates [link] [comments]
Direct-Caterpillar77 · Jun 14, 2026
r/BestofRedditorUpdates
Me [30F] wondering whether I should tell a close friend [30M] that he shouldn't marry his fiancee [27F]
I am not The OOP, OOP is u/weddingwhistleblower Me [30F] wondering whether I should tell a close friend [30M] that he shouldn't marry his fiancee [27F] Original Post Aug 11, 2014 Apologies in advance for the wall of text. I have known my friend, we'll call him Mark, since college. We're very close and hang out together pretty regularly. Mark has been with his fiancee, let's call her Laura, since grad school (about 6-7 years). Mark and Laura have been engaged for two years, and will be married in a month (I know, I know, not much time here). For the first few years of the relationship, I had zero problems with Laura. She seemed a bit shy and reserved, which is unusual for our group of friends, but otherwise seemed like a fine partner for Mark. Indeed, my only reservation was actually that Mark, having a strong personality and being an overly rational/intellectual/argumentative person, sometimes seemed to run roughshod over Laura. Over the last two or three years, Laura has opened up a bit more, and initially that was really great. My girlfriend, Julie, and Laura became closer and started hanging out, and the four of us would go out regularly (either just us, or with other friends). It was actually pretty great. Recently, however, we started noticing that there are some key issues with their relationship that make us (and other friends, actually) wonder whether they should be together at all. Now that we know Laura better, we've realized she's insanely insecure and anxious. She is constantly complaining about minor things about the wedding, including his parents' small requests, and even the nice things they do for her. We've watched them argue about pretty personal stuff, and she is pretty happy to air their dirty laundry and complain incessantly about things that it's clear he'd rather discuss in private. She also has been somewhat cruel and unfair to him in our presence. Finally, and here's the key thing, they seem to have a pretty fundamental disagreement about a key issue in their relationship (think something as fundamental as whether or not to have kids), with him being in the firm "yes, I want to do this, and I need a partner who will at least consider it" camp, and her being in the "I am saying I'll consider it, but I'm pretty sure I'm ultimately going to not want to do this, and that you're kind of an asshole for asking me to do it in the first place." (The argument issue is fairly specific, and so I don't want to give more details for fear of identifying them.) In addition, they've been arguing, seemingly non-stop, for what seems like over a year, with Laura regularly complaining to my girlfriend that she's miserable, anxious, stressed, etc., because of various relationship issues (Mark is not a complainer, but we know he is similarly not happy). These are issues that, in our mind, are part of Mark's personality that won't change, and Laura knows they will not change -- for instance, Mark has long-term close female friends whose friendship he prioritizes highly. Laura thinks their interactions are inappropriate, and that he puts their needs above hers, but Mark has been clear that his interactions with them will not change. Mark also has a difficult, time-consuming career, and doesn't have much time to do household chores or spend time alone with Laura. Again, this is not something that will not change any time soon. Another big issue is Laura believes some of Mark's fundamental values have changed over the course of their relationship, things she admired and found attractive about him initially, and that now she doesn't like very much. As I said, my girlfriend and I have been seeing these issues for some time, and they came to a head recently, when we both sort of told them that they should think about postponing the wedding. They acknowledged that they had thought about it, and said they had a good long talk and decided they wanted to go ahead with it. They said they'd discussed all their issues and talked them through and come to a consensus. We trusted that they had, and sort of shrugged our shoulders. (It may be worth noting that although Mark was able to discuss this in a levelheaded way, Laura's response was to sort of withdraw for a few weeks and stop talking to us/hanging out with us, and to make it clear to our other friends that she was doing this because we didn't support their marriage. She later acknowledged that the reason she did this was because she felt there was some truth to what we were saying, and hanging out with us upset her because it brought those feelings up again when she was trying to get over them.) Just this weekend, we saw them argue again, including about that fundamental question I noted above, and it was clear that they are still in very different places, still unhappy, and still arguing constantly. It was also clear (and upsetting) that Laura was basically including us in the argument so she could badmouth Mark and try to get us on her side -- not only was it not working (because we think he's more in the right than she is), but it was also incredibly callous and hurtful to Mark, and she didn't seem to care. We've gotten to the point where it's actually hard to spend time with Laura. My girlfriend doesn't like her at all. I'm fine spending time with her, but really feel that they are not a good match and that they're going to make each other unhappy. At the very least, I feel they need to postpone this wedding until they actually HAVE come to a place where they derive happiness from the relationship, as opposed to this constant fighting about things large and small. The question is, should I talk to Mark about this? I've already shared some of what I'm thinking and been told everything is fine, but this time I might be a little more open and also tell him that I'm happy to handle some of the logistical post-wedding cancelling stuff (calling people, whatever) if that's something that's weighting on him. tl;dr: I don't think my friend should marry his fiancee. Should I tell him? UPDATE: See Julie's comment below, also. Julie u/somynameisjulienow Julie I am the "Julie" in question. I would add this to what my love, the OP said: While we have "sort of told them they should think about postponing the wedding", that was in a very light-handed way, hoping to spark a conversation, and took place almost a year ago, long before lots of new and troubling information arose. If we were to have the conversation now, it would be far clearer, far more detailed, and include a lot of things that we didn't know at that time. In other words, the first conversation was "have you guys talked about postponing the wedding?" and this one would be "do not marry this woman: she is awful, she doesn't even like you, you're unhappy, and it's only going to get worse." Perhaps this is a rationalization, but I truly believe that he does not know that we think this wedding is a bad idea and he definitely does not know that we actively dislike his fiancee. I frankly struggle to see how we will be able to have the kind of friendship we used to have with Mark if they go through with it. That's not a threat ("It's her or us!") it's just reality. As OP said, I cannot stand Laura for more than a few minutes at a time, I cannot help but take everything she says in the most negative possible light, seeing every comment as confirmation of my bad opinion of her, and I hate the way she treats him. I don't know if I'll be able to treat her with the kind of respect and kindness that is required of even having a decent relationship with her husband. I can already see myself avoiding spending time with them as a result. Even conversations that have nothing to do with this are tinged by awkwardness, not just on our end, but on theirs, because they know we see the problems (even if they don't know how upset we are by them). Ultimately, I'm leaning away from saying something. I think that there is such a small likelihood of a good result (him calling off the wedding) and such a high likelihood of a bad result (she comes to hate us and it dooms our relationship with him, and/or causes her to badmouth us to mutual friends) that I think it's a bad idea. As a side note, I don't put any weight on the "let them make their own decisions" responses here because that's so obvious it's not worth worrying about. Of course they get to make their own decision: we're not going to actively try and stop the marriage if they go through with it. The question is whether what we have to say should be involved in that decision or not, because we love him and have perspective on it that he doesn't. Update Jan 18, 2015 (5 months later) So, Julie and I took the advice of most people here and kept our mouths shut about our feelings about Laura. We were enthusiastic at the wedding, and went out of our way to be gracious and kind to her in the run up to it and after. The wedding went off without a hitch, and we thought maybe they'd turned over a new leaf and after the stress of the wedding was removed, she'd be a better partner to him. Sadly, the opposite happened. I guess I should start by explaining that the key disagreement they had prior to marriage was about having an open relationship. He was very much in the "I want to at least explore this" camp, and she seemed very reluctant, and kind of pissed that he was asking her to consider this in the first place. Shortly before the wedding, however, she started to develop an interest in another man, and all of a sudden her doubts were all but gone. Mark was happy and excited for her, and things appeared to be going better. Unfortunately, that didn't last. Over the last few months, Mark and Laura have had increasingly bad fights, and pretty much every time we asked how things were going he'd respond with "not good." Whenever we hung out, she did increasingly annoying things (sulking if we weren't doing an activity she liked, leaving events without even saying goodbye, complaining that we were excluding her from things because we failed to somehow read her mind and determine that she wanted to do something other than what we were doing, etc.) We had a talk with Mark about this, and he sort of agreed that she was being ridiculous in several ways, that we had a right to be upset with her attitude, and said that maybe we should take a break from hanging out with her. We were fine with this, but it was pretty annoying that she was basically making him choose between spending time with us and with her. A few weeks after that conversation, he called us to tell us they're getting a divorce. We were pretty shocked - but here's the skinny: Shortly after they returned from their honeymoon, Laura went to see her, let's call him "boyfriend." She came back sad and upset, and told Mark that the guy had broken things off, presumably because he felt differently about the relationship now that she was married. He empathized and comforted her. A few days later, he noticed she was acting a little weird, checked her email, and realized that the "break-up" was a LIE. Essentially, boyfriend had told her they could only keep seeing each other if no one else, including Mark, knew about it. Instead of breaking it off, having a conversation with Mark about it, or anything else sensible, she decided to LIE to her husband so she could have an affair (and I call it an affair because, even in an open relationship, lying under these circumstances definitely makes it cheating in my book). He, of course, felt incredibly hurt and betrayed, but instead of kicking her to the curb (like I would have), he talked to her, and to the guy, to explain that this was unacceptable and uncool, but told them that he was fine allowing the relationship to continue. The only thing he asked was that, going forward, she refrain from sharing certain details of their relationship (Mark and Laura's) with the boyfriend. Reasonable request, no? Apparently not to her. A few months later, he finds out she's set up a separate email account and was using it to communicate with the boyfriend about precisely the kinds of things Mark had asked her not to share with him (she had left the account open, and had previously told him he was free to check her email and phone, as a way to regain trust after the first fuck up). She was also telling the boyfriend that she was thinking about a divorce because things were so terrible with Mark. Now, again, this is where I would've kicked her the fuck out. Instead, Mark takes a few days to cool off away from her, comes back, and tells her that she needs to break up with the boyfriend, and focus on fixing their relationship through therapy and closing off any other potential romantic partners. She is initially very apologetic and seems to want to work on things. But, of course, after a few days she starts throwing hissy fits because "she didn't know it was that big a deal to him," and he won't sleep in the same room as her, which to her means he's not really "trying" to fix it. (Keep in mind it's been less than two weeks since he found out she had betrayed him for the second time in less than four months.) He tells her he needs time - at this point he's seriously thinking about divorce, but doesn't want to give up on the marriage, considering it's been less than 6 months. And then. AND THEN. He comes home from hanging out with us for the evening, she comes home a bit later, and just basically tells him she just made out with some guy from her gym she'd been hanging out with. Essentially, she decided that things weren't going to work anyway, and she chose the most childish and hurtful way she could to end it. So, now they're getting divorced. I'm not even sure why I'm posting this - mostly because I wanted to vent to strangers about how horrible this woman is, and I can't do it in real life. He's handling this extremely well and being super gracious and mature about it, and (to his credit) he isn't really into shit talking her, though she deserves it (and everyone he's told essentially reacts with some variation of "well, I guess now I can tell you all the things I never liked about her"). I, on the other hand, want to cunt punt her into next week. So, there that is. Thanks again for all the original comments - the helpful ones and the not so helpful ones. It's always kind of cathartic to put this out into the ether and get it out of my head. TLDR; Laura "cheated" on Mark multiple times in the last four months, because she is a garbage person. They're getting divorced. Friends who know her are uniformly relieved, though sad for him. RELEVANT COMMENTS [deleted] Look, both were hoping that the other would compromise. Hoping that the other would budge, and neither did. So why does she get shit for not opting out of the relationship? Mark could've done the same and called the wedding off. But he told you they were still going through with it. OOP She gets shit because she lied and cheated. Simple as that. MormonsAreBrainwashd "Cheated" in an relationship that Mark himself made into an open one. Mmmk. ~ smacksaw Well that explains a lot. You probably ought to have mentioned that before. I'm probably on the other side of this issue, but Mark reaps what he sows. She is insecure. She is having anxiety constantly and is in a state of perpetual panic. He suggests having an open relationship and he has female friends he won't give up? Come on. You can't be that naive. What a scumbag. He loaded the gun and put it in her hand and dared her to use it. She gave him a taste of his own medicine: What he put her through. I have to wonder about people like this and why you're friends with either of them. I don't have a problem with open relationships, I had them when I was younger and it was fine. You don't suggest it to people who are insecure and feel threatened by them. Oh, and you're surprised she found a guy right away? I'm not. How could you be? I don't care if my post makes you feel bad, it gets downvoted, whatever. She did something shitty, I'm not excusing it, I'm explaining it. I'm giving you the reason. Stupid is as stupid does. Mark is toxic. He brought out the worst in Laura, cultivated it and then crushed her with it. She is cruel because she learned from the best: Mark. And if you want to associate with him, I think you need to look at yourselves. You and Julie. Because I sure as hell wouldn't. OOP I think, given my last post and this one, this is not an unreasonable conclusion if you fill in some blanks. I won't ask you to trust me when I say that, over the last few months, it has become clear to me (because I've caught Laura in multiple lies/omissions/truth manipulations) that her previous complaints about Mark and her seeming anxiety/stress were, at best, wildly exaggerated, and at worst clear attempts to make herself look like a victim to get sympathy from others. She has lost friends over this (her best friend/maid of honor almost dropped out of the wedding) in ways wholly unrelated to her relationship. Also, I don't think Mark forced her into anything. He was clear that he wanted a relationship where this was at least a possibility, and she said it was. I agree that her clear reluctance should have been a huge red flag and, in my opinion, enough to call it off, but he chose to take her word for it, particularly because she was so eager/enthusiastic about the enterprise after she found someone she liked. (Also, not that it's particularly necessary to the story, she has had at least three separate partners that I know about, and he had none. He was happy for her and supportive of her relationships, as long as they weren't outright betrayals of his trust. He is also treating her very kindly even now, in terms of logistics and splitting assets, and doesn't want his friends to bad mouth her or be rude to her.) I understand you think he is toxic and cruel, and nothing I say over the internet is likely to convince you otherwise, but I will just have to disagree. ~ dammit_need_account I dunno man. You're painting him to be the good guy here, but he asks his monogamous fiancee to have an open relationship? That's hurtful shit and a recipee for retaliation. If it were me and my bf/fiance did that I'd dump him asap, but I guess she went for the slow burn. jsingh0928 I'm glad I wasn't the only one thinking this. He had a monogamous relationship with her. Even got engaged to her, then sort of back peddled on his commitment with the request of an open relationship. That is the kind of request you bring wayyyyy early in a relationship. Like second or third date early. You don't ask that right when you are about to do an act that is the symbol of monogamy like marriage. It also sounds like that she was at least somewhat of a decent person until he asked her about the open relationship. Then shit hit the fan. At that point she looked obnoxious and angry to everyone by misplacing her anger from the request of the open relationship (and general issues stemming from her relationship.) She clearly didn't want an open relationship, but did it for him. Then that tension of doing something she did not want to do caused waves and ultimately ended the relationship. You need to be a 100% on the same page with open relationships. Not 95% or 75%. Otherwise it simply will not work. It wasn't just her. Mark is equally at fault here. OOP I wasn't clear about this - this wasn't something he knew he wanted walking into the relationship. His views on this evolved over time, and she was aware of this and participated in conversations about it. When he finally decided it was what he actually wanted (before they got engaged), he told her, and she eventually agreed. He wasn't trying to hide the ball. fuk_dapolice "she eventually agreed" yeah that means she INITIALLY wasn't into it. which means he begged and pleaded and whined until he got his way. Doesn't sound like she was ever too into it and got pressured. He should have either dropped it, or dumped her. THIS IS A REPOST SUB - I AM NOT THE OOP DO NOT CONTACT THE OOP's OR COMMENT ON LINKED POSTS, REMEMBER - RULE 7 submitted by /u/Direct-Caterpillar77 to r/BestofRedditorUpdates [link] [comments]
Direct-Caterpillar77 · Jun 4, 2026
r/cybersecurity
Researcher Drops a New VS Code Zero-Day After Losing Trust in Microsoft’s Disclosure Process
https://securityaffairs.com/193128/security/researcher-drops-a-new-vs-code-zero-day-after-losing-trust-in-microsofts-disclosure-process.html submitted by /u/sunychoudhary to r/cybersecurity [link] [comments]
sunychoudhary · Jun 4, 2026
r/indiameme
If embarrassing at world stage was a video. Bhai why he just can’t ans the question bruh said zero was invented in India 😭😭😭 in a response to why should we trust you
submitted by /u/optimusprim007 to r/indiameme [link] [comments]
optimusprim007 · May 19, 2026
r/kpoppers
Which K-pop group would you trust to perform live with ZERO backing track?
(MAMAMOO, TREASURE, SHINEE, BABYMONSTER, SEVENTEEN, BTOB, ITZY, EXO, NMIXX) submitted by /u/twinkle_twinkleee to r/kpoppers [link] [comments]
twinkle_twinkleee · Mar 31, 2026
All threads (41)
Thread Source Author Date
RE:Hướng dẫn selfhost Bitwarden miễn phí bằng Fly.io
Zero Trust said: Bitwarden trên Cloudflare chạy ngon hem các bác Thấy k ổn nên thôi chuyển về selfhost, dùng tạm thôi. 1password vẫn ngon nhất.
voz.vn jerryno6 Jun 19, 2026
RE:Xin tư vấn trồng cây ớt
Zero Trust said: Nhà em có cây ớt mà ko biết kiểu gì nó ko đậu trái, nó cứ lớn cao lên. 1 tháng trước em tìm hiểu xong cũng cắt bớt lá để dinh dưỡng nó tập trung đậu quả hay gì gì đó xong rồi nó cứ cao lớn rồi xum xuê như vậy View attachment 3672358 ớt đực cmnr ớt tôi tồng 20cm là trái sum xuê
voz.vn rickly_2006 Jun 19, 2026
RE:Last night who watched Joanne Peh livestream , she was sobbing quite badly as she talking
... the day of due to "zero respect from merchant", she wrote... where people’s time, effort and trust are not respected, and where ...
forums.hardwarezone.com.sg yperic Jun 19, 2026
RE:Testing Cold Email for Local Lead Gen – $0 Ad Spend, All Hustle
... process works from scratch with zero ad spend. Will post again... as possible. 1. Performance + Visual Trust Cold B2B traffic judges you...
www.blackhatworld.com ServerlessArch Jun 19, 2026
RE:The Amazing Digital Circus (& The Last Act): Spoiler Tag Til Release (6/19)
... things, betrayed the main cast's trust several times, and lashed out... express his regret, even with zero expectations of being forgiven, not...
forums.somethingawful.com Bad Seafood Jun 19, 2026
RE:Hur grundar man en stiftelse som förvaltar ens tillgångar i evinnerlig tid?
... Internationellt använder man oftast begreppet "Trust" eller "Foundation" (stiftelse) i...historiska regeln om att en trust måste upplösas efter 80–... pengar. 3. Caymanöarna (STAR Trust)Caymanöarna har en unik juridisk...som heter STAR Trust.Fördelar: I en vanlig trust kan släktingarna (... pengar. I en STAR Trust har förmånstagarna inga juridiska rättigheter...slängde in hälften i Avanza Zero utan att jag ens ...
www.flashback.org Paddan1000 Jun 19, 2026
RE:[NSW, ACT, VIC, QLD] LG 77" OLED EVO AI C6 4K Smart TV $3,303.10 Delivered (Selected Areas Only) / C&C / In-Store @ Bing Lee
@p3r514n: Sir I’m going to do absolutely zero research myself and trust in what you said. Ordering the 77” LG 🫡
www.ozbargain.com.au portard Jun 19, 2026
RE:What's working better than expected in SEO right now ?
... n AI overview scrapers just trust it instantly. it completely bypassed... lag just because there is zero technical debt for the bots...
www.blackhatworld.com ServerlessArch Jun 19, 2026
RE:MENACE: If Darby is Nerfed, We Riot
... have to reach a certain trust threshold with the faction to... Out [Base Perk] Sabotage costs zero AP. Corlain counts as two...
forums.somethingawful.com Pattonesque Jun 19, 2026
RE:Former Frog Marta Suarez is embracing the WNBA with an eye on her long-term growth
... the organization she chose to trust. "But it is true that... point of immense pride—and zero surprise. "Man, it doesn't surprise ...
247sports.com Melissa Triebwasser Jun 19, 2026
RE:What did you do to your C5 today? (2)
... are picked up by I trust it about zero. Mervs wheels may show...
www.corvetteforum.com Mr. Black Jun 19, 2026
RE:[Case Study] Young Vape Shop in Regulated Niche – Solid On-Page + Real Earned Links but getting absolutely fucked by Index Rationing & Weak Authority
... between position 40-75 with basically zero movement. Brand search is almost... "we need more links and trust" situation anymore. It looks like... moved the needle on domain trust and quality score instead of...
www.blackhatworld.com comeo1234 Jun 19, 2026
RE:Which niche categories have the worst link quality ratio on marketplaces right now?
... of these placements probably pass zero authority because the entire ecosystem..., you have more room to trust marketplace metrics as a starting ...
www.blackhatworld.com shubhamxseo Jun 19, 2026
RE:Retirement
... a better return - and trust me, there’s a whole multitude... people want greater returns with zero risk - or with no...
www.avforums.com MattW00 Jun 19, 2026
RE:6월 19일 QNL 오늘의 퀴즈
...로트러스트 (Zero Trust) 이란 양적완...
cafe.naver.com 사부랑삽작 Jun 19, 2026
RE:What's the Biggest Mistake People Make on LinkedIn?
... an AI corporate robot with zero human personality, which completely kills... blast out link spam with zero context myself, but i learned... to actually build real professional trust.
www.blackhatworld.com GhostlyGardener Jun 19, 2026
RE:Would you choose skill, connections, or money to restart online business?
i pick connections all day long cuz if u got a powerful network of insiders and heavy hitters, they can land u high-paying gigs instantly and share the exact blueprints of what works right now u can always hire skills with their money or use their budget to run massive tests, but u can't buy deep trust and high-level doors with zero leverage from the start
www.blackhatworld.com GhostlyGardener Jun 19, 2026
RE:Layoffs Have Started at EA Too, Reportedly
... devs I trust to be able to do so is essentially zero at...
www.neogaf.com KanKamAndNob Jun 19, 2026
Re: Rizzy.com | Crypto Casino | VIP TRANSFER | 100% Deposit Match + 100 FS
..." name and the Trustpilot accusations Zero affiliation with that other site... terms carefully. We'd rather earn trust over time than oversell on... something the community can actually trust over time, not just on...
bitcointalk.org Rizzy.com Jun 19, 2026
Only happens in India - Trust in judiciary is ZERO now.
Source: https://www.shoneekapoor.com/legal-news/domestic-fight-death-not-murder-hc/ submitted by /u/Western-Ask1377 to r/indiadiscussion [link] [comments]
r/indiadiscussion Western-Ask1377 Jun 16, 2026
My (26f) friend (26f) has accused me of stealing her boyfriend. Boyfriend (25m) had no idea they were dating
I am not The OOP, OOP is u/ThrowRAbfthief26 My (26f) friend (26f) has accused me of stealing her boyfriend. Boyfriend (25m) had no idea they were dating Originally posted to r/relationship_advice Original Post March 23, 2024 Names changed to respect privacy and throwaway account. Honestly no idea where to start with this and sorry if it's long. I (26f) have been friends with "Carly" (also 26f) since middle school. We lost touch after I moved out of state for law school but our parents are still friends. I moved back to our home state last year when I graduated and met "Matt" (25m). We bonded instantly as we're both studying to be lawyers. Matt should graduate this year if all goes well. Because of studying and work, we've taken things really slowly and only just recently became official. As we'd gone official, I decided to invite him to my sister's 21st birthday party. It was a huge party at my parent's house back in my home town. Both Matt and I work and live (separately) about an hour away. Wed been at the party for about an hour when Carly arrived with her parents. I was excited to see her as I'd been meaning to get back in touch since I'd moved back. The timing had never been right. Well, Carly spotted us and hurried on over. I was surprised when she gave Matt a huge hug and asked him what he was doing at the party. Turns out they work in the same building and Matt is friends with a few of Carly's friends. They've been out on group nights together a few times. I did the whole "Oh, Carly this is my boyfriend Matt" thing and her face instantly fell. She looked furious with me and ignored me for the rest of the party. I sent her a message the next morning asking if I had done anything wrong. Carly blew up at me and accused me of stealing her boyfriend and I soon got several rude messages from mutual friends sat Ng something similar. I met up with Matt and asked him what the hell was going on. I had assumed that once we'd made it official, we were exclusive. Matt had no idea what I was talking about. I relayed Carly's message and he was even more confused. He said that he got on with Carly when they saw each other but it had never been anything more than a friendship. He didn't think anything of them spending time together outside of work with friends so that's why I didn't know he and Carly worked in the same building. It's been a week since the party and I'm still getting messages from people 's how I could do that to Carly. I've tried saying over again that Matt and Carly weren't dating but it's falling on deaf ears. Even my parents have heard about from Carly's parents. I have zero idea the hell to do. Where do I go from here? I trust Matt completely but what do I do about Carly? Edit: People have asked about the friends who have sent me messages. These are all mutual friends of myself and Carly who we've known since high school. None of them, as far as I know, have ever met Matt. None of his work friends who also know Carly have sent me messages. Also I have spoken to Carly and we are meeting up tomorrow to talk. RELEVANT COMMENTS Not-nuts It seems you unintentionally busted up Carly's fantasy. Not your fault, not your problem. She's immature and full of drama. OOP She's never acted like this before and that's why it really rattled me. Sure, I haven't seen her much over the past few years but she was never like this in high school as far as I can remember. ApexCurve Why can’t you sit down with her and find out what the hell is going on? You’re studying law and 26, not 15. You of all people should know that but Matt said means absolutely squat. The truth is going to lay somewhere in the middle. Granted, you’re not in the wrong either way, as that girl needs to realize that there is no such thing as stole. He clearly wasn’t into her. And for crying out loud, she’s 26 and running to her mummy and daddy. Like so many, God have her parents failed her big time. OOP I'm meeting her tomorrow. It would have been sooner but I'm studying, working or with Matt so I don't have a lot of free time. Billowing_Flags If she can't produce "evidence" of her actually DATING Matt IRL (not just in her head), then I'd blow off her claims of GF status. There should easily be all kinds of social media pix, stories, check-ins, whatever evidencing a BF/GF relationship (not just a whole GROUP of people hanging out). Your generation is HUGE on social media presence. See what she can actually present! ETA: If she can't produce a sizeable number of pictures/posts of just the 2 of them dating, then I'd drop this friendship like a rock and BLOCK her because Carly would be a bunny-boiler! ~ DivinitySousVide Well this is a shit show created by Carly. I think you should just ignore her. So you know what your parents heard? Did they hear you broke up Carly and her BF? OOP "So you know what your parents heard? Did they hear you broke up Carly and her BF?" My mom called me the day after the party and told me that Carly's mom had been on the phone complaining about me. Carly had told her that I had stolen her boyfriend and then she called my mom. I told mom that wasn't the case but apparently Carly and her mom are still telling that story. OOP Updated the post March 24, 2024 (Same Post/Next Day) UPDATE: Well, I met up with Carly. They're not dating and never were so Matt isn't a cheater. I met up with Carly this morning at a coffee shop in our home town. She wasn't happy to be there but I'm over her feelings after the past week I've had. I sat her down and asked her to give me her side of the story. I told her exactly what Matt had said to me and asked for her to explain everything. Carly met Matt last year, not long before I moved back to the state. A mutual friend in the building they both work in invited Matt to after work drinks and that's when they met. Carly thought he was cute and started flirting with him. Side bar: Matt is awful at picking up flirting cues. It took weeks of me flirting with him until he realised and asked me out. This is something I always find amusing because Matt himself is really outgoing with a lot of charisma. No, they never spent any time alone together apart from the odd run to a coffee shop near their building to grab lunch. I went through Carly's phone and there are no messages from Matt apart from ones in their group chat. They haven't kissed or slept together. Carly has never been to Matt's apartment and Matt has never been to Carly's apartment. I asked her why she thought he was her boyfriend. This is a direct quote: "Ok so we're not officially boyfriend and girlfriend yet but I was sure he was going to ask me really soon. He's always smiling at me and making jokes. I know he was going to ask me out, just the two of us." I basically said "Carly, that's not him flirting with you. That's just Matt. He's a friendly guy! I'm sorry but he and I have been seeing each other for a while now so it's not going to happen." I explained how we'd been taking it slow because of us both being so busy with studying and work so we've only just made it official. As I said all this I could see Carly's elaborate fantasy crumble. I asked her to please set the record straight with her parents (for my parents sake) and with our mutual friends. Carly looked flustered but mumbled something that sounded like "Yeah, fine." I said I was sorry for this misunderstanding and hopefully we could all put this behind us. On my drive to Matt's apartment I called him to relay everything. He was baffled by the whole thing but said he would message Carly. Once I got there he showed me the text: "Hey Carly. Look, I'm sorry if I mislead you in any way with my actions, please know they have only ever been from a friendly place. I see us as friends but that's all. I hope we can be friends in the future once this has all blown over but if you're not comfortable with that then I respect it. All the best, Matt" Carly hasn't responded yet and I don't know if she will. Hopefully she will set the record straight with everyone, I'm washing my hands of this mess and focusing on my relationship with Matt and my studies! THIS IS A REPOST SUB - I AM NOT THE OOP DO NOT CONTACT THE OOP's OR COMMENT ON LINKED POSTS, REMEMBER - RULE 7 submitted by /u/Direct-Caterpillar77 to r/BestofRedditorUpdates [link] [comments]
r/BestofRedditorUpdates Direct-Caterpillar77 Jun 14, 2026
Me [30F] wondering whether I should tell a close friend [30M] that he shouldn't marry his fiancee [27F]
I am not The OOP, OOP is u/weddingwhistleblower Me [30F] wondering whether I should tell a close friend [30M] that he shouldn't marry his fiancee [27F] Original Post Aug 11, 2014 Apologies in advance for the wall of text. I have known my friend, we'll call him Mark, since college. We're very close and hang out together pretty regularly. Mark has been with his fiancee, let's call her Laura, since grad school (about 6-7 years). Mark and Laura have been engaged for two years, and will be married in a month (I know, I know, not much time here). For the first few years of the relationship, I had zero problems with Laura. She seemed a bit shy and reserved, which is unusual for our group of friends, but otherwise seemed like a fine partner for Mark. Indeed, my only reservation was actually that Mark, having a strong personality and being an overly rational/intellectual/argumentative person, sometimes seemed to run roughshod over Laura. Over the last two or three years, Laura has opened up a bit more, and initially that was really great. My girlfriend, Julie, and Laura became closer and started hanging out, and the four of us would go out regularly (either just us, or with other friends). It was actually pretty great. Recently, however, we started noticing that there are some key issues with their relationship that make us (and other friends, actually) wonder whether they should be together at all. Now that we know Laura better, we've realized she's insanely insecure and anxious. She is constantly complaining about minor things about the wedding, including his parents' small requests, and even the nice things they do for her. We've watched them argue about pretty personal stuff, and she is pretty happy to air their dirty laundry and complain incessantly about things that it's clear he'd rather discuss in private. She also has been somewhat cruel and unfair to him in our presence. Finally, and here's the key thing, they seem to have a pretty fundamental disagreement about a key issue in their relationship (think something as fundamental as whether or not to have kids), with him being in the firm "yes, I want to do this, and I need a partner who will at least consider it" camp, and her being in the "I am saying I'll consider it, but I'm pretty sure I'm ultimately going to not want to do this, and that you're kind of an asshole for asking me to do it in the first place." (The argument issue is fairly specific, and so I don't want to give more details for fear of identifying them.) In addition, they've been arguing, seemingly non-stop, for what seems like over a year, with Laura regularly complaining to my girlfriend that she's miserable, anxious, stressed, etc., because of various relationship issues (Mark is not a complainer, but we know he is similarly not happy). These are issues that, in our mind, are part of Mark's personality that won't change, and Laura knows they will not change -- for instance, Mark has long-term close female friends whose friendship he prioritizes highly. Laura thinks their interactions are inappropriate, and that he puts their needs above hers, but Mark has been clear that his interactions with them will not change. Mark also has a difficult, time-consuming career, and doesn't have much time to do household chores or spend time alone with Laura. Again, this is not something that will not change any time soon. Another big issue is Laura believes some of Mark's fundamental values have changed over the course of their relationship, things she admired and found attractive about him initially, and that now she doesn't like very much. As I said, my girlfriend and I have been seeing these issues for some time, and they came to a head recently, when we both sort of told them that they should think about postponing the wedding. They acknowledged that they had thought about it, and said they had a good long talk and decided they wanted to go ahead with it. They said they'd discussed all their issues and talked them through and come to a consensus. We trusted that they had, and sort of shrugged our shoulders. (It may be worth noting that although Mark was able to discuss this in a levelheaded way, Laura's response was to sort of withdraw for a few weeks and stop talking to us/hanging out with us, and to make it clear to our other friends that she was doing this because we didn't support their marriage. She later acknowledged that the reason she did this was because she felt there was some truth to what we were saying, and hanging out with us upset her because it brought those feelings up again when she was trying to get over them.) Just this weekend, we saw them argue again, including about that fundamental question I noted above, and it was clear that they are still in very different places, still unhappy, and still arguing constantly. It was also clear (and upsetting) that Laura was basically including us in the argument so she could badmouth Mark and try to get us on her side -- not only was it not working (because we think he's more in the right than she is), but it was also incredibly callous and hurtful to Mark, and she didn't seem to care. We've gotten to the point where it's actually hard to spend time with Laura. My girlfriend doesn't like her at all. I'm fine spending time with her, but really feel that they are not a good match and that they're going to make each other unhappy. At the very least, I feel they need to postpone this wedding until they actually HAVE come to a place where they derive happiness from the relationship, as opposed to this constant fighting about things large and small. The question is, should I talk to Mark about this? I've already shared some of what I'm thinking and been told everything is fine, but this time I might be a little more open and also tell him that I'm happy to handle some of the logistical post-wedding cancelling stuff (calling people, whatever) if that's something that's weighting on him. tl;dr: I don't think my friend should marry his fiancee. Should I tell him? UPDATE: See Julie's comment below, also. Julie u/somynameisjulienow Julie I am the "Julie" in question. I would add this to what my love, the OP said: While we have "sort of told them they should think about postponing the wedding", that was in a very light-handed way, hoping to spark a conversation, and took place almost a year ago, long before lots of new and troubling information arose. If we were to have the conversation now, it would be far clearer, far more detailed, and include a lot of things that we didn't know at that time. In other words, the first conversation was "have you guys talked about postponing the wedding?" and this one would be "do not marry this woman: she is awful, she doesn't even like you, you're unhappy, and it's only going to get worse." Perhaps this is a rationalization, but I truly believe that he does not know that we think this wedding is a bad idea and he definitely does not know that we actively dislike his fiancee. I frankly struggle to see how we will be able to have the kind of friendship we used to have with Mark if they go through with it. That's not a threat ("It's her or us!") it's just reality. As OP said, I cannot stand Laura for more than a few minutes at a time, I cannot help but take everything she says in the most negative possible light, seeing every comment as confirmation of my bad opinion of her, and I hate the way she treats him. I don't know if I'll be able to treat her with the kind of respect and kindness that is required of even having a decent relationship with her husband. I can already see myself avoiding spending time with them as a result. Even conversations that have nothing to do with this are tinged by awkwardness, not just on our end, but on theirs, because they know we see the problems (even if they don't know how upset we are by them). Ultimately, I'm leaning away from saying something. I think that there is such a small likelihood of a good result (him calling off the wedding) and such a high likelihood of a bad result (she comes to hate us and it dooms our relationship with him, and/or causes her to badmouth us to mutual friends) that I think it's a bad idea. As a side note, I don't put any weight on the "let them make their own decisions" responses here because that's so obvious it's not worth worrying about. Of course they get to make their own decision: we're not going to actively try and stop the marriage if they go through with it. The question is whether what we have to say should be involved in that decision or not, because we love him and have perspective on it that he doesn't. Update Jan 18, 2015 (5 months later) So, Julie and I took the advice of most people here and kept our mouths shut about our feelings about Laura. We were enthusiastic at the wedding, and went out of our way to be gracious and kind to her in the run up to it and after. The wedding went off without a hitch, and we thought maybe they'd turned over a new leaf and after the stress of the wedding was removed, she'd be a better partner to him. Sadly, the opposite happened. I guess I should start by explaining that the key disagreement they had prior to marriage was about having an open relationship. He was very much in the "I want to at least explore this" camp, and she seemed very reluctant, and kind of pissed that he was asking her to consider this in the first place. Shortly before the wedding, however, she started to develop an interest in another man, and all of a sudden her doubts were all but gone. Mark was happy and excited for her, and things appeared to be going better. Unfortunately, that didn't last. Over the last few months, Mark and Laura have had increasingly bad fights, and pretty much every time we asked how things were going he'd respond with "not good." Whenever we hung out, she did increasingly annoying things (sulking if we weren't doing an activity she liked, leaving events without even saying goodbye, complaining that we were excluding her from things because we failed to somehow read her mind and determine that she wanted to do something other than what we were doing, etc.) We had a talk with Mark about this, and he sort of agreed that she was being ridiculous in several ways, that we had a right to be upset with her attitude, and said that maybe we should take a break from hanging out with her. We were fine with this, but it was pretty annoying that she was basically making him choose between spending time with us and with her. A few weeks after that conversation, he called us to tell us they're getting a divorce. We were pretty shocked - but here's the skinny: Shortly after they returned from their honeymoon, Laura went to see her, let's call him "boyfriend." She came back sad and upset, and told Mark that the guy had broken things off, presumably because he felt differently about the relationship now that she was married. He empathized and comforted her. A few days later, he noticed she was acting a little weird, checked her email, and realized that the "break-up" was a LIE. Essentially, boyfriend had told her they could only keep seeing each other if no one else, including Mark, knew about it. Instead of breaking it off, having a conversation with Mark about it, or anything else sensible, she decided to LIE to her husband so she could have an affair (and I call it an affair because, even in an open relationship, lying under these circumstances definitely makes it cheating in my book). He, of course, felt incredibly hurt and betrayed, but instead of kicking her to the curb (like I would have), he talked to her, and to the guy, to explain that this was unacceptable and uncool, but told them that he was fine allowing the relationship to continue. The only thing he asked was that, going forward, she refrain from sharing certain details of their relationship (Mark and Laura's) with the boyfriend. Reasonable request, no? Apparently not to her. A few months later, he finds out she's set up a separate email account and was using it to communicate with the boyfriend about precisely the kinds of things Mark had asked her not to share with him (she had left the account open, and had previously told him he was free to check her email and phone, as a way to regain trust after the first fuck up). She was also telling the boyfriend that she was thinking about a divorce because things were so terrible with Mark. Now, again, this is where I would've kicked her the fuck out. Instead, Mark takes a few days to cool off away from her, comes back, and tells her that she needs to break up with the boyfriend, and focus on fixing their relationship through therapy and closing off any other potential romantic partners. She is initially very apologetic and seems to want to work on things. But, of course, after a few days she starts throwing hissy fits because "she didn't know it was that big a deal to him," and he won't sleep in the same room as her, which to her means he's not really "trying" to fix it. (Keep in mind it's been less than two weeks since he found out she had betrayed him for the second time in less than four months.) He tells her he needs time - at this point he's seriously thinking about divorce, but doesn't want to give up on the marriage, considering it's been less than 6 months. And then. AND THEN. He comes home from hanging out with us for the evening, she comes home a bit later, and just basically tells him she just made out with some guy from her gym she'd been hanging out with. Essentially, she decided that things weren't going to work anyway, and she chose the most childish and hurtful way she could to end it. So, now they're getting divorced. I'm not even sure why I'm posting this - mostly because I wanted to vent to strangers about how horrible this woman is, and I can't do it in real life. He's handling this extremely well and being super gracious and mature about it, and (to his credit) he isn't really into shit talking her, though she deserves it (and everyone he's told essentially reacts with some variation of "well, I guess now I can tell you all the things I never liked about her"). I, on the other hand, want to cunt punt her into next week. So, there that is. Thanks again for all the original comments - the helpful ones and the not so helpful ones. It's always kind of cathartic to put this out into the ether and get it out of my head. TLDR; Laura "cheated" on Mark multiple times in the last four months, because she is a garbage person. They're getting divorced. Friends who know her are uniformly relieved, though sad for him. RELEVANT COMMENTS [deleted] Look, both were hoping that the other would compromise. Hoping that the other would budge, and neither did. So why does she get shit for not opting out of the relationship? Mark could've done the same and called the wedding off. But he told you they were still going through with it. OOP She gets shit because she lied and cheated. Simple as that. MormonsAreBrainwashd "Cheated" in an relationship that Mark himself made into an open one. Mmmk. ~ smacksaw Well that explains a lot. You probably ought to have mentioned that before. I'm probably on the other side of this issue, but Mark reaps what he sows. She is insecure. She is having anxiety constantly and is in a state of perpetual panic. He suggests having an open relationship and he has female friends he won't give up? Come on. You can't be that naive. What a scumbag. He loaded the gun and put it in her hand and dared her to use it. She gave him a taste of his own medicine: What he put her through. I have to wonder about people like this and why you're friends with either of them. I don't have a problem with open relationships, I had them when I was younger and it was fine. You don't suggest it to people who are insecure and feel threatened by them. Oh, and you're surprised she found a guy right away? I'm not. How could you be? I don't care if my post makes you feel bad, it gets downvoted, whatever. She did something shitty, I'm not excusing it, I'm explaining it. I'm giving you the reason. Stupid is as stupid does. Mark is toxic. He brought out the worst in Laura, cultivated it and then crushed her with it. She is cruel because she learned from the best: Mark. And if you want to associate with him, I think you need to look at yourselves. You and Julie. Because I sure as hell wouldn't. OOP I think, given my last post and this one, this is not an unreasonable conclusion if you fill in some blanks. I won't ask you to trust me when I say that, over the last few months, it has become clear to me (because I've caught Laura in multiple lies/omissions/truth manipulations) that her previous complaints about Mark and her seeming anxiety/stress were, at best, wildly exaggerated, and at worst clear attempts to make herself look like a victim to get sympathy from others. She has lost friends over this (her best friend/maid of honor almost dropped out of the wedding) in ways wholly unrelated to her relationship. Also, I don't think Mark forced her into anything. He was clear that he wanted a relationship where this was at least a possibility, and she said it was. I agree that her clear reluctance should have been a huge red flag and, in my opinion, enough to call it off, but he chose to take her word for it, particularly because she was so eager/enthusiastic about the enterprise after she found someone she liked. (Also, not that it's particularly necessary to the story, she has had at least three separate partners that I know about, and he had none. He was happy for her and supportive of her relationships, as long as they weren't outright betrayals of his trust. He is also treating her very kindly even now, in terms of logistics and splitting assets, and doesn't want his friends to bad mouth her or be rude to her.) I understand you think he is toxic and cruel, and nothing I say over the internet is likely to convince you otherwise, but I will just have to disagree. ~ dammit_need_account I dunno man. You're painting him to be the good guy here, but he asks his monogamous fiancee to have an open relationship? That's hurtful shit and a recipee for retaliation. If it were me and my bf/fiance did that I'd dump him asap, but I guess she went for the slow burn. jsingh0928 I'm glad I wasn't the only one thinking this. He had a monogamous relationship with her. Even got engaged to her, then sort of back peddled on his commitment with the request of an open relationship. That is the kind of request you bring wayyyyy early in a relationship. Like second or third date early. You don't ask that right when you are about to do an act that is the symbol of monogamy like marriage. It also sounds like that she was at least somewhat of a decent person until he asked her about the open relationship. Then shit hit the fan. At that point she looked obnoxious and angry to everyone by misplacing her anger from the request of the open relationship (and general issues stemming from her relationship.) She clearly didn't want an open relationship, but did it for him. Then that tension of doing something she did not want to do caused waves and ultimately ended the relationship. You need to be a 100% on the same page with open relationships. Not 95% or 75%. Otherwise it simply will not work. It wasn't just her. Mark is equally at fault here. OOP I wasn't clear about this - this wasn't something he knew he wanted walking into the relationship. His views on this evolved over time, and she was aware of this and participated in conversations about it. When he finally decided it was what he actually wanted (before they got engaged), he told her, and she eventually agreed. He wasn't trying to hide the ball. fuk_dapolice "she eventually agreed" yeah that means she INITIALLY wasn't into it. which means he begged and pleaded and whined until he got his way. Doesn't sound like she was ever too into it and got pressured. He should have either dropped it, or dumped her. THIS IS A REPOST SUB - I AM NOT THE OOP DO NOT CONTACT THE OOP's OR COMMENT ON LINKED POSTS, REMEMBER - RULE 7 submitted by /u/Direct-Caterpillar77 to r/BestofRedditorUpdates [link] [comments]
r/BestofRedditorUpdates Direct-Caterpillar77 Jun 4, 2026
Researcher Drops a New VS Code Zero-Day After Losing Trust in Microsoft’s Disclosure Process
https://securityaffairs.com/193128/security/researcher-drops-a-new-vs-code-zero-day-after-losing-trust-in-microsofts-disclosure-process.html submitted by /u/sunychoudhary to r/cybersecurity [link] [comments]
r/cybersecurity sunychoudhary Jun 4, 2026
If embarrassing at world stage was a video. Bhai why he just can’t ans the question bruh said zero was invented in India 😭😭😭 in a response to why should we trust you
submitted by /u/optimusprim007 to r/indiameme [link] [comments]
r/indiameme optimusprim007 May 19, 2026
Which K-pop group would you trust to perform live with ZERO backing track?
(MAMAMOO, TREASURE, SHINEE, BABYMONSTER, SEVENTEEN, BTOB, ITZY, EXO, NMIXX) submitted by /u/twinkle_twinkleee to r/kpoppers [link] [comments]
r/kpoppers twinkle_twinkleee Mar 31, 2026
What Is Zero Trust Security? My Simple Explanation
Zero Trust flips the old security model on its head. Instead of trusting everyone inside the network, it trusts no one by default, and that shift changes everything about how modern organizations protect themselves. The Three Core Principles Zero Trust is built on three ideas. Everything else flows from them. 1. Never Trust, Always Verify No user, device, or network connection is trusted by default—regardless of where it is or where it's coming from. Access decisions are made based on identity, context, and policy, not network location. This sounds obvious when stated plainly, but it represents a complete inversion of legacy thinking. In a traditional network, being on the VPN or the corporate LAN implicitly granted a level of trust. In a Zero Trust model, those signals carry no weight. You prove who you are and what you need, every time. 2. Least Privilege Access Every user, application, and system should have access only to what it specifically needs to do its job—and nothing more. Access should be scoped to the minimum required, granted for the minimum necessary time, and revoked the moment it's no longer needed. This principle limits the blast radius when something goes wrong. If an attacker compromises an account with least privilege access, they inherit only that account's narrow permissions. If they compromise an over-provisioned admin account, they potentially own your entire infrastructure. 3. Assume Breach Operate as if an attacker is already inside your environment. Design your systems so that a single compromised component can't cascade into a catastrophic failure. This mindset changes how you build everything—network segmentation, logging, detection, response. "Assume breach" doesn't mean accepting defeat. It means building for resilience. It means your monitoring and detection capabilities matter as much as your prevention controls. If you're looking to implement Zero Trust in your startup, read my other article on this submitted by /u/Jumpy-Performer-940 to r/CyberIdentity_ [link] [comments]
r/CyberIdentity_ Jumpy-Performer-940 Mar 27, 2026
AITAH for not wanting to move into a house I’ll never have any legal claim to?
I (38F) signed a prenup before marrying my husband (42M) because he has significant business assets and investment properties. The agreement says that anything purchased before or even during the marriage is separate property unless it’s jointly titled. And even if something is jointly owned, ownership is strictly based on financial contribution. So if one person pays 90%, they own 90%. If we divorce, he keeps everything that’s his separate property, and I would only receive my portion of jointly owned assets based on what I financially contributed. That's what we agreed on and I'm fine with that In the event of death, it’s different. Anything held jointly would 100% pass to me. But anything he owns separately would pass to his nephew. From what he’s said, his nephew would essentially control everything he owns (as executor or trustee). I also have no issue there. Now he’s talking about buying his parents’ house and having us move into it as our family home. It would be purchased into a trust and structured as his separate property. If we divorce, I would not get the house or any equity, which I understand and accept under the prenup. The problem - I asked what would happen to the house if he dies. He said our 10-month-old daughter would be the beneficiary, and his nephew would be the trustee/executor. So I wouldn’t own the house, control it, or have guaranteed rights to remain there in the event of his death. I’m struggling with the idea of building our family life in a home that I’m structurally guaranteed not to have a long-term claim to. I’m not trying to undo the prenup or take his family’s property. I just feel uneasy about making our primary family home something I have zero legal protection in. AITAH? EDIT 1 - Holy cow I didn't expect this post to gain so much traction. I posted it last night before bed and woke up to too many comments to even read through. I'll edit again later today to provide some clarification on a few things. EDIT 2: Additional Info I read most of the comments and ok got it, consensus says I'm the idiot but NTA. Here are added details that should address many of the comments. Nephew – He does NOT automatically get everything. He would be the executor of my husband’s will, not the sole beneficiary. Assets would be distributed based on whatever the will says. The issue is the will hasn’t been updated since we got married, so I don’t actually know what it will say. For context, his nephew ran my husband’s company for almost 2 years while he was overseas, so I think he should inherit a fair amount of business-related assets. Daughter – Our daughter will likely be named beneficiary to things. I just don't know what. The nephew being executor just means he would administer the estate, not that he personally inherits everything. Timeline (I know I'm going to get decimated for this but whatever) – We met December 2023. Both divorced, no kids, ages 36 and 40, both wanted a family. Started trying to conceive March 2024. Pregnant August 2024. Signed prenup December 2024. Married April 2025. Baby born April 2025. I know that sounds wild. But we knew what we wanted and went for it. Prenup – It’s strict because we had only known each other about a year. I did not get independent counsel (my choice). I genuinely do not want any business assets. I was with my first husband for 10 years and I walked away from assets we built together because peace of mind mattered more to me than arguing over anything. I don't regret that for a second. My financial situation – I have a decent paying job and solid retirement savings. I own: – 1 rental property myself – 1 rental property jointly held with husband (50/50 financial contribution) – 1 rental property jointly held with husband where I’ll likely contribute about 25% financially (still being renovated). Edit 3 - Final clarification I think a lot of people misunderstand my concern. I’m not concerned with the prenup and with our assets being separate. My only concern is our "family home" - whatever house we decide to settle into and raise our daughter in - could be his parents house, could be any other house. If he dies before me, I think I should be the sole beneficiary of whatever home we are living in at that time. I am not talking about or thinking about any other asset. submitted by /u/spangleddangle to r/AITAH [link] [comments]
r/AITAH spangleddangle Mar 4, 2026
WARP+ vs Zero Trust
I've been using Zero Trust for quite some time. Recently I've seen that that with Discord Nitro I also get WARP+ for free (which is usually $4.99). Now I wonder what is the actual advantage of WARP+ over Zero Trust? I wouldn't pay for WARP+, but since now I already have it bundled with Discord Nitro I still don't see what's the benefit of using it. Zero Trust is free, the VPN function seems to me exactly the same as with WARP, and I can also access my home network and have some additional settings to play around with. Is there something I'm missing here? What's the point of WARP+? submitted by /u/KerneI-Panic to r/CloudFlare [link] [comments]
r/CloudFlare KerneI-Panic Feb 4, 2026
Pangolin 1.13.0: We built a zero-trust VPN! The open-source alternative to Twingate.
Hello everyone, we are back with a BIG update! TLDR; We built private VPN-based remote access into Pangolin with apps for Windows, Mac, and Linux. This functions similarly to Twingate and Cloudflare ZTNA – drop the Pangolin site connector in any network, define resources, give users and roles access, then connect privately. Pangolin is an identity aware remote access platform. It enables access to resources anywhere via a web browser or privately with remote clients. Read about how it works and more in the docs. Github: https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin YouTube Demo: check out a short demo video showing the new features in action. NEW Private resources page of Pangolin showing resources for hosts with magic DNS aliases and CIDRs. What's New? We've built a zero-trust remote access VPN that lets you access private resources on sites running Pangolin’s network connector, Newt. Define specific hosts, or entire network ranges for users to access. Optionally set friendly “magic” DNS aliases for specific hosts. Platform Support: Windows GUI client - Full native GUI application MacOS GUI client - Native macOS experience Linux CLI - Command-line interface with Pangolin CLI Once you install the client, log in with your Pangolin account and you'll get remote network access to resources you configure in the dashboard UI. Authentication uses Pangolin's existing infrastructure, so you can connect to your IdP and use your familiar login flow. Android, iOS, and native Linux GUI apps are in the works and will probably be released early next year (2026). Key Features While still early (and in beta), we packed a lot into this feature. Here are some of the highlights: User and role based access: Control which users and groups have access to each individual IP or subnet containing private resources. Whole network access: Access anything on the site of the network without setting up individual forwarding rules - everything is proxied out! You can even be connected to multiple CIDR at the same time! DNS aliases: Assign an internal domain name to a private IP address and access it using the alias when connected to the tunnel, like my-database.server1.internal. Desktop clients: Native Windows and MacOS GUI clients. Pangolin CLI for Linux (for now). NAT traversal (holepunch): Under the right conditions, clients will connect directly to the Newt site without relaying through your Pangolin server. How is this different from Tailscale/Netbird/ZeroTier/Netmaker? These are great tools for building complex mesh overlay networks and doing remote access! Fundamentally, every node in the network can talk to every other node. This means you use ACLs to control this cross talk, and you address each peer by its overlay-IP on the network. They also require every node to run node software to be joined into the network. With Pangolin, we have a more traditional hub-and-spoke VPN model where each site represents an entire network of resources clients can connect to. Clients don't talk to each other and there are no ACLs; rather, you give specific users and roles access to resources on the site’s network. Since Pangolin sites are also an intelligent relay, clients use familiar LAN-style addresses and can access any host in the addressable range of the connector. Both tools provide various levels of identity-based remote access, but Pangolin focuses on removing network complexity and simplifying remote access down to users, sites, and resources, instead of building out large mesh networks with ACLs. More New Features Analytics dashboard with graphs, charts, and world maps Site credentials regeneration and rotation Ability for server admins to generate password reset codes for users Many UI enhancements Release notes: https://github.com/fosrl/pangolin/releases/tag/1.13.0 ⚠️ Security Notice CVE-2025-55182 React2Shell: Please update to Pangolin 1.12.3+ to avoid critical RCE vulnerabilities in older versions! submitted by /u/jsiwks to r/selfhosted [link] [comments]
r/selfhosted jsiwks Dec 12, 2025
setting up Zero Trust to allow a connection to MariaDB
I've tried following a couple of guides and ... not had much luck. I end up with a tunnel that says it's healthy, but can't connect to MariaDB on the remote machine from the command line or tools. any pointers, or step by step to make sure I'm doing the right things and not confusing anything would be welcome! So, the scenario. I have MariaDB running on a Debian machine at home (ip address 192.168.1.25 on internal network). bind-address = 0.0.0.0 and happy to respond when I connect to the VPN that the whole network is on. But, I want to give access just to that machine/port to someone, and thought Cloudflare Zero Trust would be fun to try. I set up a tunnel and that said it was healthy. I set up a zero trust authentication policy to allow a specific email address to log in, and confirmed that the warp+ client would log in with that. I added an application using 192.168.1.25 and post 3306. But can't get it to connect. Kinda stuck now, and would appreciate any suggestions submitted by /u/offbeatmammal to r/CloudFlare [link] [comments]
r/CloudFlare offbeatmammal Aug 28, 2025
Indian Infrastructure runs on Zero trust, where the train is running at 10 kmph on bridge and people are stopping vehicles on the road below. Why they are doing that??
submitted by /u/IncellishStud to r/indianrailways [link] [comments]
r/indianrailways IncellishStud Aug 11, 2025
Who here is actually implementing Zero Trust in a meaningful way?
So is it a concept that makes you look strategic or are you actually implementing it? And i don't mean in the broad meaning of the term but real microsegmenetation, continuous identity verification, real time access evaluation, etc.... what actually worked? And is it worth the pain or is it just a buzzword? Thank you for you input in advance submitted by /u/Cyber_consultant to r/cybersecurity [link] [comments]
r/cybersecurity Cyber_consultant Jul 22, 2025
Cloudflare zero trust, authentication
My selfhosted applications currently use Cloudflare dns proxy which guides them to Nginx when then reverse proxies my applicatons. This works well currently. Talking to an person I met at a social gathering he asked if I used Cloudflare tunnels yet. I am now looking into this and it seems great, I love the extra layer of authentication it can offer too. which will work for most things I host. The only thing I wonder about. my sabnzbd can be accessed via api key by a usenet indexer and whilst I use sonarr etc for most things which may not be affected I do at times use their website to search for one offs which is where the api access comes in. Is it possible to put my sab lets say sabnzbd.example.com behind a tunnel with authentificartion but still use api functions by giving that api, passthrough in some way or form? submitted by /u/_Rens to r/selfhosted [link] [comments]
r/selfhosted _Rens Jun 30, 2025
Exposing Immich to the internet
Heyyo all, hope you're doing well. I'm a very happy user of Immich and have no complaints about it. However, because I use it to have shared albums with friends and family, I can't have it running under a VPN. I've been exposing it with NGINX via a reverse proxy in Docker, since I'm on Windows. What security measures do you take in NGINX, so that you are protected? Not talking about TLS, since I'm using http2.0 and TLS1.3. So far, I've enabled gzip and restricted the auth API endpoint to 1 request per second (just that one, to prevent spam). Thanks :) submitted by /u/happySTEFnr1 to r/immich [link] [comments]
r/immich happySTEFnr1 May 13, 2025
Any Experience with Zero Trust via Illumio
Hi, I am looking for any company or person who has tried implementing illumio to manage the microsegmentation. We have looked at multiple presentations of the product and what it can do and how it works etc. but I wanted to know if anyone has hands on experience with the product and its management system. Can you recommend it? Did it overall introduce a benefit to the company? For security reasons (and technical limitations of the number of vlans) we need some sort of zero trust product that itself does not become a single point of failure. So Illumio does look fairly nice with its modification of the host firewall. We also have a huge amount of software that does all kinds of communication that is not always documented so the learning / sniffing mode that finds out what communication or systems without agents exist is also very nice. It also enables a partial roll out bit by bit. We do not expect to ever reach 100% Rollout but rather secure larger chunks of the "normal" Linux / Windows Servers that we have. TLDR: Any experiences with Illumio or very similar products you can share? submitted by /u/22Anonymous to r/networking [link] [comments]
r/networking 22Anonymous Apr 11, 2025
My grandpa's west german monster of an angle grinder. I spun it up and turned it right off again. How do you get used to operating something like this? I have zero trust in this death machine even though it would be really useful for big stock
submitted by /u/Civil_Attention1615 to r/Blacksmith [link] [comments]
r/Blacksmith Civil_Attention1615 Mar 22, 2025
Cloudflare zero trust best practices
Hi everyone! I host the typical set of apps (Home Assistant, Immich, Paperless, Jellyfin, ...) and I use them both from the local network as well as over the Internet using Cloudflare tunnels. I also use most of the apps both via web browser and from a native iOS app. I recently setup Google authentication for Immich using Google Auth Platform so I can log in using my Gmail account and access the app. Now my question is what's the best practice for securing all the apps this way. Do I need to create a new Google Cloud project for each of them and repeat the process? It seems so because OAuth uses authorized domains which is app specific. I couldn't find any comprehensive guide to secure the whole homelab. Just individual howtos which I already went through. Thanks in advance for any hints. submitted by /u/pepastach to r/selfhosted [link] [comments]
r/selfhosted pepastach Feb 24, 2025
Never trust a game trailer that shows ZERO GAMEPLAY
submitted by /u/TWWOVG to r/memes [link] [comments]
r/memes TWWOVG Sep 5, 2024
Zero-trust Security, it sounds good in theory from what I've read. But how's it being applied in the real-world?
I get that zero trust security is all about "never trust, always verify." But here's the thing – won't this mess with how easily employees can get stuff done? I'm also wondering how they're actually making this work in the real world. Anybody care to break it down for me? submitted by /u/anekantavad to r/cybersecurity [link] [comments]
r/cybersecurity anekantavad Aug 18, 2023
LPT: Use zero trust with unfamiliar incoming calls - Control the conversation - Do not confirm anything - Ask for their info, hang up, and research!
I can't say this enough because I feel like as time goes on the frequency of hearing about fraud from family/friends/co-workers is increasing. If a you receive a call and you don't know the number, do not confirm any information - Example: You pick up the call and hear "Hi, am I speaking with Bob?" Don't even respond to their question, ask them for their information and reason for calling. Do not let them have control of the conversation. Collect information from them, not the other way around. Tell them you will call them back. Do your research, Google their information. Is it a company that is familiar to you? Do you remember doing business with them? Search your bank and email history using their information. If you can't find links between you and the person your calling, don't call them back. If they call you back and are persisting you owe them money just follow the rules above and continue to try and get information from them. Ask them for times/days of transactions, anything you can think of. I'm truly saddened at how people are so easily being taken advantage of. Please spread awareness. submitted by /u/sibble to r/LifeProTips [link] [comments]
r/LifeProTips sibble Dec 28, 2022
I Have “Zero Trust” in U.S. Government: Wife of Brittney Griner, Basketball Star Detained in Russia
submitted by /u/themimeofthemollies to r/sports [link] [comments]
r/sports themimeofthemollies Jun 22, 2022

What influencers are talking about this?

Ravdeep Sing Maan
@ravdeepmaan
Cybersecurity expert and influencer focused on zero trust architecture and practices in digital security.
Samantha W. Bun
@samanthawbun
Tech enthusiast and thought leader sharing insights on zero trust models for modern security strategies.
Jacob W. Sing
@jacobwsing
Information security consultant and influencer discussing the implementation and benefits of zero trust in the IT landscape.
Jennifer Hasley
@jenniferhasley
Cybersecurity advocate highlighting the importance of zero trust principles for business resilience and data protection.
Tommy Greene
@tommygreene
IT professional and speaker sharing knowledge on zero trust security frameworks and best practices.