Iphone 17 Pro Max Ultra

... iphone 17 iphone 17 pro max (3000nits) iphone 16 pro max (2000nits) Samsung S26 Ultra & S25 Ultra (2500) samsung S23 Ultra...

...함. 3. 폴더블 iPhone Gurman이 4~5년...전략: 올가을 iPhone 라인업을 분..., 폴더블과 iPhone 18 Pro/Pro Max에 스포트라.... 6. Mac Pro & Mac Studio Mac Pro 타워는...종임. 현재 M2 Ultra에서 업데이...Ultra 버전이 예정되어 있음. Mac Pro...것임. Mac mini (M4 Pro, $1,500 미만)도...입장임. 10. AirPods Max 3 최소 1~2...향 팀이 AirPods, AirPods Max, iPhone·iPad·HomePod·스마트...어 있음. AirPods Max가 Apple에게 개...있음. Gurman은 AirPods Max가 일종의 컬... 중임. 다만 iPhone을 대체하는... 장기적으로 iPhone을 대체하는...다고 평가함 17. 인재 유출 OpenAI...

... Charging Compatible With iPhone Air/17/16 Pro Max, Galaxy S25 Ultra, Pixel 9, iPad... Pro 2024/Air 5, MacBook Pro... iPad Pro 2024, iPad Air 5, MacBook Pro M3, MacBook Air, iPhone Air/17.../16 Plus/Pro/Pro Max, Galaxy S25/S24 Ultra, Mi 13..., Pixel 9 Pro, Huawei...

... For MacBook, iPad, iPhone Air/17/16, Galaxy S25, 1M Max, Black. The... can power up a MacBook Pro to 42% in just 30... of devices, including iPhone 17, iPhone 16, and Galaxy S25 Ultra, as well as...

Floorp schrieb: Das iPhone ist weiterhin das beste Allrounder Phone was einfach alles sehr gut kann. Leider ist iOS drauf, was es unbenutzbar macht. Aber mal davon abgesehen, was kann denn ein iPhone 17 Pro Max besser als ein S26 Ultra? Ich seh da jetzt keine signifikanten Ausschläge in die eine oder andere Richtung sofern man nicht bestimmte Details wie Magsafe oder den S-Pen braucht/will.

.../mo. | S26+ 20/mo. | S26 Ultra 22.5/mo. | $45 CAN-US... iPhone 17 Air $10 + $45 CAN-US 100GB iPhone 17 Air $0 + $70 CAN-Global 200GB   iPhone 17... $18.58 +  $45 CAN-US 100GB iPhone 17 Pro... $37.25 + $45 CAN-US 100GB iPhone 17 Pro Max...

TLDR: This single prompt generates stunning, museum-quality technical infographics for any object. I break down how this advanced prompt works, provide the full template, and show examples for an iPhone 17, a DJI Drone, and a MacBook Pro M5 that were created instantly with it. Recommend using this prompt with Google Gemini Nano Banana model. I have seen a lot of image prompts, but this one is different. It is a complete, self-contained system for creating beautiful and informative technical teardowns of any object you can imagine. Forget spending hours in Photoshop or Illustrator trying to combine renders with annotations. This prompt does it all in one shot, producing visuals that look like they belong in a high-end engineering manual or a museum exhibit. This is more than just a prompt; it is a workflow. It combines multiple advanced techniques into a single, powerful command. Today, I am breaking down why it works, giving you the full template, and showing you three incredible examples I generated with it. The Anatomy of a Perfect Technical Infographic Prompt This prompt is so effective because it is incredibly specific and layers multiple instructions together. It does not just ask for an image; it dictates a precise visual language. Best Practices Embodied in This Prompt: •Hybrid Style: It masterfully combines a realistic photoreal render with black ink technical annotations. This is the key to its professional look. You get the beauty of a 3D model and the clarity of an engineering diagram. •Dramatic Perspective: It specifically calls for a 45-degree isometric 3D perspective. This is a classic drafting technique that shows an object's form and internal structure in a way that a flat, head-on view never could. It adds depth, dimension, and a sense of drama. •Controlled Information Flow: The prompt uses a clear, color-coded system for annotations. This is a critical detail. By assigning specific colors to functions like power, data, and thermals, the infographic becomes instantly readable and easy to understand. Pro Tips for Adapting This Prompt: •Customize the Color Codes: The prompt suggests a standard color scheme, but you can adapt it to any system. For example, you could add a color for PURPLE (Audio Components) or YELLOW (Structural Elements). •Specify Cutaway Depth: You can guide the AI on how deep the cutaway sections should be. Try adding phrases like shallow cutaway revealing only the top layer of components or deep cross-section showing the core architecture. •Change the Annotation Style: While the prompt calls for a technical pen style, you could experiment with other styles like vintage blueprint annotations or minimalist digital callouts. The Ultimate Technical Infographic Prompt Template Here is the full prompt. Simply copy, paste, and replace the object with anything you want to visualize. Prompt Template: Plain Text Create a technical infographic of [OBJECT] with a 45-degree isometric 3D perspective showing the device slightly tilted to reveal depth and dimension. Combine a realistic photoreal render with black ink technical annotations on pure white background. Include: Key component labels with color-coded callout boxes Internal component visibility through transparent/cutaway sections Measurements, dimensions, and precise scale markers Material callouts and quantities Color-coded arrows for function/flow: RED (power/battery), BLUE (data/connectivity), ORANGE (thermal/processor), GREEN (sensors/haptics) Simple schematics or cross-sectional diagrams where relevant Place “OBJECT” title in a hand-drawn technical box (top-left corner). Style: Black linework (technical pen/architectural), sketched but precise. Object remains clearly visible. Educational museum-exhibit vibe. Clean composition, balanced negative space. Perspective: Isometric 3D angle—tilted to show depth, dimension, and internal architecture dramatically. Like a professional product teardown or engineering manual. Colors: ~10-15% accent density. Black dominant. White background. Output: 1080×1080, ultra-crisp, social-feed optimized. Prompt Examples: From Imagination to Reality I used this exact prompt to generate detailed infographics for three different products. The results speak for themselves. Notice how the AI correctly interprets the internal components and applies the annotation style consistently across all three. (The three generated images of the iPhone 17 Pro Max, DJI Mavic 4 Drone, and MacBook Pro M5 would be inserted here in the Reddit post) Hidden Things Most People Miss in This Prompt •The Hand-Drawn Title Box: This small detail adds a touch of authenticity and reinforces the “engineering manual” aesthetic. It feels more personal and less sterile than a standard digital font. •Educational Museum-Exhibit Vibe: This phrase guides the AI’s overall composition. It encourages clarity, clean composition, and a focus on making the information accessible and engaging. •Ultra-Crisp, Social-Feed Optimized: This is a practical instruction that ensures the final output is high-resolution and perfectly suited for platforms like Instagram, LinkedIn, or Reddit. It is thinking about the end use case directly within the prompt. This prompt is a masterclass in how to communicate with AI. It is specific, structured, and full of expert details that guide the model toward a brilliant result. Take it, use it, and start creating your own incredible technical visuals. Want more great prompting inspiration? Check out all my best prompts for free at PromptMagic.dev and create your own prompt library to keep track of all your prompts. submitted by /u/Beginning-Willow-801 to r/ThinkingDeeplyAI [link] [comments]

TLDR: This single prompt generates stunning, museum-quality technical infographics for any object. I break down how this advanced prompt works, provide the full template, and show examples for an iPhone 17, a DJI Drone, and a MacBook Pro M5 that were created instantly with it. Recommend using this prompt with Google Gemini Nano Banana model. I have seen a lot of image prompts, but this one is different. It is a complete, self-contained system for creating beautiful and informative technical teardowns of any object you can imagine. Forget spending hours in Photoshop or Illustrator trying to combine renders with annotations. This prompt does it all in one shot, producing visuals that look like they belong in a high-end engineering manual or a museum exhibit. This is more than just a prompt; it is a workflow. It combines multiple advanced techniques into a single, powerful command. Today, I am breaking down why it works, giving you the full template, and showing you three incredible examples I generated with it. The Anatomy of a Perfect Technical Infographic Prompt This prompt is so effective because it is incredibly specific and layers multiple instructions together. It does not just ask for an image; it dictates a precise visual language. Best Practices Embodied in This Prompt: •Hybrid Style: It masterfully combines a realistic photoreal render with black ink technical annotations. This is the key to its professional look. You get the beauty of a 3D model and the clarity of an engineering diagram. •Dramatic Perspective: It specifically calls for a 45-degree isometric 3D perspective. This is a classic drafting technique that shows an object's form and internal structure in a way that a flat, head-on view never could. It adds depth, dimension, and a sense of drama. •Controlled Information Flow: The prompt uses a clear, color-coded system for annotations. This is a critical detail. By assigning specific colors to functions like power, data, and thermals, the infographic becomes instantly readable and easy to understand. Pro Tips for Adapting This Prompt: •Customize the Color Codes: The prompt suggests a standard color scheme, but you can adapt it to any system. For example, you could add a color for PURPLE (Audio Components) or YELLOW (Structural Elements). •Specify Cutaway Depth: You can guide the AI on how deep the cutaway sections should be. Try adding phrases like shallow cutaway revealing only the top layer of components or deep cross-section showing the core architecture. •Change the Annotation Style: While the prompt calls for a technical pen style, you could experiment with other styles like vintage blueprint annotations or minimalist digital callouts. The Ultimate Technical Infographic Prompt Template Here is the full prompt. Simply copy, paste, and replace the object with anything you want to visualize. Prompt Template: Plain Text Create a technical infographic of [OBJECT] with a 45-degree isometric 3D perspective showing the device slightly tilted to reveal depth and dimension. Combine a realistic photoreal render with black ink technical annotations on pure white background. Include: Key component labels with color-coded callout boxes Internal component visibility through transparent/cutaway sections Measurements, dimensions, and precise scale markers Material callouts and quantities Color-coded arrows for function/flow: RED (power/battery), BLUE (data/connectivity), ORANGE (thermal/processor), GREEN (sensors/haptics) Simple schematics or cross-sectional diagrams where relevant Place “OBJECT” title in a hand-drawn technical box (top-left corner). Style: Black linework (technical pen/architectural), sketched but precise. Object remains clearly visible. Educational museum-exhibit vibe. Clean composition, balanced negative space. Perspective: Isometric 3D angle—tilted to show depth, dimension, and internal architecture dramatically. Like a professional product teardown or engineering manual. Colors: ~10-15% accent density. Black dominant. White background. Output: 1080×1080, ultra-crisp, social-feed optimized. Prompt Examples: From Imagination to Reality I used this exact prompt to generate detailed infographics for three different products. The results speak for themselves. Notice how the AI correctly interprets the internal components and applies the annotation style consistently across all three. (The three generated images of the iPhone 17 Pro Max, DJI Mavic 4 Drone, and MacBook Pro M5 would be inserted here in the Reddit post) Hidden Things Most People Miss in This Prompt •The Hand-Drawn Title Box: This small detail adds a touch of authenticity and reinforces the “engineering manual” aesthetic. It feels more personal and less sterile than a standard digital font. •Educational Museum-Exhibit Vibe: This phrase guides the AI’s overall composition. It encourages clarity, clean composition, and a focus on making the information accessible and engaging. •Ultra-Crisp, Social-Feed Optimized: This is a practical instruction that ensures the final output is high-resolution and perfectly suited for platforms like Instagram, LinkedIn, or Reddit. It is thinking about the end use case directly within the prompt. This prompt is a masterclass in how to communicate with AI. It is specific, structured, and full of expert details that guide the model toward a brilliant result. Take it, use it, and start creating your own incredible technical visuals. Want more great prompting inspiration? Check out all my best prompts for free at PromptMagic.dev and create your own prompt library to keep track of all your prompts. submitted by /u/Beginning-Willow-801 to r/promptingmagic [link] [comments]

This might sound like a really dumb question at first especially on an iPhone focused subreddit, a $599 phone has a different camera than $1199 phone duh. However, imagine you are in the shoes of a normal person who just wants an iPhone and you look at the Apple website to see which model to buy and also use the compare feature to assist you. You see all of these models have a 48mp fusion Main camera with the differentiating 'Pro' feature being that your lens has new generation stabilization. So this means that the main camera is an identical 48mp fusion main across the lineup with Pro's only advantage being more stability, right? Wrong. The most important specification for a camera is how much light it can gather which mostly depends on the size of the sensor. Bigger sensor = more light gathered. The 17 Pro's main features a big 1/1.28" sensor which means it's light gathering ability is technically superior to the latest $1299 S26 Ultra with a 1/1.3" sensor. The base iPhone 17/Air on the other hand feature a 1/1.56" sensor which is identical to the latest base model S26 but with slightly higher aperture which means even more light. The 17E's main on the other hand is a ridiculously tiny 1/2.55" sensor which puts it at the same tier as the iPhone XS or the Galaxy S10, both obsolete models that don't even get OS updates anymore. Now, of course the quality of output produced by these phones isn't exactly proportional to how big the sensor is and I'm sure a lot of people will be satisfied with Galaxy S10 sized sensor of the 17E but I feel like it's still important to at least be aware what exactly you are getting because there is still noticeable benefits. And remember if there wasn't a benefit, Apple wouldn't have added it which is something to remember. The reason why I made this post is because I myself have been looking to purchase the Air and I thought despite it only having single lens, if it at least has the 17 Pro's main camera it would still be justifiable but sadly that is not the case. I never got deeper and just assumed that till today. And if a nerdier than average person like me was so close to being fooled by this very smart intentional naming scheme Apple has going on, I can only imagine most people have absolutely no idea about this big difference that exists. TLDR: Having a 48mp Fusion Main could either mean your iPhone has a better sensor than the latest 1300$ 2026 S26 Ultra or worse than the 2019 S10. If camera is your priority, be sure to check sites like gsmarena or whichever that show the real specifications instead of relying on meaningless tags like fusion camera. submitted by /u/Lucky_Outside_2009 to r/iphone [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/Time-Credit43 to r/IndiaTech [link] [comments]

submitted by /u/Mandy587 to r/PhoneNow [link] [comments]

First of all, I’d like to clarify, this shouldn’t be used as a guide towards buying devices, there are many guides out there that are way better than what I have here, and this is only my personal opinion. My Background: I am a High School student here in Quebec, Canada, extremely interested in computer engineering related things, also an Apple Developer. I use two phones because of several reasons. But the main reason is that I have 4 phone numbers, 2 being personal, 2 for business, iPhone Air was bought as a secondary phone to run my tech company. I’m a subscriber of Apple One Premier and an additional 2TB iCloud Storage, which makes it 4TB in total. I don’t play games so I don’t have a “Gamer’s Advise” The two devices are: iPhone 17 Pro Max 1TB bought at launch and iPhone Air 256GB bought at around January, both with AppleCare+. Now, just to be clear, I’ve had a taste of nearly most, if not all Apple’s devices, but this year, it felt different with the introduction of iPhone Air. Weight: The first time I’m holding it, it was genuinely a “Holy S**t, this is real” moment. 17PM being the heaviest phone in Apple’s history vs Air being the lightest and thinnest. Spoilers: I find my self using Air more than 17PM now. Camera: 1.1 Rear: I believe this is something that most people will want to ask about. Through your my experience, I find the iPhone Air’s camera better than the iPhone 17 Pro Max (when used with the camera app). This is mainly noticeable when I’m shooting product pictures. Where sometimes on the 17, it would automatically switch to the macro mode which, yes captures details, but we lost depth, this never happens on the iPhone Air (and yes I know that there is a setting to disable it). Then onto the actual features, it wouldn’t be a suprise that the 17 have more features than the Air camera wise, Air’s zoom maxout at 10x while 17’s max out at 40x. Air doesn’t have features such as 0.5x, LOG, HDR, Raw, Cinematic mode, which I rarely use anyways, so taking pictures had really just been mainly using my Air, it’s so much easier to take out in and out through out the day. 1.2 Front: Same 1.3 Camera Control Button: I like Air’s Camera control button way more the 17ProMax and 17 Pro’s, iPhone Air is built in a way that the size is in the middle of both. The iPhone 17 Pro that I’ve bought I realized that I usually over reaches the CC button, which isn’t the best experience ever, which 17PM’s CC button is hard to reach, and even harder to click with one hand. Air’s camera control button (with the advantage of the size) is perfect, and I’d actually use the button on the Air. 2 Screen: 2.1 Quality: No noticeable difference 2.2 Dynamic Island: The iPhone Air’s Dynamic Island has been shifted slightly downwards for the camera module. There are reports saying how apps haven’t adapted to this change, but by the time I’ve got this iPhone, I haven’t experienced anything like this. 3 Speaker: I seriously don’t see any problems with the Air being mono sound, this might differ by people. The only thing that bothers me a little is that the sound coming out of the Air doesn’t have the “layers” and lacks of base. I used AirPod Pro anyways. 4 Battery Life: My honest opinion, Air Can provide you with one full day of normal day to day use, 17PM around 1.5 days. Not much of a difference, somehow. But when you mix two phones together, gosh it’s amazing. 5 Signals iPhone Air uses Apple’s proprietary C1X baseband, it mostly stays the same as my 17, however, it’s slightly so faster when the signals are strong, but C1X sometimes drops signals randomly (as in no signal completely) especially on sim2 if you have 2 esims. In basements iPhone Air cell reception beats iPhone 17PM, ALWAYS. 6 Heat iPhone Air does an extremely BAD job when it comes to heat distribution compared to 17PM, heats are concentrated on the top plateau section, but this rarely costs any problems. 7 AppleTV/Youtube If you are someone who likes laying in bed while watching content and you hate how you arms get tired, this phone is for you. 8 Storage The 17PM I bought despite having 1TB of storage, if you have iCloud 512GB is more than enough. Currently my 1.5TB of pictures are stored on iCloud, the actual phone storage still has around 800GB left. 9 Gaming Gaming on iPhone Air is slightly worse than 17PM, in this case, I tested using the good old Genshin Impact, all maxed out. (This is literally my benchmark now). It seems like Air would experience a lot more lags than 17PM, despite the phone being in normal temps. 10 flash light On iPhone Air, the flash light is not like the 17PM’s, where you can adjust the horizontal length (which does nothing anyways). You ca only adjust how light you want it to be. Honestly, in my opinion, iPhone Air wins me, I’m pulling iPhone Air out and using that more than I’m using my 17 Pro Max, and this is unbelievable, that I’d start to prefer a entry/middle level device than a professional grade device. In a few weeks, I’d be in china for holidays, and there I will buy a base model 17, just because both of my phones lacks SIM card slots while China only supports Physical SIM card. I’ll write another comparison once I’ve got a taste of that. Feel free to leave your thoughts, things you want to add, corrections to what I said or your experience with past iPhones in comparison to current iPhones. submitted by /u/Curious_Mistake6420 to r/iphone [link] [comments]