Ionq Stock

Quote History Originally Posted By sentionaut: I think we may see sleeper cell shit, but who knows. View Quote I think IonQ stock will be $3000 per share by Christmas, but who knows.

...: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1772119733.A.C7F.html...驚艷請參考IONQ 跟 CRCL 02/26 23...

Ionq is up 20 percent today after taking a battering in the recent sell off. Finally, a stock that smashes expectations and actually rises on the news!

...$20.00 in shares of IonQ common stock, subject to a collar, for...share of SkyWater common stock held at close of the ... SkyWater shareholders will receive IonQ stock valued at $20.00 per ... weighted average price of IonQ stock as of three business days ... will receive 0.3326 IonQ shares per SkyWater share, or ... will receive 0.5265 IonQ shares per SkyWater share. https://www.ionq.com/news/ionq-to-acqui ... ...

...$20.00 in shares of IonQ common stock, subject to a collar, for...share of SkyWater common stock held at close of the ... SkyWater shareholders will receive IonQ stock valued at $20.00 per ... weighted average price of IonQ stock as of three business days ... will receive 0.3326 IonQ shares per SkyWater share, or ... will receive 0.5265 IonQ shares per SkyWater share. https://www.ionq.com/news/ionq-to-acqui ... ...

Ionq... a stock with 23 percent short. Looks like it could be a good short squeeze. Better prospects than this .�

...: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1771863819.A.77D.html.../24 01:17 → reall860523 : CRWV IONQ 前陣子也看...

... provider. The world's largest cybersecurity stock, Palo Alto Networks $PANW beat... $TJX. The quantum computing scams, IonQ $IONQ and D-Wave Quantum $QBTS... low-volatility for months as the stock carves out a potential distribution..., HD is a mess. The stock remains stuck in a wide, ... four. Perhaps most notably, the stock has experienced positive post-earnings drift ...

...도 섹터 TOP 5 (STOCK ONLY) 1) Technology — NVDA, AAPL... (STOCK ONLY) 1) Crypto Mining — WULF, MARA 2) Quantum Computing — IONQ, QBTS...

...% PETRONOR E&P ASA 0,47% IonQ 0,45% PayPal 0,45...,21% C Cycclone Inc. Common Stock 0,11% BGF World Gold...

.... Plug Power: Which Fuel Cell Stock Leads in 2026? BE's surging...   3 Unpleasant Truths Investors in IonQ, Rigetti Computing, D-Wave Quantum, and... on Rocket Lab, upgrading the stock to Overweight from Equalweight and ... really paying for today. The stock last closed at US$225.52, ...

... hear from another Mag 7 stock when Apple reports after the.... Read More » QBTS or IONQ: Which Quantum Stock Wins After January Sell-Off...

... Supply Chain with SkyWater Acquisition (IONQ) IonQ (IONQ) is modestly lower after announcing ... in cash and $20 in IONQ stock (subject to a collar). Operationally, ..., and potential dilution from the stock component. With the deal expected ... bln investment into CRWV's common stock at a purchase price of ....com Analyst Insight: CRWV’s surging stock price reflects the market’s recognition ...

...cash and $20 in IonQ stock for each share of SkyWater...biggest deal yet for IonQ, which has a market value...own branded chips. The stock portion of the SkyWater deal ...quantum platform business,” allowing IonQ to speed up its manufacturing ... of our nation.” IonQ went public through a merger ...funding toward these initiatives. IonQ already does work with the ...string of deals for IonQ. Last year, it signed a ...

...", "WISH", "CLOV"],             "10. Quantum Computing": ["IONQ", "RGTI", "QUBT", "HON", "IBM", "MSFT...(self, ticker):         try:             stock = yf.Ticker(ticker)             hist = stock.history(period="1y... hist.empty: return None                          info = stock.info             cur = hist['Close'].iloc...

submitted by /u/SolongLife to r/StockOptionsAlerts [link] [comments]

Oil prices surpassing $100/barrel and rising inflation fears are triggering market volatility for quantum computing stocks IonQ, QBTS, and RGTI, highlighting macro sensitivity of early-stage deep-tech equities. QuantumStocks #QuantumComputing #News #Informaq https://iq.fp2.dev/ySFNG submitted by /u/therealfatumbot to r/informaq [link] [comments]

Quantum computing stocks are so overvalued - no commercial use case, computers dont work and revenue is fake. This is exactly like 3D printing in 2014, Cannabis in 2019 & NFTs in 2022. Once all the fraud is over stocks like IONQ, RGTI, QUBT, QBTS will all drop 85%+. submitted by /u/Longjumping-Swim2854 to r/ValueInvesting [link] [comments]

IonQ closed at $33.03, down 3.62% in the latest trading session, underperforming the broader market. No operational or technical quantum computing developments cited as cause. IonQ #QuantumStocks #News #Informaq https://iq.fp2.dev/fKnJQ submitted by /u/therealfatumbot to r/informaq [link] [comments]

IonQ's trapped-ion approach delivers superior accuracy over Rigetti's superconducting method. Q4: IonQ posted $61.9M revenue vs Rigetti's $1.9M, though both remain unprofitable. Analyst favors IonQ as the stronger near-term quantum investment. QuantumComputing #IonQ #News #Informaq https://iq.fp2.dev/vqmlU submitted by /u/therealfatumbot to r/informaq [link] [comments]

IonQ (NYSE: IONQ) shares dropped 3.1% after the company filed a prospectus supplement allowing a major stockholder to resell over 2.5 million common shares, signalling potential dilution pressure. QuantumComputing #IONQ #News #Informaq https://iq.fp2.dev/x0YXG submitted by /u/therealfatumbot to r/informaq [link] [comments]

IonQ reported ~3x revenue growth in Q4 2025, outpacing analyst forecasts, yet shares sit 21% below 2026 opening levels — highlighting a disconnect between operational performance and market sentiment. QuantumComputing #IonQ #News #Informaq https://iq.fp2.dev/bdktA submitted by /u/therealfatumbot to r/informaq [link] [comments]

I wanted to start making more professional analysis/reports on stocks that interest me. I spent a lot of time on this, so I would appreciate it if you could give an upvote. Sometimes I post things that people do not like BUT I do not want retail holding the bag. THIS IS NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE THIS IS MY OPINION. While looking at historical share price history for IONQ I found a particular pattern eerily similar to today. For Q2 2022 earnings release they had a gain of 2.24% on earnings day, next day 31.7% gain, day after -6.2% loss. The following week the stock closed 16%. 2026 (Present) 6.2% gain on earnings day, next day 21.7%, day after -6.2% loss. Another similarity was that Q2 2022 earnings beat on both revenue and EPS. They also gave a strong guidance for the rest of the year. This time it beat on revenue and EPS again. They also gave good future guidance. This earnings report is arguably a better beat though. There is an absolute mountain of GEX and DEX exposure right at the $40 strike. Market makers made this a price ceiling in the short term. There are over 20,000 call options at this price point. Market makers don't want to pay out the profits so they actively short the stock hedging against it so it does not break that level. The Put/Call volume ratio (using GEX and DEX) is 0.39 for next week, meaning the market is crowded with call buyers, probably retail. The next major downside magnets sit at $36 based on the DEX and GEX clusters. Max pain (the level where most options expire worthless and where market makers try to push the price to, to avoid paying hefty profits) and then $32 which is the max pain for next week. The stock is well above max pain for this week meaning market makers had to pay out more profits than they expected, this could mean next week they are more incentivized to push it down further. Implied volatility (IV) is siting at 115.5% for next week. This means the options market is pricing in an expected move of +-$6.14. So it could go either $44.50 or $32.20. The Put/Call volume ratio for today is 1.57, meaning the market is leaning more bearish for next week. So even though IV tells us the magnitude of the price swing next week it is leaning bearish. Macroeconomic similarities Around the same time in August 2022 SPY reached its local top for the month near the same time IONQ peaked for that month. After that inflation fears kicked in and hope for fed rate cuts died. We are seeing a similar pattern now, inflation fears remain high, inflation report came out today worse than expected. High beta tech stocks like IONQ are very rate cut sensitive. The market dropped its expectations for rate cuts today because of the report. With no rate cuts incoming I see IONQ and other risky tech stocks trading sideways. Something else I thought was interesting the 2-year price correlation between Bitcoin and IONQ is 0.8536. 1 is perfectly correlated, 0.5 is somewhat correlated. Bitcoin and IONQ move pretty closely together and people have been very bearish on Bitcoin. Higher inflation means less rate cuts, which are bad for Bitcoin. This also tells me that the market treats IONQ like a crypto coin or a very speculative investment. We will see what happens next week and the months going forward. Let me know what you guys think. Edit: typos, missing words. submitted by /u/alemorg to r/stocks [link] [comments]

I recently started using OpenClaw to help me trade better, and I wanted to start making more professional analysis/reports on stocks that interest me. I pay lots of money for the subscriptions for this data, so I would appreciate it if you could give an upvote. Sometimes I post things that people in this subreddit do not like BUT I do not want retail holding the bag. THIS IS NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE THIS IS MY OPINION. While looking at historical share price history for IONQ I found a particular pattern eerily similar to today. For Q2 2022 earnings release they had a gain of 2.24% on earnings day, next day 31.7% gain, day after -6.2% loss. The following week the stock closed 16% over the next 5 trading days. 2026 (Present) 6.2% gain on earnings day, next day 21.7%, day after -6.2% loss. Another similarity was that Q2 2022 earnings beat on both revenue and EPS. They also gave a strong guidance for the rest of the year. This time it beat on revenue and EPS again. They also gave good future guidance. This earnings report is arguably a better beat though. There is an absolute mountain of GEX and DEX exposure right at the $40 strike. Market makers made this a price celing in the short term. There are over 20,000 call options at this price point. Market makers don't want to pay out the profits so they actively short the stock hedging against it so it does not break that level. The Put/Call volume ratio (using GEX and DEX) is 0.39 for next week, meaning the market is crowded with call buyers, probably retail. The next major downside magnets sit at $36 based on the DEX and GEX clusters. Max pain (the level where most options expire worthless and where market makers try to push the price to, to avoid paying hefty profits) and then $32 which is the max pain for next week. The stock is well above max pain for this week meaning market makers had to pay out more profits than they expected, this could mean next week they are more incentivized to push it down further. Implied volatility (IV) is siting at 115.5% for next week. This means the options market is pricing in an expected move of +-$6.14. So it could go either $44.50 or $32.20. The Put/Call volume ratio for today is 1.57, meaning the market is leaning more bearish for next week. So even though IV tells us the magnitude of the price swing next week it is leaning bearish. Macroeconomic similarities Around the same time in August 2022 SPY reached its local top for the month near the same time IONQ peaked for that month. After that inflation fears kicked in and hope for fed rate cuts died. We are seeing a similar pattern now, inflation fears remain high, inflation report came out today worse than expected. High beta tech stocks like IONQ are very rate cut sensitive. The market dropped its expectations for rate cuts today because of the report. With no rate cuts incoming I see IONQ and other risky tech stocks trading sideways. Something else I thought was interesting the 2-year price correlation between Bitcoin and IONQ is 0.8536. 1 is perfectly correlated, 0.5 is somewhat correlated. Bitcoin and IONQ move pretty closely together and people have been very bearish on Bitcoin. Higher inflation means less rate cuts, which are bad for Bitcoin. This also tells me that the market treats IONQ like a crypto coin or a very speculative investment. We will see what happens next week and the months going forward. Let me know what you guys think. Edit: Typos, missing words submitted by /u/alemorg to r/IonQStock [link] [comments]

Let's see, maybe LAES is next! submitted by /u/rickertsnaak to r/sealsq [link] [comments]

New to this but there’s a ton of buzz generating on all of these. Interested in hearing what you all think and if you have significant investments in any/all of these submitted by /u/Ready_Astronaut_915 to r/TheRaceTo10Million [link] [comments]

Fellow IonQ bagholder here, currently holding at a loss. I’m trying to look past the day to day price action and focus on what could realistically push the stock higher. IonQ always gets attention when quantum computing sentiment heats up, but outside of that it’s been pretty choppy. So I’m curious what people see as real catalysts from here. Are there any upcoming contract wins, government deals, earnings surprises, or tech milestones that could matter? Or is this still mostly a long term story where near term moves depend more on sector hype than fundamentals? submitted by /u/West-Chard-1474 to r/IonQStock [link] [comments]

What should I check first? submitted by /u/Hot-Attorney5957 to r/StockInvest [link] [comments]

Reposted with positions. Mods removed it because it had no positions (I replied with my positions to a comment asking for them). My background: I'm a graduate student and researcher in quantum complexity theory. I'm not a hardware engineer, but I do follow developments in quantum hardware closely. Based on my analysis, I have serious concerns that QUBT’s claims may amount to fraud. Positions. I fully believe that the stock of this beverage-company-turned-quantum-computing should go to $0 (or close to it) and it is only a matter of time before it does. I will split this post into a few parts. First, we will review their fundamentals. Then, we will look into their future claims. Finally, we will review any contracts and future prospects. 1) Fundamentals. The market cap of QUBT is $3.73 billion and for the three-month period ending June 30, 2025, QUBT reported revenues of $61,000 (yes, you read that right), a decrease from the $183,000 generated in the same quarter of the previous year. They do not have a P/E ratio, as they are unprofitable (you could think that their P/E ratio is high and negative). This means that they have an enterprise value of roughly $3.38 billion which comes almost entirely from their market cap and with a revenue of $263k, their EV/revenue ratio is 12.870. To put it into perspective how extreme that is: Company Enterprise Value/Revenue QUBT 12870 IONQ 419 GOOGL 8 RDDT 20 If you think RDDT is inflated, then QUBT is roughly 643 more inflated. Equivalently, RDDT's price would be $137,602 with QUBT's ratio. This isn't just a premium or hopeium, this is complete detachment from any financial logic or reality. The company's operational model is a financial black hole. While generating almost no income, its operating expenses nearly doubled year-over-year to $10.2 million for the quarter, resulting in a $10.2 million operating loss. That means the company spent over $167 for every single dollar it made in revenue. The bottom line was a net loss of $36.5 million for the quarter. QUBT's narrative is that it's a pioneer in one of the most capital-intensive R&D races in human history. Yet, its R&D investment totaled $6.0 million. To compare, Google and IBM are forming partnerships to pour $150 million into university research alone, with their internal budgets estimated to be in the billions. How can QUBT possibly compete, let alone innovate, when its R&D budget is a rounding error for its serious competitors? 2) Their future plan. This is straight from their presentation. For 2025, they claim "Early revenues primarily from early adopters." This is their present reality: microscopic revenues. For 2026-2027, they project "High-margin revenue from first mover advantage" and "Strong pipeline conversion." These are classic, undefined marketing terms. What constitutes "high-margin"? 20%? 80%? How much revenue? A million dollars? A hundred million? The lack of any figures makes these claims meaningless. There is no way to measure their performance or hold them accountable. They have no viable plan to get an advantage. In 2028, the goal is "Sales Growth => Market Growth." This is a generic corporate objective, not a financial forecast. It's a promise to perform well in an undefined future market. They sell something they call the DIRAC-3, which is an analog quantum annealer. It is not a universal quantum computer capable of running a wide range of algorithms. Its sole function is to find approximate solutions in a a narrow category of optimization problems. In practice, its actual use is almost certainly confined to experimental and research settings. The buyers are not businesses looking to solve their core operational issues, but rather academic institutions or corporate R&D labs that are exploring novel computing architectures. For these niche customers, the DIRAC-3 serves as a piece of laboratory equipment to test theories, publish papers, and perhaps make small claims in quantum-adjacent research. The almost non-existent revenue confirms that it is not being deployed for any meaningful commercial or production-level task. The primary reason a research group might acquire a DIRAC-3 has little to do with solving a pressing business problem better than a classical computer. Its appeal lies in its novelty and convenience. The machine's use of "qudits" and its analog architecture makes it a fun object of academic study at the very best. In essence, someone would want the DIRAC-3 not because it provides a superior solution, but because it is a comparatively cheap tool for exploration and playing around, not a tool for production. The future prospects for the DIRAC-3 appear exceptionally bleak. It is trapped in a brutally competitive field and it has failed to demonstrate a decisive advantage. To be commercially viable, it must solve a specific, high-value optimization problem significantly faster or cheaper than the highly-refined classical software that has been developed over decades. There is zero evidence that it can do this, and it will never be able to do so. Its potential market is being squeezed from both sides: classical optimization algorithms continue to improve, while the slow but steady progress of true universal quantum computers (i.e. by Google and IBM) threaten to make such intermediate devices obsolete. The DIRAC-3's most probable fate is to become a technological footnote. It is an interesting but ultimately unsuccessful architectural experiment that never found a problem it could solve well enough to justify its own existence in the commercial world. They make some claims of what they "will develop": First is the Photonic Intelligent Unit (PIU), or "Reservoir Computer," which is being marketed as a revolutionary device for "compute at the edge" and Artificial Intelligence. This is straight up misleading and the reality is that reservoir computing is a highly obscure, academic niche even amongst researchers. It has zero commercial adoption. The AI market is not asking for this and it never will, not even in 20 years. AI is built around GPUs and specialized AI chips from NVIDIA, Google, and Apple. The notion that QUBT's niche device, based on a fringe computing model, could make even the smallest dent in this market is laughable. It is a solution in search of a problem, a research gadget being passed off as a commercial AI accelerator. Its only potential customers are a handful of academics, not the enterprises driving the AI revolution. I fully believe they only included the word "AI" as a buzzword to attract and scam more investors into their sham of a company. Next is the Quantum Cyber Module (QCM), which promises "unconditional security at chip scale" and is supposedly destined for "cell phones." This is pure fantasy. At its core, this device is likely just a Quantum Random Number Generator (QRNG), a piece of hardware that has been around for years. While useful for specific cryptographic applications, the market is small, and established competitors like ID Quantique have dominated it for over a decade. The claim of putting this technology into a cell phone is absurd. The cost, size, and marginal benefit over existing cryptographic algorithms make it a non-starter for any mass-market device. It is a commodity component being dressed up in a superhero costume of "unconditional security" to attract investors who are fearful of cyber threats but ignorant of the actual technology. Finally, the company claims to have a "Quantum Intelligent Sensing Module" (QISM) focused on LiDAR applications, boasting "unparalleled detection accuracy." This is, perhaps, the most ridiculous claim of all (and they have made a lot of crazy claims!). Consider heavily-funded companies like Luminar and Velodyne fighting for razor-thin margins and massive automotive and defense contracts. These companies have invested billions in manufacturing scale, supply chains, and industry partnerships. QUBT has none of this. Their supposed technological edge (single-photon detection) is a known technique with its own significant drawbacks, not a magic bullet. They are entering a market with a lab prototype and a marketing slogan. Their sensing platform has no viable path to commercialization and stands zero chance against the alternatives. In conclusion, these other "gadgets" are not serious products. Each one is a lab-level prototype, carefully branded with the buzzwords of a hot industry (AI, cybersecurity, autonomous vehicles) to create the illusion of a diversified, high-tech portfolio. In reality, none of these products have a credible path to generating meaningful revenue or competing in their respective markets. 3) Lawsuits and future contracts. QUBT is now facing multiple securities class-action lawsuits that accuse the company and its leadership of securities fraud. The allegation is that QUBT deliberately misled investors through a series of false statements and material omissions designed to artificially inflate its stock price. A central point in the lawsuits is the systematic misrepresentation of its relationship with NASA. The company presented itself as a key strategic partner, implying its technology was integral to the space agency's operations. The lawsuits allege this was a calculated falsehood. In reality, the company had only received a few minor Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grants. These are common, low-value awards and do not represent a major strategic partnership. The plaintiffs argue that QCi improperly used the NASA brand to create a false impression of credibility and technological validation. In fact, you would be surprised how easy a company can get one of these contracts. The NASA Phase I grants QCi received were for approximately $125,000 to $150,000 each. It's the financial equivalent of a student receiving a $1,000 university grant to work on a science fair project, and then telling investors they have a major strategic partnership with the university to revolutionize the field. The legal complaints further allege that the company created a false narrative of commercial readiness. While executives claimed to have market-ready products like the DIRAC-3 and a significant sales pipeline, the company's public financial filings reported negligible revenue. This data is presented as direct evidence that the commercial operations described to investors were a fiction. The lawsuits contend that the company was not a viable business but was merely pretending to be one to support its inflated market valuation. Finally, the lawsuits claim that QCi made unsupported statements about its technological superiority, including achieving "quantum advantage," without providing the necessary scientific proof. The plaintiffs argue that these were not good-faith claims but were technical jargon used to intentionally mislead investors who could not independently verify their accuracy. These legal actions now pose a direct threat to the company's operational stability, demanding millions in legal fees, consuming management's focus, and causing irreversible damage to its reputation. 4) My personal note. The field of quantum computing and its adjacent disciplines is still in its embryonic stage. It is a very active research field with a lot of math to discover, but hardware progress is extremely slow and there are no signs that it will speed up any time soon. Any prospect of a profitable, commercial quantum computing business remains decades away. A conservative estimate would place the timeline for consistent profitability at 20 years or more, and even then, it will only be achieved by the organization that makes fundamental breakthroughs in research. That level of discovery will not come from an underfunded startup with a negligible R&D budget; it will almost certainly emerge from major research universities and/or Google and IBM. They possess scientific talent required to solve the hardest problems in science, QUBT does not. Given this context, the valuations attached to companies like Quantum Computing Inc. are fundamentally absurd. They are not based in any recognizable financial or scientific reality. The claims made by the company's leadership are not merely optimistic; they are so far removed from the current state of the art that no credible expert in the field would support them. This disconnect is so severe that it transcends poor business strategy and enters the realm of potential securities fraud. When a company's public statements and valuation are in such stark opposition to the consensus of the scientific community, it raises serious questions that demand investigation by the appropriate financial authorities to determine if investors were willfully deceived. submitted by /u/aizver_muti to r/wallstreetbets [link] [comments]

Today, ULTY added 6 new stocks (accounting for 10% of the portfolio) while also continuing to close/trim a former "core holdings". The basket is being refreshed with from sectors spanning autonomy and AI to quantum and crypto. They also sit on $820M in cash -- part of which is used for short put spreads, but all that cash still totals to 24% of AUM.   Key Links: Full Daily Recap (newsletter) Raw Data Tracker   ULTY Highlights: AUM: $3,462,821,465 (+0.8%) Inflows (est.): $39,123,000 (+1.1% to S/O) Cash balance: $820,474,215 (+32.0%) Options Net (Credit/Debit): -$35,044,676 Options Premium (SS/S): +$33,969,119 Position Changes: New: BMNR, FIG, PONY, QUBT, SOUN, SYM Closed: CRDO, IONQ, OKLO Top increased shares: BLSH (+176.9%), UPST (+12.6%) Top reduced shares: RGTI (-38.3%), SMR (-19.8%) Movers & Shakers (underlying performance) Winners: CRWV (+6.7%), SOUN (+6.5%), SYM (+6.5%) Biggest Losers: QUBT (-13.2%), OPEN (-12.4%), BMNR (-10.1%) SLTY Highlights: AUM: $11,592,103 (-1.1%) Inflows (est.): $0,000 (0 to S/O) Cash balance: $13,973,601 (-0.3%) Options Credit/Debit: -$39,236 Position Changes: New: N/A Closed: N/A Top increased shares: N/A Top reduced shares: N/A Movers & Shakers (underlying performance) Underperformers: BTDR (+9.1%), NBIS (+7.3%), SYM (+6.5%) Top performers: CRCL (-4.5%), ALAB (-3.2%), RH (-3.1%) submitted by /u/boldux to r/YieldMaxETFs [link] [comments]

I noticed IONQ's presentation on investors' day, and they shared some information about achieving targets, and also had one slide where they presented the revenue, which is doubling every year. But if you look at the expenses, they are much more than the revenue they are generating. I understand it is a growth company, but I am not sure of the complete technology. So, I am trying to get some insights and want to check if you guys are aware or have any idea what they are talking about. Similarly, I noticed RGTI, QUBT, and QBTS are all going up. Period Revenue Operating Cash Flow (or Cash Flow from Operating Activities) Q2 2025 (quarter ended June 30, 2025) US$20.7 million US$-85.6 million Q1 2025 Q1 revenue is $7.57 million US$-33M Full Year 2024 US$43.07 million − US$105.68 million approximately operating cash flow Full Year 2023 US$22.04 million US$-78.81 million~ operating cash flow Full Year 2022 US$11.13 million US$-44.70 million~ operating cash flow I understand NVDA has gone through the same cycle at one point, but as Jensen mentioned, he was just lucky that AI happened and GPUs were useful. I am not sure if Quantum is anywhere near. It takes more than 3 years as IONQ has presented to commercialize, and I'm not sure if there is an actual application that can leverage the technology fully. Thanks for your valuable feedback. Updated: IonQ reported a net loss of $177.5 million and an adjusted EBITDA loss of $36.5 million. With all the acquisitions and compensation to more leadership teams, losses are expected to increase to $ 250 million per quarter. To acquire Oxford Ionic, IONQ paid $1.065 billion in IONQ common stock and $10 million in cash. So, basically, the stockholders have already been diluted. Insider sales: Here’s a breakdown of recent trading of $IONQ stock by insiders over the last 6 months: PETER HUME CHAPMAN (Executive Chair) has made 0 purchases and 4 sales selling 6,001,209 shares for an estimated $231,229,952. MASI NICCOLO DE (President and CEO) has made 0 purchases and 3 sales selling 2,622,900 shares for an estimated $105,900,928. THOMAS G. KRAMER (Chief Financial Officer) has made 0 purchases and 7 sales selling 471,208 shares for an estimated $19,460,492. RIMA ALAMEDDINE (Chief Revenue Officer) has made 0 purchases and 4 sales selling 149,952 shares for an estimated $6,302,733. INDER M SINGH has made 0 purchases and 3 sales selling 130,961 shares for an estimated $5,291,564. KATHRYN K. CHOU has made 0 purchases and 3 sales selling 37,485 shares for an estimated $1,563,531. ROBERT T. CARDILLO has made 0 purchases and 2 sales selling 18,831 shares for an estimated $847,769. WENDY THOMAS sold 16,696 shares for an estimated $658,296. PAUL T DACIER (Chief Administrative Officer) sold 4,175 shares for an estimated $185,376. GABRIELLE B TOLEDANO sold 792 shares for an estimated $32,868. submitted by /u/Dizzy_Maybe8225 to r/investing [link] [comments]

Jensen literally said they were more "instrument" than "computer" and proceeded to laugh to their face for 2 hours. Not a single institution holds the stock other than for market making purposes, only monkeys with a robinhood account. Easiest money I'll ever make. Bookmark this post. https://preview.redd.it/k5t6qyw76ycf1.png?width=1376&format=png&auto=webp&s=12305c60bbed573ad13af6f445b7dd903f3c00d9 submitted by /u/Delicious_Nature_280 to r/wallstreetbets [link] [comments]

How far away is IonQ from being a stock you would want to buy? Do you own some now? Are you buying more? Or are you waiting for the price to drop. If so what Price would you buy more at. Seems like a very good opportunity to get into early but i have heard some people say that it wont be worth it for 15+ years. With how fast tech evolves couldn’t we see this make big leaps sooner? Is this the big boy stock of quantum computing or is it a different stock? It has been on my watch lost for a while now but i missed the big jump in stock price so it seems a little to high for me to buy right now but maybe im wrong. submitted by /u/ViktorBateman to r/stocks [link] [comments]

Morning fellas, I'm back after more than three years to bring you my highest conviction idea ever. I'm talking 90%+ downside. TL;DR: Quantum computing stocks are the next great meme bubble — a flaming clown car of hype, government grants, and zero actual business. Companies like $QBTS, $IONQ, $RGTI, and especially $QUBT (which literally used to sell flavored beverages) are pretending to be tech plays while burning through cash with nothing to show for it. Even if quantum computing becomes real, Google and IBM already won the arms race. Experts say useful quantum is still 20–30 years away — not 3. This is The Big Short 2: Quantum Boogaloo. I’m shorting these frauds before they drop another 90%. Strap in. Introduction: Quantum stocks ripped aggressively since the beginning of the year, after the announcement of Willow, Google's new quantum processor. First of all, Google didn't even come up with anything groundbreaking. Ironically, this also highlights how far ahead Google is from the competition. Even worse, some of the stocks below don't even make quantum computers at all. Quantum computing is 20-30y+ away, if at all. Yet the stocks trade like they cured cancer yesterday. This is honestly a lot worse than Nikola and EV stocks for those who were there back then. They are totally misunderstood by retail, and some of them literaly have 90%+ downside. Quantum Computing Basics: Quantum computing isn't a better computer. It's a compeltely different paradigm that is only useful to solve very specific and esoteric problems. Like factoring big prime numbers (even that doesn't even work yet) or doing weird matrix math only under certain condtions. To run these algorithms, you don't need just a couple qubits, you need error corrected logical qubits, which take thousands of physicals qubits. We're barely One of the biggest issues with quantum computeers is gate fidelity. This measures how a quantum gate actually performs its intended operation compared to an ideal, noise-free version of that gate. Today, even the best systems get around 99.9% fiedlity under perfect lab conditions. This sounds high, but due to the exponential scaling of quantum algorithms, erors compoound extremely quickly and at 99.9% they are literaly useless. Quantum algos need billions of error free operations and we're nowhere closes. For comparisons, classical computers have gate fidelity of between 10-15 and 10-18. Thats eighteen 9s after 99, or 99.99999999999999999%. Its not that quantum computers are behind classical computers - they're basically unusable Industry Experts Why should you believe me when I say quantum computing doens't work? After all I'm just a muppet. If you don't take my word for it, listen to the leading industry experts, that spend their days working on it. Scott Aaronson (Professor, UT Austin, top quanutm complexity theorist): "We're nowhere near large-scale quantum computers. The real applications are speculative and still a long way off" Jensen Huang (CEO, NVIDIA): "Quantum computing is decades away. It will not replace classical computing. It's a different tool for very specific problems." Dr. Isaac Chuang (MIT, pionner in quantum information): "Quantum computers are not yet practical, and may not be for a long time. The barriers are fundamental" Even if all these people are wrong, Google and IBM are so far ahead, that they'll be the clear winners. The Trade: The most overvalued and ridiculous names are: $QUBT, $QBTS, $IONQ, $RGTI. I'm short only the first two. They're all ridiculous, but at least IONQ and Rigetti have somewhat of a product. $QUBT: This is literaly a scam, they've got very little to do with Quantum. These guys were literaly a beverage company. They don't build quantum computers. They sell vague "quantum inspired" software with 0 commerical traction. They claim to be "hardware-agnostic", which literaly reads "we don't have a machine". Imagine being a quantum computing stock with no computer. Revenue in 23 was $100k, not millions, $100k. This is not even a real business, just a vehicule made to earn a quick buck. Their software doens't even require a qaumtum processor to run, it's just classical code with buzzwords. This is my highest conviction short. $QBTS: These guys make quantum annealers, not even a real quantum computer. They've een in business for 25 years, and only make $9m in revenue, with a market cap of $4.7bn. They were on the brink of bankruptcy, trading for $1, with no cash left. Then the Willow anouncement came and they manage to issue some stock and get some cash back. As a reminder, Willow has nothing to do with QBTS, this will end going back to 0 after the hype subsides. Positions: Short shares and puts https://preview.redd.it/3lvx60xuax3f1.png?width=528&format=png&auto=webp&s=7f523c7bd92d1368822272e88ec874f0d69b5b1f Godspeed lads submitted by /u/Pendigan to r/wallstreetbets [link] [comments]

President Donald Trump called for ending a bipartisan $52 billion semiconductor subsidy program that’s spurred more than $400 billion in investments from companies like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. and Intel Corp. “Your Chips Act is a horrible, horrible thing,” the president said in a prime-time address to Congress on Tuesday. Trump implored US House Speaker Mike Johnson to get rid of the legislation and use “whatever is left over” to “reduce debt or any other reason.” His remarks were met with applause in a chamber that passed the Chips and Science Act less than three years ago. Vice President JD Vance, whose home state of Ohio won a massive Intel project thanks to the law, stood up to show his support for its revocation. The Chips Act is among the most significant US forays into industrial policy in more than a generation. It set aside $39 billion in grants — plus loans and 25% tax breaks — to revitalize American semiconductor manufacturing, as well as $11 billion for chip research and development. The aim was to reduce reliance on Asia for electronic components that power everything from smartphones to massive data centers. Trump, however, has consistently derided a program he regards as a waste of government funds, arguing tariffs would achieve the same outcome while filling coffers. Republicans have also indicated that they want to repeal what they see as “social” provisions of the Chips Act. That could involve eliminating labor-friendly regulations or environmental requirements. Officials on both sides of the aisle have touted the Chips Act as crucial to US national and economic security, and Trump could have a hard time getting congressional support to repeal it. Dozens of GOP lawmakers voted for the measure, and many red districts have won factories or other projects supported by the law. That includes South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co. and SK Hynix Inc., which have committed to multibillion-dollar projects in Texas and Indiana that were contingent on funding and support from the US government. Company representatives declined to comment on the president’s remarks. Trump, favoring tariffs over incentives, has signaled that import levies on chips could come as soon as next month. Companies can avoid those duties, he has said, by building factories on American soil. He has not offered additional details. On Monday, Trump credited the tariff threats for TSMC’s decision to invest $100 billion in the US, on top of a previous $65 billion commitment. He touted that project in his address Tuesday, referencing the full $165 billion figure. “We’re giving them no money,” Trump said. “All that was important to them was they didn’t want to pay the tariffs.” A TSMC spokesperson declined to comment. The company originally announced plans for a $12 billion US site during Trump’s first term and expanded that project to three factories under Biden. To support those facilities, TSMC struck an agreement with Biden officials for $6.6 billion in Chips Act grants and $5 billion in loans. As is the case for other Chips Act awards, the funding is supposed to be disbursed over time, as TSMC hits negotiated project milestones. The company received $1.5 billion before Biden left office. Trump did not specify whether he would attempt to claw back money that’s already been disbursed, renege on remaining incentives to which the government has already committed, or simply not provide additional support for the chipmaker’s latest investment. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Monday that the newly announced projects — three additional chip plants, plus R&D and advanced packaging sites — won’t win federal funds. “The main uncertainty is the future of TSMC,” said Xin-Yao Ng, an investment director at abrdn plc. “One long-time competitive advantage was their clustering in Taiwan, where labor costs are still reasonable, construction costs are cheaper, government is supportive, and they can find more workers with vocational training. It’s completely different in the US if they are to shift more manufacturing. Subsidies from US were to be crucial to help mitigate some of the higher costs and challenges.” TSMC is among 20 companies that reached binding Chips Act agreements with Biden officials. The deals, which represent more than 85% of the manufacturing incentives available under the program, are designed to support leading-edge facilities by companies like TSMC, Intel, Samsung and Micron Technology Inc. — as well as older-generation factories by the likes of GlobalFoundries Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc. Companies have generally viewed those agreements as ironclad — regardless of who’s in office. But some of them have worried that the Trump administration could seek to modify the terms, Bloomberg has reported. Lutnick has said he cannot commit to honoring existing contracts without reviewing them first. That review is ongoing, and Lutnick’s intentions for the initiative remain unclear. So far, his questions to program staff have focused on the rationale behind award decisions and the government’s legal authority to claw money back, Bloomberg has reported. The current Chips Act team, meanwhile, has been preparing a list of potential adjustments to the funding application process and final contracts that would be minimally disruptive. A spokesperson for GlobalWafers Co., which won $406 million from the Chips Act for factories in Texas and Missouri, said the Taiwanese company is committed to its expansion strategy and views any changes to the Chips Act as “unlikely.” But if the law were to be modified in some way, the spokesperson said, “we would reassess future investments, including evaluating US market demand, pricing, and potential tariffs if production were moved outside the US.” My take: Brutally bad for semiconductor sector if CHIPS is actually repealed, INTC is especially targeted. There'd be less semiconductor manufacturing in the US (INTC/TSM/Samsung) primarily because we subsidize and have tax incentives for current US chip manfacturing projects, and companies that haven't received their funding will likely scale back projects (remember INTC delayed their Ohio plant to 2028?). The US would also be far more dependent on semiconductor production overseas. This also has spillover into the quantum computing stocks (IONQ/RGTI) and AI sector due to the sectors being so reliant on technological development and supply from the semis sectors. Overall don't think new tariffs are going to be an adequate replacement for what the US has committed so far (but we don't know much about the tariffs yet), and the markets hate uncertainty. Link: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-03-05/trump-calls-for-end-to-52-billion-chips-act-subsidy-program submitted by /u/WinningWatchlist to r/stocks [link] [comments]

Please watch this video in it's entirety if you have the time but if you don't I pulled out all the quotes below. Will Rich attended the quantum track of CES today and asked leaders from IBM, MSFT, IONQ etc the current position of the market. I made another post today which has more research into the pushback Jensen received from analysts and CEO's for his statement Quantum stocks rebound tomorrow??! D-Wave Quantum CEO Alan Baratz responded to Jensen - saying he's “dead wrong” about Quantum. What's next for RGTI, IONQ, QBTS, etc. [tomorrow and beyond]? Today Jan 9, 2026 Will Rich at CES https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xy__-MDkiSs I have been waiting ALL DAY for information out of CES and there's been nothing. FINALLY this video dropped from Will Rich. Here's the details about the panel and the conference website. TL;DR - quantum is NOW, hardware is good NOW they are working on software to fully take advantage of quantum NOW. Market cap currently $100b expected in 5-10 years $1-$3T Crazy quotes from the conference Any one of these statements is a crazy headline. See for yourself: "We firmly believe we are NOW in an era of Quantum Utility, we are very confident that quantum advantage is here." "Quantum is here. We don't need to understand quantum to use it, just like you don't need to understand electronics to use your phone." "Quantum technology has been here - LED lights are created with quantum understanding." "We need people to understand has been here and will continue to generate all sorts of new technologies." IBM "Since 2016, we have had 600,000 users have used our system running over 3 trillion quantum circuits on our system. We have deployed over 70 quantum computers. Over 250 organizations (universities, companies, labs) on our quantum network." IBM "there's a large group of people that use these machines already." "We are excited about quantum networking - the quantum internet." "We are creating a co-pilot like experience that automates the entire scientific reasoning loop -- algorithms and agentic framework will interact with you" "1.) The machines are reliable (higher fidelity, better error corrections, better algorithms) - lots of progress expected this year, more qubits plus better fidelity. 2) In terms of applications; very important application that affects everyone on this planet - solve these problems with combination of CPU + GPU + Quantum 3.) quantum + AI tons of potential. This will take quantum to next level in 2025 IBM, Quantinuum, IONQ - leaders in this space possiblities Biggest breakthroughs happening in biotech, batteries One use/example: 25 years of knowledge dumped into quantum computer - provided 8 results. Of the 8 results, they tested and found a Lithium Ion battery solution that was 70% more efficient. Another example: Cancers - they have protein peptides, but if you can figure out how to bind them together you can create a cancer vaccine for specific types of cancer. Recent error corrections are so good they are building SOFTWARE now because the hardware is so good already Another example: MSFT AI can pair with CPU/GPU/QPU to work on complex problems Hardware - what Jensen was referring to - full scale utility they est. 8 out (but this is hardware only and WIDE SCALE) Quantum is around $100bn industry. in 5-10 years could be 1-3 trillion market cap. Market looks promising! More momentum coming for Quantum. Thanks to Will Rich for going to CES and giving this industry a voice after. **With all the negative press out there Quantum, PLEASE consider sharing this POST AND to get some information out there to balance this conversation. ** Reality is stranger than fiction. HODL quantum BROS submitted by /u/ABadPhotoshop to r/WallStreetbetsELITE [link] [comments]

Quantum stocks took a massive hit on Wednesday, based on Jensen Huang's comments that the tech is 15-30 years away. But did Jensen unintentionally bring more attention, scrutiny and perhaps momentum to the industry? Let's examine. With over 100k views so far, check out D-Wave CEO Alan Baratz responding to Jensen. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qDJOIpWKk4&t Takeaways from this: He disagrees with Jensen Has current commercial clients (e.g. Mastercard) Basically saying his company will beat earnings and guidance in the next quarter [bullish!!] Now take a look at these analysts using this as a buying opportunity: https://www.thestreet.com/investing/stocks/veteran-analyst-who-was-early-to-quantum-computing-revamps-outlook-after-stocks-get-clobbered https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WG2TqJT5rJI Now take a look at this analyst saying the tech is here within 5 years and Jensen's comments are self-serving https://www.investors.com/news/technology/quantum-computing-ionq-stock-nvidia-nvda-huang/ Today at CES, there was a whole panel of Quantum. If anyone has any information, transcripts, etc. from those conversations i'm particularly intersted in what MSFT, IONQ and IBM representatives said in response to Jensen's comments. My prediction I have incomplete information. I think the CES conversations that happened today are really important to connect dots here. I think there is potentially market manipulation at play here. I would slightly lean to favor a rebound for all quantum stocks tomorrow - but i'm uncertain about performance beyond. Thoughts? EDIT:: HOLY SHIT THE UPDATE OF ALL UDPATES Will Rich just got back from CES and posted his video, I'm ULTRA BULLISH on quantum from here. https://old.reddit.com/r/WallStreetbetsELITE/comments/1hxtsex/jensen_is_wrong_massive_rebound_for_quantum/ submitted by /u/ABadPhotoshop to r/WallStreetbetsELITE [link] [comments]